Resource competition and allelopathy in two peat mosses: implication for niche differentiation
- 117 Downloads
Separating the effect of resource competition from allelopathy in plants is challenging and it has never been attempted in closely related co-occurring bryophytes. In peatlands, peat mosses (Sphagnum spp.) show niche differentiation along water table level (WTL) gradient. Our aim was to evaluate whether the hummock species, S. magellanicum would be a winner at low WTL due to its allelopathic advantage and the hollow species, S. angustifolium would win by virtue of its superior competitive ability but not of allelopathy at high WTL due to dilution of its allelochemicals.
We used a nested, field experimental design, with two WTL treatments—low WTL (hummock habitat) and high WTL (hollow habitat)—and three different inter-specific interactions: 1) monoculture; 2) mixed culture without activated charcoal; and 3) mixed culture with activated charcoal added to the neighbor. We measured growth and biochemical traits of the two species and compared the index of relative neighbor effect on each other.
We discovered a trade-off between biomass production (competitive outcome) and phenolic content (allelopathy) in these species. At low WTL, allelopathy of the hummock species is the main mechanism to suppress the hollow species, whereas at high WTL, competition is the main driver to suppress the hummock species.
Competitive advantage in Sphagnum is mediated by both resource competition and allelopathy of the co-occurring species through niche differentiation along a WTL gradient. Unlike vascular plants, Sphagnum mosses can serve as excellent model organisms in studying allelopathic interaction since they bypass the complexity of plant-soil interactions.
KeywordsSphagnum Water table level Trade-off Niche separation Phenolics Phenotypic responses
This study was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 41871046 and 41471043), the National Key Research and Development Project (No. 2016YFA0602301 and No. 2016YFC0500407) and Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Development Project (20190101025JH). Håkan Rydin commented on the manuscript. Azim Mallik contributed to this paper during his tenure as a Visiting Professor at the School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun.
- Chiapusio G, Jassey VEJ, Bellvert F, Comte G, Weston LA, Delarue F, Buttler A, Toussaint ML, Binet P (2018) Sphagnum species modulate their phenolic profiles and mycorrhizal colonization of surrounding Andromeda polifolia along peatland microhabitats. J Chem Ecol 44(12):1146–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clymo RS, Hayward PM (1982) The ecology of Sphagnum. In: smith a.J.E. (ed.) bryophyte ecology, springer NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of Favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez C, Monnier Y, Santonja M, Gallet C, Weston LA, Prévosto B, Saunier A, Baldy V, Bousquet-Mélou A (2013) The impact of competition and allelopathy on the trade-off between plant defense and growth in two contrasting tree species. Front Plant Sci 7:594Google Scholar
- Gatti AB, Takao LK, Pereira VC, Ferreira AG, Lima MIS, Gualtieri SCJ (2014) Seasonality effect on the allelopathy of Cerrado species. Braz J Biol 74(3):64S–69SGoogle Scholar
- Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation process [M]. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kong CH, Hu F (2001) Planting sensation and its application. China Agriculture Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Ma J-Z, Bu Z-J, Zheng X-X, Zeng J (2015) Shading enhances the competitive advantage of Sphagnum fallax in a simulation experiment. Mires Peat 16:1–17Google Scholar
- Michael DJ, Anders PM (2002) A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior. Behav Ecol 14:438–445Google Scholar
- Rice EL (1984) Allelopathy, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Rydin H (1997) Competition among bryophytes. Adv Bryol 6:135–168Google Scholar
- Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1964) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic- phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic1 6(3):144–158Google Scholar
- Tsubota H, Kuroda A, Masuzaki H, Deguchi H (2006) Preliminary study on allelopathic activity of bryophytes under laboratory conditions using the sandwich method. J Hattori Bot Lab 100:517–525Google Scholar