Initial biochar effects on plant productivity derive from N fertilization
Background and aim
Biochar application to soil is widely claimed to increase plant productivity. However, the underlying mechanisms are still not conclusively described. Here, we aim to elucidate these mechanisms using stable isotope probing.
We conducted two experiments with uniquely double-labelled (15N and 13C) biochar and its feedstock (residue), applied separately at 15 Mg ha−1. Both experiments contained three treatments: biochar amendment (Biochar), unpyrolysed residue amendment (Residue) and a no addition control (Control). Experiment I was a 119 day pot experiment seeded with Lolium perenne. Experiment II was a 71 day incubation experiment without plants in which CO2 and N2O fluxes were measured.
Both Biochar and Residue significantly increased aboveground productivity compared to Control (140% and 160%, respectively). Initial N immobilisation was stimulated in Residue, whereas not in Biochar. 13C–CO2 analysis confirmed that biochar was significantly more recalcitrant than residue. 15N analysis showed that 2% and 0.3% of grass N was derived from the amended material in Residue and Biochar, respectively.
Our results suggest that biochar-induced yield increases derive from a combination of reduced N immobilization and a moderate N fertilization effect. Although in the short term biochar might offer benefits compared to residue incorporation, it is unlikely that biochar yield gains will be sustainable for the decades to centuries that biochar C can be expected to reside in soil.
KeywordsPyrolysis Organic amendment Stable isotopes C dynamics N immobilisation Greenhouse gases
- Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method for total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917Google Scholar
- Boschker HTS (2004) Linking microbial community structure and functioning: Stable isotope (13C) labeling in combination with PLFA analysis. In: Kowalchuk GA, Head d BFJIM, Akkermans AD and van Elsas JD (ed) Molecular microbial ecology manual II. Kluwer, pp 1673–1688Google Scholar
- Cornelissen G, Gustafsson O, Bucheli TD, Jonker MTO, Koelmans AA, van Noort PCM (2005) Extensive sorption of organic compounds to black carbon, coal, and kerogen in sediments and soils: mechanisms and consequences for distribution, bioaccumulation, and biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 39:6881–6895. doi:10.1021/es050191b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeffery S, Abalos D, Spokas K, Verheijen FGA (2015a) Biochar effects on crop yields. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Earthscan, London, pp 301–326Google Scholar
- Lehmann J, Gaunt J and Rondon M 2006 Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – A Review. 11, 395–419 DOI:10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5
- Paul EA, Paustian KH, Elliott ET, Cole CV (1996) Soil organic matter in temperate Agroecosystems - long term experiments in North America. CRC Press, Taylor Francis Group, USAGoogle Scholar
- Shackley S, Sohi SP, Ibarrola R, Hammond J, Mašek O, Brownsort P, Cross A, Prendergast-Miller M, Haszeldine S (2012) Biochar, tool for climate change mitigation and soil management. In: Lenton T, Vaughan N (eds) Geoengineering responses to climate change. Springer, New York, pp 73–140Google Scholar
- Singla A, Iwasa H, Inubushi K (2014) Effect of biogas digested slurry based-biochar and digested liquid on N2O, CO2 flux and crop yield for three continuous cropping cycles of komatsuna (Brassica rapa var. perviridis). Biol Fertil Soils 50:1201–1209. doi:10.1007/s00374-014-0950-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stiboka (1975) Stiboka Bodemkaart van Nederland Stiboka, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Suddick EC, Six J (2013) An estimation of annual nitrous oxide emissions and soil quality following the amendment of high temperature walnut shell biochar and compost to a small scale vegetable crop rotation. Sci Total Environ 465:298–307. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.094 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677. doi:10.1038/nature01014
- von Rein I, Gessler A, Premke K, Keitel C, Ulrich A, Kayler ZE (2016) Forest understory plant and soil microbial response to an experimentally induced drought and heat-pulse event: the importance of maintaining the continuum. Glob Chang Biol 22:2861–2874. doi:10.1111/gcb.13270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wardle D A, Nilsson M C, Zackrisson O (2008) Fire-Derived Charcoal Causes Loss of Forest Humus. Science 320, 629. doi:10.1126/science.1154960
- Zelles (1999) Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterisation of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biol Fertil Soils 29. doi:10.1007/s003740050533
- Zimmerman A R, Gao B, Ahn MY (2011) Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1169–1179Google Scholar