Political Behavior

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 289–315 | Cite as

War Chests as Precautionary Savings

Article

Abstract

I present a model of campaign spending and saving in repeated elections which yields empirical implications on the creation of war chests. As previous studies disagree whether war chests deter potential challengers from running against incumbents, I present an alternative model that intentionally excludes deterrence as a motivation and formalizes under what circumstances (if any) a war chest would be created for savings. The model predicts that an incumbent creates a war chest when she faces a weaker challenger, i.e. as precautionary savings for future elections. The model yields several other predictions of incumbent fund-raising, spending, and saving behavior. Using incumbents from 1982–1998 U.S. House elections, I find strong empirical support for the predictions of the model.

Keywords

war chests congressional elections challenger entry precautionary savings campaign finance 

References

  1. Abramowitz, Alan I. 1991Incumbency, campaign spending, and the decline of competition in U.S House electionsJournal of Politics,533456Google Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M.,Jr. 2000Campaign war chests in Congressional electionsBusiness and Politics2933Google Scholar
  3. Beck, Nathaniel 1996Reporting Heteroskedasticity consistent standard errors.The Political Methodologist746Google Scholar
  4. Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard (1991). Explaining candidate quality in open seat house races, 1976–1988. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  5. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. 1996A dynamic analysis of the role of war chests in campaign strategyAmerican Journal of Political Science40352371Google Scholar
  6. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Franklin, Charles H. 1995

    The long campaign: Senate Elections in 1992

    Weisberg, Herbert F. eds. Democracy’s Feast: Elections in AmericaChatham HouseChatham, NJ292318
    Google Scholar
  7. Canon, David T. 1990Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in United States ElectionsUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Corrado, AnthonyMann, Thomas E.Ortiz, Daniel R.Potter, TrevorSorauf, Frank J. eds. 1997Campaign Finance Reform: A Sourcebook.Brookings Institution PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Dharmapala, Dhammika 2002Campaign war chests, entry deterrence, and voter rationality.Economics & Politics14325350Google Scholar
  10. Donovan, Beth 1993Campaign finance provisionsCongressional Quarterly Weekly Report14 August22392242Google Scholar
  11. Epstein, David, Zemsky, Peter 1995Money talks: deterring quality challengers in congressional elections.American Political Science Review89295308Google Scholar
  12. Goidel, Robert K., Gross, Donald A. 1994A systems approach to campaign finance in U.SHouse Elections. American Politics Quarterly22125153Google Scholar
  13. Goldenberg, Edie N., Traugott, Michael W., Baumgartner, Frank K. 1986Preemptive and reactive spending in U.S House racesPolitical Behavior8320Google Scholar
  14. Goodliffe, Jay 2001The effect of war chests on challenger entry in U.S. House electionsAmerican Journal of Political Science45830844Google Scholar
  15. Goodliffe, Jay (2003). War chests and information. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  16. Goodliffe, Jay (2005). When do war chests deter? Journal of Theoetical Politics 17: forthcoming.Google Scholar
  17. Green, Donald Philip, Krasno, Jonathan S. 1988Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: reestimating the effects of campaign spending in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science32884907Google Scholar
  18. Gronke, Paul 2000The Electorate, the Campaign, and the Office: A Unified Approach to Senate and House Elections.University of Michigan PressAnn Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  19. Groseclose, Timothy, Krehbiel, Keith 1994Golden parachutes, rubber checks, and strategic retirements from the 102d House.American Journal of Political Science387599Google Scholar
  20. Hall, Richard L., Houweling, Robert P. 1995Avarice and ambition in Congress: representatives’ decision to run or retire from the U.S HouseAmerican Political Science Review89121136Google Scholar
  21. Herrnson, Paul S. 2000Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 3rd edCQ PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Herrnson, Paul S. 2004Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 4th edCQ PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hersch, Philip L., McDougall, Gerald S. 1994Campaign war chests as a barrier to entry in congressional racesEconomic Inquiry32630641Google Scholar
  24. Hogan, Robert E. 2001Campaign war chests and challenger emergence in state legislative electionsPolitical Research Quarterly54815830Google Scholar
  25. Jacobson, Gary C., Kernell, Samuel 1983Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections.Yale University PressNew Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobson, Gary C. 1989Strategic politicians and the dynamics of U.S House Elections, 1946–1986American Political Science Review83773793Google Scholar
  27. Kazarosian, Mark 1997Precautionary savings—a panel study.Review of Economics and Statistics79241247Google Scholar
  28. Kiewiet, D. Roderick, Langche, Zeng 1993An analysis of Congressional career decisions, 1947–1986.American Political Science Review87928941Google Scholar
  29. Krasno, Jonathan S., Donald Philip, Green 1988Preempting quality challengers in House Elections.Journal of Politics50920936Google Scholar
  30. Leland, Hayne E. 1968Saving and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for savingQuarterly Journal of Economics82465473Google Scholar
  31. Levy, Dena, Squire, Peverill 2000Television markets and the competitiveness of U.S. House electionsLegislative Studies Quarterly25319325Google Scholar
  32. Milyo, Jeffrey 1997The economics of political campaign finance: FECA and the puzzle of the not very greedy grandfathers.Public Choice93245270Google Scholar
  33. Milyo, Jeffrey 1998The Electoral Effects of Campaign Spending in House ElectionsCitizens’ Research FoundationLos AngelesGoogle Scholar
  34. Milyo, Jeffrey 2001What do candidates maximize (and why should anyone care)?Public Choice109119139Google Scholar
  35. Milyo, Jeffrey, Groseclose, Timothy 1999The electoral effects of incumbent wealth.Journal of Law and Economics42699722Google Scholar
  36. Morton, Rebecca B. 1999Methods and Models: A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political ScienceCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Mycoff, Jason Daniel (2004). The effect of the competitive balance on Congressional incumbents’ financial patterns. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  38. Peters, John G., Susan, Welch 1980The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in Congressional elections.American Political Science Review74697708Google Scholar
  39. Rohde, David 1979Risk-bearing and progressive ambition: the case of members of the United States House of Representatives.American Journal of Political Science23126Google Scholar
  40. Salant, Jonathan D. 1996Freshman’s war chest deters challengersCongressional Quarterly Weekly Report24 August23632366Google Scholar
  41. Sorauf, Frank J. 1988Money in American Elections.Scott, ForesmanGlenview, ILGoogle Scholar
  42. Squire, Peverill 1989Competition and uncontested seats in U.S.House elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly14281295Google Scholar
  43. Squire, Peverill 1991Preemptive fund-raising and challenger profile in Senate elections.Journal of Politics5311501164Google Scholar
  44. Squire, Peverill 1995Candidates, money, and voters—assessing the state of Congressional elections research.Political Research Quarterly48891917Google Scholar
  45. Stewart, Charles III, Mark, Reynolds 1990Television markets and U.S. Senate electionsLegislative Studies Quarterly15495523Google Scholar
  46. Stone, Walter J., Maisel, L. Sandy, Maestas, Cherie D. 2004Quality counts: extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrenceAmerican Journal of Political Science48479495Google Scholar
  47. White, Halbert 1980A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroscedasticity.Econometrica48817838Google Scholar
  48. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel DataMIT PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2003Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 2nd ed.Thomson LearningMason, OHGoogle Scholar
  50. Wrighton, J. Mark, Peverill, Squire 1997Uncontested seats and electoral competition for the U.S. House of Representatives over timeJournal of Politics59452468Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations