Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 420, Issue 1–2, pp 37–48 | Cite as

Taxonomic and ecological patterns in root traits of Carex (Cyperaceae)

  • Maxim A. Konoplenko
  • Sabine Güsewell
  • Denis V. Veselkin
Regular article

Abstract

Background and aims

Plants can develop various root traits which may contribute to their nutrient acquisition. We investigated the occurrence of five root traits among species of genus Carex to determine their frequency, mutual associations and dependence on taxonomy (subgenus) or habitat.

Methods

Root samples of 40 species were collected in their natural habitats within Russia and Belarus. They were examined microscopically to quantify the abundance of AM-fungal hyphae (H), arbuscules (A) and vesicles (V), dark septate endophyte (DSE), typical (long) root hairs (TRH), bulbous (shortened) root hairs (BRH) and dauciform roots (DR).

Results

The frequency of root traits decreased in the order TRH (100% of the species), DSE (80%), BRH (43%), A and V (25%) and DR (23%). Most species possessed 2–4 different traits, but up to five were possible, even on a single plant. Traits occurred largely independently of each other. DR were only found in subgenus Carex and mainly in grasslands. DSE and BRH were more abundant in subgenus Carex. BRH were most abundant in wetlands, TRH were shortest and thinnest in grasslands.

Conclusions

A diversity of root traits exists in the genus Carex, with variation both among and within species. The abundance and size of traits exhibits some taxonomic and ecological patterns, which differ for each trait.

Keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhiza Dark septate endophytes Dauciform roots Root hairs Carex 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to A.A. Betekhtina for advice; to N.V. Zolotareva for providing some samples; and to N.B. Kuyantseva for organizing the fieldwork. They also thank Hans Lambers and two referees for constructive comments on a first version of the manuscript. The work was supported by Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation, contract № 02.A03.21.0006; by the Ural Federal University (a grant for the young scientists, а graduate students and students, contract no. 1.2.2.2-14/99 on March 31, 2014) and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16–54–00105).

Supplementary material

11104_2017_3292_MOESM1_ESM.doc (312 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 312 kb)

References

  1. Afonin AN, Greene SL, Dzyubenko NI, Frolov AN (eds.) (2008) Interactive Agricultural Ecological Atlas of Russia and Neighboring Countries. Economic Plants and their Diseases, Pests and Weeds [Online]. Available at: http://www.agroatlas.ru
  2. Barrow JR, Osuna P (2002) Phosphorus solubilization and uptake by dark septate fungi in fourwing saltbush, Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. J Arid Environ 51:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates TR, Lynch JP (2001) Root hairs confer a competitive advantage under low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 236:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berntson GM (1997) Topological scaling and plant root system architecture: developmental and functional hierarchies. New Phytol 135:621–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brundrett МC (2009) Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil 320:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies J, Briarty LG, Rieley JO (1973) Observations on the swollen lateral roots of the Cyperaceae. New Phytol 72:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delaux P-M, Varala K, Edger PP, Coruzzi GM, Pires JC, Ané J-M (2014) Comparative phylogenomics uncovers the impact of symbiotic associations on host genome evolution. PLoS Genet 10:e1004487CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Della Monica IF, Saparrat MCN, Godeas AM, Scervino JM (2015) The co-existence between DSE and AMF symbionts affects plant P pools through P mineralization and solubilization processes. Fungal Ecol 17:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards KA, Jefferies RL (2010) Nitrogen uptake by Carex aquatilis during the winter–spring transition in a low Arctic wet meadow. J Ecol 98:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egorova TV (1999) The sedges (Carex L.) of Russia and adjacent states (within the limits of the former URSS). Takhtajan AL (ed). St. Petersburg Chemical-Pharmaceutical Academy, St-Petersburg; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Saint-LouisGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao Q, Yang ZL (2016) Diversity and distribution patterns of root-associated fungi on herbaceous plants in alpine meadows of southwestern China. Mycologia 108:281–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghosh A, Bhujel S, Maiti GG (2014) Occurrence of mycorrhizae in some species of Carex (Cyperaceae) of the Darjeeling Himalayas, India. International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research 4:1–10Google Scholar
  13. Global Carex Group (2015) Making Carex monophyletic (Cyperaceae, tribe Cariceae): a new broader circumscription. Bot J Linn Soc 179:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Güsewell S (2005a) High nitrogen: phosphorus ratios reduce nutrient retention and second year growth of wetland sedges. New Phytol 166:537–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Güsewell S (2005b) Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency of wetland graminoids with contrasting N:P ratios. Funct Ecol 19:344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Güsewell S (2017) Regulation of dauciform root formation and root phosphatase activities of sedges (Carex) by nitrogen and phosphorus. Plant Soil, in press.Google Scholar
  17. Güsewell S, Koerselman W (2002) Variation in nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of wetland plants. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 5:37–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Güsewell S, Schroth MH (2017) How functional is a trait? Phosphorus mobilisation through root exudates differs little between Carex species with and without specialised dauciform roots. New Phytol, accepted pending revisionsGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrington TJ, Mitchell DT (2002) Colonization of root systems of Carex flacca and C. pilulifera by Cortinarius (Dermocybe) cinnamomeus. Mycol res 106:452–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haselwandter K, Read DJ (1982) The significance of a root-fungus association in two Carex species of high-alpine plant communities. Oecologia 53:352–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lagrange A, L’Huillier L, Amir H (2013) Mycorrhizal status of Cyperaceae from new Caledonian ultramafic soils: effects of phosphorus availability on arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of Costularia comosa under field conditions. Mycorrhiza 23:655–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Laliberté E, Lambers H, Burgess TI, Wright SJ (2015) Phosphorus limitation, soil-borne pathogens and the coexistence of plant species in hyperdiverse forests and shrublands. New Phytol 206:507–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambers H, Shane MW (2007) Role of root clusters in phosphorus acquisition and increasing biological diversity in agriculture. In: scale and complexity in plant systems research: Gene-Plant-crop relations. Spiertz JHJ, Struik PC and van Laar HH (eds). Springer, pp 237–250.Google Scholar
  24. Lambers H, Raven JA, Shaver GR, Smith SE (2008) Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol Evol 23:95–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lambers H, Brundrett MC, Raven JA, Hopper SD (2011) Plant mineral nutrition in ancient landscapes: high plant species diversity on infertile soils is linked to functional diversity for nutritional strategies. Plant Soil 334:11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lambers H, Clements JC, Nelson MN (2013) How a phosphorus-acquisition strategy based on carboxylate exudation powers the success and agronomic potential of lupines (Lupinus, Fabaceae). Am J bot 100:263–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamont BB (1993) Why are hairy root clusters so abundant in the most nutrient-impoverished soils of Australia? Plant Soil 155(156):269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lipson DA, Schadt CW, Schmidt SK, Monson RK (1999) Ectomycorrhizal transfer of amino acid-nitrogen to the alpine sedge Kobresia myosuroides. New Phytol 142:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Massicotte HB, Melville LH, Peterson RL, Luoma DL (1998) Anatomical aspects of field ectomycorrhizas on Polygonum viviparum (Polygonaceae) and Kobresia bellardii (Cyperaceae). Mycorrhiza 7:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meney KA, Dixon KW, Scheltema M, Pate JS (1993) Occurrence of vesicular mycorrhizal fungi in dryland species of Restionaceae and Cyperaceae from south-west Western Australia. Aust J bot 41:733–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller RM (2005) The nonmycorrhizal root – a strategy for survival in nutrient-impoverished soils. New Phytol 165:655–658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller RM, Smith CI, Jastrow JD, Bever JD (1999) Mycorrhizal status of the genus Carex (Cyperaceae). Am J bot 86:547–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K (2000) Arbuscular mycorrhizas of plants growing in the Western Ghats region, southern India. Mycorrhiza 9:297–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K, Vasantha K, Kleiner D, Manian S (1999) Mycorrhizae in sedges as related to root character and its ecological significance. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 22:9–17Google Scholar
  35. Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K, Shanmughavel P (2004) Mycorrhiza in sedges – an overview. Mycorrhiza 14:65–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nobis A, Błaszkowski J, Zubek S (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associations of vascular plants confined to river valleys: towards understanding the river corridor plant distribution. J Plant res 128:127–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Playsted CWS, Johnston ME, Ramage CM, Edwards DG, Cawthray GR, Lambers H (2006) Functional significance of dauciform roots: exudation of carboxylates and acid phosphatase under phosphorus deficiency in Caustis blakei (Cyperaceae). New Phytol 170:491–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Qin S, Wang H-B, Chen H-H, Zhang Y-Q, Jiang C-L, Xu L-H, Li W-J (2008) Glycomyces endophyticus sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the root of Carex baccans Nees. Int J Syst Evol Micr 58:2525–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Read DJ, Koucheki HK, Hodgson J (1976) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation system. New Phytol 77:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruotsalainen AL, Väre H, Vestberg M (2002) Seasonality of root fungal colonization in low alpine herbs. Mycorrhiza 12:29–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shane MW, Lambers H (2005) Cluster roots: a curiosity in context. Plant Soil 274:101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shane MW, Dixon KW, Lambers H (2005) The occurrence of dauciform roots amongst Western Australian reeds, rushes and sedges, and the impact of phosphorus supply on dauciform-root development in Schoenus unispiculatus (Cyperaceae). New Phytol 165:887–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shane MW, Cawthray GR, Cramer MD, Kuo J, Lambers H (2006) Specialized ‘dauciform’ roots of Cyperaceae are structurally distinct, but functionally analogous with ‘cluster’ roots. Plant Cell Environ 29:1989–1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sieber TN, Grünig CR (2013) Fungal root endophytes. In: plant roots – the hidden half, 4th ed. Eshel A, Beeckman T (eds). CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 38-1–38-49Google Scholar
  45. Song GC, Yasir M, Bibi F, Chung EJ, Jeon CO, Chung YR (2011) Nocardioides caricicola sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from a halophyte, Carex scabrifolia Steud. Int J Syst Evol Micr 61:105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spalink D, Drew MT, Pace MC, Zaborsky JG, Starr JR, Cameron KM, Givnish TJ, Systma KJ (2016) Biogeography of the cosmopolitan sedges (Cyperaceae) and the area-richness correlation in plants. J Biogeogr 43:1893–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uma E, Muthukumar T, Sathiyadash K, Muniappan V (2010) Mycorrhizal and dark septate fungal associations in gingers and spiral gingers. Botany 88:500–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan D (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol 157:423–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Veselkin DV, Konoplenko MA, Betekhtina AA (2014a) The ability to form mycorrhiza in the genus Carex L. (Cyperaceae): the published data analysis. Plant Life of Asian Russia 16:26–35Google Scholar
  50. Veselkin DV, Konoplenko MA, Betekhtina AA (2014b) Means for soil nutrient uptake in sedges with different ecological strategies. Russ J Ecol 45:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Visser EJW, Bögemann GM, van de Steeg HM, Pierik R, Blom CWPM (2000) Flooding tolerance of Carex species in relation to field distribution and aerenchyma formation. New Phytol 148:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang B, Qiu Y-L (2006) Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16:299–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Weishampel PA, Bedford BL (2006) Wetland dicots and monocots differ in colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes. Mycorrhiza 16:495–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zemunik G, Turner BL, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2015) Diversity of plant nutrient-acquisition strategies increases during long-term ecosystem development. Nat Plants 1:1–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maxim A. Konoplenko
    • 1
  • Sabine Güsewell
    • 2
  • Denis V. Veselkin
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Ecology, Department of Biological ScienceUral Federal University named after the first president B.N. YeltsinEkaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Laboratory of plant and fungal biodiversityInstitute of plant and animal ecology of Ural branch of Russian academy of scienceEkaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations