Advertisement

Photonic Network Communications

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 90–96 | Cite as

Performance of two-stage shared fiber delay line optical packet switch under bursty traffic

  • Ahmed Galib Reza
  • Hyotaek Lim
Article

Abstract

Packet contention is a major issue in an optical packet switching network. It is not a trivial task to resolve contention due to lack of optical RAM technology. This article proposes a two-stage shared fiber delay line (FDL) optical packet switch for contention resolution. In this article, shared FDLs are used to buffer optical packets, in which a pool of buffer memory is shared among all switch output ports. Most of the existing optical buffering schemes are output-based which require a huge number of FDLs as well as a larger switch size that incur extra implementation cost. However, a shared buffering approach is considered in this article in order to reduce implementation cost. In this article, FDLs are implemented in two stages using an extremely simple auxiliary switch. The proposed switch architecture leads to more efficient use of buffer space. The superiority of the proposed switch architecture has been established by means of extensive simulations. The performance of the proposed switch is investigated under bursty traffic. Simulation result shows that the proposed switch can achieve satisfactory performance at the price of a reasonable amount of FDLs. Moreover, the significance of the proposed switch is confirmed by simulation.

Keywords

Optical packet switch Fiber delay line Contention resolution Bursty traffic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yao S., Mukherjee B., Dixit S.: Advances in photonic packet switching: an overview. IEEE Commun. Mag. 38, 84–95 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eramo V., Listanti M.: Packet loss in a bufferless optical WDM switch employing shared tunable wavelegth converters. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 18(12), 1818–1833 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castanon, G., Tancevski, L., Yagnanarayanan, S., Tamil, L.: Asymmetric WDM all-optical packet switched routers. In: Proceedings of OFC ’00, vol. 2, pp. 53–55 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elmirghani J.M.H., Mouftah H.T.: All-optical wavelength conversion: technologies and applications in DWDM networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 38(3), 86–92 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forghierri F., Bononi A., Prucnal P.R.: Analysis and comparison of hot-potato and single-buffer deflection routing in very high bit rate optical mesh networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 43(1), 88–98 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castanon, G., Tancevski, L., Tamil, L.: Routing in all-optical packet switched irregular mesh networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom ’99, pp. 1017–1022, December (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yao S., Xue F., Mukherjee B., Yoo S.J.B., Dixit S.: Electrical ingress buffering and traffic aggregation for OPS and their effect on TCP-level performance in optical mesh networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(9), 66–72 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tancevski, L., Ge, A., Castanon, G.: Optical packet switch with partially shared buffers: design principles. In: Proceedings of OFC ’01, vol. 2, pp. TuK3-1–TuK3-3, March (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Callegati, F., Cerroni, W.: Wavelength allocation algorithms in optical buffers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC ’01), vol. 2, pp. 499–503, June (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang T., Lu K., Jue J.P.: Shared fiber delay line buffers in asynchronous optical packet switches. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 24(4), 118–127 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karol M.J., Hluchyj M.G.: Input versus output queuing on a space-division packet switch. IEEE Trans. Commun. 35(12), 1347–1356 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunter D.K. et al.: Buffering in optical packet switches. IEEE/ OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 16(12), 2081–2094 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hluchyj M.G., Karol M.J.: Queueing in high-performance packet switching. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 6(9), 1587–1597 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim H., Park C.-S.: An optical packet switch with hybrid buffer structure for contention resolution of asynchronous variable length packets. In: IEEE International Workshop HPSR 2004, pp. 162–166 April (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cruz R.L., Tsai J.T.: COD: alternative architectures for high speed packet switching. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 4(1), 11–20 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gazi, B., Ghassemlooy, Z., and Swift G.: Cascaded optical delay line architectures in the performance of optical MIN. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, pp. 277–281 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hunter D., Cornwell W.D., Gilfedder T.H., Franzen A., Andonovic I.: SLOB: a switch with large optical buffers for packet switching. J. Lightwave Technol. 16(10), 1725–1736 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang H., Yoo S.J.B.: Combined input and output all-optical variable buffered switch architecture for future optical routers. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(6), 1292–1294 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haas, Z.: The ‘staggering switch’: an electronically controlled optical packet switch. J. Lightwave Technol. 11, 925–936, 499–503 (1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liew, S.Y., Law, S.F.: A fast scheduling algorithm for all-optical shared-buffer packet switches. In: Proceedings of CCECE’08, pp. 1413–1416, May (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Computer and Information EngineeringDongseo UniversityPusanKorea

Personalised recommendations