Over twenty years farmland reforestation decreases fungal diversity of soils, but stimulates the return of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities

  • Nan Hui
  • Xinxin Liu
  • Ari Jumpponen
  • Heikki Setälä
  • D. Johan Kotze
  • Liliya Biktasheva
  • Martin Romantschuk
Regular Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Background and Aims

Although soil-inhabiting fungi can affect tree health and biomass production in managed and pristine forests, little is known about the sensitivity of the plant-fungal associations to long-term changes in land use. We aimed to investigate how reforestation of farmlands change soil characteristics and affected the recovery of soil fungal functional guilds.

Methods

We examined edaphic conditions and fungal communities (Illumina Sequencing) in three land-use types: primary forests (PF), secondary forests (SF, established over two decades ago) and active farmlands during May, July and September in Wuying, China.

Results

Edaphic conditions and general fungal communities varied with land-use. Interestingly, overall fungal diversity was higher in soils at the farmland than at the forested sites, possibly as a result of recurring disturbances (tilling) allowing competitive release as described by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Although ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and richness were marginally higher in PF than in SF, the latter still hosted surprisingly diverse and abundant ectomycorrhizal fungal communities.

Conclusions

Reforestation largely restored fungal communities that were still in transition, as their composition in SF was distinct from that in PF. Our results highlight the ability of fungi grown in previously strongly managed agricultural land to rapidly respond to reforestation and thus provide support for forest trees.

Keywords

Fungal community development Reforestation Fungal functional guild Atrazine Ectomycorrhizal fungal community 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mr. Quanyou Zhang and Mr. Minghao Zhang for their help with field sampling. Prof. Changlin Hui provided information on land-use history in Wuying. Mr. Lars Paulin provided advice and services in DNA sequencing. We would also thank the section editor and the two reviewers for providing detailed comments that helped us improve this work immeasurably. The study was supported by Tekes (project number 2975/31/2015).

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3647_MOESM1_ESM.docx (56 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 55.5 kb)

References

  1. Abarenkov K, Henrik Nilsson R, Larsson KH, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Høiland K, Kjøller R, Larsson E, Pennanen T (2010) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi–recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol 186:281–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliasgharzad N, Mårtensson L-M, Olsson PA (2010) Acidification of a sandy grassland favours bacteria and disfavours fungal saprotrophs as estimated by fatty acid profiling. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1058–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balser T, Treseder K, Ekenler M (2005) Using lipid analysis and hyphal length to quantify AM and saprotrophic fungal abundance along a soil chronosequence. Soil Biol Biochem 37:601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boddy L, Büntgen U, Egli S, Gange AC, Heegaard E, Kirk PM, Mohammad A, Kauserud H (2014) Climate variation effects on fungal fruiting. Fungal Ecol 10:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown SP, Veach AM, Rigdon-Huss AR, Grond K, Lickteig SK, Lothamer K, Oliver AK, Jumpponen A (2015) Scraping the bottom of the barrel: are rare high throughput sequences artifacts? Fungal Ecol 13:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavagnaro T, Cunningham S, Fitzpatrick S (2016) Pastures to woodlands: changes in soil microbial communities and carbon following reforestation. Appl Soil Ecol 107:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang R, Fu B, Liu G, Liu S (2011) Soil carbon sequestration potential for “Grain for Green” project in Loess Plateau, China. Environ Manag 48:1158–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Emurotu M, Anyanwu C (2016) Effect of atrazine and butachlor on soil microflora in agricultural farm in Anyigba, Nigeria. Eur J Exp Biol 6:16–20Google Scholar
  12. Fierer N (2017) Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Francini G, Hui N, Jumpponen A, Kotze DJ, Romantschuk M, Allen JA, Setälä H (2018) Soil biota in boreal urban greenspace: Responses to plant type and age. Soil Biol Biochem 118:145–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu X, Yang F, Wang J, Di Y, Dai X, Zhang X, Wang H (2015) Understory vegetation leads to changes in soil acidity and in microbial communities 27years after reforestation. Sci Total Environ 502:280–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gagné A, Jany J-L, Bousquet J, Khasa DP (2006) Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of nursery-inoculated seedlings outplanted on clear-cut sites in northern Alberta. Can J For Res 36:1684–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris J (2009) Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers? Science 325:573–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatta R, Ito K, Hosaki Y, Tanaka T, Tanaka A, Yamamoto M, Akimitsu K, Tsuge T (2002) A conditionally dispensable chromosome controls host-specific pathogenicity in the fungal plant pathogen Alternaria alternata. Genetics 161:59–70PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Helgason T, Daniell T, Husband R, Fitter A, Young J (1998) Ploughing up the wood-wide web? Nature 394:431–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Higgins KL, Arnold AE, Miadlikowska J, Sarvate SD, Lutzoni F (2007) Phylogenetic relationships, host affinity, and geographic structure of boreal and arctic endophytes from three major plant lineages. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:543–555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.07.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang H, Zhang S, Wu N, Luo L, Christie P (2009) Influence of Glomus etunicatum/Zea mays mycorrhiza on atrazine degradation, soil phosphatase and dehydrogenase activities, and soil microbial community structure. Soil Biol Biochem 41:726–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hui N, Jumpponen A, Francini G, Kotze DJ, Liu X, Romantschuk M, Strommer R, Setala H (2017a) Soil microbial communities are shaped by vegetation type and park age in cities under cold climate. Environ Microbiol 19:1281–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13660 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hui N, Liu X, Kotze DJ, Jumpponen A, Francini G, Setälä H (2017b) Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in urban parks are similar to those in natural forests but shaped by vegetation and park age. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01797–e01717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jangid K, Williams MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Schmidt TM, Coleman DC, Whitman WB (2011) Land-use history has a stronger impact on soil microbial community composition than aboveground vegetation and soil properties. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2184–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones MD, Durall DM, Cairney JW (2003) Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging. New Phytol 157:399–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonsson LM, Nilsson MC, Wardle DA, Zackrisson O (2001) Context dependent effects of ectomycorrhizal species richness on tree seedling productivity. Oikos 93:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy N, Brodie E, Connolly J, Clipson N (2006) Seasonal influences on fungal community structure in unimproved and improved upland grassland soils. Can J Microbiol 52:689–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ketner-Oostra R, Van der Peijl M, Sýkora K (2006) Restoration of lichen diversity in grass-dominated vegetation of coastal dunes after wildfire. J Veg Sci 17:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khromonygina V, Saltykova A, Vasil'chenko L, Kozlov YP, Rabinovich M (2004) Degradation of the herbicide atrazine by the soil mycelial fungus INBI 2-26 (−), a producer of cellobiose dehydrogenase. Appl Biochem Microbiol 40:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koskinen K, Hultman J, Paulin L, Auvinen P, Kankaanpää H (2011) Spatially differing bacterial communities in water columns of the northern Baltic Sea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75(1):99–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kruger EL, Somasundaram L, Coats JR, Kanwar RS (1993) Persistence and degradation of [14C] atrazine and [14C] deisopropylatrazine as affected by soil depth and moisture conditions. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:1959–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laliberté E, Lambers H, Burgess TI, Wright SJ (2015) Phosphorus limitation, soil - borne pathogens and the coexistence of plant species in hyperdiverse forests and shrublands. New Phytol 206:507–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lei D, Shangguan Z-P, Rui L (2012) Effects of the grain-for-green program on soil erosion in China. Int J Sediment Res 27:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindahl BO, Taylor AF, Finlay RD (2002) Defining nutritional constraints on carbon cycling in boreal forests–towards a lessphytocentric'perspective. Plant Soil 242:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu X, Hui C, Bi L, Romantschuk M, Kontro M, Strömmer R, Hui N (2016) Bacterial community structure in atrazine treated reforested farmland in Wuying China. Appl Soil Ecol 98:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luo Z-B, Wu C, Zhang C, Li H, Lipka U, Polle A (2014) The role of ectomycorrhizas in heavy metal stress tolerance of host plants. Environ Exp Bot 108:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller J, Wollum A, Weber J (1997) Degradation of carbon-14-atrazine and carbon-14-metolachlor in soil from four depths. J Environ Qual 26:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Molina R, Horton TR (2015) Mycorrhiza Specificity: Its Role in the Development and Function of Common Mycelial Networks. In: Horton TR (ed) Mycorrhizal Networks. Springer Netherlands, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  38. Motiejūnaitė J, Adamonytė G, Iršėnaitė R, Juzėnas S, Kasparavičius J, Kutorga E, Markovskaja S (2014) Early fungal community succession following crown fire in Pinus mugo stands and surface fire in Pinus sylvestris stands. Eur J For Res 133:745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nguyen NH, Song Z, Bates ST, Branco S, Tedersoo L, Menke J, Schilling JS, Kennedy PG (2016) FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol 20:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nousiainen AO, Björklöf K, Sagarkar S, Mukherjee S, Purohit HJ, Kapley A, Jørgensen KS (2014) Atrazine degradation in boreal nonagricultural subsoil and tropical agricultural soil. J Soils Sediments 14:1179–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliver AK, Brown SP, Callaham MA, Jumpponen A (2015) Polymerase matters: non-proofreading enzymes inflate fungal community richness estimates by up to 15%. Fungal Ecol 15:86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oria-de-Rueda JA, Hernández-Rodríguez M, Martín-Pinto P, Pando V, Olaizola J (2010) Could artificial reforestations provide as much production and diversity of fungal species as natural forest stands in marginal Mediterranean areas? For Ecol Manag 260:171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prescott CE, Grayston SJ (2013) Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil: current knowledge and research needs. For Ecol Manag 309:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Santalahti M, Sun H, Jumpponen A, Pennanen T, Heinonsalo J (2016) Vertical and seasonal dynamics of fungal communities in boreal Scots pine forest soil. FEMS Microb Ecol 92: fiw170Google Scholar
  45. Schadt CW, Martin AP, Lipson DA, Schmidt SK (2003) Seasonal dynamics of previously unknown fungal lineages in tundra soils. Science 301:1359–1361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt DJE, Pouyat R, Szlavecz K, Setälä H, Kotze DJ, Yesilonis I, Cilliers S, Hornung E, Dombos M, Yarwood SA (2017) Urbanization erodes ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and may cause microbial communities to converge. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schnoor TK, Mårtensson L-M, Olsson PA (2011) Soil disturbance alters plant community composition and decreases mycorrhizal carbon allocation in a sandy grassland. Oecologia 167:809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Setälä HM, Francini G, Allen JA, Hui N, Jumpponen A, Kotze DJ (2016) Vegetation Type and Age Drive Changes in Soil Properties, Nitrogen, and Carbon Sequestration in Urban Parks under Cold Climate. Front Ecol Evol 4:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Song X, Peng C, Zhou G, Jiang H, Wang W (2014) Chinese Grain for Green Program led to highly increased soil organic carbon levels: A meta-analysis. Sci Rep 4:4460CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Strickland MS, Callaham MA Jr, Gardiner ES, Stanturf JA, Leff JW, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2017) Response of soil microbial community composition and function to a bottomland forest restoration intensity gradient. Appl Soil Ecol 119:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tedersoo L, Jairus T, Horton BM, Abarenkov K, Suvi T, Saar I, Kõljalg U (2008) Strong host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Tasmanian wet sclerophyll forest as revealed by DNA barcoding and taxon - specific primers. New Phytol 180:479–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tedersoo L, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Jairus T, Sadam A, Saar I, Bahram M, Bechem E, Chuyong G, Kõljalg U (2010) 454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases. New Phytol 188:291–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Twieg BD, Durall DM, Simard SW (2007) Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in mixed temperate forests. New Phytol 176:437–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Velmala SM, Rajala T, Heinonsalo J, Taylor AF, Pennanen T (2014) Profiling functions of ectomycorrhizal diversity and root structuring in seedlings of Norway spruce (Picea abies) with fast - and slow - growing phenotypes. New Phytol 201:610–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Verbruggen E, Röling WF, Gamper HA, Kowalchuk GA, Verhoef HA, van der Heijden MG (2010) Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils. New Phytol 186: 968–979Google Scholar
  57. Vonberg D, Hofmann D, Vanderborght J, Lelickens A, Köppchen S, Pütz T, Burauel P, Vereecken H (2014) Atrazine soil core residue analysis from an agricultural field 21 years after its ban. J Environ Qual 43:1450–1459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wedin M, Döring H, Gilenstam G (2004) Saprotrophy and lichenization as options for the same fungal species on different substrata: environmental plasticity and fungal lifestyles in the Stictis–Conotrema complex. New Phytol 164:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xiao L, Gb L, Jy Z, Xue S (2016) Long-term effects of vegetational restoration on soil microbial communities on the Loess Plateau of China. Restor Ecol 24:794–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yan Y, Tian J, Fan M, Zhang F, Li X, Christie P, Chen H, Lee J, Kuzyakov Y, Six J (2012) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in intensively managed arable soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 150:102–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Biological and Environment SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiLahtiFinland
  2. 2.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental SciencesKazan Federal UniversityKazanRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations