Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 252–264

Genetic Diversity Among Jatropha and Jatropha-Related Species Based on ISSR Markers

  • Patcharin Tanya
  • Puntaree Taeprayoon
  • Yaowanart Hadkam
  • Peerasak Srinives


Jatropha curcas (jatropha) is a potential biodiesel crop. A major limitation in production is that jatropha remains wild with low genetic variation. Related species/genera in the Euphorbiaceae can potentially be used for its genetic improvement. In this study, we employed inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) to assess genetic variation among 30 accessions of jatropha, two accessions of bellyache bush (Jatropha gossypifolia), two accessions of spicy jatropha (Jatropha integerrima), two accessions of bottleplant shrub (Jatropha podagrica), and three accessions of castor bean hybrids. Genetic relationships were evaluated using 27 of 86 ISSR markers, yielding 307 polymorphic bands with polymorphism contents ranging from 0.76 to 0.95 for IMPN 1 and UBC 807 markers, respectively. Dice’s genetic similarity coefficient ranged from 0.39 to 0.99, which clearly separated the plant samples into seven groups at the coefficient of 0.48. The first group comprised J. curcas from Mexico, the second group comprised J. curcas from China and Vietnam, the third group comprised J. curcas from Thailand, the fourth group was J. integerrima, the fifth group was J. gossypifolia, the sixth group was J. podagrica, and the last and most distinct group was Ricinus communis. Analysis of molecular variance revealed that 63% of the variability was attributable to variation among groups, while 37% was due to variation within groups. Based on Nei’s genetic distance, the population from G2 (J. curcas from China) and G4 (J. curcas from Vietnam) had the least ISSR variability (0.0668), whereas G8 (R. communis) and Jatropha spp. displayed the highest distance (0.6005–0.7211).


Euphorbiaceae Jatropha spp. ISSR Genetic diversity 


  1. Basha SD, Sujatha M (2007) Inter and intra-population variability of Jatropha curcas (L.) characterized by RAPD and ISSR markers and development of population-specific SCAR markers. Euphytica 156(3):375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basha SD, Sujatha M (2009) Genetic analysis of Jatropha species and interspecific hybrids of Jatropha curcas using nuclear and organelle specific markers. Euphytica 168(2):197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basha SD, Francis G, Makkar HPS, Becker K, Sujatha M (2009) A comparative study of biochemical traits and molecular markers for assessment of genetic relationships between Jatropha curcas L. germplasm from different countries. Plant Sci 176:812–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhagyawant SS, Srivastava N (2008) Genetic fingerprinting of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm using ISSR markers and their relationships. Afr J Biotechnol 7(24):4428–4431Google Scholar
  5. Blair MW, Panaud O, McCouch SR (1999) Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 98:780–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bostein D, White RL, Sholnick M, David RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331Google Scholar
  7. Devappa RK, Swamylingappa B (2008) Biochemical and nutritional evaluation of Jatropha protein isolate prepared by steam injection heating for reduction of toxic and antinutritional factors. J Sci Food Agric 88:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology 26:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Francis G, Edinger R, Becker K (2005) A concept for simultaneous wasteland reclamation, fuel production, and socio-economic development in degraded areas in India: Need, potential and perspectives of Jatropha plantations. Nat Resour Forum 29:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganesh Ram S, Parthiban KT, Senthil Kumar R, Thiruvengadam V, Paramathma M (2008) Genetic diversity among Jatropha species as revealed by RAPD markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55:803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guillemaut P, Maréchal-Drouard L (1992) Isolation of plant DNA: a fast, inexpensive, and reliable method. Plant Mol Biol Report 10(1):60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta S, Srivastava M, Mishra GP, Naik PK, Chauhan RS, Tiwari SK, Kumar M, Singh R (2008) Analogy of ISSR and RAPD markers for comparative analysis of genetic diversity among different Jatropha curcas genotypes. Afr J Biotechnol 7(23):4230–4343Google Scholar
  13. Hampl V, Pavlícek A, Flegr J (2001) Construction and bootstrap analysis of DNA fingerprinting-based phylogenetic trees with the freeware program Freetree: application to trichomonad parasites. Int J Syst Ecol Mic 51:731–735Google Scholar
  14. Hashizume T, Shimamoto I, Hirai M (2003) Construction of a linkage map and QTL analysis of horticultural traits for watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (THUNB.) MATSUM & NAKAI] using RAPD, RFLP and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 106:779–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heller J (1996) Physic nut, Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 1. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, GarterslebenGoogle Scholar
  16. Joshi-Saha A, Gopalakrishna T (2007) Inheritance and tagging of gene regulating flowering time in the green manure crop Sesbania rostrata (Bremek. & Obrem.). Mol Breed 20:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura I, Crow J (1964) The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. King AJ, He W, Cuevas JA, Freudenberger M, Ramiaramanana D, Graham IA (2009) Potential of Jatropha curcas as a source of renewable oil and animal feed. J Exp Bot 13:1–9Google Scholar
  19. Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evol Biol 6:381–398Google Scholar
  20. Li Z, Nelson RL (2002) RAPD marker diversity among cultivated and wild soybean accessions from four Chinese provinces. Crop Sci 42:1737–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Makkar HPS, Becker K, Schmook B (1998) Edible provenances of Jatropha curcas from Quintana Roo state of Mexico and effect of roasting on antinutrient and toxic factors in seeds. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 52:31–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martins-Lopes P, Lima-Brito J, Gomes S, Meirinhos J, Santos L, Guedes-Pinto H (2007) RAPD and ISSR molecular markers in Olea europaea L.: genetic variability and molecular cultivar identification. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McDermott JM, McDonald BA (1993) Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:353–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Openshaw K (2000) A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise. Biomass Bioenergy 19(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parthiban KT, Kumar RS, Thiyagarajan P, Subbulakshmi V, Vennila S, Rao MG (2009) Hybrid progenies in jatropha—a new development. Curr Sci 96(6):815–823Google Scholar
  28. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAIEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prabakaran AJ, Sujatha M (1999) Jatropha tanjorensis Ellis & Saroja, a natural interspecific hybrid occurring in Tamil Nadu, India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 46:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qi X, Pittaway TS, Lindup S, Liu H, Waterman E, Padi FK, Hash CT, Zhu J, Gale MD, Devos KM (2004) An integrated genetic map and a new set of simple sequence repeat markers for pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum. Theor Appl Genet 109:1485–1493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ranade SA, Srivastava AP, Rana TS, Srivastava J, Tuli R (2008) Easy assessment of diversity in Jatropha curcas L. plants using two single-primer amplification reaction (SPAR) methods. Biomass Bioenergy 32:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ratha Krishnan P, Paramathma M (2009) Potentials and Jatropha species wealth of India. Curr Sci 97(7):1000–1004Google Scholar
  33. Reddy MP, Sarlan N, Siddiq EA (2002) Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica 128:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rohlf FJ (1998) On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Syst Biol 47:147–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rohlf FJ, Sokal RR (1981) Comparing numerical taxonomic studies. Syst Zool 30:459–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sankar AA, Moore GA (2001) Evaluation of inter-simple sequence repeat analysis for mapping in citrus and extension of the genetic linkage map. Theor Appl Genet 102:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sehgal D, Rajpal VR, Raina SN, Sasanuma T, Sasakuma T (2009) Assaying polymorphism at DNA sequence level for new and novel genetic diversity diagnostics of the safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) world germplasm resources. Genetica 135(3):457–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Semagn K, Bjørnstad Å, Ndjiondjop MN (2006) An overview of molecular marker methods for plants. Afr J Biotechnol 5(25):2540–2568Google Scholar
  39. Senthil Kumar R, Parthiban KT, Govinda Rao M (2009) Molecular characterization of Jatropha genetic resources through inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Mol Biol Rep 36:1951–1956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  41. Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) Statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kans Sci Bull 38:1409–1438Google Scholar
  42. Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principle of numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  43. Sudheer Pamidimarri DVN, Pandya N, Reddy MP, Radhakrishnan T (2009a) Comparative study of interspecific genetic divergence and phylogenic analysis of genus Jatropha by RAPD and AFLP. Mol Biol Rep 36:901–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sudheer Pamidimarri DVN, Singh S, Mastan SG, Patel J, Reddy MP (2009b) Molecular characterization and identification of markers for toxic and non-toxic varieties of Jatropha curcas L. using RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers. Mol Biol Rep 36:1357–1364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sujatha M, Prabakaran AJ (2003) New ornamental Jatropha hybrids through interspecific hybridization. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tatikonda L, Wani SP, Kannan S, Beerelli N, Sreedevi TK, Hoisington DA, Devi P, Varshney RK (2009) AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Sci 176:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van der Nest MA, Steenkamp ET, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2000) Development of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in Eucalyptus from amplified inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR). Plant Breed 119:433–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Venkateswarlu M, Raje Urs S, Surendra Nath B, Shashidhar HE, Maheswaran M, Veeraiah TM, Sabitha MG (2006) A first genetic linkage map of mulberry (Morus spp.) using RAPD, ISSR, and SSR markers and pseudotestcross mapping. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vijayan K, Srivatsava PP, Nair CN, Awasthi AK, Tikader A, Sreenivasa B, Urs SR (2006) Molecular characterization and identification of markers associated with yield traits in mulberry using ISSR markers. Plant Breed 125:298–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang A, Yu Z, Ding Y (2009) Genetic diversity analysis of wild close relatives of barley from Tibet and the Middle East by ISSR and SSR markers. C R Biologies 332:393–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle T (1999) POPGENE Version 1.31, Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. University of Alberta and Centre for International Forestry ResearchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patcharin Tanya
    • 1
  • Puntaree Taeprayoon
    • 1
  • Yaowanart Hadkam
    • 1
  • Peerasak Srinives
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng SaenKasetsart UniversityNakhon PathomThailand

Personalised recommendations