Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 411, Issue 1–2, pp 333–346 | Cite as

Direct and indirect effects of shifting rainfall on soil microbial respiration and enzyme activity in a semi-arid system

  • Ellen H. EschEmail author
  • David Lipson
  • Elsa E. Cleland
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Higher interannual precipitation variability is predicted for Southern California’s shrub-dominated systems, promoting soil moisture variation and changing community composition. We asked if soil microbial responses to rainfall regime will depend on litter inputs; showing direct effects of altered precipitation through soil moisture and indirect effects resulting from shifting litter inputs.

Methods

Soils were collected from a 2-year field rainfall manipulation experiment. Under lab conditions soils were subjected to high or low moisture pulses with litter amendments from native and exotic species in all combinations.

Results

Soil respiration was higher with larger water pulses, but rose over time in low pulse treatments (direct response). Litter additions from exotic species promoted greater respiration, and results were stronger under higher soil moisture (indirect response). Extracellular enzyme activities generally were higher with exotic litter and under high moisture pulses. Those involved in N-cycling had much larger increases activity for the exotic litter addition - high moisture pulse scenarios compared to other treatments.

Conclusions

Our results indicate the potential for microbial acclimation to drought conditions over short timescales and that below-ground processes are sensitive to direct and indirect effects of shifting rainfall regimes, especially where invasion is promoted by future climate change.

Keywords

Chaparral Exotic species Extracellular enzyme activity Microbial acclimation Microbial biomass Microbial respiration 

Abbreviations

NAG

β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase

BGLUC

β-Glucosidase

CBH

Cellobiohydrolase

EEA

Extracellular enzyme activity

LAP

L-leucine aminopeptidase

MBM

Microbial biomass

PHOS

Phosphatase

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Rachel Abbott, Angie Ashbacher, and Christopher Kopp for maintaining the field experiment along with Rochelle Aran and Magali Porrachia for their laboratory assistance. This work was performed at the University of California Natural Reserve System and supported by a Mildred E. Mathias Graduate Student Research Grant from the University of California Natural Reserve System. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. (DGE-1144086) and also a National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology grant (DEB 1154082). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944. doi: 10.1016/J.Soilbio.2004.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Public Health Association (1994) Water Environment Federation (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashbacher AC, Cleland EE (2015) Native and exotic plant species show differential growth but similar functional trait responses to experimental rainfall. Ecosphere 6. doi: 10.1890/Es15-00059.1
  4. Austin AT (2011) Has water limited our imagination for aridland biogeochemistry? Trends Ecol Evol 26:229–235. doi: 10.1016/J.Tree.2011.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin AT et al. (2004) Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:221–235. doi: 10.1007/S00442-004-1519-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck T, Joergensen RG, Kandeler E, Makeschin F, Nuss E, Oberholzer HR, Scheu S (1997) An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1023–1032. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00030-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg N, Hall A (2015) Increased interannual precipitation extremes over California under climate change. J Clim 28:6324–6334. doi: 10.1175/Jcli-D-14-00624.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birch H (1958) The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant and soil 10:9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blazewicz SJ, Schwartz E, Firestone MK (2014) Growth and death of bacteria and fungi underlie rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses from seasonally dried soil. Ecology 95:1162–1172. doi: 10.1890/13-1031.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Borken W, Matzner E (2009) Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Glob Chang Biol 15:808–824. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2008.01681.X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brando PM, Nepstad DC, Davidson EA, Trumbore SE, Ray D, Camargo P (2008) Drought effects on litterfall, wood production and belowground carbon cycling in an Amazon forest: results of a throughfall reduction experiment. Philos T R Soc B 363:1839–1848. doi: 10.1098/Rstb.2007.0031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bray SR, Kitajima K, Mack MC (2012) Temporal dynamics of microbial communities on decomposing leaf litter of 10 plant species in relation to decomposition rate. Soil Biol Biochem 49:30–37. doi: 10.1016/J.Soilbio.2012.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil-nitrogen - a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castro-Diez P, Godoy O, Alonso A, Gallardo A, Saldana A (2014) What explains variation in the impacts of exotic plant invasions on the nitrogen cycle? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 17:1–12. doi: 10.1111/Ele.12197 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cayan D et al. (2009) Climate change scenarios and sea level rise estimates for the California 2008 climate change scenarios assessment California Climate Change Center CEC-500-2009-014-D doi:http://www.energy.ca.gov/2009publications/CEC-500-2009-014/CEC-500-2009-014-D.PDF
  16. Charlotte J Alster, Donovan P German, Ying Lu, Steven D Allison (2013) Microbial enzymatic responses to drought and to nitrogen addition in a southern California grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 64:68–79Google Scholar
  17. Chen SP, Lin GH, Huang JH, Jenerette GD (2009) Dependence of carbon sequestration on the differential responses of ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration to rain pulses in a semiarid steppe. Glob Chang Biol 15:2450–2461. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2009.01879.X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cleland EE et al. (2013) Sensitivity of grassland plant community composition to spatial vs. temporal variation in precipitation. Ecology 94:1687–1696. doi: 10.1890/12-1006.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins SL, Sinsabaugh RL, Crenshaw C, Green L, Porras-Alfaro A, Stursova M, Zeglin LH (2008) Pulse dynamics and microbial processes in aridland ecosystems. J Ecol 96:413–420. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2745.2008.01362.X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins M et al. (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF et al. (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, pp. 1029–1136. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024 Google Scholar
  21. Cook FJ, Orchard VA (2008) Relationships between soil respiration and soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1013–1018. doi: 10.1016/J.Soilbio.2007.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Antonio CM (2000) Fire, plant invasions, and global changes. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 65–94Google Scholar
  23. de Vries FT, Shade A (2013) Controls on soil microbial community stability under climate change. Front Microbiol 4. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00265
  24. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523. doi: 10.1007/S10021-002-0151-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esch EH, Hernandez DL, Pasari JR, Kantor RSG, Selmants PC (2013) Response of soil microbial activity to grazing, nitrogen deposition, and exotic cover in a serpentine grassland. Plant Soil 366:671–682. doi: 10.1007/S11104-012-1463-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans SE, Burke IC (2013) Carbon and nitrogen decoupling under an 11-year drought in the shortgrass steppe. Ecosystems 16:20–33. doi: 10.1007/S10021-012-9593-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans SE, Wallenstein MD (2012) Soil microbial community response to drying and rewetting stress: does historical precipitation regime matter? Biogeochemistry 109:101–116. doi: 10.1007/S10533-011-9638-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans SE, Wallenstein MD (2014) Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett 17:155–164. doi: 10.1111/ele.12206 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fierer N, Schimel JP (2002) Effects of drying-rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 34:777–787. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00007-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, Second edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. Gorissen A et al. (2004) Climate change affects carbon allocation to the soil in shrublands. Ecosystems 7:650–661. doi: 10.1007/S10021-004-0218-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawkes CV, Keitt TH (2015) Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change. Ecol Lett 18:612–625. doi: 10.1111/ele.12451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (1991) Effects of rainfall variability and gopher disturbance on serpentine annual grassland dynamics. Ecology 72:59–68. doi: 10.2307/1938902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (2005) Invasive species in a changing world: the interactions between global change and invasives. In: Mooney HA (ed) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Hugh AL, Henry, John D Juarez, Christopher B Field, Peter M Vitousek (2005) Interactive effects of elevated CO2, N deposition and climate change on extracellular enzyme activity and soil density fractionation in a California annual grassland. Global Change Biology 11 (10):1808–1815Google Scholar
  36. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Kempf B, Bremer E (1998) Uptake and synthesis of compatible solutes as microbial stress responses to high-osmolality environments. Arch Microbiol 170:319–330. doi: 10.1007/S002030050649 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. KR Saiya-Cork, RL Sinsabaugh, DR Zak (2002) The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34 (9):1309–1315Google Scholar
  39. Kramer S, Green DM (2000) Acid and alkaline phosphatase dynamics and their relationship to soil microclimate in a semiarid woodland. Soil Biol Biochem 32:179–188. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00140-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lennon JT, Aanderud ZT, Lehmkuhl BK, Schoolmaster DR (2012) Mapping the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits. Ecology 93:1867–1879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Li XZ, Sarah P (2003) Enzyme activities along a climatic transect in the Judean Desert. Catena 53:349–363. doi: 10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00087-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liao CZ et al. (2008) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714. doi: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.2007.02290.X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Meisner A, Rousk J, Bååth E (2015) Prolonged drought changes the bacterial growth response to rewetting. Soil Biol Biochem 88:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mikha MM, Rice CW, Milliken GA (2005) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization as affected by drying and wetting cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 37:339–347. doi: 10.1016/J.Soilbio.2004.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ng EL, Patti AF, Rose MT, Schefe CR, Smernik RJ, Cavagnaro TR (2015) Do organic inputs alter resistance and resilience of soil microbial community to drying? Soil Biol Biochem 81:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Placella SA, Brodie EL, Firestone MK (2012) Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109:10931–10936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204306109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pysek P, Jarosik V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vila M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Chang Biol 18:1725–1737. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2011.02636.X CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  49. Rao LE, Allen EB (2010) Combined effects of precipitation and nitrogen deposition on native and invasive winter annual production in California deserts. Oecologia 162:1035–1046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Robert L Sinsabaugh, Christian L Lauber, Michael N Weintraub, Bony Ahmed, Steven D Allison, Chelsea Crenshaw, Alexandra R Contosta, Daniela Cusack, Serita Frey, Marcy E Gallo, Tracy B Gartner, Sarah E Hobbie, Keri Holland, Bonnie L Keeler, Jennifer S Powers, Martina Stursova, Cristina Takacs-Vesbach, Mark P Waldrop, Matthew D Wallenstein, Donald R Zak, Lydia H Zeglin, (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology LettersGoogle Scholar
  51. Sandel B, Dangremond EM (2012) Climate change and the invasion of California by grasses. Glob Chang Biol 18:277–289. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2011.02480.X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sardans J, Penuelas J (2005) Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. Forest. Soil Biol Biochem 37:455–461. doi: 10.1016/J.Soilbio.2004.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M (2007) Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88:1386–1394. doi: 10.1890/06-0219 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwinning S, Sala OE (2004) Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in and and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:211–220. doi: 10.1007/S00442-004-1520-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Shi AD, Marschner P (2014) Drying and rewetting frequency influences cumulative respiration and its distribution over time in two soils with contrasting management. Soil Biol Biochem 72:172–179. doi: 10.1016/J.Soilbio.2014.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinsabaugh RL (1994) Enzymatic analysis of microbial pattern and process Biol Fert. Soils 17:69–74Google Scholar
  57. Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Shah JJF (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462:795–U117. doi: 10.1038/Nature08632 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith MD, Knapp AK, Collins SL (2009) A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology 90:3279–3289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Stevenson, FJ, Cole, MA (1999) Cycles of soils: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients. WileyGoogle Scholar
  60. Tiemann LK, Billings SA (2011) Changes in variability of soil moisture alter microbial community C and N resource use. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1837–1847. doi: 10.1016/J.Soilbio.2011.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vangestel M, Merckx R, Vlassak K (1993) Microbial biomass responses to soil drying and rewetting - the fate of fast-growing and slow-growing microorganisms in soils from different climates. Soil Biol Biochem 25:109–123. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90249-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setala H, van der Putten WH, Wall DH (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304:1629–1633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolkovich EM, Lipson DA, Virginia RA, Cottingham KL, Bolger DT (2010) Grass invasion causes rapid increases in ecosystem carbon and nitrogen storage in a semiarid shrubland. Glob Chang Biol 16:1351–1365. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2009.02001.X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xiang SR, Doyle A, Holden PA, Schimel JP (2008) Drying and rewetting effects on C and N mineralization and microbial activity in surface and subsurface California grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2281–2289. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yu ZH, Wang GH, Marsthner P (2014) Drying and rewetting - effect of frequency of cycles and length of moist period on soil respiration and microbial biomass. Eur J Soil Biol 62:132–137. doi: 10.1016/J.Ejsobi.2014.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen H. Esch
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Lipson
    • 2
  • Elsa E. Cleland
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biological Sciences, Ecology, Behavior & Evolution SectionUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations