Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 443, Issue 1–2, pp 463–471 | Cite as

Priming of soil organic carbon decomposition induced by exogenous organic carbon input: a meta-analysis

  • Zhaolin Sun
  • Shengen Liu
  • Tianan Zhang
  • Xuechao Zhao
  • Shi Chen
  • Qingkui WangEmail author
Regular Article
  • 378 Downloads

Abstract

Background and aims

Priming effect (PE) of soil organic carbon (SOC) decomposition induced by exogenous organic C is an important ecological process in regulating the soil C cycle. The objective of this study was to evaluate how the PE varied among different ecosystems at the global scale and explore factors that drive the direction and magnitude of the PE.

Methods

Using 2048 experimental comparisons compiled from 94 incubation studies with stable (13C) or radioactive (14C) carbon isotopic techniques, we performed a meta-analysis on the effect of exogenous organic C input on native SOC decomposition (i.e., PE) across multiple terrestrial ecosystems. In particular, the linear mixed-effect model was used to examine the relationship between the PE and potential influencing factors.

Results

The addition of exogenous organic C significantly enhanced native SOC decomposition by 47.5% (i.e., positive PE), with the highest value in cropland soils (60.9%) and the lowest value in forest soils (26.2%). The intensity of the PE decreased with increasing SOC content, soil total nitrogen content, soil C/N, incubation duration, and incubation temperature, but increased with increasing exogenous organic C addition rate and soil pH. Soil PE was not affected by the complexity of exogenous organic C.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that positive PE is a widespread phenomenon in terrestrial ecosystems, and that the magnitude is closely related to soil properties and experimental conditions. These findings may be useful for understanding soil C priming and the effect on soil C balance under climate change scenarios.

Keywords

Soil organic carbon decomposition Priming effect Carbon turnover Soil property Incubation condition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 31830015, 31570466), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2016YFA0600801), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant No. XDB15010301). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions to improve the quality of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

11104_2019_4240_MOESM1_ESM.csv (325 kb)
ESM 1 (CSV 325 kb)
11104_2019_4240_MOESM2_ESM.docx (370 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 370 kb)

References

  1. Arevalo CBM, Bhatti JS, Chang SX, Sidders D (2009) Ecosystem carbon stocks and distribution under different land-uses in North Central Alberta, Canada. For Ecol Manag 25:1776–1785.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aye NS, Butterly CR, Sale PWG, Tang CX (2017) Residue addition and liming history interactively enhance mineralization of native organic carbon in acid soils. Biol Fertil Soils 53:61–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1156-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bader NE, Cheng WX (2007) Rhizosphere priming effect of Populus fremontii obscures the temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon respiration. Soil Biol Biochem 39:600–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Christensen RHB, Singmann H, Dai B, Grothendieck G, Green P (2017) lme4: linear mixed effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–13Google Scholar
  5. Bernal B, McKinley DC, Hungate BA, White PM, Mozdzer TJ, Megonigal JP (2016) Limits to soil carbon stability; deep, ancient soil carbon decomposition stimulated by new labile organic inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 98:85–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2008) Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review. Biol Fertil Soils 45:115–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0334-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blagodatskaya EV, Blagodatsky SA, Anderson TH, Kuzyakov Y (2007) Priming effects in Chernozem induced by glucose and N in relation to microbial growth strategies. Appl Soil Ecol 37:95–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chao L, Liu YY, Freschet GT, Zhang WD, Yu X, Zheng WH, Guan X, Yang QP, Chen LC, Dijkstra FA, Wang SL (2019) Litter carbon and nutrient chemistry control the magnitude of soil priming effect. Funct Ecol 33:876–888.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen RR, Senbayram M, Blagodatsky S, Myachina O, Dittert K, Lin XG, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories. Glob Chang Biol 20:2356–2367.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12475 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen C, Chen HYH, Chen XL, Huang ZQ (2019) Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration. Nat Commun 10:1332.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09258-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng W, Parton WJ, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Phillips R, Asao S, McNickle GG, Brzostek E, Jastrow JD (2014) Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. New Phytol 201:31–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12440 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. London, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Craine JM, Morrow C, Fierer N (2007) Microbial nitrogen limitation increases decomposition. Ecology 88:2105–2113.  https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1847.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dijkstra FA, Cheng WX (2007) Moisture modulates rhizosphere effects on C decomposition in two different soil types. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2264–2274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35:837–843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fontaine S, Henault C, Aamor A, Bdioui N, Bloor JMG, Maire V, Mary B, Revaillot S, Maron PA (2011) Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect. Soil Biol Biochem 43:86–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, Chivenge P, Six J (2008) Interactive effects from combining fertilizer and organic residue inputs on nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2375–2384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. German DP, Chacon SS, Allison SD (2011) Substrate concentration and enzyme allocation can affect rates of microbial decomposition. Ecology 92:1471–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2028.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giardina CP, Ryan MG (2000) Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature 404:858–861.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35009076 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamer U, Marschner B (2005) Priming effects in different soil types induced by fructose, alanine, oxalic acid and catechol additions. Soil Biol Biochem 37:445–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuzyakov Y (2010) Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1363–1371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahra K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–1498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00084-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5111–5120.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00335-09 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Li JW, Wang GS, Mayes MA, Allison SD, Frey SD, Shi Z, Hu XM, Luo YQ, Melillo JM (2018) Reduced carbon use efficiency and increased microbial turnover with soil warming. Glob Chang Biol 25:900–910.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14517 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liang JY, Zhou ZH, Huo CF, Shi Z, Cole JR, Huang L, Konstantinidis KT, Li XM, Liu B, Luo ZK, Penton RC, Schuur EAG, Tiedje JM, Wang YP, Wu LY, Xia JY, Zhou JZ, Luo YQ (2018) More replenishment than priming loss of soil organic carbon with additional carbon input. Nat Commun 9:3175.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05667-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu SE, Wang H, Deng Y, Tian P, Wang QK (2018) Forest conversion induces seasonal variation in microbial β-diversity. Environ Microbiol 20:111–123.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo YQ, Hui DF, Zhang DQ (2006) Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecology 87:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1724 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Luo ZK, Wang EL, Smith C (2015) Fresh carbon input differently impacts soil carbon decomposition across natural and managed systems. Ecology 96:2806–2813.  https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3308049.v1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Luo ZK, Wang EL, Sun OJ (2016) A meta-analysis of the temporal dynamics of priming soil carbon decomposition by fresh carbon inputs across ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 101:96–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nottingham AT, Griffiths H, Chamberlain PM, Stott AW, Tanner EVJ (2009) Soil priming by sugar and leaf-litter substrates: a link to microbial groups. Appl Soil Ecol 42:183–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pascault N, Ranjard L, Kaisermann A, Bachar D, Christen R, Terrat S, Mathieu O, Lévêque J, Mougel C, Henault C, Lemanceau P, Péan M, Boiry S, Fontaine S, Maron P (2013) Stimulation of different functional groups of bacteria by various plant residues as a driver of soil priming effect. Ecosystems 16:810–822.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9650-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qiao N, Schaefer D, Blagodatskaya E, Zou X, Xu X, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Labile carbon retention compensates for CO2 released by priming in forest soils. Glob Chang Biol 20:1943–1954.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12458 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (2000) MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmatz R, Recous S, Aita C, Tahir MM, Schu AL, Chaves B, Giacomini SJ (2017) Crop residue quality and soil type influence the priming effect but not the fate of crop residue C. Plant Soil 414:229–245.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3120-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shahbaz M, Kuzyakov Y, Heitkamp F (2017) Decrease of soil organic matter stabilization with increasing inputs: mechanisms and controls. Geoderma 304:76–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shahbaz M, Kumar A, Kuzyakov Y, Börjesson G, Blagodatskaya E (2018) Interactive priming effect of labile carbon and crop residues on SOM depends on residue decomposition stage: three-source partitioning to evaluate mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 126:179–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarnocai C, Canadell JG, Schuur EAG, Kuhry P, Mazhitova G, Zimov S (2009) Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Glob Biogeochem Cy 23:2607–2617.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thiessen S, Gleixner G, Wutzler T, Reichstein M (2013) Both priming and temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition depend on microbial biomass-an incubation study. Soil Biol Biochem 57:739–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tian QX, Yang XL, Wang XG, Liao C, Li QX, Wang M, Wu Y, Liu F (2016) Microbial community mediated response of organic carbon mineralization to labile carbon and nitrogen addition in topsoil and subsoil. Biogeochemistry 128:125–139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0198-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Troyer ID, Amery F, Moorleghem CV, Smolders E, Merckx R (2011) Tracing the source and fate of dissolved organic matter in soil after incorporation of a 13C labelled residue: a batch incubation study. Soil Biol Biochem 43:513–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vesterdal L, Elberling B, Christiansen JR, Callesen I, Schmidt IK (2012) Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species. For Ecol Manag 264:185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walz J, Knoblauch C, Bohme L, Pfeiffer E (2017) Regulation of soil organic matter decomposition in permafrost affected Siberian tundra soils-impact of oxygen availability, freezing and thawing, temperature, and labile organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 110:34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang QK, Wang SL, He TX, Liu L, Wu JB (2014a) Response of organic carbon mineralization and microbial community to leaf litter and nutrient additions in subtropical forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 71:13–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang X, Liu LL, Piao SL, Janssens IA, Tang JW, Liu WX, Chi YG, Wang J, Xu S (2014b) Soil respiration under climate warming: differential response of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. Glob Chang Biol 20:3229–3237.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12620 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang H, Xu WH, Hu G, Dai W, Jiang P, Bai E (2015) The priming effect of soluble carbon inputs in organic and mineral soils from a temperate forest. Oecologia 178:1239–1250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3290-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang QK, Zeng ZQ, Zhong MC (2016a) Soil moisture alters the response of soil organic carbon mineralization to litter addition. Ecosystems 19:450–460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9941-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang QK, He TX, Liu J (2016b) Litter input decreased the response of soil organic matter decomposition to warming in two subtropical forest soils. Sci Rep-UK 6:33814.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang QK, Chen LC, Yang QP, Sun T, Li CM (2019) Different effects of single versus repeated additions of glucose on the soil organic carbon turnover in a temperate forest receiving long-term N addition. Geoderma 341:59–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu J, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1993) Formation and destruction of microbial biomass during the decomposition of glucose and ryegrass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1435–1441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(93)90058-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang WD, Wang SL (2012) Effects of NH4 + and NO3 on litter and soil organic carbon decomposition in a Chinese fir plantation forest in South China. Soil Biol Biochem 47:116–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang WD, Wang XF, Wang SL (2013) Addition of external organic carbon and native soil organic carbon decomposition: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 8:e54779.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054779 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang TA, Chen HYH, Ruan HH (2018) Global negative effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbes. ISME J 12:1817–1825.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0096-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhou ZH, Wang CK, Zheng MH, Jiang FL, Luo YQ (2016) Patterns and mechanisms of responses by soil microbial communities to nitrogen addition. Soil Biol Biochem 115:433–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhaolin Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shengen Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tianan Zhang
    • 3
  • Xuechao Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shi Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qingkui Wang
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and ManagementInstitute of Applied EcologyShenyangChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the EnvironmentNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Huitong Experimental Station of Forest EcologyChinese Academy of SciencesHuitongChina

Personalised recommendations