Field-scale variability in site conditions explain phenotypic plasticity in response to nitrogen source in Pinus radiata D. Don
- 122 Downloads
Productivity of forest ecosystems is constrained by site resource availability and utilisation at an individual tree level. A better understanding of nitrogen (N) nutrition addition to forest ecosystems is critical for maintaining optimal plantation productivity, given the influence of an environment gradient, genetics, and their interactions.
We studied the aboveground growth response in a plantation setting of ten commercial P. radiata genotypes to N-fertilisation using three different N sources, and also assessed the effect of on-site environmental factors on this response. We compared, on equimolar basis, the effect of N-fertilisation with inorganic N (NH4NO3), organic N (L-arginine), and the two N sources combined (L-arginine:NO3−) to that of unfertilised trees on tree height, diameter, descriptors of microsite variability, and climate and seasonal information. After 2.5 years of fertilisation, genotype-specific variation in aboveground growth response to N sources were measured, and these were significantly influenced by field-scale heterogeneity.
Across P. radiata genotypes, trees treated with inorganic N forms showed suppressed growth compared to unfertilised trees, while trees fertilised with organic N (either alone or in combination with inorganic N) were not significantly different than the untreated controls. We provide evidence of significant interactions between N source and genotype, N source and cover as well as genotype and microsite variability affecting temporal trends in tree volume.
We conclude that the comprehension of field-scale variability in soil properties and associated environmental variables is essential for understanding genotype performance as they are crucial determinants of intraspecific variation in response to N-fertilisation.
KeywordsPhenotypic plasticity Pinus radiata Forest ecosystems G x E Genotype-by-environment interaction Genotype Organic N N source Microsite variation Apparent electrical conductivity Understory vegetation ECa Field-scale variability Temporal variation
This research was supported by the Growing Confidence in Forestry’s Future programme, which is jointly funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (contract No C04X1306) and the Forest Growers Levy Trust (Wellington, New Zealand). The author was supported by scholarships from the New Zealand Forest Research Institute (Scion, Rotorua, New Zealand) and the University of Canterbury. We thank Alan Leckie, Dave Conder, Marie Heaphy, Mike Carson, Juan Rodríguez-Gamir, Mariona Roigé and Torgny Näsholm for their kind advice and valuable technical skills.
- Bongarten BC, Cregg BM, Dougherty PM, Hennessey TC (1987) Physiology and genetics of tree growth response to moisture and temperature stress: an examination of the characteristics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol 61:41–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/3.1.41
- Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60048-6
- Burdon R (1976) Foliar macronutrient concentrations and foliage retention in radiata pine clones on four sites. New Zeal J For Sci 5:250–259Google Scholar
- Burdon R, Shelbourne C (1971) Breeding populations for recurrent selection: conflicts and possible solutions. New Zeal J For Sci 1:174–193Google Scholar
- Burdon RD, Britton RAJ, Walford GB (2001) Wood stiffness and bending strength in relation to density in four native provenances of Pinus radiata. New Zeal J For Sci 31:130–146Google Scholar
- Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) ASReml-R reference manual. Release 3.0. AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Forest Owners Association (2016) Facts and Figs. 2015/16: New Zealand plantation forestry industry.Google Scholar
- Gallart M, Adair KL, Love J et al (2018b) Genotypic variation in Pinus radiata responses to nitrogen source are related to changes in the root microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy071
- Garcia Villacorta AM, Martin TA, Jokela EJ et al (2015) Variation in biomass distribution and nutrient content in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) clones having contrasting crown architecture and growth efficiency. For Ecol Manage 342:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt AE (1993) New Zealand soil classification. Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research New Zealand.Google Scholar
- McDonald PM, Laacke RJ (1990) Pinus radiata D. Don. Monterey Pine. In: Burns R, Honkala B (eds) Silvics of North America. Volume 1, Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 433–441Google Scholar
- McLaren RG, Cameron KC (1990) Soil Science: An introduction to the properties and management of New Zealand soils. Oxford University Press, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Mead DJ (2013) Sustainable management of Pinus radiata plantations. Food and agriculture organization of the United nations (FAO), Roma.Google Scholar
- Mead D, Draper D, Madgwick H (1984) Dry matter production of a young stand of Pinus radiata: some effects of nitrogen fertiliser and thinning. New Zeal J For Sci 14:97–108Google Scholar
- Ministry for Primary Industries of New Zealand (2013) National exotic forest description. As at 1 april 2013.Google Scholar
- Nadler A, Frenkel H (1980) Determination of soil solution electrical conductivity from bulk soil electrical conductivity measurements by the four-electrode method. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:1216. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400060017x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Näsholm T, Persson J (2001) Plant acquisition of organic nitrogen in boreal forests. Physiol Plant 111:419–426. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110401.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Öhlund J, Näsholm T (2004) Regulation of organic and inorganic nitrogen uptake in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings. Tree Physiol 24:1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.12.1397
- Prasolova NV, Xu ZH, Lundkvist K et al (2003) Genetic variation in foliar carbon isotope composition in relation to tree growth and foliar nitrogen concentration in clones of the F1 hybrid between slash pine and Caribbean pine. For Ecol Manage 172:145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00807-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Richardson DM (1998) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez-Gamir J, Xue J, Clearwater MJ et al (2018) Aquaporin regulation in roots controls plant hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in Pinus radiata under water stress. Plant Cell Environ. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13460
- Sudduth KA, Kitchen NR, Wiebold WJ, Batchelor WD, Bollero GA, Bullock DG, Clay DE, Palm HL, Pierce FJ, Schuler RT, Thelen KD (2005) Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central USA. Comput Electron Agric 46(1-3):263–283Google Scholar
- Thornley J (1972) A balanced quantitative model for root:shoot ratios in vegetative plants. Ann Bot 36:431–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valladares F, Wright SJ, Lasso E et al (2000) Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81:1925–1936. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1925:PPRTLO]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xue J, Clinton PW, Davis MR et al (2013) Genotypic variation in foliar nutrient concentrations, delta13C, and chlorophyll fluorescence in relation to tree growth of radiata pine clones in a serpentine soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:724–733Google Scholar