Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 425, Issue 1–2, pp 457–477 | Cite as

Measuring root system traits of wheat in 2D images to parameterize 3D root architecture models

  • Magdalena Landl
  • Andrea Schnepf
  • Jan Vanderborght
  • A. Glyn Bengough
  • Sara L. Bauke
  • Guillaume Lobet
  • Roland Bol
  • Harry Vereecken
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

The main difficulty in the use of 3D root architecture models is correct parameterization. We evaluated distributions of the root traits inter-branch distance, branching angle and axial root trajectories from contrasting experimental systems to improve model parameterization.

Methods

We analyzed 2D root images of different wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum) from three different sources using automatic root tracking. Model input parameters and common parameter patterns were identified from extracted root system coordinates. Simulation studies were used to (1) link observed axial root trajectories with model input parameters (2) evaluate errors due to the 2D (versus 3D) nature of image sources and (3) investigate the effect of model parameter distributions on root foraging performance.

Results

Distributions of inter-branch distances were approximated with lognormal functions. Branching angles showed mean values <90°. Gravitropism and tortuosity parameters were quantified in relation to downwards reorientation and segment angles of root axes. Root system projection in 2D increased the variance of branching angles. Root foraging performance was very sensitive to parameter distribution and variance.

Conclusions

2D image analysis can systematically and efficiently analyze root system architectures and parameterize 3D root architecture models. Effects of root system projection (2D from 3D) and deflection (at rhizotron face) on size and distribution of particular parameters are potentially significant.

Keywords

Axial root trajectories Branching angle Foraging performance Inter-branch distance Model parameterization Root system architecture 

Abbreviations

β

Root segment angle to the horizontal

∆β

Reorientation angle of an individual root segment

De

Diffusion coefficient of a solute in soil

ibd

Inter-branch distance

IRC

Inter-root competition

μ

Mean value

σ

Standard deviation of the random deflection angle (tortuosity)

sg

Sensitivity to gravitropism

std

Standard deviation

θ

Branching angle in the vertical plane

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding by German Research Foundation within the Research Unit DFG PAK 888 is gratefully acknowledged. The James Hutton Institute receives funding from the Scottish Government. We also thank Klaas Metselaar from the Department of Environmental Sciences at Wageningen University, Netherlands, for providing high-resolution scans of wheat root images from the Root Atlas and the authors of Atkinson et al. (2017) for publicly sharing their image datasets.

References

  1. Abadia-Fenoll F, Casero P, Lloret P, Vidal M (1986) Development of lateral primordia in decapitated adventitious roots of Allium cepa. Ann Bot 58:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson JA, Lobet G, Noll M, Meyer PE, Griffiths M, Wells DM (2017) Combining semi-automated image analysis techniques with machine learning algorithms to accelerate large scale genetic studies. GigaScience 6:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson JA, Wingen LU, Griffiths M, Pound MP, Gaju O, Foulkes MJ, Le Gouis J, Griffiths S, Bennett MJ, King J (2015) Phenotyping pipeline reveals major seedling root growth QTL in hexaploid wheat. J Exp Bot 66:2283–2292CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao Y, Aggarwal P, Robbins NE, Sturrock CJ, Thompson MC, Tan HQ, Tham C, Duan L, Rodriguez PL, Vernoux T, Mooney SJ, Bennett MJ, Dinneny JR (2014) Plant roots use a patterning mechanism to position lateral root branches toward available water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:9319–9324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow P, Adam J (1988) The position and growth of lateral roots on cultured root axes of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum (Solanaceae). Plant Syst Evol 158:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauke SL, Landl M, Koch M, Hofmann D, Nagel KA, Siebers N, Schnepf A, Amelung W (2017) Macropore effects on phosphorus acquisition by wheat roots – a rhizotron study. Plant Soil 416:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bingham IJ, Wu L (2011) Simulation of wheat growth using the 3D root architecture model SPACSYS: validation and sensitivity analysis. Eur J Agron 34:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouma TJ, Yanai RD, Elkin AD, Hartmond U, Flores-Alva DE, Eissenstat DM (2001) Estimating age-dependent costs and benefits of roots with contrasting life span: comparing apples and oranges. New Phytol 150:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark RT, MacCurdy RB, Jung JK, Shaff JE, McCouch SR, Aneshansley DJ, Kochian LV (2011) 3-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform. Plant Physiol 156:455–465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Clausnitzer V, Hopmans J (1994) Simultaneous modeling of transient three-dimensional root growth and soil water flow. Plant Soil 164:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delory BM, Baudson C, Brostaux Y, Lobet G, Du Jardin P, Pagès L, Delaplace P (2016) archiDART: an R package for the automated computation of plant root architectural traits. Plant Soil 398:351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diggle AJ (1988) ROOTMAP - a model in three-dimensional coordinates of the growth and structure of fibrous root systems. Plant Soil 105:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doussan C, Pierret A, Garrigues E, Pagès L (2006) Water uptake by plant roots: II-modelling of water transfer int he soil root-system with explicit accoutn of flow within the root system - comparison with experiments. Plant Soil 283:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Draye X (2002) Consequences of root growth kinetics and vascular structure on the distribution of lateral roots. Plant Cell Environ 25:1463–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunbabin V, Diggle AJ, Rengel Z, van Hugten R (2002) Modelling the interactions between water and nutrient uptake and root growth. Plant Soil 239:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunbabin VM, Postma JA, Schnepf A, Pagès L, Javaux M, Wu L, Leitner D, Chen YL, Rengel Z, Diggle AJ (2013) Modelling root–soil interactions using three–dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 372:93–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitter A, Stickland T, Harvey M, Wilson G (1991) Architectural analysis of plant root systems 1. Architectural correlates of exploitation efficiency. New Phytol 118:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forde BG (2009) Is it good noise? The role of developmental instability in the shaping of a root system. J Exp Bot 60:3989–4002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao S, Pan WL, Koenig RT (1998) Integrated root system age in relation to plant nutrient uptake activity. Agron J 90:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ge Z, Rubio G, Lynch JP (2000) The importance of root gravitropism for inter-root competition and phosphorus acquisition efficiency: results from a geometric simulation model. Plant Soil 218:159–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hargreaves CE, Gregory PJ, Bengough AG (2009) Measuring root traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare and ssp. spontaneum) seedlings using gel chambers, soil sacs and X-ray microtomography. Plant Soil 316:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ito K, Tanakamaru K, Morita S, Abe J, Inanaga S (2006) Lateral root development, including responses to soil drying, of maize (Zea Mays) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) seminal roots. Physiol Plant 127:260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Javaux M, Schröder T, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2008) Use of a three-dimensional detailed modeling approach for predicting root water uptake. Vadose Zone J 7:1079–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Judd LA, Jackson BE, Fonteno WC (2015) Advancements in root growth measurement technologies and observation capabilities for container-grown plants. Plants 4:369–392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuchenbuch R, Ingram K (2002) Image analysis for non-destructive and non-invasive quantification of root growth and soilw ater content in rhizotrons. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuijken RC, van Eeuwijk FA, Marcelis LF, Bouwmeester HJ (2015) Root phenotyping: from component trait in the lab to breeding. J Exp Bot 66:5389–5401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kutschera L (1960) Wurzelatlas mitteleuropäischer Ackerunkräuter und Kulturpflanzen. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, pp 124, 574Google Scholar
  28. Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E, Sobotik M (2009) Wurzelatlas der Kulturpflanzen gemäßigter Gebiete: mit Arten des Feldgemüsebaues. DLG-Verlag Frankfurt/Main, pp 222, 226–227Google Scholar
  29. Landl M, Huber K, Schnepf A, Vanderborght J, Javaux M, Bengough AG, Vereecken H (2017) A new model for root growth in soil with macropores. Plant Soil 415:99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Le Bot J, Serra V, Fabre J, Draye X, Adamowicz S, Pagès L (2010) DART: a software to analyse root system architecture and development from captured images. Plant Soil 326:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leitner D, Felderer B, Vontobel P, Schnepf A (2014) Recovering root system traits using image analysis exemplified by two-dimensional neutron radiography images of lupine. Plant Physiol 164:24–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Leitner D, Klepsch S, Bodner G, Schnepf A (2010) A dynamic root system growth model based on L-systems. Plant Soil 332:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liang J, Zhang J, Wong M (1996) Effects of air-filled soil porosity and aeration on the initiation and growth of secondary roots of maize (Zea Mays). Plant Soil 186:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lynch JP (2007) Roots of the second green revolution. Aust J Bot 55:493–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lynch JP, Nielsen KL, Davis RD, Jablokow AG (1997) SimRoot: modelling and visualization of root systems. Plant Soil 188:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mairhofer S, Zappala S, Tracy SR, Sturrock C, Bennett M, Mooney SJ, Pridmore T (2012) RooTrak: automated recovery of three-dimensional plant root architecture in soil from X-ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant Physiol 158:561–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mooney SJ, Pridmore TP, Helliwell J, Bennett MJ (2012) Developing X-ray computed tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil. Plant Soil 352:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagel K, Putz A, Gilmer F, Heinz K, Fischbach A, Pfeifer J, Faget M, Bloßfeld S, Ernst M, Dimaki C, Kastenholz B, Kleinert A, Galinski A, Scharr H, Fiorani F, Schurr U (2012) GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enablign simultaneous measruements of root and shoot growth for pkants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Funct Plant Biol 39:891–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nagel KA, Bonnett D, Furbank R, Walter A, Schurr U, Watt M (2015) Simultaneous effects of leaf irradiance and soil moisture on growth and root system architecture of novel wheat genotypes: implications for phenotyping. J Exp Bot 66:5441–5452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakamoto T (1994) Plagiogravitropism of maize roots. Plant Soil 165:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nye PH, Tinker PB (1977) Solute movement in the soil-root system. Univ of California Press, p 342Google Scholar
  42. Pagès L (2011) Links between root developmental traits and foraging performance. Plant Cell Environ 34:1749–1760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pagès L, Pellerin S (1994) Evaluation of parameters describing the root system architecture of field grown maize plants (Zea mays L.), II. Plant Soil 164:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pagès L, Picon-Cochard C (2014) Modelling the root system architecture of Poaceae. Can we simulate integrated traits from morphological parameters of growth and branching? New Phytol 204:149–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pagès L, Vercambre G, Drouet J-L, Lecompte F, Collet C, Le Bot J (2004) Root Typ: a generic model to depict and analyse the root system architecture. Plant Soil 258:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pellerin S, Pagès L (1994) Evaluation of parameters describing the root system architecture of field grown maize plants (Zea mays L.), I. Plant Soil 164:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pellerin S, Tabourel F (1995) Length of the apical unbranched zone of maize axile roots: its relationship to root elongation rate. Environ Exp Bot 35:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pohlmeier A, Javaux M, Vereecken H, Haber-Pohlmeier S (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging techniques for visualization of root growth and root water uptake processes. In: Anderson SH, Hopmans JW (eds) Soil–water–root processes: advances in tomography and imaging, pp 137–156. Publ, SSSA Spec, p 61Google Scholar
  49. Popova L, van Dusschoten D, Nagel KA, Fiorani F, Mazzolai B (2016) Plant root tortuosity: an indicator of root path formation in soil with different composition and density. Ann Bot 118:685–698CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Postma JA, Dathe A, Lynch JP (2014) The optimal lateral root branching density for maize depends on nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Plant Physiol 166:590–602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rascher U, Blossfeld S, Fiorani F, Jahnke S, Jansen M, Kuhn AJ, Matsubara S, Märtin LL, Merchant A, Metzner R (2011) Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean. Funct Plant Biol 38:968–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rich S, Watt M (2013) Soil conditions and cereal root system architecture: review and considerations for linking Darwin and Weaver. J Exp Bot 64:1193–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Roose T, Schnepf A (2008) Mathematical models of plant–soil interaction. Philos Trans R Soc A 366:4597–4611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schenk M, Barber S (1979) Phosphate uptake by corn as affected by soil characteristics and root morphology. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:880–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith S, De Smet I (2012) Root system architecture: insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:1441–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tardieu F, Pellerin S (1990) Trajectory of the nodal roots of maize in fields with low mechanical constraints. Plant Soil 124:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tracy SR, Black CR, Roberts JA, Sturrock C, Mairhofer S, Craigon J, Mooney SJ (2012) Quantifying the impact of soil compaction on root system architecture in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) by X-ray micro-computed tomography. Ann Bot 110:511–519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Tracy SR, Roberts JA, Black CR, McNeill A, Davidson R, Mooney SJ (2010) The X-factor: visualizing undisturbed root architecture in soils using X-ray computed tomography. J Exp Bot 61:311–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tricot F, Crozat Y, Pellerin S (1997) Root system growth and nodule establishment on pea (Pisum sativum L.) J Exp Bot 48:1935–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Volder A, Smart DR, Bloom AJ, Eissenstat DM (2005) Rapid decline in nitrate uptake and respiration with age in fine lateral roots of grape: implications for root efficiency and competitive effectiveness. New Phytol 165:493–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Weaver JE, Jean FC, Crist JW (1922) Development and activities of roots of crop plants: a study in crop ecology. Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications, paper 511Google Scholar
  62. Weaver JE, Kramer J, Reed M (1924) Development of root and shoot of winter wheat under field environment. Ecology 5:26–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wenzel WW, Wieshammer G, Fitz WJ, Puschenreiter M (2001) Novel rhizobox design to assess rhizosphere characteristics at high spatial resolution. Plant Soil 237:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu J, Pagès L, Wu Q, Yang B, Guo Y (2015) Three-dimensional architecture of axile roots of field-grown maize. Plant Soil 387:363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wu L, McGechan M, McRoberts N, Baddeley J, Watson C (2007) SPACSYS: integration of a 3D root architecture component to carbon, nitrogen and water cycling—model description. Ecol Model 200:343–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu L, McGechan M, Watson C, Baddeley J (2005) Developing existing plant root system architecture models to meet future agricultural challenges. Adv Agron 85:181–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yu P, Gutjahr C, Li C, Hochholdinger F (2016) Genetic control of lateral root formation in cereals. Trends Plant Sci 21:951–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3)JuelichGermany
  2. 2.The James Hutton InstituteDundeeUK
  3. 3.School of Science and EngineeringUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
  4. 4.Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) – Soil Science and Soil EcologyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations