Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities
The dynamics of phosphorus (P) in the environment is important for regulating nutrient cycles in natural and managed ecosystems and an integral part in assessing biological resilience against environmental change. Organic P (Po) compounds play key roles in biological and ecosystems function in the terrestrial environment being critical to cell function, growth and reproduction.
We asked a group of experts to consider the global issues associated with Po in the terrestrial environment, methodological strengths and weaknesses, benefits to be gained from understanding the Po cycle, and to set priorities for Po research.
We identified seven key opportunities for Po research including: the need for integrated, quality controlled and functionally based methodologies; assessment of stoichiometry with other elements in organic matter; understanding the dynamics of Po in natural and managed systems; the role of microorganisms in controlling Po cycles; the implications of nanoparticles in the environment and the need for better modelling and communication of the research. Each priority is discussed and a statement of intent for the Po research community is made that highlights there are key contributions to be made toward understanding biogeochemical cycles, dynamics and function of natural ecosystems and the management of agricultural systems.
KeywordsEcosystems services Method development Microbiome Modelling Organic phosphorus Stoichiometry
Oxygen-18 isotope ratio
- 16S rRNA
16S ribosomal Ribonucleic acid
Pho regulon transcription factors
Organic phosphorus compounds
The importance of phosphorus and organic phosphorus
The dynamics of phosphorus (P) in the terrestrial environment is critical for regulating nutrient cycling in both natural and managed ecosystems. Phosphorus compounds fundamentally contribute to life on earth: being essential to cellular organization as phospholipids, as chemical energy for metabolism in the form of ATP, genetic instructions for growth, development and cellular function as nucleic acids, and as intracellular signalling molecules (Butusov and Jernelöv 2013). Plant growth is limited by soil P availability, so turnover of organic phosphorus (Po) represents a source of P for ecosystem function and, critically, P supply affects crop production (Runge-Metzger 1995). Phosphorus deficiency constrains the accumulation and turnover of plant biomass and dictates community assemblages and biodiversity in a range of natural ecosystems (Attiwill and Adams 1993; McGill and Cole 1981).
There have been a number of important advances in our understanding of Po dynamics at the ecosystem and rhizosphere scale in the past decade, with particular advancement in understanding of plant-soil-microorganism interactions and concomitant advances in techniques used to assess these dynamics. It is now timely to start to consider how to integrate this information and extract further understanding of the dynamics of Po in the managed and natural environment and this will have a number of potentially important impacts on how we tackle some of the most pressing global issues of today. Here we summarise the state of the art of Po research and identify priorities for future research, which will help meet these goals.
Establishing priorities for organic phosphorus research
Synthesis of expert opinions on the global issues associated with organic phosphorus, how the research community can potentially contribute to solutions to such issues, and identification of opportunities for research to allow this to happen
What are the global issues associated with Po?
What are the methodological strengths and weaknesses?
What are benefits of understanding dynamics of Po?
What are the priorities for Po research?
Opportunities in Po research
Food Security and agricultural sustainability
Po has a role as a source of P for agricultural crops
Nutrient cycling in natural ecosystems
Po buffers ecosystem function with effects on ecosystem resilience and biodiversity
Use of wastes containing Po as fertilisers to close the loop
C storage in soils
Utilisation of soil Po may be counter to our need to store C in organic matter
Need to manage the balance of food security vs environmental P pollution
Warmer temperatures will shift the biogeochemical cycle of Po
Biogeochemical cycling from global to cellular scales
Po compounds are vital for cell function and are moved globally as part of biogeochemical cycles and in the food chain
Po as an alternative to mined P resources
Strong collection of well-developed methods
Wide range of techniques
Capacity for multi-disciplinarity
Strong international networks
Potential for commercialisation of techniques Range of field based applications Weaknesses
'Snap-shot' rather than dynamic techniques
Operational methodologies lack biological relevance
Lack of standardisation and quality control
Methodological limitations (matrix issues)
Loss of training/education in soil science
Lack of replication and appropriate statistical approaches
Limited access to advanced techniques for all
Management of plant P nutrition
Assessment of soil P availability
Understanding biological system function
Input into climate and biogeochemical models
Potential to close the P cycle
Manage ecosystem services and resilience
Understand the role of soil biology – fungal vs bacterial dominated systems
Assess stability of P forms in soil
Identify mechanisms from natural systems that can be applied in managed systems
Separate plant and microbial contributions to soil functions
Develop indicators for tipping points in ecosystem function – identify conditions of resistance, resilience and “points of no return”
Allow scaling up in time and space through input to models
Extend our understanding of global nutrient dynamics beyond what can be ascertained empirically
• Use existing datasets more effectively
• Avoid repeating experiments by being aware of past research
• Better access to shared facilities
• Training programmes in Po related techniques and concepts
• Interdisciplinary and long term research
General advances in the research model
• Link operationally-defined pools with biological processes
• Some standardisation of protocols
• Development of in situ, non-destructive techniques for Po
• Develop a minimum dataset and an accessible database
Opportunities in organic phosphorus analytical methodologies
• Link the Po cycle with other biogeochemical cycles
• Optimise stoichiometry between Po and other elements for system function
• Integrate soil physics, chemistry and biology to understand Po and how it fits with wider soil fertility
Opportunities from understanding stoichiometry – interactions with other element cycles
• Design tailored systems for specific managed environments that optimise use of Po
• Optimise Po utilisation over loss
• Improve soil P testing
• Develop a P credits system
• Utilise Po more effectively by using what’s in soil, what’s added to soil and what’s lost
Opportunities from understanding interactions with land management
• Understand which genes and transcripts control the microbial response to Po
• Understand microbial impacts on Po cycles
• Understand the P limits to plants and microbes
• Produce a molecular toolkit for studying microbial structure and function
Opportunities from understanding Microbial Po: Function and dynamics
• Understand Po interaction with natural and manmade nanoparticles
• Assess the utility of nanoparticles to help manage the system
Opportunities from interactions with nanoparticles
• Model P dynamics in the environment
• Develop conceptual models of cycling at a range of scales
• Build empirical models using existing data
• Produce a life cycle analysis of Po
Opportunities to use modelling of Po in soil and ecosystems
• Promote discussion of Po within the scientific community
• Better communication with stakeholders and the public on the importance of Po
• Develop a central platform for knowledge exchange
• Understand the needs and motivations of land managers and policy makers with respect to Po
• Emphasise educating the public in issues associated with Po
• Understand the socio-economic factors influencing Po dynamics
• Improve the translation of research in Po to impactful outcomes
Opportunities to better communicate and translate research
Opportunities in organic phosphorus analytical methodologies
The core analytical tools for the Po discipline are 31P NMR spectroscopy (Cade-Menun and Liu 2014; Cade-Menun 2005; Cade-Menun et al. 2005; Turner et al. 2005a, 2005b), which is used to identify Po compounds in several environmental matrices, along with more traditional soil extraction methods, such as those to measure total Po and the fractionation method developed by Hedley et al. (Condron and Newman 2011; Hedley et al. 1982; Negassa and Leinweber 2009). There is discussion and debate focused around the suitability of these analytical methodologies for characterizing Po in soil and terrestrial systems (Liu et al. 2014; Doolette and Smernik 2011) and this debate revolves around the identity of the broad base of the inositol hexaphosphate peak on NMR spectra, which some contest is resolved and other suggest is unidentified (Jarosch et al. 2015). Despite this, research into Po is still limited methodologically and many methods are operationally-defined. Importantly, there is a need to link the results from these methods to biological and biogeochemical processes in the environment. In the process of achieving this, there is debate over the benefits of (i) standardization or homogenization of analytical methods, versus the merits of (ii) promoting diversity of analytical procedures.
It is critical to develop non-destructive methods to analyse soil pools and their dynamics without the need for extraction. Some solid-state methods, such as solid-state NMR or P-XANES (X-ray Adsorptive Near Edge Structure) spectroscopy are limited by the naturally low concentrations of Po forms in soils (Liu et al. 2013, 2014, 2015). Visible Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (VNIRS) has shown some promise for determining total Po in soils (Abdi et al. 2016), but further testing is needed. Another priority for Po methodologies is the development of standard analytical quality controls through the use of standardized reference materials for cross-comparison and checks on analytical methods. These standardized reference materials will include reference soils and chemicals. There is a need for the community to identify standardized natural reference materials such as soils and manures, but a large amount of effort would be needed to put together a collection of appropriate materials as well as a means to share them internationally. Standardization of Po compounds could be achieved through the use of simple, relatively pure, and inexpensive Po compounds (e.g. Na-phytate, glucose 1-P) purchased from a single supplier operating in many countries with a guaranteed long-term production commitment. And there is a need to develop a commercial supply of other commonly identified Po compounds in soils, such as scyllo-inositol hexakisphosphate, to allow the use of appropriate substrates for research to fully understand the biological and chemical processes controlling the behaviour of this and other Po compounds in the environment. It is a priority for researchers to further develop methods, while also refining existing Po methods and standards, to generate useful and comparable datasets and to build a consensus with respect to Po dynamics and function in agricultural and natural ecosystems.
Opportunities from understanding stoichiometry – Interactions of organic phosphorus with other element cycles
Comparing element ratios of living organisms and their non-living environment has been at the centre of scientific debate for many years. In oceans, planktonic biomass is characterized by similar C:N:P ratios as marine water (106:16:1) (Redfield 1958). While similar characteristic element ratios also exist for terrestrial ecosystems with much greater heterogeneity across a range of spatial scales (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007). The comparison of C:N:P ratios in the microbial biomass of soils with that of soil organic matter (SOM) may therefore help to identify the nutrient status of the soil (Redfield 1958). Following this concept, the stoichiometric ratios of resources (e.g., SOM) over the microbial biomass has been calculated as a proxy for nutrient imbalances (Cleveland and Liptzin 2007). An understanding of stoichiometric ratios in soils and their relationship to those in crop plants and for the decomposition of litter and SOM will provide an important indicator of nutrient status in terrestrial ecosystems and better management of systems.
Until now, the large temporal and spatial heterogeneity of soil systems and the heterogeneous distribution of SOM constituents have made the analysis and interpretation of ecosystem stoichiometry a challenge because for microbial decomposers the elemental composition of micro-sites in soils might be more relevant than the overall element ratio of the soil. For example, by analysing the C:N:P ratio of bulk soils only, information on relevant and spatially-dependent processes may be lost (e.g., rhizosphere, soil horizons). The most obvious reason for soil-specificity and heterogeneity among stoichiometric ratios is that part of the SOM is separated from microorganisms and roots via physical and physicochemical barriers. By re-analysing the results of C:N:P:Sulphur (S) analyses of SOM obtained from 2000 globally distributed soil samples, Tipping et al. (2016) demonstrated that there is both nutrient-poor and nutrient-rich SOM, with the latter being strongly sorbed by soil minerals (Tipping et al. 2016). This may be explained by the incorporation of SOM into aggregates (Stewart and Tiessen 1987) or the adsorption of P-containing organic and inorganic molecules to mineral surfaces (Celi et al. 2003; Giaveno et al. 2010). Clay and metal (oxy)hydroxide minerals can sequester Po and Pi released by microbial- or plant-driven processes and/or affect enzyme activities, while limiting P biocycling (Celi and Barberis 2005). This highlights the need to understand the tight interrelationship between chemical, physical and biological processes and the potential for stoichiometric assessment as an indicator of P and organic matter availability in soils. Modern analytical techniques which enable to analyse the stoichiometry of the soil constituents at a high resolution might help provide this knowledge (Mueller et al. 2012).
There are many known mechanisms by which organisms can improve access to Po (Richardson et al. 2011), but there are several novel mechanisms being identified that target key components of SOM, such as polyphenols and tannins, to mobilise P (Kohlen et al. 2011). A priority will be to understand the plant and microbial mechanisms involved in the accumulation and mobilization of P from organic matter. It is important to attempt to determine the optimal stoichiometry between C:N:P, and understand the role Po plays in this, to allow sustainable management of P in arable soils and to identify anthropogenic nutrient imbalances in natural, agricultural and forest ecosystems (Frossard et al. 2015).
Opportunities from understanding interactions of organic phosphorus with land management
An ability to utilise Po to sustain agronomic productivity with declining conventional fertiliser inputs drives research into interactions among Po, land use and management (Nash et al. 2014; Stutter et al. 2012). The conditions to better utilise Po may bring benefits for other soil quality factors (e.g., SOM status and microbial cycling), but may require management of potentially adverse effects on wider biological cycles and water quality (Dodd and Sharpley 2015). Societal drivers for food and timber production underpin much of the research into Po speciation, biological turnover and integration with agronomic systems. Numerous studies have reported Po stocks and changes associated with management; fewer have studied the time-course of transformations and turnover with management change, linked with soil chemical and biological processes. The interactions between P speciation, (bio)availability and SOM are of prime importance since land management greatly affects SOM in space and time (in beneficial or detrimental ways) and exert strong geochemical and microbial controls on Po cycling.
The interactions of land cover, use and management are important for understanding the role of Po across ecosystems. In agricultural systems, the information on soil Po stocks is well represented and have been quantified by numerous studies in North America (Abdi et al. 2014; Cade-Menun et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2015; Schneider et al. 2016), Europe (Ahlgren et al. 2013; Annaheim et al. 2015; Keller et al. 2012; Stutter et al. 2015), China (Liu et al. 2013), South America (de Oliveira et al. 2015), and Australia (Adeloju et al. 2016). In forestry, such information is available in tropical (Zaia et al. 2012) and temperate systems (Slazak et al. 2010) and orchards (Cui et al. 2015). However, an important improvement will be to better understand the reasons as to why particular stocks exist under certain geoclimatic-land cover combinations. Key opportunities exist to understand Po dynamics for sustainable P use in tropical systems and for forests growing on marginal soils, both of which depend on effective management of Po resources.
It is known that both land cover and management factors (tillage, fertilizer type, application rate and timing) interact with abiotic factors in controlling Po stocks and cycling, such as SOM, stabilizing surfaces [e.g., Fe- and aluminium (Al)-oxides, calcium (Ca) forms, clays] and soil moisture, (Adeloju et al. 2016; Cade-Menun et al. 2015; Stutter et al. 2015). Chemical fractionation studies of Po stocks provide a snap-shot in time, missing temporal aspects of cycling associated with management-induced change at seasonal or to longer term management. As a result, short periods of rapid change in P speciation and turnover may not be appreciated. The utilization of ‘legacy P’ (Haygarth et al. 2014; Powers et al. 2016), following declining fertiliser inputs or altered cropping practices, has been studied following long-duration manipulations. Often these look at the end point of change (Cade-Menun et al. 2015), but have not ‘followed’ the dynamic. Although powerful methods for Po assessment are developing rapidly, studies that preceded these have the opportunity to incorporate them with archived samples or control soils (Keller et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2015). Long-term understanding of Po dynamics in management systems should be pursued, while short-term seasonal observations (for example Ebuele et al. 2016) will be needed to understand the influence of microbial dynamics on P speciation and turnover under various land-use and management scenarios. If studies of short-term peturbations (via management, climate etc) can show benefits for providing greater Po resources into available pools then these processes may be beneficially incorporated in future land management.
‘Organic’ farming brings a commercial stimulus to substitute agro-chemicals (including chemical P fertilisers) with sustainable management, such as use of organic amendments, for example enhancing soil P cycling with the aim of better utilizing P already present and moving towards a ‘closed’ system (Annaheim et al. 2015; Gaind and Singh 2016; Schneider et al. 2016). The same approaches can be applied to less intensive, or developing, agricultural systems. Canadian pastures managed under an organic regime, had a greater abundance of Po (65% vs 52% of total P) compared to conventional pastures and were able to maintain yield without inorganic fertilisers (Schneider et al. 2016). These authors concluded that plants were using Pi rather than Po and supported by other studies showing no indication that the greater microbial activity under organic farming caused utilization of stabilized Po forms (Keller et al. 2012). Therefore, the management conditions and actions required to promote better acquisition of Po pools remain elusive.
The consensus is that a key question remains: How long could the turnover of Po sustain crop yields under scenarios of reduced P inputs and maintained or increased outputs and thus contribute to agricultural production and feed supplies? The mechanistic understanding required to answer this question lies in the role of biota (in the context of their abiotic setting) in Po turnover and the potential pathways of Po loss to be managed (e.g. runoff). In order to progress, a systems approach is needed to fully assess the opportunities and role of Po, as well as the interactions of soil chemical, physical and biological processes and impacts of land use change that control P availability.
Opportunities from understanding microbial Po: Functional genes and metagenomics
As our abilities to analyse and interpret the complexity inherent in the soil microbiome improves, interest is burgeoning around the functional ecology of microorganisms. Organic P dynamics across ecosystems, along with development of many techniques that will aid in this understanding, are beginning to emerge. Scavenging of P from P-containing organic compounds by soil microbes is tightly controlled by intracellular P availability through the Pho pathway in yeast (Secco et al. 2012) and the Pho regulon in bacteria. In both cases, transcription of phosphatase and phytase, which act to release orthophosphate from phosphate esters, and high affinity transporters which transport Pi into the cell, are up-regulated under Pi limitation, affecting the organisms’ ability to utilise Po. The Pho regulon also acts as a major regulator of other cellular processes, including N assimilation and ammonium uptake (Santos-Beneit 2015). The C:N:P elemental ratios of the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis range between C53–125:N12–29:P1 under N- and P-limited culture conditions (Dauner et al. 2001), although environmental assemblages may exhibit greater stoichiometric flexibility (Godwin and Cotner 2015). Given this regulatory cross-talk, nutrient stoichiometry will be important to cellular and community metabolism meaning that the cycling of P must be considered within the context of other biogeochemical cycles, as highlighted earlier.
Soil type, nutrient inputs, and plant species have been shown to determine microbiota species composition and function (Alegria-Terrazas et al. 2016). However, plant root exudation drives recruitment of specific microbes and microbial consortia to the rhizosphere and may outweigh the impacts of soil and its management in shaping community composition and function (Tkacz et al. 2015). As yet, there is only limited understanding of how specific root exudates affect microbial recruitment (Neal et al. 2012), let alone specific microbiota responsible for phosphatase expression and production. A better understanding of interactions between plants and microbes would facilitate identification of functional redundancy among them, which could ultimately help manage the availability of P in soils and sediments by selection of the optimal plant rhizosphere compliment.
Alkaline phosphatase and phytase genes are distributed across a broad phylogenetic range and display a high degree of microdiversity (Jaspers and Overmann 2004; Lim et al. 2007; Zimmerman et al. 2013), where closely related organisms exhibit different metabolic activities. It is therefore not possible to determine community functional potential from 16S rRNA gene abundance – functional gene abundance information is required and this can be provided by employing sequencing techniques to assess the soil metagenome. In marine systems, there is evidence from metagenomic sequencing of environmental DNA that alkaline phosphatase genes phoD and phoX are more abundant than phoA (Luo et al. 2009; Sebastian and Ammerman 2009) and the β-propeller phytase is the most abundant phytase gene (Lim et al. 2007). The dominant alkaline phosphatase gene in terrestrial ecosystems is also phoD (Tan et al. 2013), which is more abundant in soils than other environments (Courty et al. 2010; Ragot et al. 2015; Fraser et al. 2017). From a functional standpoint, abundance of phoD-like sequences correlate well with estimates of potential alkaline phosphatase activity (Fraser et al. 2015), although this is not always the case (Ragot et al. 2015). Moreover, in soils there is little information regarding other phosphatases and little is known about the distribution and abundance of bacterial acid phosphatases, but there is some information related to phoX (Ragot et al. 2016). In contrast, fungi are well known for their capacity to secrete acid phosphatases (Plassard et al. 2011; Rosling et al. 2016), especially ectomycorrhizal fungi. Since only a small percentage of soil microorganisms are cultivable, research will need to rely upon culture-independent approaches to generate a thorough understanding of the abundance and diversity of genes associated with Po turnover. Environmental metagenomic sequencing can form the basis of an efficient molecular toolkit for studying microbial gene dynamics and processes relevant to Po mineralization (Neal et al. 2017). Such an approach will need to prioritize generating comprehensive understanding of the distribution of alkaline and acid phosphatase and phytase genes within soils, coupled with activity measurements, and an assessment of their relative sensitivities to edaphic factors. This will allow explicit incorporation of microbial Po turnover in the new generation of soil models, as well as allowing rapid assessment of a soil’s capabilities for Po cycling. Improved knowledge will allow the exploitation of microbial activity to sustain and improve soil fertility and allow the tailoring of new fertilizers based upon the capacity of microbes to exploit Po.
Opportunities from understanding microbial Po: Measuring stocks, mineralisation and dynamics of turnover
The apparently large diversity of genes associated with Po-hydrolysing enzymes suggests that changes in community composition are unlikely to result in a loss of ecosystem function. This confers resilience to P-cycling processes, although many of these genes have very specific functions intracellularly. However, trait differences are likely to have significant implications for community function in soils, e.g., the contrasting effects of arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal fungi upon the cycling of P in forest soils, where it has been shown that Po is more labile in ectomycorrhizal dominated systems than arbuscular mycorrhizal systems (Rosling et al. 2016). The fact that enzyme activity in soil appears to be disconnected from soil P status is at odds with the apparent influence of the Pho regulon or pathway upon gene expression and indicates that much of the observed activity derives from multiple enzyme sources, which have been stabilised by soil colloids (Nannipieri et al. 2011). This also suggests that soil enzyme activity does not directly represent microbial activity or simply reflects the complexity in current P requirements of different microbial species. However, visualization of acid and alkaline phosphatase activity associated with roots by zymography (Spohn and Kuzyakov 2013) does provide an exciting means to determine regulation of soil phosphatase activity with P availability and illustrates the clear spatial separation among the activities of physiologically different enzymes. It is a priority to develop and couple techniques that resolve the distribution of active enzymes in soil with estimates of gene expression derived from functional genes or meta-transcriptomic studies.
The stock of microbial P is an easy-to-determine component in soils, which is widely used to characterize the P status of microbial communities and ecosystems (Brookes et al. 1982, 1984). Nevertheless, its analysis relies on many different protocols (Bergkemper et al. 2016). Building on the previous work, further insights into both microbial-mediated and enzyme-mediated P transformations in soils may now be gained from measurement of the isotopic composition of oxygen associated with phosphate (δ18OP) (Tamburini et al. 2014; von Sperber et al. 2014) and the use of radiolabelled (32P or 33P) Po compounds to measure mineralisation and immobilisation rates directly (Harrison 1982). A powerful tool for quantifying soil P pools and transformation rates is the isotope dilution technique [reviewed in Bünemann 2015; Di et al. 2000; Frossard et al. 2011]. The decrease in radioactivity with time is caused by the exchange of the added radiolabelled P (either 32P or 33P) with 31P from the sorbed/solid phase and by the release of inorganic 31P from the organic pool via hydrolysing enzymes (Bünemann 2015). Determination of gross Po mineralization rates from Po to Pi remains a critical approach, helping understand the processes and rates of P cycling in different soils and under different environmental conditions (Frossard et al. 2011). These techniques present new opportunities to link P cycling to other biogeochemical cycles, such as C and N.
Opportunities in the emerging area of interactions between Po dynamics and nanoparticles
Reactive nanoparticles can take the form of natural soil colloids or man-made particles and are potential Po carriers, sources and sinks in ecosystems. Up to 90% of P in stream water and runoff is present in nano- and colloidal sized materials (Borda et al. 2011; Gottselig et al. 2014; Uusitalo et al. 2003; Withers et al. 2009). Colloidal P may comprise nano-sized aggregates (Jiang et al. 2015) bound to Fe, Al and SOM (Celi and Barberis 2005; Celi and Barberis 2007), including inositol phosphates. However, the influence of nanoparticles on the dynamics and bioavailability of P in soil-plant systems is unclear (Bol et al. 2016). Nanoparticles such as C-magnetite, which adsorb and retain Pi and Po, are used to enhance the recovery and recycling of P from P-rich wastes (Magnacca et al. 2014; Nisticò et al. 2016). It may also be possible to enhance soil enzyme activity with amendments containing mesoporous nanoparticle materials (Zhou and Hartmann 2012). Phytase encapsulated in nanoparticles was shown to be resistant to inhibitors and proteases and to promote the hydrolysis of phytate for P uptake by Medicago truncatula (Trouillefou et al. 2015). Nanotechnology has also been used to develop new fertilizers and plant-growth-enhancing materials (Liu and Lal 2015), representing one potentially effective option for enhancing global food production. A better understanding of the Po nanoparticle interaction may improve our understanding of P fluxes in natural and agricultural systems, and provide innovative technologies for fertilizer production and environmental remediation.
Opportunities to use modelling of Po in soil and ecosystems
Prediction of the relationship between soil Po and plant uptake, which should be developed in both conceptual and mechanistic models of P dynamics in the environment.
Application at different scales to determine the relationship between Po with land use and management should be possible by building empirical models based on existing data.
Application of modelling to help understand the role of microbial traits in soil (Wieder et al. 2015), which may determine the effects of gene expression, enzyme activities and the stoichiometric ratio of C:N:P in the microbial biomass relative to that of SOM
Application of complete Life-Cycle Analysis for relying of the run-down of soil Po as a replacement to inorganic fertilisers will help us develop adequate conceptual models for management of the system.
Modelling could also be used to help in the quantification of soil P pools for estimating flow among Po pools.
In general, there is a great opportunity for the development of modelling in all areas of Po research and this will be of considerable benefit to the subject if this can be developed and integrated with all areas. The cooperation of modellers and empiricists is essential for building models with great potential use to predict changes in Po bioavailability due to land-use and management change and to infer the sustainability of the system as a whole.
Opportunities to better communicate and translate research
Organic P represents a small, albeit critical component of biogeochemical research. The marginal nature of the subject to date creates a need to communicate the importance of this science for the future of P sustainability. As for other scientific disciplines, communication priorities include (1) strengthening communication among scientists within and outside of the Po research community; (2) engagement with stakeholders; and (3) dissemination of knowledge to the public and specific end-users.
Conferences and workshops on the topic of organic P promote the exchange of ideas and forging of new research partnerships (Sharpley et al. 2015; Turner et al. 2015). Online platforms are also powerful tools to connect researchers and stakeholders on issues of global P sustainability (e.g., European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform, www.phosphorusplatform.eu, North America Partnership for Phosphorus Sustainability) (Rosemarin and Ekane 2015). The ‘Soil Phosphorus Forum’ (www.soilpforum.com) provides a platform for the exchange of information relating to Po. Specific protocols and conference presentations are also featured in archived YouTube channels (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtGI3eUZscCgByewafsQKdw). A central platform for Po research and communications is still needed, to connect existing forums to global research networks and would include features such as researcher membership, methodological resources, links to relevant organizations and platforms, and a clearing house of Po data for future meta-analysis and modelling efforts.
Key stakeholder groups such as land managers, farmers and extension services are a natural link between industry, government, and academia (FAO 2016). These key groups hold traditional knowledge on sustainable farming techniques, which serve as a potential basis for future Po research. Industry initiatives such as the 4R Nutrient Stewardship framework provide feedback from end users and practitioners on research priorities associated with the management of agricultural nutrients (Vollmer-Sanders et al. 2016). The engagement of Po researchers with existing nutrient initiatives such as these will be critical for bolstering public understanding of Po and its important role in global P dynamics.
Conclusion - statement of intent for the Po research community
Organic P research has a critical role to play in tackling a number of important global challenges and there are key contributions to be made toward understanding biogeochemical cycles, dynamics and function of natural ecosystems and the management of agricultural systems. In particular, we must reduce our reliance on inorganic P fertilisers and strategies to do this will increase the relevance of soil Po for plant nutrition. Secondly, there is a need to develop a circular P economy and close the P cycle which will likely lead to an increase in the amounts of organic P “waste” products being recycled to land shifting the Po/Pi balance in the soil. To address these global environmental changes and challenges, we should concentrate our efforts on understanding the biological significance of Po by considering its interactions with other elements in SOM, soil microorganisms and active soil surfaces. We should consider these interactions with respect to changes in land use and management and as a function of geochemical conditions in the wider biophysical and socio-economic environment. We need to integrate this understanding through the production of models for Po, which capture both whole systems and fine-scale mechanisms. In addition, we need to develop novel and standardised methodologies that can integrate the dynamics and function of Po on appropriate scales in a non-invasive manner. To achieve a step-change in the impact of Po research, we need to engage with researchers outside of the discipline, align the research with pressing societal issues, and become more global, collaborative, inclusive, interdisciplinary, and longer-term in nature. The key to fostering this change will depend on logically communicating the importance of Po to society at large, engaging with stakeholders on important global issues, and ultimately pushing this important area of research up the agenda of policy makers and funding bodies on a global scale.
This work was performed with the financial support of the Organic Phosphorus Utilisation in Soils (OPUS) project, funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC – BBSRC - BB/K018167/1) in the UK and the Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government. Fraser and Tibbett acknowledge the support of BBSRC SARISA programme BB/L025671/2. We also acknowledge the contribution to the output of the OP2016 workshop of all the attendees of the meeting who chose not be named as an author on this paper. In particular, the authors would like to thank Barbara Cade-Menun and Ben Turner and acknowledge there contribution to drafts of this manuscript.
- Abdi D, Cade-Menun BJ, Ziadi N, Parent L-É (2014) Long-term impact of tillage practices and phosphorus fertilization on soil phosphorus forms as determined by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Environ Qual 43:1431–1441. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.10.0424 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alegria-Terrazas R, Giles CD, Paterson E, Robertson-Albertyn S, Cesco S, Mimmo T, Pii Y, Bulgarelli D (2016) Plant-microbiota interactions as a driver of the mineral turnover in the rhizosphere. Adv Appl Microbiol. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Annaheim KE, Doolette AL, Smernik RJ, Mayer J, Oberson A, Frossard E, Bünemann EK (2015) Long-term addition of organic fertilizers has little effect on soil organic phosphorus as characterized by 31P NMR spectroscopy and enzyme additions. Geoderma 257–258:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Attiwill PM, Adams MA (1993) Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytol 124:561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03847.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bergkemper F, Bünemann EK, Hauenstein S, Heuck C, Kandeler E, Krüger J, Marhan S, Mészáros É, Nassal D, Nassal P, Oelmann Y, Pistocchi C, Schloter M, Spohn M, Talkner U, Zederer DP, Schulz S (2016) An inter-laboratory comparison of gaseous and liquid fumigation based methods for measuring microbial phosphorus (Pmic) in forest soils with differing P stocks. J Microbiol Methods 128:66–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bol R, Julich D, Brödlin D, Siemens J, Kaiser K, Dippold MA, Spielvogel S, Zilla T, Mewes D, von Blanckenburg F, Puhlmann H, Holzmann S, Weiler M, Amelung W, Lang F, Kuzyakov Y, Feger K-H, Gottselig N, Klumpp E, Missong A, Winkelmann C, Uhlig D, Sohrt J, von Wilpert K, Wu B, Hagedorn F (2016) Dissolved and colloidal phosphorus fluxes in forest ecosystems—an almost blind spot in ecosystem research. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 179:425–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Butusov M, Jernelöv A (2013) Phosphorus in the organic life: cells, tissues, organisms. Phosphorus: An Element that could have been called Lucifer. Springer New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cade-Menun BJ, Turner B, Frossard E, Baldwin D (2005) Using phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to characterize organic phosphorus in environmental samples. Org Phosphorus Environ:21–44Google Scholar
- Celi L, Barberis E (2005) Abiotic stabilization of organic phosphorus in the environment. Org Phosphorus Environ CABI Pub pp 113–132Google Scholar
- Celi L, Barberis E (2007) Abiotic reactions of inositol phosphates in soils. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (eds) Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture and the environment. CAB International, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
- Celi L, De Luca G, Barberis E (2003) Effects of interaction of organic and inorganic P with ferrihydrite and kaolinite-iron oxide systems on iron release. Soil Sci 168:479–488Google Scholar
- Chardon WJ, Oenema O (1995) Leaching of dissolved organically bound phosphorus. DLO Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil FertilityGoogle Scholar
- Darch T, Blackwell MSA, Hawkins JMB, Haygarth PM, Chadwick D (2014) A meta-analysis of organic and inorganic phosphorus in organic fertilizers, soils, and water: implications for water quality. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:2172–2202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.790752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ebuele VO, Santoro A, Thoss V (2016) Phosphorus speciation by 31P NMR spectroscopy in bracken (Pteridium Aquilinum (L.) Kuhn) and bluebell (Hyacinthoides non-Scripta (L.) Chouard ex Rothm.) dominated semi-natural upland soil. Sci Tot Environ 566–567:1318–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (2016). Research and Extension http://www.fao.org/nr/research-extension-systems/res-home/en/. Date Accessed: 13 October 2016
- Frossard E, Achat DL, Bernasconi SM, Bünemann EK, Fardeau J-C, Jansa J, Morel C, Rabeharisoa L, Randriamanantsoa L, Sinaj S, Tamburini F, Oberson A (2011) The use of tracers to investigate phosphate cycling in soil–plant systems. In: Bünemann E, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action: biological processes in soil phosphorus cycling. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Gottselig N, Bol R, Nischwitz V, Vereecken H, Amelung W, Klumpp E (2014) Distribution of phosphorus-containing fine colloids and nanoparticles in stream water of a Forest catchment. Vadose Zone J 13. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2014.01.0005
- Haygarth PM, Jarvie HP, Powers SM, Sharpley AN, Elser JJ, Shen J, Peterson HM, Chan NI, Howden NJ, Burt T, Worrall F, Zhang F, Liu X (2014) Sustainable phosphorus management and the need for a long-term perspective: the legacy hypothesis. Environ Sci Technol 48:8417–8419. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502852s CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaspers E, Overmann J (2004) Ecological significance of microdiversity: identical 16S rRNA gene sequences can be found in bacteria with highly divergent genomes and ecophysiologies. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4831–4839. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.8.4831-4839.2004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Keller M, Oberson A, Annaheim KE, Tamburini F, Mäder P, Mayer J, Frossard E, Bünemann EK (2012) Phosphorus forms and enzymatic hydrolyzability of organic phosphorus in soils after 30 years of organic and conventional farming. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201100177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Liu Q, Bours R, Domagalska MA, Beguerie S, Verstappen F, Leyser O, Bouwmeester H, Ruyter-Spira C (2011) Strigolactones are transported through the xylem and play a key role in shoot architectural response to phosphate deficiency in nonarbuscular mycorrhizal host Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 155:974–987. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.164640 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang F, Bauhus J, Frossard E, George E, Kaiser K, Kaupenjohann M, Krüger J, Matzner E, Polle A, Prietzel J, Rennenberg H, Wellbrock N (2016) Phosphorus in forest ecosystems: new insights from an ecosystem nutrition perspective. J Plant Nutri Soil Sci 179:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201500541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Yang J, Cade-Menun BJ, Liang X, Hu Y, Liu CW, Zhao Y, Li L, Shi J (2013) Complementary phosphorus speciation in agricultural soils by sequential fractionation, solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance, and phosphorus K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy. J Environ Qual 42:1763–1770. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.04.0127 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Hu Y, Yang J, Abdi D, Cade-Menun BJ (2015) Investigation of soil legacy phosphorus transformation in long-term agricultural fields using sequential fractionation, P K-edge XANES and solution P NMR spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 49:168–176. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504420n CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo H, Benner R, Long RA, Hu J (2009) Subcellular localization of marine bacterial alkaline phosphatases. PNAS 106:21249–21223Google Scholar
- Magnacca G, Allera A, Montoneri E, Celi L, Benito DE, Gagliardi LG, Gonzalez MC, Mártire DO, Carlos L (2014) Novel magnetite nanoparticles coated with waste-sourced biobased substances as sustainable and renewable adsorbing materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1518–1524. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500213j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nannipieri P, Giagnoni L, Landi L, Renella G (2011) Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil. In: Bünemann E, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action: biological processes in soil phosphorus cycling. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Neal AL, Rossman M, Brearley C, Akkari E, Guyomar C, Clark IM, Allen E (2017) Hirsch PR (2017) land-use influences phosphatase gene microdiversity. Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13778
- Nisticò R, Evon P, Labonne L, Vaca-Medina G, Montoneri E, Francavilla M, Vaca-Garcia C, Magnacca G, Franzoso F, Negre M (2016) Extruded poly(ethylene–co–vinyl alcohol) composite films containing biopolymers isolated from municipal biowaste. Chem Select 1:2354–2365. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201600335 Google Scholar
- Powers SM, Bruulsema TW, Burt TP, Chan NI, Elser JJ, Haygarth PM, Howden NJK, Jarvie HP, Lyu Y, Peterson HM, Sharpley AN, Shen J, Worrall F, Zhang F (2016) Long-term accumulation and transport of anthropogenic phosphorus in three river basins. Nat Geosci 9:353–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ragot SA, Kertesz MA, Mészáros É, Frossard E, Bünemann EK. (2016) Soil phoD and phoX alkaline phosphatase gene diversity responds to multiple environmental factors. FEMS microbiology ecology. 93:fiw212Google Scholar
- Redfield AC (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:230A–2221Google Scholar
- Richardson AE, Lynch JP, Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Smith FA, Smith SE, Harvey PR, Ryan MH, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Oberson A, Culvenor RA, Simpson RJ (2011) Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture. Plant Soil 349:121–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0950-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosemarin A, Ekane N (2015) The governance gap surrounding phosphorus. Nutri Cycl Agroecosys:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9747-9
- Runge-Metzger A (1995) Closing the cycle: obstacles to efficient P management for improved global food security. Scope-Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment International Council of Scientific Unions 54: 27–42Google Scholar
- Santos-Beneit F (2015) The pho regulon: a huge regulatory network in bacteria. Front Microbiol 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00402
- Sharpley AN, Bergström L, Aronsson H, Bechmann M, Bolster CH, Börling K, Djodjic F, Jarvie HP, Schoumans OF, Stamm C, Tonderski KS, Ulén B, Uusitalo R, Withers PJA (2015) Future agriculture with minimized phosphorus losses to waters: research needs and direction. Ambio 44:163–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0612-x CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Spohn M, Kuzyakov Y (2013) Distribution of microbial- and root-derived phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere depending on P availability and C allocation – coupling soil zymography with 14C imaging. Soil Biol Biochem 67:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stutter MI, Shand CA, George TS, Blackwell MSA, Dixon L, Bol R, MacKay RL, Richardson AE, Condron LM, Haygarth PM (2015) Land use and soil factors affecting accumulation of phosphorus species in temperate soils. Geoderma 257–258:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tan H, Barret M, Mooij MJ, Rice O, Morrissey JP, Dobson A, Griffiths B, O’Gara F (2013) Long-term phosphorus fertilisation increased the diversity of the total bacterial community and the phoD phosphorus mineraliser group in pasture soils. Biol Fertil Soils 49:661–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0755-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turner BL, Frossard E, Baldwin DS, editors. (2005b) Organic phosphorus in the environment. CABI Pub.pp 377–380Google Scholar
- Vollmer-Sanders C, Allman A, Busdeker D, Moody LB, Stanley WG (2016) Building partnerships to scale up conservation: 4R nutrient stewardship certification program in the Lake Erie watershed. J Great Lakes Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.09.004
- Zaia FC, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Gama-Rodrigues EF, Moço MKS, Fontes AG, Machado RCR, Baligar VC (2012) Carbon, nitrogen, organic phosphorus, microbial biomass and N mineralization in soils under cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Agroforest Sys 86:197–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9550-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar