Advertisement

Photonic Network Communications

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 110–119 | Cite as

Experimental validation of multiple gain combiner in single-relay cooperative FSO communication systems

  • Vineeta Dubey
  • Devi Chadha
  • Vinod ChandraEmail author
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we have proposed a new combining technique named as multiple gain combiner (MGC) for single-relay cooperative FSO communication systems. The first objective of this paper is to test the experimental feasibility of single-relay cooperative FSO communication system. The next objective is to ascertain the performance of a cooperative FSO link in the presence of simulated fading effect generated by means of modified optical chopper. The last objective is to determine the performance improvement of our proposed MGC combining method over conventional equal gain combining method. Bit error rate performance of the relay system is tested for single-relay cooperative FSO link under weak and strong fading conditions simulated with the modified optical chopper, which shows that the significant performance improvement can be obtained with the use of cooperative diversity. Rsoft-Optsim with MATLAB® co-simulation results show the same trend of performance for the same level of fading present in the system, thereby validating the fading mechanism as obtained by means of modified optical chopper.

Keywords

FSO Cooperative communication Multiple gain combiner Equal gain combiner Fading 

References

  1. 1.
    www.fsona.com Accessed April 2016
  2. 2.
    Ghassemlooy, Z., Popoola, W., Rajbhandari, S.: Optical Wireless Communication. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsiftsis, T.A., Sandalidis, H.G., Karagiannidis, G.K., Uysal, M.: Optical wireless links with spatial diversity over strong atmospheric turbulence channels. IEEE Trans. on Wirel. Commun. 8(2), 951–957 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Safari, M., Uysal, M.: Relay-assisted free-space optical communication. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 7(12), 5441–5449 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simon, M.K., Alouini, M.S.: Digital Communication over Fading Channels: A Unified Approach to Performance Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abou-Rjeily, C., Haddad, S.: Cooperative FSO systems: performance analysis and optimal power allocation. J. Lightw. Technol. 29(7), 1058–1065 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fan, J., Zhou, X., Liu, J.: Design and evaluation of an IDMA cooperative relay free-space optical system. In: International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 358–362 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karimi, M., Nasiri-Kenari, M.: Outage analysis of relay-assisted free-space optical communications. IET Commun. 4(12), 1423–1432 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dubey, V., Chandra, V., Chadha, D.: Bit error rate and reliability analysis of cooperative communication in free-space optical systems. Photon Netw. Commun. 28, 92–101 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ijaz, M., Ghassemlooy, Z., Ansari, S., Adebanjo, O., Minh, H. Le and Rajbhandari, S.: Experimental investigation of the performance of different modulation techniques under controlled FSO turbulence channel. In: 5th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST), Tehran, pp. 59–64, (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rajbhandari, S., Ghassemlooy, Z., Antony, P.: Experimental error performance of modulation schemes under a controlled laboratory turbulence FSO channel. J. Lightw. Technol. 33(1), 244–250 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anguita, J. A., Cisternas, J. E.: Experimental evaluation of transmitter and receiver diversity in a terrestrial FSO link. In: IEEE Globecom 2010 Workshop on Optical Wireless Communications, Miami, FL, pp. 1005–1009, (6–10) (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kazaura, K., Omae, K., Suzuki, T., Matsumoto, M.: Enhancing performance of next generation FSO communication systems using soft computing based predictions. Opt. Express 14(12), 4958–4968 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ijaz, M., Ghassemlooy, Z., Minh, H. Le, Rajbhandari, S., Perez, J., Gholami, A.: Bit error rate measurement of free space optical communication links under laboratory-controlled fog conditions. In: 16th European Conference on Networks and Optical Communications (NOC)- 2011, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, pp. 52–55 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dhawan, K., Chadha, D., Chandra, V.: An experimental study for enhanced availability of free-space optics systems over hybrid free-space optics/radio frequency systems using switching scheme based on on–off keying and multiple pulse position modulation schemes with variable data rates. Fiber Integr. Opt. 30(6), 356–374 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Libich, J., Komanec, M., Zvanovec, S., Pesek, P., Popoola, W.O., Ghassemlooy, Z.: Experimental verification of an all-optical dual-hop 10 Gbit/s free-space optics link under turbulence regimes. Opt. Lett. 40(3), 391–394 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Popoola, W.O., Ghassemlooy, Z., Allen, J.I.H., Leitgeb, E., Gao, S.: Free-space optical communication employing subcarrier modulation and spatial diversity in atmospheric turbulence channel. IET Optoelectron. 2(1), 16–23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Andrews, L.C., Phillips, R.L., Hopen, C.Y.: Laser Beam Scintillation with Applications. SPIE Press, Bellingham (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bharti School of Telecommunications Technology & Management and Electrical Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology, DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations