Plant and Soil

, Volume 431, Issue 1–2, pp 37–52 | Cite as

Does sowing an oats catch crop reduce nitrate leaching from urine deposition following simulated winter forage grazing? - a growth chamber experiment

  • P. L. CareyEmail author
  • K. C. Cameron
  • H. J. Di
  • G. R. Edwards
Regular Article



Growing winter forages, such as brassicas and fodder beets, is a common feed strategy to build body condition for non-lactating cows, prior to calving, in the temperate regions of New Zealand. However, the large quantities of feed grown, ~14-20 tonnes ha-1, and resulting high stocking rates, means large volumes of urine are deposited during grazing, over relatively small areas, on cool, bare and often wet soils. These conditions create a high potential for large N leaching losses. Sowing a catch crop might be one way to mitigate this potential but most catch crops are sown in late-summer/autumn, not late winter/spring, so this study’s objectives were to examine the potential of a cold-tolerant cereal, oats, to establish and take up soil N over this period.


A study was undertaken using free-draining repacked soil cores in two climate-controlled growth chambers at 6° and 10°C, and at two lighting intensities, 5 and 10 MJ m-2, reflecting the mean soil temperature (0-100 mm) and light levels experienced in Canterbury, New Zealand, around late winter and mid spring, respectively. The cores all received an application of 15N-labelled urine (350 kg N ha-1) and two weeks later, oats were sown in half the soil cores, with the remainder left fallow.


Sowing oats at 6° and 10°C both proved highly effective in reducing nitrate leaching loss by around 33% and 75%, respectively, compared to fallow treatments. Soil temperature, however, was the chief driver of oats development, growing an order of magnitude more rapidly at 10°C and reducing nitrate leaching loss quickly through a combination of increased N uptake and reduced drainage. However, ammonia oxidising bacteria (AOB) abundance in 10°C fallow treatments increased more rapidly after urine application than at 6°C, meaning soil nitrate concentrations rose quickly, leaching twice as much nitrate as the 6°C fallow treatments after 90 days. Greater plant growth (10-times more) at 10°C than at 6°C, 75 days after sowing, was offset to some degree by greater N% and N content in the plant stems and roots at 6°C (2-4 times more). Higher light intensity increased evaporative water loss in both 6° and 10°C chambers, reducing drainage and nitrate leaching, and increasing the rate of oats development at 10°C.


The sowing of oats as a catch crop following simulated winter forage grazing conditions shows promise as an effective means to limit nitrate leaching. Further research, however, is needed to show that a catch crop can be sown successfully in most years at farm paddock scale across a range of soil conditions.


Soil nitrogen Crop development Solar radiation Fodder crop Avena sativa 



The authors wish to thank the Pastoral 21 consortium partners (DairyNZ, Fonterra, Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand, Beef + Lamb New Zealand and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) for funding this study. We also wish to thank Mr. Simon Kelly, Ms Jie Lei, Ms. Shelagh Bassett, Mrs. Jeneth Hendry, Mrs. Emily Huang, Mrs Carole Barlow and Mr. Barry Anderson for skilled technical assistance.


  1. Blakemore LC, Searle PL, Daly BK 1987. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Soils. NZ Soil Bureau Report no. 80. 103 p. Lower HuttGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks PD, Stark JM, McInteer BB, Preston T (1989) Diffusion method to prepare soil extracts for automated Nitrogen-15 analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53(6):1707–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabrera ML, Kissel DE (1989) Review and simplification of calculations in 15N tracer studies. Fertilizer Research 20(1):11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JL (2013) Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. Ann Appl Biol 162(2):145–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carey PL (2017) Effect of a catch crop to reduce nitrate leaching loss following simulated winter forage grazing. Unpublished thesis, Lincoln University, Christchurch, p 276Google Scholar
  6. Carey PL, Cameron KC, Di HJ, Edwards GR, Chapman DF (2016) Sowing a winter catch crop can reduce nitrate leaching losses from winter-applied urine under simulated forage grazing: a lysimeter study. Soil Use Manag 32(3):329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey PL, Cameron KC, Di HJ, Edwards GR (2017) Comparison of nitrate leaching from oats and Italian ryegrass catch crops following simulated winter forage grazing: a field lysimeter study. N Z J Agric Res 60(3):298–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicek H, Thiessen Martens JR, Bamford KC, Entz MH (2014) Effects of grazing two green manure crop types in organic farming systems: N supply and productivity of following grain crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cicek H, Martens JRT, Bamford KC, Entz MH (2015) Late-season catch crops reduce nitrate leaching risk after grazed green manures but release N slower than wheat demand. Agriculture. Ecosystems & Environment 202(Supplement C):31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clothier B, Scotter D, Kerr J (1977) Water retention in soil underlain by a coarse-textured layer: theory and a field application. Soil Sci 123(6):392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cookson WR, Cornforth IS, Rowarth JS (2002) Winter soil temperature (2–15 °C) effects on nitrogen transformations in clover green manure amended or unamended soils; a laboratory and field study. Soil Biol Biochem 34(10):1401–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di HJ, Cameron KC (2004) Effects of temperature and application rate of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), on nitrification rate and microbial biomass in a grazed pasture soil. Aust J Soil Res 42(8):927–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di HJ, Cameron KC, Shen JP, Winefield CS, O’Callaghan M, Bowatte S, He JZ (2009) Nitrification driven by bacteria and not archaea in nitrogen-rich grassland soils. Nat Geosci 2(9):621–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di HJ, Cameron KC, Shen J-P, Winefield CS, O'Callaghan M, Bowatte S, He J-Z (2010) Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea grow under contrasting soil nitrogen conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72(3):386–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Di HJ, Cameron KC, Podolyan A, Robinson A (2014) Effect of soil moisture status and a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide, on ammonia oxidizer and denitrifier growth and nitrous oxide emissions in a grassland soil. Soil Biol Biochem 73:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flowers TH, O'Callaghan JR (1983) Nitrification in soils incubated with pig slurry or ammonium sulphate. Soil Biol Biochem 15(3):337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Francis GS, Haynes RJ, Williams PH (1995) Effects of the timing of ploughing-in temporary leguminous pastures and two winter cover crops on nitrogen mineralization, nitrate leaching and spring wheat growth. J Agric Sci 124(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francis GS, Bartley KM, Tabley FJ (1998) The effect of winter cover crop management on nitrate leaching losses and crop growth. J Agric Sci 131(3):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser PM, Cameron KC, Sherlock RR (1994) Lysimeter study of the fate of nitrogen in animal urine returns to irrigated pasture. Eur J Soil Sci 45(4):439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gal C, Frenzel W, Moller J (2004) Re-examination of the cadmium reduction method and optimisation of conditions for the determination of nitrate by flow injection analysis. Microchim Acta 46:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hornek R, Pommerening-Röser A, Koops H-P, Farnleitner AH, Kreuzinger N, Kirschner A, Mach RL (2006) Primers containing universal bases reduce multiple amoA gene specific DGGE band patterns when analysing the diversity of beta-ammonia oxidizers in the environment. J Microbiol Methods 66(1):147–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hughes KA, Hall AJ, Gandar PW, Kerr JP, Withers NJ (1984) The prediction of cool-season forage oat yield using temperature and solar radiation data. Proceedings Agronomy Society of New Zealand 14:65–69Google Scholar
  23. Jenkinson BAB, Edwards GR, Bryant RH (2014) Grazing behaviour, dry matter intake and urination patterns of dairy cows offered kale or fodder beet in winter. In: Proceedings of the new Zealand Society of Animal Production. Napier 06/2014, vol 74, pp 23–28Google Scholar
  24. Laine P, Bigot J, Ourry A, Boucaud J (1994) Effects of low temperature on nitrate uptake, and xylem and phloem flows of nitrogen, in Secale cereale L. and Brassica napus L. New Phytol 127(4):675–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laurenson S, Houlbrooke DJ (2016) Identifying critical soil water thresholds to decrease cattle treading damage risk. N Z J Agric Res 59(4):444–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malcolm B, Teixeira E, Johnstone P, Maley S, de Ruiter J, Chakwizira E 2016. Catch crops after winter grazing for production and environmental benefits. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 46: 99–108Google Scholar
  27. Martini MY, McKenzie BA, Moot DJ, DJ HGD, de Ruiter JD (2009) Dry matter accumulation of oats sown at five different sowing dates 38th agronomy society conference. Agronomy Society of new Zealand. Lincoln. Can Underwrit 39:71–80 Google Scholar
  28. NIWA 2016. CliFlo: NIWA's National Climate Database on the web. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. Retrieved 4–4-2016.
  29. Noble PF (1972) The efficiency of pastures and forage crops in photosynthetic conversion of solar radiation in the Waikato District, New Zealand. N Z J Agric Res 15(4):676–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ravera BL, Bryant RH, Cameron KC, Di HJ, Edwards GR, Smith NP (2015) Use of a urine meter to detect variation in urination behaviour of dairy cows on winter crops. Proceedings of the new Zealand Society of Animal Production. New Zealand society of. Anim Prod 75:84–88Google Scholar
  31. Thorup-Kristensen K, Magid J, Jensen LS (2003) Catch crops and green manures as biological tools in nitrogen management in temperate zones. Adv Agron 79:227–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. VSN International Ltd. 2018. GenStat for Windows 18th Edition. VSN International. Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom.
  33. Zwer PK 2004. Oats. In: Wrigley C ed. Encyclopedia of grain science. Oxford, Elsevier. Pp. 365–375Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lincoln Agritech Ltd, Lincoln UniversityChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations