Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 444, Issue 1–2, pp 1–19 | Cite as

Nutrient acquisition strategies in agroforestry systems

  • Marney E. IsaacEmail author
  • Kira A. Borden
Marschner Review

Abstract

Background

Disentangling nutrient acquisition strategies between trees and crops is central to understanding positive nutrient interactions in agroforestry systems for improved low-input agriculture. However, as plants are responsive to a complex soil matrix at multiple scales, generalizable diagnostics across diverse agroforests remains challenging.

Scope

We synthesize research at various scales of the tree-crop interface that are cumulatively hypothesized to underpin nutrient acquisition strategies in agroforestry systems. These scales span the whole root system to fine-scale sites of acquisition actively engaged in biological and chemical interactions with soil. We target vertical and horizontal dimensions of acquisition patterns; localized root-soil dynamics including biological associations; root-scale plasticity for higher acquisition; and nutrient additions via biological nitrogen fixation and deep soil nutrient uplift. We consolidate methodological advances and the effects of environmental change on well-established nutrient interactions.

Conclusions

Root distribution patterns remain one of the most universal indicators of nutrient acquisition strategies in a range of agroforestry systems, while root functional traits are emerging as an effective root-scale indicator of nutrient acquisition strategy. We validate that in agroforestry systems crop root functional traits reveal bivariate trade-offs similar to, but weaker than, crops in monoculture, with mechanistic links to nutrient acquisition strategies. While interspecific root overlap may be associated with nutrient competition, clear cases of enhanced chemically and microbially meditated processes result in species- and management-specific nutrient facilitation. We argue for agroforestry science to use distinct and standardized nutrient acquisition indicators and processes at multiple scales to generate more nuanced, while also generalizable, diagnostics of tree-crop interactions. And extensive research is needed on how agroforestry practices stabilize key nutrient acquisition patterns in the face of environmental change.

Keywords

Agroecosystems Ecosystem function Facilitation Rhizosphere Root distribution Root functional traits Soil heterogeneity Tree-crop interactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Nigel Hawtin for designing the infographic and Astrid Galvez-Ciani for research assistance. We also thank anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge the Canada Research Chairs program for funding to MEI.

References

  1. Abdulai I, Vaast P, Hoffmann M et al (2018) Cocoa agroforestry is less resilient to sub-optimal and extreme climate than cocoa in full sun. Glob Chang Biol 24:273–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abou Rajab Y, Hölscher D, Leuschner C et al (2018) Effects of shade tree cover and diversity on root system structure and dynamics in cacao agroforests: the role of root competition and space partitioning. Plant Soil 422:349–369Google Scholar
  3. Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31Google Scholar
  4. Bainard LD, Koch AM, Gordon AM, Newmaster SG, Thevathasan NV, Klironomos JN (2011) Influence of trees on the spatial structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal communities in a temperate tree-based intercropping system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 14:3–20Google Scholar
  5. Bambrick AD, Whalen JK, Bradley RL, Cogliastro A, Gordon AM, Olivier A, Thevathasan NV (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 79:343–353Google Scholar
  6. Bardgett RD, Mommer L, De Vries FT (2014) Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 29:692–699.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agrofor Syst 38:139–164Google Scholar
  8. Bergeron M, Lacombe S, Bradley RL, Whalen JK (2011) Reduced soil nutrient leaching following the establishment of tree-based interactopping systems in eastern Canada. Agrofor Syst 83:321–330Google Scholar
  9. Borden KA (2018) Root ecology for sustainable agroecosystems: intraspecific variation in a pan-tropical tree crop. PhD diss.. University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  10. Borden KA, Isaac ME (2019) Management strategies differentially affect root functional trait expression in cocoa agroforestry systems. Agron Sustain Dev 39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0567-1
  11. Borden KA, Thomas SC, Isaac ME (2017) Interspecific variation of tree root architecture in a temperate agroforestry system characterized using ground-penetrating radar. Plant Soil 410:323–334Google Scholar
  12. Borden KA, Thomas SC, Isaac ME (2019) Variation in fine root traits reveals nutrient-specific acquisition strategies in agroforestry systems. Plant Soil.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04003-2
  13. Bordron B, Robin A, Oliveira IR et al (2019) Fertilization increases the functional specialization of fine roots in deep soil layers for young Eucalyptus grandis trees. For Ecol Manag 341:6–16Google Scholar
  14. Boreux V, Vaast P, Madappa LP et al (2016) Agroforestry coffee production increased by native shade trees, irrigation, and liming. Agron Sustain Dev 36:9Google Scholar
  15. Bouttier L, Paquette A, Messier C, Rivest D, Olivier A, Cogliastro A (2014) Vertical root separation and light interception in a temperate tree-based intercropping system of Eastern Canada. Agrofor Syst 88:693–706.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9721-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the mantenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol 48:1079–1087Google Scholar
  17. Cahill JF, Mcnickle GG, Haag JJ et al (2010) Plants integrate information about nutrients and neighbors. Science 328:1657–1657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Callaway RM, Nadkarni NM, Mahall BE (1991) Facilitation and interference of Quercus douglasii on understory productivity in Central California. Ecology 72:1484–1499Google Scholar
  19. Callaway RM, Pennings S, Richards C (2003) Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:1115–1128Google Scholar
  20. Cannell MGR, Van Noordwijk M, Ong CK (1996) The central agroforestry hypothesis: the trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire. Agrofor Syst 34:27–31Google Scholar
  21. Cardinael R, Mao Z, Prieto I, Stokes A, Dupraz C, Kim JH, Jourdan C (2015) Competition with winter crops induces deeper rooting of walnut trees in a Mediterranean alley cropping agroforestry system. Plant Soil 391:219–235Google Scholar
  22. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67Google Scholar
  23. Carvalho AMX, Tavares RDC, Cardoso IM, Kuyper TW (2010) Mycorrhizal associations in agroforestry systems. In: Dion P (ed) Soil biology and agricultrue in the tropics. Springer, pp 185–208Google Scholar
  24. Chapin F, Autumn K, Pugnaire F (1993) Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. Am Nat 142:S78–S92Google Scholar
  25. Craine JM, Brookshire ENJ, Cramer MD, Hasselquist NJ, Koba K, Marin-Spiotta E, Wang L (2015) Ecological interpretations of nitrogen isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils. Plant Soil 396:1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Damour G, Navas ML, Garnier E (2018) A revised trait-based framework for agroecosystems including decision rules. J Appl Ecol 55:12–24Google Scholar
  27. Danjon F, Stokes A, Bakker MR (2013) Root systems of woody plants. In: Eshel A, Beeckman T (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Das DKK, Chaturvedi OPP (2008) Root biomass and distribution of five agroforestry tree species. Agrofor Syst 74:223–230Google Scholar
  29. Dawson LAA, Duff EII, Campbell CDD, Hirst DJJ (2001) Depth distribution of cherry (Prunus avium L.) tree roots as influenced by grass root competition. Plant Soil 231:11–19Google Scholar
  30. Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP (2002) Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:507–559Google Scholar
  31. de Kroon H, Visser EJW, Huber H et al (2009) A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control. Plant Cell Environ 32:704–712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. De Vries FT, Manning P, Tallowin JRB, Mortimer SR, Pilgrim ES, Harrison KA et al (2012) Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape-scale patterns in soil microbial communities. Ecol Lett 15:1230–1239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. De Vries FT, Brown C, Stevens CJ (2016) Grassland species root response to drought: consequences for soil carbon and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 409:297–231Google Scholar
  34. Drinkwater LE, Snapp SS (2007) Nutriends in agroecosystems: rethinking the management paradigm. Adv Agron 92:163–186Google Scholar
  35. Duan ZP, Gan YW, Wang BJ et al (2017) Interspecific interaction alters root morphology in young walnut/wheat agroforestry systems in Northwest China. Agrofor Syst 93:419–434Google Scholar
  36. Dunbabin VM, Postma JA, Schnepf A, Pagès L, Javaux M, Wu L, Leitner D, Chen YL, Rengel Z, Diggle AJ (2013) Modelling root–soil interactions using three–dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 372:93–124Google Scholar
  37. Dupraz C, Wolz KJ, Lecomte I, Talbot G, Vincent G, Mulia R, Bussière F, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Andrianarisoa S, Jackson N, Lawson G, Dones N, Sinoquet H, Lusiana B, Harja D, Domenicano S, Reyes F, Gosme M, van Noordwijk M (2019) Hi-sAFe: a 3D agroforestry model for integrating dynamic tree–crop interactions. Sustainability 11:2293Google Scholar
  38. Erktan A, Mccormack ML, Roumet C (2018) Frontiers in root ecology: recent advances and future challenges. Plant Soil 424:1–9Google Scholar
  39. Faucon M, Houben D, Lambers H (2017) Plant functional traits: soil and ecosystem services. Trends Plant Sci 22:385–394Google Scholar
  40. Forde B, Lorenzo H (2001) The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil 232:51–68Google Scholar
  41. Fort F, Cruz P, Lecloux E, De Oliveira LB, Stroia C, Theau JP et al (2016) Grassland root functional parameters vary according to a community level resource acquisition conservation trade-off. J Veg Sci 27:749–758Google Scholar
  42. Freschet GT, Roumet C (2017) Sampling roots to capture plant and soil functions. Funct Ecol 31:1506–1518Google Scholar
  43. Furze JR, Martin AR, Nasielski J et al (2017) Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem. Ecol Evol:1–12Google Scholar
  44. Gagliardi S, Martin AR, Virginio Filho EM, Rapidel B, Isaac ME (2015) Intraspecific leaf economic trait variation partially explains coffee performance across agroforestry management regimes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:151–160Google Scholar
  45. George TS, Gregory PJ, Robinson JS, Buresh RJ (2002) Changes in phosphorus concentrations and pH in the rhizosphere of some agroforestry and crop species. Plant Soil 246:53–63Google Scholar
  46. Gowda HBS, Kumar BM (2008) Root competition for phosphorus between coconut palms and interplanted dicot trees along a soil fertility gradient in Kerala, India. In: Jose S, Gordon AM (eds) Toward agroforestry design, an ecological approach. Springer, Florida, pp 175–193Google Scholar
  47. Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910Google Scholar
  48. Guillot E, Hinsinger P, Dufour L, Roy J, Bertrand I (2019) With or without trees: resistance and resilience of soil microbial communities to drought and heat stress in a Mediterranean agroforestry system. Soil Bio Biochem 129:122–135Google Scholar
  49. Hartemink AE, Buresh RJ, Jama B, Janssen BH (1996) Soil nitrate and water dynamics in sesbania fallows, weed fallows, and maize. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:568–574Google Scholar
  50. Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW (2005) Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol 168:293–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hinsinger P, Betencourt E, Bernard L, Brauman A, Plassard C, Shen J, Tang X, Zhang F (2011) P for two, sharing a scarce resource: soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiol 156:1078–1086PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Hodge A (2004) The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162:9–24Google Scholar
  53. Hodge A (2006) Plastic plants and patchy soils. J Exp Bot 57:401–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hutchings M, de Kroon H (1994) Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Adv Ecol Res 25:159–238Google Scholar
  55. Huxley PA (1985) The tree/crop interface - or simplifying the biological/environmental study of mixed cropping agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 3:251–266Google Scholar
  56. Ingleby K, Wilson J, Munro RC, Cavers S (2007) Mycorrhizas in agroforestry: spread and sharing of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi between trees and crops: complementary use of molecular and microscopic approaches. Plant Soil 294:125–136Google Scholar
  57. Isaac ME, Anglaaere LCN (2013) An in-situ approach to detect tree root ecology: linking ground penetrating radar imaging to isotope derived water acquisition zones. Eco Evol 3:1330–1339Google Scholar
  58. Isaac ME, Kimaro AA (2011) Diagnosis of nutrient imbalances with vector analysis in agroforestry systems. J Environ Qual 40:860PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Isaac ME, Harmand JM, Lesueur D, Lelon J (2011) Tree age and soil phosphorus conditions influence N2-fixation rates and soil N dynamics in natural populations of Acacia senegal. For Ecol Manag 261:582–588Google Scholar
  60. Isaac ME, Hinsinger P, Harmand JM (2012) Nitrogen and phosphorus economy of a legume tree-cereal intercropping system under controlled conditions. Sci Total Environ 434:71–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Isaac ME, Anglaaere LCN, Borden K, Adu-Bredu S (2014a) Intraspecific root plasticity in agroforestry systems across edaphic conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 185:16–23Google Scholar
  62. Isaac ME, Carlsson G, Ghoulam C, Makhani M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon A (2014b) Legume performance and nitrogen acquisition strategies in a tree-based agroecosystem. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 38:686–703Google Scholar
  63. Isaac ME, Martin AR, de Melo Virginio Filho E et al (2017) Intraspecific trait variation and coordination: root and leaf economics spectra in coffee across environmental gradients. Front Plant Sci 8:1–13Google Scholar
  64. Isaac ME, Isakson RS, Dale B et al (2018) Agroecology in Canada: towards an integration of agroecological practice, movement, and science. Sustainability 10:1–17Google Scholar
  65. Issah G, Kimaro AA, Kort J, Knight JD (2015) Nitrogen transfer to forage crops from a Caragana shelterbelt. Forests 6:1922–1932Google Scholar
  66. Iversen CM (2014) Using root form to improve our understanding of root function. New Phytol 203:707–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Iversen CM, McCormack ML, Powell AS et al (2017) A global fine-root ecology database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology. New Phytol 215:15–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Jalonen R, Nygren P, Sierra J (2009) Transfer of nitrogen from a tropical legume tree to an associated fodder grass via root exudation and common mycelial networks. Plant Cell Environ 32:1366–1376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2004) The uplift of soil nutrients by plants: biogeochemical consequences across scales. Ecology 85:2380–2389Google Scholar
  70. Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10Google Scholar
  71. Jose S, Gillespie AR (1998) Allelopathy in black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) alley cropping. I. Spatio-temporal variation in soil juglone in a black walnut–corn (Zea mays L.) alley cropping system in the midwestern USA. Plant Soil 203:191–197Google Scholar
  72. Jose S, Gillespie AR, Seifert JR, Mengel DB, Pope PE (2000) Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA 3. Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamics. Agrofor Syst 48:61–77Google Scholar
  73. Jose S, Gillespie AR, Seifert JR, Pope PE (2001) Comparison of minirhizotron and soil core methods for quantifying root biomass in a temperate alley cropping system. Agrofor Syst 52:161–168Google Scholar
  74. Kaba JS, Zerbe S, Agnolucci M et al (2019) Atmospheric nitrogen fixation by gliricidia trees (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp.) intercropped with cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). Plant Soil 435:323–336Google Scholar
  75. Kähkölä A-K, Nygren P, Leblanc HA, Pennanen T, Pietikäinen J (2012) Leaf and root litter of a legume tree as nitrogen sources for cacaos with different root colonisation by arbuscular mycorrhizae. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 92:51–65Google Scholar
  76. Kumar BM, Jose S (2018) Phenotypic plasticity of roots in mixed tree species agroforestry systems: review with examples from peninsular India. Agrofor Syst 92:59–69Google Scholar
  77. Kurppa M, Leblanc HA, Nygren P (2010) Detection of nitrogen transfer from N2-fixing shade trees to cacao saplings in 15N labelled soil: ecological and experimental considerations. Agrofor Syst 80:223–239Google Scholar
  78. Laclau J-P, Arnaud M, Bouillet J-P, Ranger J (2001) Spatial distribution of Eucalyptus roots in a deep sandy soil in the Congo: relationships with the ability of the stand to take up water and nutrients. Tree Physiol 21:129–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Laclau J-P, da Silva EA, Lambais GR et al (2013) Dynamics of soil exploration by fine roots down to a depth of 10 m throughout the entire rotation in Eucalyptus grandis plantations. Front Plant Sci 4:12Google Scholar
  80. Lambers H, Shane MW, Cramer MD et al (2006) Root structure and functioning for efficient acquisition of phosphorus: matching morphological and physiological traits. Ann Bot 98:693–713PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Larson JE, Funk JL (2016) Seedling root responses to soil moisture and the identification of a belowground trait spectrum across three growth forms. New Phytol 210:827–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Le Bissonnais Y, Prieto I, Roumet C et al (2018) Soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean and tropical agro-ecosystems: effect of plant roots and soil characteristics. Plant Soil 424:303–317Google Scholar
  83. Lehmann J (2003) Subsoil root activity in tree-based cropping systems. Plant Soil 255:319–331Google Scholar
  84. Leigh J, Hodge A, Fitter AH (2009) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can transfer substantial amounts of nitrogen to their host plant from organic material. New Phytol 181:199–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Link C, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Isaac ME (2015) Determining tree water acquisition zones with stable isotopes in a temperate tree-based intercropping system. Agrofor Syst 89:611–620Google Scholar
  86. Liu X, Dong X, Xue Q, Leskovar DI, Jifon J, Butnor JR, Marek T (2018) Ground penetrating radar (GPR) detects fine roots of agricultural crops in the field. Plant Soil 423:517–531Google Scholar
  87. Livesley SJJ, Gregory PJJ, Buresh RJJ (2000) Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 1. Distribution and dynamics of fine root length and biomass. Plant Soil 227:149–161Google Scholar
  88. López-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramírez A, Herrera-Estrella L (2003) The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:280–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Lose SJ, Hilger TH, Leihner DE, Kroschel J (2003) Cassava, maize and tree root development as affected by various agroforestry and cropping systems in Bénin, West Africa. Ecosyst Environ 100:137–151Google Scholar
  90. Luedeling E, Smethurst PJ, Baudron F, Bayala J, Huth NI, van Noordwijk M, Ong CK, Mulia R, Lusiana B, Muthuri C, Sinclair FL (2016) Field-scale modeling of tree-crop interactions: challenges and development needs. Agric Syst 142:51–69Google Scholar
  91. Mafongoya PL, Giller KE, Palm CA (1998) Decompoisitoin and nitrogen release patterns of tree prunings and litter. Agrofor Syst 38:77–97Google Scholar
  92. Mahall BE, Callaway RM (1992) Root communication mechanisms and intracommunity distributions of two Mojave desert shrubs. Ecology 73:2145–2151Google Scholar
  93. Malamy JE (2005) Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture. Plant Cell Environ 28:67–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Malézieux E, Crozat Y, Dupraz C, Laurans M, Makowski D, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Rapidel B, Tourdonnet S, Valantin-Morison M (2009) Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:43–62Google Scholar
  95. Martin AR, Isaac ME (2015) Functional traits in agroecology: a blueprint for research. J Appl Ecol 52:1425–1435Google Scholar
  96. Martin AR, Hayes F, Borden KA et al (2019) Integrating nitrogen fixing structures into above- and belowground functional trait spectra in soy (Glycine max). Plant Soil 440:53–69Google Scholar
  97. Meylan L, Gary C, Allinne C, Ortiz J, Jackson L, Rapidel B (2017) Evaluating the effect of shade trees on provision of ecosystem services in intensively managed coffee plantations. Agric Ecosyst Environ 245:32–42Google Scholar
  98. Mbow C, Smith P, Skole D, Duguma L, Bustamante M (2014) Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:8–14Google Scholar
  99. McCormack ML, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM et al (2015) Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol 207:505–518PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. McCormack ML, Guo D, Iversen CM et al (2017) Building a better foundation: improving root trait measurements to understand and model plant and ecosystem processes. New Phytol 215:27–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. McGrath D, Duryea M, Cropper W (2001) Soil phosphorus availability and fine root proliferation in Amazonian agroforests 6 years following forest conversion. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:271–284Google Scholar
  102. McNickle GG, St. Clair CC, Cahill JF (2009) Focusing the metaphor: plant root foraging behaviour. Trends Ecol Evol 24:419–426Google Scholar
  103. Méndez VE, Bacon CM, Cohen R (2013) Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory and action-oriented approach. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 37:3–18Google Scholar
  104. Miner BG, Sultan SE, Morgan SG, Padilla DK, Relyea RA (2005) Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:685–692Google Scholar
  105. Mohamed A, Stokes A, Mao Z, Jourdan C, Sabatier S, Pailler F, Fourtier S, Dufour L, Monnier Y (2018) Linking above- and belowground phenology of hybrid walnut growing along a climatic gradient in temperate agroforestry systems. Plant Soil 424:103–122Google Scholar
  106. Mommer L, Weemstra M (2012) The role of roots in the resource economics spectrum. New Phytol 195:725–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Mommer L, Kirkegaard J, van Ruijven J (2016) Root-root interactions: towards a rhizosphere framework. Trends Plant Sci 21:209–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Mora A, Beer J (2013) Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of coffee fine roots under Erythrina shade trees and contrasting soil management. Agrofor Syst 87:365–376Google Scholar
  109. Moreno G, Obrador JJ, Cubera E, Dupraz C (2005) Fine root distribution in Dehesas of Central- Western Spain. Plant Soil 277:153–162Google Scholar
  110. Mulia R, Dupraz C (2006) Unusual fine root distributions of two deciduous tree species in southern France: what consequences for modelling of tree root dynamics? Plant Soil 281:71–85Google Scholar
  111. Munroe JW, Isaac ME (2014) N2-fixing trees and the transfer of fixed-N for sustainable agroforestry: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:417–427Google Scholar
  112. Munroe JW, Soto G, de M. Virginio Filho E, Fulthorpe R, Isaac ME (2015) Soil microbial and nutrient properties in the rhizosphere of coffee under agroforestry management. Appl Soil Ecol 93:40–46Google Scholar
  113. Nasielski J, Furze JR, Tan J, Bargaz A, Thevathasan NV, Isaac ME (2015) Agroforestry promotes soybean yield stability and N2- fixation under water stress. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1541–1549Google Scholar
  114. Nesper M, Kueffer C, Krishnan S et al (2018) Simplification of shade tree diversity reduces nutrient cycling resilience in coffee agroforestry. J Appl Ecol 56:119–131Google Scholar
  115. Nygren P, Leblanc HA (2009) Natural abundance of 15N in two cacao plantations with legume and non-legume shade trees. Agrofor Syst 76:303–315Google Scholar
  116. Nygren P, Cruz P, Domenach AM, Vaillant V, Sierra J (2000) Influence of forage harvesting regimes on dynamics of biological dinitrogen fixation of a tropical woody legume. Tree Physiol 20:41–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Nygren P, Fernández MP, Harmand JM, LeBlanc HA (2012) Symbiotic dinitrogen fixation by trees: an underestimated resource in agroforestry systems? Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 94:123–160Google Scholar
  118. Nygren P, Leblanc HA, Lu M, Gomez Luciano CA (2013) Distribution of coarse and fine roots of Theobroma cacao and shade tree Inga edulis in a cocoa plantation. Ann For Sci 70:229–239Google Scholar
  119. Ong CK, Leakey RRB (1999) Why tree-crop interactions in agroforestry appear at odds with tree-grass interactions in tropical savannahs. Agrofor Syst 45:109–129Google Scholar
  120. Padovan MP, Cortez VJ, Navarrete LF, Navarrete ED, Deffner AC, Centeno LG, Munguía R, Barrios M, Vílchez-Mendoza JS, Vega-Jarquín C, Costa AN, Brook RM, Rapidel B (2015) Root distribution and water use in coffee shaded with Tabebuia rosea Bertol. And Simarouba glauca DC. Compared to full sun coffee in sub-optimal environmental conditions. Agrofor Syst 89:857–868Google Scholar
  121. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Garnier E et al (2013) New handbook for standardized measurment of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234Google Scholar
  122. Phillips RP, Erlitz Y, Bier R, Bernhardt ES (2008) New approach for capturing soluble root exudates in forest soils. Funct Ecol 22:990–999Google Scholar
  123. Pierret A, Maeght J-L, Clément C, Montoroi JP, Hartmann C, Gonkhamdee S (2016) Understanding deep roots and their functions in ecosystems: an advocacy for more unconventional research. Ann Bot 118:621–635PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. Prieto I, Roumet C, Cardinael R, Dupraz C, Jourdan C, Kim JH, Maeght JL, Mao Z, Pierret A, Portillo N, Roupsard O, Thammahacksa C, Stokes A (2015) Root functional parameters along a land-use gradient: evidence of a community-level economics spectrum. J Ecol 103:361–373Google Scholar
  125. Pritchard J (1998) Control of root growth: cell walls and turgor. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, Van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 21–39Google Scholar
  126. Radersma S, Grierson PF (2004) Phosphorus mobilization in agroforestry: organic anions, phosphatase activity and phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 259:209–219Google Scholar
  127. Rao AV, Giller KE (1993) Nitrogen fixation and its transfer from Leucaena to grass using 15N. For Ecol Manag 61:221–227Google Scholar
  128. Rewald B, Ephrath JE, Rachmilevitch S (2011) A root is a root is a root? Water uptake rates of Citrus root orders. Plant Cell Environ 34:33–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Rigal C, Xu J, Vaast P (2019) Young shade trees improve soil quality in intensively managed coffee systems recently converted to agroforestry in Yunnan Province. China Plant Soil.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04004-1
  130. Rillig MC, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Bergmann J, Verbruggen E, Veresoglou SD, Lehmann A (2015) Plant root and mycorrhizal fungal traits for understanding soil aggregation. New Phytol 205:1385–1388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Robertson W (1994) Modelling soil nitrogen levels under acacia/sorghum rotations. Agroforestry Systems 27:283–292Google Scholar
  132. Roumet C, Birouste M, Picon-Cochard C, Ghestem M, Osman N, Vrignon-Brenas S, Cao KF, Stokes A (2016) Root structure-function relationships in 74 species:evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. New Phytol 210:815–826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Rowe EC, Van Noordwijk M, Suprayogo D et al (2001) Root distributions partially explain 15N uptake patterns in Gliricidia and Peltophorum hedgerow intercropping systems. Plant Soil 235:167–179Google Scholar
  134. Rowe EC, Noordwijk MVAN, Suprayogo D (2006) Variable responses of the depth of tree nitrogen uptake to pruning and competition. Tree Physiol 26:1529–1535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Sanchez PA (1995) Science in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30:5–55Google Scholar
  136. Sanders IR (2003) Specificity in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. In: Van Der Heijden MGA, Sanders I (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 415–437Google Scholar
  137. Schoeneberger MM, Bentrup G, de Gooijer H, Soolanayakanahally R, Sauer T, Brandle J, Zhou X, Current D (2012) Branching out: agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture. Soil Water Conserv 67:128–136Google Scholar
  138. Schroth G (1999) A review of belowground interactions in agroforestry, focussing on mechanisms and management options. Agrofor Syst 43:5–34Google Scholar
  139. Schwendenmann L, Veldkamp E, Moser G et al (2010) Effects of an experimental drought on the functioning of a cacao agroforestry system, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Glob Chang Biol 16:1515–1530Google Scholar
  140. Somarriba E, Beer J, Orihuela JA, Andrade H, Cerda R, DeClerck F et al (2012) Mainstreaming agroforestry in Latin America. In: Nair PKR, Garrity DP (eds) Agroforestry: the way forward, Advances in agroforestry, vol 9. Springer, New York, pp 429–453Google Scholar
  141. Sun F, Pan K, Tariq A, Zhang L, Sun X, Li Z, Wang S, Xiong Q, Song D, Olatunji OA (2016) The response of the soil microbial food web to extreme rainfall under different plant systems. Sci Rep 6:37662PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (1997) Poplar leaf biomass distribution and nitrogen dynamics in a poplar-barley intercropped system in southern Ontario. Agrofor Syst 37:79–90Google Scholar
  143. Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Bradley R et al (2012) Agroforestry research and development in Canada: the way forward. In: PKR N, Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry - the future of global land use, advances in agroforestry 9. Springer, Netherlands, pp 247–283Google Scholar
  144. Tomich TP, Brodt S, Ferris H, Galt R, Horwath WR, Kebreab E, Leveau JHJ, Liptzin D, Lubell M, Merel P, Michelmore R, Rosenstock T, Scow K, Six J, Williams N, Yang L (2011) Agroecology: a review from a global-change perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:193–222Google Scholar
  145. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59Google Scholar
  146. Upson MA, Burgess PJ (2013) Soil organic carbon and root distribution in a temperate arable agroforestry system. Plant Soil 373:43–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1733-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. van Kanten R, Schroth G, Beer J, Jiménez F (2005) Fine-root dynamics of coffee in association with two shade trees in Costa Rica. Agrofor Syst 63:247–261Google Scholar
  148. Van Noordwijk M, Lusiana B (1998) WaNulCAS, a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 43:217–242Google Scholar
  149. Van Oijen M, Dauzat J, Harmand JM, Lawson G, Vaast P (2010) Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: II. Development of a simple process-based model and preliminary results. Agrofor Syst 80:361–378Google Scholar
  150. Vanlauwe B, Akinnifesi FK, Tossah BK, Lyasse O, Sanginga N, Merckx R (2002) Root distribution of Senna siamea grown on a series of derived-savanna-zone soils in Togo, West Africa. Agrofor Syst 54:1–12Google Scholar
  151. Verchot L, Van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich TP, Ong CK, Albrecht A, Mackensen J, Bantilan C, Anupama KV, Palm CA (2007) Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 12:901–918Google Scholar
  152. Weemstra M, Mommer L, Visser EJW, Ruijven J, Kuyper TW, Mohren GMJ, Sterck FJ (2016) Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review. New Phytol 211:1159–1169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Wezel A, Soldat V (2009) A quantitative and qualitative historical analysis of the scientific discipline of agroecology. Int J Agr Sustain 7:3–18Google Scholar
  154. Wood SA, Karp DS, DeClerck F, Kremen C, Naeem S, Palm CA (2015) Functional traits in agriculture: agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 30:531–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Wu J, Liu W, Chen C (2016) Below-ground interspecific competition for water in a rubber agroforestry system may enhance water utilization in plants. Sci Rep 6:19502PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Land and Food SystemsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations