Harvesting forage of the perennial grain crop kernza (Thinopyrum intermedium) increases root biomass and soil nitrogen
Background and aims
Emerging perennial grain crops yield less grain than annual crops, but the economic viability of these perennial systems could be improved if both forage and grain are harvested. However, the belowground consequences of forage removal in perennial grain systems are unknown. This study aimed to determine the effect of the additional harvest of forage biomass on overall plant biomass allocation and labile soil C and N dynamics within a perennial grain dual-use system.
Plant biomass and associated soil samples of a perennial grain [Kernza (Thinopyrum intermedium)] were taken monthly over the first three growing seasons under three harvest regiments: No Cut (0x), Summer Cut (1x), and Summer and Fall Cut (2x).
The harvesting of forage biomass significantly increased both above- and belowground biomass. The once and twice forage-harvested treatments averaged 39% and 73% greater root biomass in 2016 and 39% and 49% greater root biomass in 2017 relative to the treatment not harvested for forage. Soil indicators of carbon and nitrogen storage were not affected by forage harvest but mineralizable carbon, an indicator of nutrient cycling, was greater under the forage harvested treatments.
The harvest of forage and grain promoted nutrient availability and overall productivity (forage, root and grain biomass) relative to harvesting for grain only. Our findings suggest dual-use management of Kernza can provide a productive and profitable pathway for perennial grain adoption.
KeywordsSoil health Perennial grain Root biomass Dual-use Forage harvest Permanganate oxidizable carbon Mineralizable carbon Soil protein
We would like to thank Stuti Sharma, Meredith Mann, Phoo Pye Zone, and Anthony Fulford for their assistance in the field and laboratory. We thank Lee DeHaan and the Land Institute for supplying Kernza seed and threshing grain for us. Support for this work was provided by the School of Environment and Natural Resources at The Ohio State University.
- Christiansen S, Svejcar T (1988) Grazing effects on shoot and root dynamics and above and below-ground non-structural carbohydrate in Caucasian bluestem. Grass Forage Sci 4:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1988.tb01878.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Culman SW, Freeman M, Snapp SS (2012) Procedure for the determination of permanganate oxidizable carbon. In: Kellogg Biological Station-Long Term Ecological Research Protocols. Hickory Corners, MIGoogle Scholar
- DeHaan LR, Wang S, Larson SR, Cattani DJ, Zhang X, Katarski T (2013) Current efforts to develop perennial wheat and domesticate Thinopyrum intermedium as a perennial grain. In: Perennial crops for food security. Proceedings of the FAO Expert Workshop, Rome, pp 72–89Google Scholar
- DuPont ST, Culman SW, Ferris H, Buckley DH, Glover JD (2010) No-tillage conversion of harvested perennial grassland to annual cropland reduces root biomass, decreases active carbon stocks, and impacts soil biota. Ag, Ecosyst Environ 137:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glover JD, Culman SW, DuPont ST, Broussard W, Young L, Mangan ME, Mai JG, Crews TE, DeHaan LR, Buckley DH, Ferris H, Turner RE, Reynolds HL, Wyse DL (2010) Harvested perennial grasslands provide ecological benchmarks for agricultural sustainability. Agric Ecosys Environ 137:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heal O, Anderson J, Swift M (1997) Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In: Cadisch G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 3–32Google Scholar
- Hurisso TT, Culman SW, Horwath WR, Wade J, Cass D, Beniston JW, Bowles TM, Grandy AS, Franzluebbers AJ, Schipanski ME, Lucas ST, Ugarte CM (2016) Comparison of permanganate-oxidizable carbon and mineralizable carbon for assessment of organic matter stabilization and mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 80:1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.04.0106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stanton NL (1988) The underground in grasslands. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19:573–589. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.003041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wagoner P (1990) Perennial grain: new use for intermediate wheatgrass. J Soil Water Conserv 45:81–82Google Scholar
- Wagoner P (1995) Intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium): development of a perennial grain crop. In: Williams JT (ed) Cereals and Pseudocereals. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 248–259Google Scholar
- Zhang X., Sallam A, Gao L, Kantarski T, Poland J, DeHaan LR, Wyse DL, Anderson JA (2016) Establishment and optimization of genomic selection to accelerate the domestication and improvement of intermediate wheatgrass. Plant Genome 9:1–18Google Scholar