A performance study on optical burst switched networks: the ring topology
Existing performance studies on optical burst switched (OBS) networks have been focusing on channel blocking, i.e., when the required wavelength is not available on a link along a burst’s route. However, we identify another type of blocking as the receiver blocking, i.e., when the receiver at a burst’s destination node is occupied by another burst. Receiver blocking may account for the much larger part of total burst blocking. Receiver blocking has been largely ignored in existing research. In this paper we propose using multiple receivers or fiber delay lines (FDL) in front of the receivers in order to reduce the receiver blocking probability. Extensive simulation results on bi-directional OBS rings are presented to illustrate the problem and the performance of our proposed approaches. The results indicate that receiver blocking can be almost eliminated by using as little as three receivers and can be reduced by using a FDL of small length. To our knowledge, this is the first performance study that covers both channel and receiver blocking for OBS networks.
KeywordsOptical burst switched networks Performance study
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Vokkarane, V. M., Haridoss, K., & Jue, J. P. (2002). Threshold-based burst assembly policies for qos support in optical burst-switched networks. In Proceedings of SPIE OptiComm’2002, pp. 125–136.Google Scholar
- 3.Wei J.Y., Mcfarland R.I. (2000) Just-in-time signalling for wdm optical burst switching network. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications 18(12): 2019–2037Google Scholar
- 4.Turner J. (1999) Terabit burst switching. Journal of High Speed Networks 8(1): 3–16Google Scholar
- 6.Teng, J., & Rouskas, G. N. (2003). A comparison of the jit, jet, and horizon wavelength reservation schemes on a single obs node. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Optical Burst Switching (co-located with Opticomm 2003).Google Scholar
- 7.Gauger, C. M., Kohn, M., & Scharf, J. (2004). Comparison of contention resolution strategies in obs network scenarios. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Transport Optical Networks, Vol. 1, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
- 8.Chang, J.-B., & Park, C.-S. (2002). Efficient channel-scheduling algorithm in optical burst switching architecture. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing, pp. 194–198.Google Scholar
- 9.Liu, D. Q., & Liu, M. T. (2002). Differentiated services and scheduling scheme in optical burst-switched wdm networks. In Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2002, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
- 10.Kozlovski, E., Duser, M., De Miguel, I., & Bayvel, P. (2001). Analysis of burst scheduling for dynamic wavelength assignment in optical burst-switched networks. In Proceedings of IEEE LEOS’01, Vol. 1, pp. 161–162.Google Scholar
- 15.Laevens, K. (2002). Traffic characteristics inside optical burst switched networks. In Proceedings of SPIE OptiComm’2002, pp. 137–148.Google Scholar
- 16.Morato, D., Izal, M., Aracil, J., Magana, E., & Miqueleiz, J. (2003). Blocking time analysis of obs routers with arbitrary burst size distribution. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM’03, Vol. 5, pp. 2488–2492.Google Scholar
- 17.Qiao C., Yoo M. (1999) Optical burst switching (OBS) – a new paradigm for an optical internet. Journal of High Speed Networks 8(1): 69–84Google Scholar
- 19.Lu, X., & Mark, B. L. (2002). Analytical modeling of optical burst switching with fiber delay lines. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, & Simulation of Computer & Telecommunications Systems, pp. 501–506.Google Scholar