Asymmetric effects of litter removal and litter addition on the structure and function of soil microbial communities in a managed pine forest
- 402 Downloads
Variation in tree litter inputs and understory vegetation caused by human disturbances and climate change in forest plantations can extend to alter forest stability and productivity over time. Here, we explore how tree litter inputs interact with understory plant management to influence belowground processes in a managed forest plantation.
We conducted a two-factor nested experimental manipulation of pine litter and understory vegetation in a nutrient-poor Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation. Three levels of tree litter manipulation (ambient litter, litter removal and litter addition) were nested in two levels of understory manipulation (understory intact and understory removal). After two years of manipulation, mineral soils were analyzed for total and extractable C, N and P concentrations, N mineralization, enzyme activities, as well as the microbial community structure (as indicated by phospholipid fatty acids).
Litter removal had little impact on C and nutrient cycling as well as microbial biomass and community structure in this low nutrient pine plantation; however, litter addition and the removal of the understory vegetation had large impacts on these processes. Litter addition elevated soil microbial biomass, acid phosphatase and β-1, 4-glucosidase activities, by a much greater degree when the understory vegetation was intact than when the understory was removed. Litter addition also reduced soil available P by 39% when the understory vegetation was intact, and reduced soil available P by 74% and NO3 −–N by 45% when the understory was removed. Litter addition significantly reduced the ratio of Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria as well as the ratio between PLFA markers cy17:0 and 16:1ω7. Understory removal reduced the ratio of PLFA markers cy17:0 to 16:1ω7.
Our study results show that, in this managed pine plantation, soil microbial community structure and function were more sensitive to an increase rather than to a decrease in pine litter inputs. Further, we found that the presence of understory vegetation can increase soil microbial biomass and alleviate the reduction in available N and P concentrations induced by pine litter addition. Thus, preservation of the understory vegetation is an effective way to maintain the functional stability of managed forests on nutrient-poor soils.
KeywordsPinus sylvestris var. mongolica Litter Understory vegetation Soil microbial community Nutrient availability
We thank Guiyan Ai and Zhencheng Su for their help in lab analyses, and thank Yunzhi Yan for his help in statistical analyses. We are grateful to Gregory S. Newman and two referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41373087 and 31270668) and the State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology of China (LFSE2013-11).
Data availability statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.
- Blazier MA, Hennessey TC, Deng SP (2005) Effects of fertilization and vegetation control on microbial biomass carbon and dehydrogenase activity in a juvenile loblolly pine plantation. For Sci 51:449–459Google Scholar
- FAO (2010) Global Forest resources assessment 2010. Main report. FAO forestry paper 163. FAO, Rome, p. 378Google Scholar
- Feng HM, He HB, Bai Z, Wu YY, Guo BD, Zhang M, Zhang XD (2008) Microbial degradation of acetochlor in mollisol and the effects of acetochlor on the characteristics of soil phospholipid fatty acids. Chinese J App Ecol 19:1585–1590 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Lu RK (1999) Analytical methods of soil and agricultural chemistry. China Agricultural Science and Technology Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Muller RN (2003) Nutrient relations of the herbaceous layer in deciduous forest ecosystem. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (eds) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 15–37Google Scholar
- Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Leoppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin, pp. 961–1010Google Scholar
- Norby RJ, Hanson PJ, O’Neill EG, Tschaplinski TJ, Weltzin JF, Hansen RA, Cheng W, Wullschleger SD, Gunderson CA, Edwards NT, Johnson DW (2002) Net primary productivity of a CO2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storage. Ecol Appl 12:1261–1266Google Scholar
- Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium biocarbonate. US Department of Agriculture, p19 (Circular No. 939)Google Scholar
- Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottobley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: microbiological and biochemical methods, SSSA Book Series No, vol 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 775–883Google Scholar