Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 443, Issue 1–2, pp 293–306 | Cite as

Changes in soil properties rather than functional gene abundance control carbon and nitrogen mineralization rates during long-term natural revegetation

  • Kerong ZhangEmail author
  • Xinshuai Li
  • Xiaoli Cheng
  • Zhenhua Zhang
  • Quanfa Zhang
Regular Article
  • 198 Downloads

Abstract

Background and aims

Agricultural abandonment has been taken as one of the most widely used strategies for ecological restoration. Abandoned croplands expanded worldwide since the middle of the twentieth century and will increase considerably in the future. Whether agricultural abandonment alters the abundances of soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) mineralization genes, and whether these functional genes are linked to alterations in C and N mineralization rates remain unknown.

Methods

We took advantage of a well-established chronosequence of nature restoration sites on abandoned croplands which represent a century of vegetation succession in China’s Qinling Mountains, to determine soil C and N mineralization rates, and their relationships with vegetation succession, edaphic characteristics, soil microbial communities, and functional genes based on GeoChip 5.0.

Results

We found that soil C and N mineralization rates, microbial biomass and composition, and the number and abundances of functional genes were significantly affected by vegetation succession following agricultural abandonment. Soil C and N mineralization rates increased by sixfold and threefold, respectively, along the cropland to forest successional gradient. The NO3-N, NH4-N and soil available phosphorus (P) concentrations were important factors associated with the C and N mineralization genes. The shifts in edaphic environments (i.e., soil moisture, cation exchange capacity, and C/P ratio), vegetation-derived substrates (i.e., soil organic C and N), and soil microbial composition (i.e., Fungi/Bacteria ratio, amounts of Gram-negative bacteria, Actinomycetes, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi), rather than the abundances of functional genes involved in mineralization processes, controlled soil C and N mineralization rates along the long-term vegetation successional gradient.

Conclusions

Abandoning cropland for natural succession could facilitate the recuperation of soil C and N processes and alter soil microbial composition and functional genes. The abundances of microbial functional genes are less important than previously expected in regulating soil C and N mineralization rates.

Keywords

GeoChip Abandoned croplands Land-use change Vegetation succession Carbon cycling Soil microbes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770562, 31470499, 3192200779), Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2018374), and the Strategic Priority Research Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05060500 and XDB15010200). We are grateful for the comments and constructive suggestions from the editors and anonymous reviewers.

Supplementary material

11104_2019_4212_MOESM1_ESM.docx (94 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 94 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM2_ESM.docx (41 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 40 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM3_ESM.docx (28 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 27 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM4_ESM.docx (22 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 22 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM5_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 14 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM6_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 6 (DOCX 14 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM7_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 7 (DOCX 18 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM8_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 8 (DOCX 15 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM9_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 9 (DOCX 17 kb)
11104_2019_4212_MOESM10_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 10 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Austin AT, Vitousek PM (1998) Nutrient dynamics on a precipitation gradient in Hawaii. Oecologia 113:519–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Awiti AO, Walsh MG, Kinyamario J (2008) Dynamics of topsoil carbon and nitrogen along a tropical forest-cropland chronosequence: evidence from stable isotope analysis and spectroscopy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedard-Haughn A, Matson AL, Pennock DJ (2006) Land use effects on gross nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, and N2O emissions in ephemeral wetlands. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3398–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bracho R, Natali S, Pegoraro E, Crummer KG, Schädel C, Celis G, Hale L, Wu L, Yin H, Tiedje JM, Konstantinidis KT, Luo Y, Zhou J, Schuur EAG (2016) Temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition of permafrost-region soils during laboratory incubations. Soil Biol Biochem 97:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell JE, Lobell DB, Genova RC, Field CB (2008) The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. Environ Sci Technol 42:5791–5794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatterjee A, Vance GF, Pendall E, Stahl PD (2008) Timber harvesting alters soil carbon mineralization and microbial community structure in coniferous forests. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1901–1907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen H, Li D, Xiao K, Wang K (2018) Soil microbial processes and resource limitation in karst and non-karst forests. Funct Ecol 32:1400–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng X, Yang Y, Li M, Dou X, Zhang Q (2013) The impact of agricultural land use changes on soil organic carbon dynamics in the Danjiangkou reservoir area of China. Plant Soil 366:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clement CR, Williams TE (1967) Leys and soil organic matter: II. The accumulation of nitrogen in soils under different leys. J Agr Sci 69:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clivot H, Mary B, Valé M, Cohan JP, Champolivier L, Piraux F, Laurent F, Justes E (2017) Quantifying in situ and modeling net nitrogen mineralization from soil organic matter in arable cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 111:44–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cong J, Liu X, Lu H, Xu H, Li Y, Deng Y, Li D, Zhang Y (2015) Analyses of the influencing factors of soil microbial functional gene diversity in tropical rain- forest based on GeoChip 5.0. Genomics Data 5:397–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramera VA, Hobbs RJ, Standisha RJ (2008) What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends in Ecol Evol 23:104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Don A, Böhme IH, Dohrmann AB, Poeplau C, Tebbe CC (2017) Microbial community composition affects soil organic carbon turnover in mineral soils. Biol Fertil Soils 53:445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frostegård Å, Bååth E (1996) The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 22:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham EB, Knelman JE, Schindlbacher A, Siciliano S, Breulmann M, Yannarell A et al (2016) Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Front Microbiol 7:214PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hallin S, Jones CM, Schloter M, Philippot L (2009) Relationship between N-cycling communities and ecosystem functioning in a 50-year-old fertilization experiment. ISME J 3:597–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jha P, De A, Lakaria BL, Biswas AK, Singh M, Reddy KS, Rao AS (2012) Soil carbon pools, mineralization and fluxes associated with land use change in Vertisols of Central India. Nat Acad Sci Lett 35:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaiser C, Kilburn MR, Clode PL, Fuchslueger L, Koranda M, Cliff JB, Solaiman ZM, Murphy DV (2015) Exploring the transfer of recent plant photosynthates to soil microbes: mycorrhizal pathway vs direct root exudation. New Phytol 205:1537–1551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelley KR, Stevenson FJ (1995) Forms and nature of organic N in soil. Fertil Res 42:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Zhou X, Zhang Q, Cheng X (2014) Consequences of afforestation for soil nitrogen dynamics in Central China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu RK (2000) Soil agro-chemical analyses. Agricultural Technical Press of China, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Marin-Spiotta ERIKA, Silver WL, Swanston CW, Ostertag R (2009) Soil organic matter dynamics during 80 years of reforestation of tropical pastures. Glob Change Biol 15:1584–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer N, Welp G, Rodionov A, Borchard N, Martius C, Amelung W (2018) Nitrogen and phosphorus supply controls soil organic carbon mineralization in tropical topsoil and subsoil. Soil Biol Biochem 119:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller EK, Johnson AH, Vann DR, Joshi AB (2003) Nitrogen availability and forest productivity along a climosequency on Whiteface Mountain, New York. Can J For Res 33:1880–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morriën E, Hannula SE, Snoek LB, Helmsing NR, Zweers H, De Hollander M et al (2017) Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses. Nat Commun 8:14349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Nadal-Romero E, Cammeraat E, Pérez-Cardiel E, Lasanta T (2016) How do soil organic carbon stocks change after cropland abandonment in Mediterranean humid mountain areas? Sci Total Environ 566:741–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pathak H, Rao DLN (1998) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization from added organic matter in saline and alkali soils. Soil Biol Biochem 30:695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paula FS, Rodrigues JL, Zhou J, Wu L, Mueller RC, Mirza BS, Bohannan BJM, Klaus NK, Deng Y, Tiedje