Performance of two-stage shared fiber delay line optical packet switch under bursty traffic
Packet contention is a major issue in an optical packet switching network. It is not a trivial task to resolve contention due to lack of optical RAM technology. This article proposes a two-stage shared fiber delay line (FDL) optical packet switch for contention resolution. In this article, shared FDLs are used to buffer optical packets, in which a pool of buffer memory is shared among all switch output ports. Most of the existing optical buffering schemes are output-based which require a huge number of FDLs as well as a larger switch size that incur extra implementation cost. However, a shared buffering approach is considered in this article in order to reduce implementation cost. In this article, FDLs are implemented in two stages using an extremely simple auxiliary switch. The proposed switch architecture leads to more efficient use of buffer space. The superiority of the proposed switch architecture has been established by means of extensive simulations. The performance of the proposed switch is investigated under bursty traffic. Simulation result shows that the proposed switch can achieve satisfactory performance at the price of a reasonable amount of FDLs. Moreover, the significance of the proposed switch is confirmed by simulation.
KeywordsOptical packet switch Fiber delay line Contention resolution Bursty traffic
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Yao S., Mukherjee B., Dixit S.: Advances in photonic packet switching: an overview. IEEE Commun. Mag. 38, 84–95 (2000)Google Scholar
- 3.Castanon, G., Tancevski, L., Yagnanarayanan, S., Tamil, L.: Asymmetric WDM all-optical packet switched routers. In: Proceedings of OFC ’00, vol. 2, pp. 53–55 (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Castanon, G., Tancevski, L., Tamil, L.: Routing in all-optical packet switched irregular mesh networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom ’99, pp. 1017–1022, December (1999)Google Scholar
- 8.Tancevski, L., Ge, A., Castanon, G.: Optical packet switch with partially shared buffers: design principles. In: Proceedings of OFC ’01, vol. 2, pp. TuK3-1–TuK3-3, March (2001)Google Scholar
- 9.Callegati, F., Cerroni, W.: Wavelength allocation algorithms in optical buffers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC ’01), vol. 2, pp. 499–503, June (2001)Google Scholar
- 14.Lim H., Park C.-S.: An optical packet switch with hybrid buffer structure for contention resolution of asynchronous variable length packets. In: IEEE International Workshop HPSR 2004, pp. 162–166 April (2004)Google Scholar
- 16.Gazi, B., Ghassemlooy, Z., and Swift G.: Cascaded optical delay line architectures in the performance of optical MIN. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, pp. 277–281 (2003)Google Scholar
- 19.Haas, Z.: The ‘staggering switch’: an electronically controlled optical packet switch. J. Lightwave Technol. 11, 925–936, 499–503 (1993)Google Scholar
- 20.Liew, S.Y., Law, S.F.: A fast scheduling algorithm for all-optical shared-buffer packet switches. In: Proceedings of CCECE’08, pp. 1413–1416, May (2008)Google Scholar