Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 443, Issue 1–2, pp 155–166 | Cite as

Silicon cycled by tropical forest trees: effects of species, elevation and parent material on Mount Kinabalu, Malaysia

  • Ryosuke NakamuraEmail author
  • Hidehiro Ishizawa
  • Rota Wagai
  • Shizuo Suzuki
  • Kanehiro Kitayama
  • Kaoru Kitajima
Regular Article
  • 156 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

We aimed to compare uptake and litter flux of silicon (Si) across tropical tree species and sites on Mt. Kinabalu, Borneo.

Methods

Si flux components were measured at eight plots in tropical forests at four altitudes (700–3,100 m above sea level) on two types of parent materials (acidic sedimentary/granite rock and ultramafic igneous rock, paired at each elevation).

Results

Leaf Si concentration differed substantially among tree species (0.24–13.6 mg g−1). Species with high leaf Si concentrations occurred mostly in the lowest elevation plots on both parent materials. The abundance-weighted community means of live-leaf Si concentrations, as well as Si concentration in leaf litter, declined with increasing elevation. Annual leaf-litter Si flux and water extractable Si per unit air-dried soil also decreased with increasing elevation, whereas parent material type had little influence despite consistently higher pH by 0.5–1.0 unit in ultramafic soil.

Conclusions

Si uptake and litter Si flux were greater in lower elevation forests regardless of parent material types, most likely because Si accumulating species are more abundant in lowland tropical forests. These results suggest a stronger role of biota than the geochemistry of parent material and rock weathering in Si cycling in the forests on Mt. Kinabalu.

Keywords

Biogenic silica Borneo Ecosystem silicon cycling Elevational gradient Parent material Tropical montane forest 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the grants 26650163, 22255002 and 26660051 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We thank the Sabah Parks for permission and logistic support for research on Mt. Kinabalu. Soil import followed the regulations specified by a permit issued by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery in Japan. We also thank Joseph Phillips for English language editing and Yusuke Onoda for pre-submission review.

Author contribution

K. Kitajima conceived the ideas; K. Kitajima, K. Kitayama and R. Nakamura designed methodology; R. Wagai, S. Suzuki and K. Kitayama collected samples; R. Nakamura and H. Ishizawa performed the chemical analyses; K. Kitayama and R. Wagai provided critical information on the forest monitoring plots on Mt. Kinabalu; R. Nakamura and K. Kitajima led data analyses; R. Nakamura wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Supplementary material

11104_2019_4230_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 2136 kb)

References

  1. Aiba S, Kitayama K (1999) Structure, composition and species diversity in an altitude-substrate matrix of rain forest tree communities on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Plant Ecol 140:139–157.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009710618040
  2. Aiba S, Kitayama K, Repin R (2002) Species composition and species-area relationships of trees in nine permanent plots in altitudinal sequences on different geological substrates of Mount Kinabalu. Sabah Parks Nature Journal 5:7–69Google Scholar
  3. Alexandre A, Meunier JD, Colin F, Koud JM (1997) Plant impact on the biogeochemical cycle of silicon and related weathering processes. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 61:677–682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00001-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartoli F (1983) The biogeochemical cycle of silicon in two temperate forest ecosystems. Ecol Bull 35:469–476Google Scholar
  5. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremer B, Bremer K, Chase MW et al (2009) An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc 161:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks RR (1987) Serpentine and its vegetation: a multidisciplinary approach. Dioscorides Press, Portland, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke J (2003) The occurrence and significance of biogenic opal in the regolith. Earth-Sci Rev 60:175–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00092-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conley DJ, Schelske CL (1993) Potential role of sponge spicules in influencing the silicon biogeochemistry of Florida lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:296–302.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke J, Leishman MR (2011) Is plant ecology more siliceous than we realise? Trends Plant Sci 16:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke J, Leishman MR (2012) Tradeoffs between foliar silicon and carbon-based defences: evidence from vegetation communities of contrasting soil types. Oikos 121:2052–2060.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20057.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornelis JT, Delvaux B (2016) Soil processes drive the biological silicon feedback loop. Funct Ecol 30:1298–1310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornelis JT, Ranger J, Iserentant A, Delvaux B (2010) Tree species impact the terrestrial cycle of silicon through various uptakes. Biogeochemistry 97:231–245.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9369-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Epstein E (1994) The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. P Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein E (1999) Silicon. Annu Rev Plant Phys 50:641–664.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faisal S, Callis KL, Slot M, Kitajima K (2012) Transpiration-dependent passive silica accumulation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) under varying soil silicon availability. Botany 90:1058–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b2012-072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1086/284325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fraysse F, Pokrovsky OS, Schott J, Meunier JD (2009) Surface chemistry and reactivity of plant phytoliths in aqueous solutions. Chem Geol 258:197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garland T, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41:18–32.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gérard F, Mayer KU, Hodson MJ, Ranger J (2008) Modelling the biogeochemical cycle of silicon in soils: application to a temperate forest ecosystem. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 72:741–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldich SS (1938) A study in rock-weathering. J Geol 46:17–58.  https://doi.org/10.1086/624619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartley SE, Fitt RN, McLarnon EL, Wada RN (2015) Defending the leaf surface: intra- and inter-specific differences in silicon deposition in grasses in response to damage and silicon supply. Front Plant Sci 6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00035
  23. Hodson MJ, Sangster AG (1999) Aluminium/silicon interactions in conifers. J Inorg Biochem 76:89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0162-0134(99)00119-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodson MJ, White PJ, Mead A, Broadley MR (2005) Phylogenetic variation in the silicon composition of plants. Ann Bot 96:1027–1046.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci255 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Ishizawa H, Niiyama K, Iida Y, Shari NHZ, Ripin A, Kitajima K (2019) Spatial variations of soil silicon availability and biogenic silicon flux in a lowland tropical forest in Malaysia. Ecol Res 34:548–559.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobson G (1970) Gunung Kinabalu Area, Sabah, Malaysia. Geological Survey Malaysia, Report 8 (with a coloured geological map on a scale of 1 : 50000). Geological Survey Malaysia, Kuching, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitayama K (1992) An altitudinal transect study of the vegetation on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Vegetatio 102:149–171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044731
  28. Kitayama K, Aiba S (2002) Ecosystem structure and productivity of tropical rain forests along altitudinal gradients with contrasting soil phosphorus pools on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. J Ecol 90:37–51.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00634.x
  29. Kitayama K, Majalap-Lee N, Aiba S (2000) Soil phosphorus fractionation and phosphorus-use efficiencies of tropical rainforests along altitudinal gradients of Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Oecologia 123:342–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420051020
  30. Korndörfer AP, Del-Claro K (2006) Ant defense versus induced defense in Lafoensia pacari (Lythraceae), a myrmecophilous tree of the Brazilian cerrado. Biotropica 38:786–788.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00200.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang Y, Hua H, Zhu YG, Zhang J, Cheng C, Romheld V (2006) Importance of plant species and external silicon concentration to active silicon uptake and transport. New Phytol 172:63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01797.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucas Y (2001) The role of plants in controlling rates and products of weathering: importance of biological pumping. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc 29:135–163.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.29.1.135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucas Y, Luizao FJ, Chauvel A, Rouiller J, Nahon D (1993) The relation between biological activity of the rain forest and mineral composition of soils. Science 260:521–523.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5107.521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ma JF and Takahashi E (2002) Soil, fertilizer and plant silicon research in Japan. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  35. McNaughton SJ, Terrants JL (1983) Grass leaf silicification: natural selection for an inducible defense against herbivores. P Natl Acad Sci USA 80:790–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Motomura T, Fujii T, Suzuki M (2004) Silica deposition in relation to aging of leaf tissues in Sasa veitchii (Carrière) Rehder (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Ann Bot 93:235–248.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch034 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Piperno DR (2006) Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. AltaMira Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. R Development Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document] URL https://R-project.org
  40. Rai D, Kittrick JA (1989) Mineral equilibria and the soil system. In: Dixon J, Weed S (eds) Minerals in soil environments. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Revell LJ (2012) Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3:217–223.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards PW (1952) The tropical rainforest. Cambridge University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  43. Sauer D, Saccone L, Conley DJ, Herrmann L, Sommer M (2006) Review of methodologies for extracting plant-available and amorphous Si from soils and aquatic sediments. Biogeochemistry 80:89–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-5879-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schaller J, Turner BL, Weissflog A, Pino D, Bielnicka AW, Engelbrecht BM (2018) Silicon in tropical forests: large variation across soils and leaves suggests ecological significance. Biogeochemistry 140:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0483-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schulz MS, White AF (1999) Chemical weathering in a tropical watershed, Luquillo mountains, Puerto Rico III: quartz dissolution rates. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 63:337–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00056-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Struyf E, Conley DJ (2012) Emerging understanding of the ecosystem silica filter. Biogeochemistry 107:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9590-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Takahashi E, Tanaka H, Miyake Y (1981) Distribution of silicon accumulating plants in the plant kingdom. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:551–515Google Scholar
  48. Wagai R, Kitayama K, Satomura T, Fujinuma R, Balser T (2011) Interactive influences of climate and parent material on soil microbial community structure in Bornean tropical forest ecosystems. Ecol Res 26:627–636.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-011-0822-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wagai R, Mayer LM (2007) Sorptive stabilization of organic matter in soils by hydrous iron oxides. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 71:25–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.08.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagai R, Mayer LM, Kitayarna K, Knicker H (2008) Climate and parent material controls on organic matter storage in surface soils: a three-pool, density-separation approach. Geoderma 147:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webb CO, Donoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:181–183.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00829.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of EngineeringOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
  4. 4.National Agriculture and Food Research OrganizationInstitute for Agro-Environmental SciencesTsukubaJapan
  5. 5.National Institute of TechnologyNumazu CollegeNumazuJapan

Personalised recommendations