JM, Pellizari VH (2014) Land use change alters functional gene diversity, composition and abundance in Amazon forest soil microbial communities. Mol Ecol 23:2988–2999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Prasanna R, Kanchan A, Ramakrishnan B, Ranjan K, Venkatachalam S, Hossain F, Shivay YS, Krishnan P, Nain L (2016) Cyanobacteria-based bioinoculants influence growth and yields by modulating the microbial communities favourably in the rhizospheres of maize hybrids. Eur J Soil Biol 75:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Development Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.r-project. Org, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  32. Reich PB, Grigal DF, Aber JD, Gower ST (1997) Nitrogen mineralization and productivity in 50 hardwood and conifer stands on diverse soils. Ecology 78:335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rey Benayas JM, Martins A, Nicolau JM, Schulz JJ (2007) Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB reviews: perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural resources 2:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Song XP, Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Tyukavina A, Vermote EF, Townshend JR (2018) Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature 560:639–643CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Stanturf JA, Palik BJ, Dumroese RK (2014) Contemporary forest restoration: a review emphasizing function. Forest Ecol Manag 331:292–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strickland MS, Callaham JMA, Davies CA, Lauber CL, Ramirez K, Richter JDD, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2010) Rates of in situ carbon mineralization in relation to land-use, microbial community and edaphic characteristics. Soil Biol Biochem 42:260–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun S, Liu J, Chang SX (2013) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: impacts of nitrogen species and land use type. Plant Soil 372:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Swap RJ, Aranibar JN, Dowty PR, Gilhooly WP III, Macko SA (2004) Natural abundance of 13C and 15N in C3 and C4 vegetation of southern Africa: patterns and implications. Glob Change Biol 10:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tardy V, Spor A, Mathieu O, Lévèque J, Terrat S, Plassart P, Regnier T, Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH, Roggero PP, Seddaiu G, Bagella S, Lemanceau P, Ranjard L, Maron PA (2015) Shifts in microbial diversity through land use intensity as drivers of carbon mineralization in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 90:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2012) CANOCO reference manual and User's guide: software for ordination. Version 5. Microcomputer power Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Tian Q, Wang X, Wang D, Wang M, Liao C, Yang X, Liu F (2017) Decoupled linkage between soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization among soil depths in a subtropical mixed forest. Soil Biol Biochem 109:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trivedi P, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Trivedi C, Hu H, Anderson IC, Jeffries TC, Zhou J, Singh BK (2016) Microbial regulation of the soil carbon cycle: evidence from gene-enzyme relationships. ISME J 10:2593–2604CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Tu Q, Yu H, He Z, Deng Y, Wu L, Van Nostrand JD, Zhou A, Voordeckers J, Lee YJ, Qin Y, Hemme CL, Shi Z, Xue K, Yuan Y, Wang A, Zhou J (2014) GeoChip 4: a functional gene-array-based high-throughput environmental technology for microbial community analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 14:914–928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Nostrand JD, Yin H, Wu L, Yuan T, Zhou J (2016) hybridization of environmental microbial community nucleic acids by GeoChip. In microbial environmental genomics (MEG) (pp. 183-196). Humana press, New York. NYGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang L, Shaner PJL, Macko S (2007) Foliar δ15N patterns along successional gradients at plant community and species levels. Geophys Res Lett 34:16403Google Scholar
  46. Wang Q, Wang S, He T, Liu L, Wu J (2014) Response of organic carbon mineralization and microbial community to leaf litter and nutrient additions in subtropical forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 71:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitman T, Pepe-Ranney C, Enders A, Koechli C, Campbell A, Buckley DH, Lehmann J (2016) Dynamics of microbial community composition and soil organic carbon mineralization in soil following addition of pyrogenic and fresh organic matter. ISME J 10:2918–2930CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao W, Feng S, Liu Z, Su Y, Zhang Y, He X (2017) Interactions of soil particulate organic matter chemistry and microbial community composition mediating carbon mineralization in karst soils. Soil Biol Biochem 107:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xue K, Yuan MM, Shi ZJ, Qin Y, Deng Y, Cheng L, Wu L, He Z, Van Nostrand JD, Bracho R, Natali S, Schuur EAG, Luo C, Konstantinidis KT, Wang Q, Cole JR, Tiedje JM, Luo Y, Zhou J (2016) Tundra soil carbon is vulnerable to rapid microbial decomposition under climate warming. Nat Clim Chang 6:595–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zeller V, Bahn M, Aichner M, Tappeiner U (2000) Impact of land-use change on nitrogen mineralization in subalpine grasslands in the southern Alps. Biol Fert Soils 31:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang K, Cheng X, Dang H, Ye C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q (2013) Linking litter production, quality and decomposition to vegetation succession following agricultural abandonment. Soil Biol Biochem 57:803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang K, Dang H, Zhang Q, Cheng X (2015) Soil carbon dynamics following land-use change varied with temperature and precipitation gradients: evidence from stable isotopes. Glob Change Biol 21:2762–2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang K, Cheng X, Shu X, Liu Y, Zhang Q (2018) Linking soil bacterial and fungal communities to vegetation succession following agricultural abandonment. Plant Soil 431:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang Y, Liu X, Cong J, Lu H, Sheng Y, Wang X, Li D, Liu X, Yin H, Zhou J, Deng Y (2017) The microbially-mediated soil organic carbon loss under degenerative succession in an alpine meadow. Mol Ecol 26:3676–3686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhu B, Gutknecht JL, Herman DJ, Keck DC, Firestone MK, Cheng W (2014) Rhizosphere priming effects on soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 76:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerong Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xinshuai Li
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Xiaoli Cheng
    • 1
  • Zhenhua Zhang
    • 4
  • Quanfa Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Center of Plant Ecology, Core Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Foping National Nature ReserveFoping ShaanxiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations