Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 418, Issue 1–2, pp 241–253 | Cite as

Responses of litter decomposition and nutrient release rate to water and nitrogen addition differed among three plant species dominated in a semi-arid grassland

  • Xue Wang
  • Zhuwen Xu
  • Xiaotao Lü
  • Ruzhen Wang
  • Jiangping Cai
  • Shan Yang
  • Mai-He LiEmail author
  • Yong JiangEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Precipitation and nitrogen (N) deposition are predicted to increase in northern China. The present paper aimed to better understand how different dominant species in semi-arid grasslands in this region vary in their litter decomposition and nutrient release responses to increases in precipitation and N deposition.

Methods

Above-ground litter of three dominant species (two grasses, Agropyron cristatum and Stipa krylovii, and one forb, Artemisia frigida) was collected from areas without experimental treatments in a semi-arid grassland in Inner Mongolia. Litter decomposition was studied over three years to determine the effects of water and N addition on litter decomposition rate and nutrient dynamics.

Results

Litter mass loss and nutrient release were faster for the forb species than for the two grasses during decomposition. Both water and N addition increased litter mass loss of the grass A. cristatum, while the treatments showed no impacts on that of the forb A. frigida. Supplemental N had time-dependent, positive effects on litter mass loss of the grass S. krylovii. During the three-year decomposition study, the release of N from litter was inhibited by N addition for the three species, and it was promoted by water addition for the two grasses. Across all treatments, N and potassium (K) were released from the litter of all three species, whereas calcium (Ca) was accumulated. Phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) were released from the forb litter but accumulated in the grass litter after three years of decomposition.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that the litter decomposition response to water and N supplementation differed among dominant plant species in a semi-arid grassland, indicating that changes in dominant plant species induced by projected increases in precipitation and N deposition are likely to affect litter decomposition, nutrient cycling, and further biogeochemical cycles in this grassland. The asynchronous nutrient release of different species’ litter found in the present study highlights the complexity of nutrient replenishment from litter decomposition in the temperate steppe under scenarios of enhancing precipitation and N deposition.

Keywords

Litter mass loss Nitrogen deposition Nutrient release Precipitation Perennial forbs Perennial grasses Temperate steppe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Duolun Restoration Ecological Research Station for facilitating this study, and Melissa Dawes for the language correction. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0500707), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371251, 31370009, 41371076), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2014174), and the Sino-Swiss Science and Technology Cooperation (SSSTC) program (Project No. EG 06-032015).

Supplementary material

11104_2017_3288_MOESM1_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 47 kb)

