Advertisement

Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics

, Volume 57, Issue 3–4, pp 242–249 | Cite as

Assessment of the Protective Properties of Impact-Resistant Ceramic-Polymer Composites Using Acoustic Nondestructive Methods

  • Yu. G. BezimyanniyEmail author
  • L. R. Vyshniakov
  • O. V. Mazna
  • A. M. Vysotskyy
  • K. A. Komarov
  • O. V. Neshpor
STRUCTURAL MATERIALS RESEARCH
  • 30 Downloads

The use of acoustic nondestructive methods was studied with the purpose of determining the composition and structure of protective ceramic-polymer composites according to the criteria of penetration resistance and protective barrier endurance. The methods of acoustic measurements were adapted to the characteristics possessed by groups of samples from the following materials: ceramics, polymer composites, honeycomb-structure materials, and ceramic-polymer composites. Stiffness, ρc2, was used as an informative parameter to define the elasticity of the materials in the direction of impact, and frequency drift was used as a measure of elastic wave dissipation. The measured acoustic characteristics of the samples were compared to the known criteria for penetration resistance of ceramics and the results of ballistic tests. The ceramic-polymer material with a gradient support demonstrated better ballistic endurance and lower after-penetration deformation. The material is recommended for the production of efficient impact-resistant composites possessing enhanced dissipative capabilities.

Keywords

acoustic nondestructive methods ceramic-polymer protective materials penetration resistance criteria protective barrier endurance stiffness 

References

  1. 1.
    G. G. Gnesin, “Ceramic armor materials,” in: G. G. Gnesin and V. V. Skorokhod (eds.), Inorganic Materials Science: Encyclopedia in 2 Vols. [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (2008), Vol. 2: Materials and Technologies, Book 1, pp. 171–174.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Grigoryan (ed.), I. F. Kobylkin, V. M. Marinin, et al., Materials and Protective Structures for Local and Individual Armoring [in Russian], RadioSoft, Moscow (2008), p. 406.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. R. Vyshniakov, O. V. Neshpor, and O. V. Mazna, “Impact-resistant ceramics from reaction-sintered silicon carbide with an organic plastic support,” Visn. Inzh. Akad. Ukrainy, No. 2, 186–189 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. V. Kharchenko, A. L. Maystrenko, A. I. Babutsky, et al., “Deformation and fracture behavior of plates from brittle materials under impact load,” Probl. Prochn., No. 3, 27–32 (2002).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. E. Perepelkin, “Polymer fiber composites, their main types, production principles, and properties,” Khim. Volokna, No. 4, 7–22 (2005).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. R. Vyshniakov, O. V. Neshpor, O. V. Mazna, et al., “Impact resistance of the glass-fiber reinforced plastics with an epoxy matrix under high-speed impact loads,” Novi Mater. Tekhnol. Metall. Mashynobud., No. 1, 66–71 (2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. V. Neshpor, L. R. Vyshniakov, and O. V. Mazna, “Impact-resistant polymer layer composites,” Technol. Syst., No. 3, 61–66 (2009).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. V. Neshpor, L. R. Vyshniakov, and O. V. Mazna, “Impact-resistant polymer and ceramic layer composites,” Technol. Syst., No. 4, 34–39 (2009).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. R. Vyshniakov, O. V. Mazna, O. V. Neshpor, and E. Yu. Chizhankov, Ukrainian Patent 108668, Armor Plate [in Ukrainian], IPC F41 H1/02, F41 H5/04, publ. May 25, 2015, Bull. No. 10.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. R. Vyshniakov, O. V. Mazna, O. V. Neshpor, et al., “Influence of the design and process factors on the efficiency of ceramic-based shock-resistant elements,” Probl. Prochn., No. 6, 128–135 (2004).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. P. Golyamina (ed.), Ultrasound. Small Encyclopedia [in Russian], Sov. Enc., Moscow (1979), p. 400.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu. G. Bezymannyi, “Use of acoustic methods to control the quality of layered materials,” Powder Metall. Met. Ceram., 38, Nos. 5-6, 236–239 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu. G. Bezimyanniy, “Acoustic representation of materials with developed mesostructure,” Akust. Visn., 9, No. 2, 3–16 (2006).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. A. Shutilov, Fundamentals of Ultrasound Physics: Handbook [in Russian], Izd. Leningrad. Univ., Leningrad (1980), p. 280.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu. G. Bezimyanniy, “Peculiarities of acoustic measurements under pulse sounding of the materials produced by powder metallurgy,” in: Modern Problems of Physical Materials Science (Collected Scientific Papers), Physicochemical Basis of Powder Material Technology Series [in Russian], Inst. Probl. Materialoved., NAN Ukrainy, Kyiv (2005), pp. 190–201.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. N. Ermolov and Yu. V. Lange (eds.), “Volume 3: Ultrasonic inspection,” in: V. V. Klyuev (ed.), Nondestructive Inspection: Handbook in 7 Vols. [in Russian], Mashinostroeniye, Moscow (2004), p. 864.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Truell, C. Elbaum, and B. Chick, Ultrasonic Methods in Solid State Physics, Academic Press, New York (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. G. Bezimyanniy
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. R. Vyshniakov
    • 1
  • O. V. Mazna
    • 1
  • A. M. Vysotskyy
    • 1
  • K. A. Komarov
    • 1
  • O. V. Neshpor
    • 1
  1. 1.Frantsevich Institute for Problems of Materials Science, National Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations