An adaptive load-aware burst assembly scheme to achieve optimal performance of FDL buffers in OBS networks
- 45 Downloads
Optical burst switching (OBS) is regarded as one of the most promising switching technologies for next generation optical networks. Contention resolution of data bursts is a critical mission to implement practical OBS. The use of fiber delay line (FDL) buffers has received a lot of attention as a fundamental but effective solution to resolve burst contention. Several studies have investigated the way to achieve the optimal performance of FDL buffers at a single-node level. However, this article studies how to achieve the best performance of OBS networks with FDL buffers under varying traffic condition at a network level. For this purpose, we propose an adaptive load-aware burst assembly (ALBA) scheme, which adaptively adjusts the size threshold of burst assembler optimized to the current network traffic load. A piggybacking method used to deliver the traffic-load information from core nodes to ingress edge nodes accelerates the adaptiveness of the proposed scheme by reducing the update time of the size threshold. The effectiveness of the ALBA scheme is proved by comparing with No-FDL case and fixed size-threshold cases under changing traffic-load environment from extensive simulation tests.
KeywordsBurst assembly FDL buffer Optical burst switching
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Qiao C., Yoo M.: Optical burst switching (OBS)—a new paradigm for an optical internet. J. High Speed Netw. 8(1), 69–84 (1999)Google Scholar
- 5.Zhang, T., Lu, K., Jue, J.P.: An analytical model for shared fiber-delay line buffers in asynchronous optical packet and burst switches. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’05), 16–20 May 2005, Seoul, Korea, vol. 3, pp. 1636–1640 (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Rostami, A., Wolisz, A.: Impact of edge traffic aggregation on the performance of FDL-assisted optical core switching nodes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’07), 24–28 June 2007, Glasgow, Scotland, vol. 1, pp. 2275–2282 (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Tanida, H., Ohmae, K., Choi, Y., Okada, H.: An effective BECN/CRN typed deflection routing for QoS guaranteed optical burst switching. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Globecom’03), San Francisco, USA, 1–5 December 2003, vol. 5, pp. 2601–2606 (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.Vokkarane, V.M., Jue, J.P., Sitaraman, S.: Burst segmentation: an approach for reducing packet loss in optical burst switched networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’02), New York, USA, May 2002, vol. 5, pp. 2673–2677 (2002)Google Scholar
- 11.Agusti-Torra, A., Bochmann, G.V., Cervello-Pastor, C.: Retransmission schemes for optical burst switching over star networks. In: Second IFIP International Conference on Communications Networks (WOCN’05), 6–8 March 2005, Dubai, UAE, pp. 126–130 (2005).Google Scholar
- 12.Farahmand, F., Zhang, Q., Jue, J.P.: A feed-back based contention avoidance mechanism for optical burst switching networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Optical Burst Switching (WOBS’04), San Jose, USA, October 2004Google Scholar
- 13.NS-2 simulator, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
- 14.Garner, G.M.: Application of time and frequency stability parameters to the characterization of ATM cell delay variation and traffic. T1A1.3 and T1X1.3 Working Group, October 1996Google Scholar