References

  1. Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y, Wu J, Clark CM, Naeem S, Pan Q, Huang J, Zhang L, Han X (2010) Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: evidence from inner Mongolia grasslands. Glob Change Biol 16:358–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker TT, Lockaby BG, Conner WH, Meier CE, Stanturf JA, Burke MK (2001) Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1334–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg B, Laskowski R (2006) Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg B, Matzner E (1997) Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ Rev 5:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloor JMG, Bardgett RD (2012) Stability of above-ground and below-ground processes to extreme drought in model grassland ecosystems: interactions with plant species diversity and soil nitrogen availability. Perspect Plant Ecol 14:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, Bustamante M, Cinderby S, Davidson E, Dentener F (2010) Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 20:30–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke IC, Lauenroth WK, Parton WJ (1997) Regional and temporal variation in net primary production and nitrogen mineralization in grasslands. Ecology 78:1330–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpita NC (1996) Structure and biogenesis of the cell walls of grasses. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:445–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carreiro M, Sinsabaugh R, Repert D, Parkhurst D (2000) Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen deposition. Ecology 81:2359–2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin FS, Vitousek PM, Van Cleve K (1986) The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. Am Nat 127:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright IJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, van Bodegom P, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Díaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J, Reich PB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaieretti MV, Westoby M (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fay PA, Prober SM, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Bakker JD, Borer ET, Lind EM, MacDougall AS, Seabloom EW, Wragg PD, Adler PB, Blumenthal DM, Buckley Y, Chu C, Cleland EE, Collins SL, Davies KF, Du G, Feng X, Firn J, Gruner DS, Hagenah N, Hautier Y, Heckman RW, Jin VL, Kirkman KP, Klein J, Ladwig LM, Li Q, McCulley RL, Melbourne BA, Mitchell CE, Moore JL, Morgan JW, Risch AC, Schuetz M, Stevens CJ, Wedin DA, Yang LH (2015) Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients. Nat Plants 1:15080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng L, Zhou TJ, Wu B, Li T, Luo JJ (2011) Projection of future precipitation change over China with a high-resolution global atmospheric model. Adv Atmos Sci 28:464–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fornara DA, Banin L, Crawley MJ (2013) Multi-nutrient vs. nitrogen-only effects on carbon sequestration in grassland soils. Glob Change Biol 19:3848–3857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao X, Shi Y, Song R, Giorgi F, Wang Y, Zhang D (2008) Reduction of future monsoon precipitation over China: comparison between a high resolution RCM simulation and the driving GCM. Meteorog Atmos Phys 100:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. García-Palacios P, McKie BG, Handa IT, Frainer A, Hättenschwiler S, Jones H (2016) The importance of litter traits and decomposers for litter decomposition: a comparison of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems within and across biomes. Funct Ecol 30:819–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry HAL, Moise ERD (2014) Grass litter responses to warming and N addition: temporal variation in the contributions of litter quality and environmental effects to decomposition. Plant Soil 389:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobbie SE (1996) Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66:503–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hobbie SE (2005) Contrasting effects of substrate and fertilizer nitrogen on the early stages of decomposition. Ecosystems 8:644–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hobbie SE (2008) Nitrogen effects on decomposition: a five-year experiment in eight temperate sites. Ecology 89:2633–2644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hobbie SE, Eddy WC, Buyarski CR, Adair EC, Ogdahl ML, Weisenhorn P (2012) Response of decomposing litter and its microbial community to multiple forms of nitrogen enrichment. Ecol Monogr 82:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knorr M, Frey SD, Curtis PS (2005) Nitrogen additions and litter decomposition: a meta-analysis. Ecology 86:3252–3257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koukoura Z, Mamolos AP, Kalburtji KL (2003) Decomposition of dominant plant species litter in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 23:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Loeppert PA, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis Part 3: chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  26. Li MH, Hoch G, Korner C (2002) Source/sink removal affects mobile carbohydrates in Pinus cembra at the Swiss treeline. Trees-Struct Funct 16:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li LJ, Zeng DH, Yu ZY, Fan ZP, Yang D, Liu YX (2011) Impact of litter quality and soil nutrient availability on leaf decomposition rate in a semi-arid grassland of Northeast China. J Arid Environ 75:787–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li MH, Cherubini P, Dobbertin M, Arend M, Xiao WF, Rigling A (2013) Responses of leaf nitrogen and mobile carbohydrates in different Quercus species/provenances to moderate climate changes. Plant Biol 15:177–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu P, Huang J, Han X, Sun OJ, Zhou Z (2006) Differential responses of litter decomposition to increased soil nutrients and water between two contrasting grassland plant species of Inner Mongolia, China. Appl Soil Ecol 34:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu P, Huang J, Sun OJ, Han X (2010) Litter decomposition and nutrient release as affected by soil nitrogen availability and litter quality in a semiarid grassland ecosystem. Oecologia 162:771–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu X, Duan L, Mo J, Du E, Shen J, Lu X, Zhang Y, Zhou X, He C, Zhang F (2011) Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview. Environ Pollut 159:2251–2264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ma H, Bai G, Sun Y, Kostenko O, Zhu X, Lin S, Ruan W, Zhao N, Bezemer TM (2016) Opposing effects of nitrogen and water addition on soil bacterial and fungal communities in the Inner Mongolia steppe: a field experiment. Appl Soil Ecol 108:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Makkonen M, Berg MP, Handa IT, Hattenschwiler S, van Ruijven J, van Bodegom PM, Aerts R (2012) Highly consistent effects of plant litter identity and functional traits on decomposition across a latitudinal gradient. Ecol Lett 15:1033–1041CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning P, Saunders M, Bardgett RD, Bonkowski M, Bradford MA, Ellis RJ, Kandeler E, Marhan S, Tscherko D (2008) Direct and indirect effects of nitrogen deposition on litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 40:688–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Niu SL, Wu MY, Han Y, Xia JY, Li LH, Wan SQ (2008) Water-mediated responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to climatic change in a temperate steppe. New Phytol 177:209–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Portillo-Estrada M, Pihlatie M, Korhonen JFJ, Levula J, Frumau AKF, Ibrom A, Lembrechts JJ, Morillas L, Horvath L, Jones SK, Niinemets U (2016) Climatic controls on leaf litter decomposition across European forests and grasslands revealed by reciprocal litter transplantation experiments. Biogeosciences 13:1621–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prescott CE (1995) Does nitrogen availability control rates of litter decomposition in forests. Plant Soil 168:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M (2007) Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88:1386–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schuster MJ (2016) Increased rainfall variability and N addition accelerate litter decomposition in a restored prairie. Oecologia 180:645–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Seastedt T (1984) The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annu Rev Entomol 29:25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith VC, Bradford MA (2003) Litter quality impacts on grassland litter decomposition are differently dependent on soil Fauna across time. Appl Soil Ecol 24:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stump LM, Binkley D (1993) Relationships between litter quality and nitrogen availability in rocky-moutain forests. Can J For Res 23:492–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walter J, Hein R, Beierkuhnlein C, Hammerl V, Jentsch A, Schaedler M, Schuerings J, Kreyling J (2013) Combined effects of multifactor climate change and land-use on decomposition in temperate grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 60:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang R, Filley TR, Xu Z, Wang X, Li M-H, Zhang Y, Luo W, Jiang Y (2014) Coupled response of soil carbon and nitrogen pools and enzyme activities to nitrogen and water addition in a semi-arid grassland of Inner Mongolia. Plant Soil 381:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang X, Xu Z, Yan C, Luo W, Wang R, Han X, Jiang Y, Li M-H (2017) Responses and sensitivity of N, P and mobile carbohydrates of dominant species to increased water, N and P availability in semiarid grasslands in northern China. J Plant Ecol. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtw053
  46. Xiao W, Ge X, Zeng L, Huang Z, Lei J, Zhou B, Li M (2014) Rates of litter decomposition and soil respiration in relation to soil temperature and water in different-aged Pinus massoniana forests in the three gorges reservoir area, China. PLoS One 9:e101890CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu GL, Schleppi P, Li M-H, Fu SL (2009) Negative responses of Collembola in a forest soil (Alptal, Switzerland) under experimentally increased N deposition. Environ Pollut 157:2030–2036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu Z, Wan S, Zhu G, Ren H, Han X (2010) The influence of historical land use and water availability on grassland restoration. Restor Ecol 18:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu GL, Kuster TM, Guenthardt-Goerg MS, Dobbertin M, Li M-H (2012a) Seasonal exposure to drought and air warming affects soil Collembola and mites. PLoS One 7:e43102Google Scholar
  50. Xu ZW, Wan SQ, Ren HY, Han XG, Li MH, Cheng WX, Jiang Y (2012b) Effects of water and nitrogen addition on species turnover in temperate grasslands in northern China. PLoS One 7:e39762Google Scholar
  51. Xu ZW, Wan SQ, Ren HY, Han XG, Jiang Y (2012c) Influences of land use history and short-term nitrogen addition on community structure in temperate grasslands. J Arid Environ 87:103–109Google Scholar
  52. Yue K, Yang W, Peng C, Peng Y, Zhang C, Huang C, Tan Y, Wu F (2016) Foliar litter decomposition in an alpine forest meta-ecosystem on the eastern Tibetan plateau. Sci Total Environ 566-567:279–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang D, Hui D, Luo Y, Zhou G (2008) Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol 1:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhu W, Wang J, Zhang Z, Ren F, Chen L, He JS (2016) Changes in litter quality induced by nutrient addition alter litter decomposition in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Sci Rep-UK 6:34290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xue Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Zhuwen Xu
    • 1
  • Xiaotao Lü
    • 1
  • Ruzhen Wang
    • 1
  • Jiangping Cai
    • 1
    • 3
  • Shan Yang
    • 1
    • 4
  • Mai-He Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yong Jiang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of SciencesShenyangChina
  2. 2.Forest DynamicsSwiss Federal Research Institute WSLBirmensdorfSwitzerland
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.College of Land and EnvironmentShenyang Agricultural UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations