Photonic Network Communications

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 173–182 | Cite as

Novel wavelength and bandwidth allocation algorithms for WDM EPON with QoS support

Article

Abstract

Ethernet passive optical networks (EPONs) have been considered as the one of the most promising candidates for next-generation access networks. However, the EPON architecture although cost effective is bandwidth limited and quality of service (QoS) support is still a major concern. In this paper, we propose a cost-efficient wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) EPON architecture. We present two wavelength and bandwidth allocation algorithms with full QoS support to fulfill all requirements of new application and services in a converged triple play network. We analyze and compare the presented models and algorithms in terms of delay, jitter, queue occupancy, throughput and overall system performance. We conduct detailed simulation experiments to study the performance and validate the effectiveness of the proposed architecture and algorithms.

Keywords

Dynamic bandwidth allocation Ethernet passive optical network Modeling and simulation Quality of service Wavelength division multiplexing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kramer G., Pesavento G.: Ethernet PON: building a next-generation optical access network. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(2), 66–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEE 802.3ah task force home page. http://www.ieee802.org/3/efm
  3. 3.
    Radivojevic M., Matavulj P.: Implementation of intra-ONU scheduling for quality of service support in Ethernet passive optical networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 27(18), 4055–4062 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banerjee A., Park Y., Clarke F., Song H., Yang S., Kramer G., Kim K., Mukherjee B.: Wavelength-division-multiplexed passive optical network (WDM-PON) technologies for broadband access: a review [Invited]. OSA J. Opt. Netw. 4(11), 737–758 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGarry M.P., Maier M., Reisslein M.: WDM Ethernet passive optical networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 44(2), S18–S25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwong, K., Harle, D., Andonovic, I.: Dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm for differentiated services over WDM EPONs. In: 9th International Conference Communications Systems. pp. 116–120, Sept 2004Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Assi C.M.: Dynamic bandwidth allocation for quality-of-service over Ethernet PONs. IEEE J. Select. Area Commun. 21(9), 1467–1477 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhaini, A.R., Assi, C.M., Shami, A.: Quality of Service in TDM/WDM Ethernet passive optical networks (EPONs). In: IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. pp. 616–621, June 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGarry, M. P., Maier, M., Reisslein, M.: An evolutionary WDM upgrade for EPONs. Technical Report (Arizona State University) (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhaini A.R., Assi C.M., Shami A.: Dynamic bandwidth allocation schemes in hybrid TDM/WDM passive optical networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 25(1), 277–286 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang I.S., Shyu Z.D., Ke L.Y., Chang C.C: Fault-tolerant architecture with dynamic wavelength and bandwidth allocation scheme in WDM-EPON. Photon. Netw. Commun. 18(2), 160–173 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., Weiss, W.: An architecture for differentiated services. IETF RFC 2475, Dec (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGarry M.P., Maier M., Reisslein M., Keha A.: Bandwidth management for WDM EPONs. J. Opt. Netw. 5(9), 637–654 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGarry M.P., Reisslein M., Colbourn C.J., Maier M., Aurzada F., Scheutzow M.: Just-in-time scheduling for multichannel EPONs. J. Lightwave Technol. 26(10), 1204–1216 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aurzada F., Scheutzow M., Reisslein M., Maier M.: Towards a fundamental understanding of the stability and delay of offline WDM EPONs. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(1), 51–66 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kramer G., Mukherjee B., Pesavento G.: IPACT: a dynamic protocol for an Ethernet PON (EPON). IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(2), 74–80 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hens F.J., Caballero J.M.: Triple Play: Building the Converged Network for IP, VoIP and IPTV. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Willinger W., Taqqu M.S., Erramilli A.: A bibliographical guide to self-similar traffic and performance modeling for modern high-speed networks. In: Kelly, F.P., Zachary, S., Ziedins, I. (eds) Stochastic Networks, pp. 339–366. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shami A., Bai X., Assi C.M., Ghani N.: Jitter performance in Ethernet Passive Optical Networks. IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 23(4), 1745–1753 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computing ScienceUniversity UnionBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations