Dissolution rate and agronomic effectiveness of struvite fertilizers – effect of soil pH, granulation and base excess
Struvite (MgNH4PO4.6H2O) recovered from wastewater can be used as fertilizer. The agronomic effectiveness of struvite has mostly been evaluated using ground fertilizer mixed through soil. However, fertilizers are most commonly applied in granular form in the field. In this study, we assessed the dissolution and effectiveness of different struvites when applied in granular or powdered form.
Phosphorus (P) diffusion in soil, determined using a visualization technique and chemical analyses, and P uptake by 6-week old wheat was compared for soluble fertilizer (monoammonium phosphate, MAP), a commercial struvite and three synthesized struvites with different excess MgO, in both granular and ground form.
Ground struvite mixed through soil quickly dissolved and its agronomic effectiveness was similar to that of MAP. For pure granular struvite, the granule dissolution rate ranged from circa 0.03 mg d−1 in alkaline soil to 0.43 mg d−1 in acidic soil. Excess base in the struvite fertilizer reduced its dissolution rate. The P uptake by wheat followed the order MAP > > struvite ≥ control (no P), with no significant difference between the control and the struvite treatment in alkaline soil.
Both fertilizer characteristics (particle size, excess base) and soil pH strongly affect the dissolution rate of struvite and hence its agronomic effectiveness.
KeywordsPhosphorus Fertilizer Struvite Granule Dissolution
- Ahmed S, Klassen TN, Keyes S, Daly M, Jones DL, Mavrogordato M, Sinclair I, Roose T (2015) Imaging the interaction of roots and phosphate fertiliser granules using 4D X-ray tomography. Plant Soil:1–10Google Scholar
- Kanabo I, Gilkes R (1987) The role of soil pH in the dissolution of phosphate rock fertilizers. Fert Res 12:165–173.Google Scholar
- Kirk G, Nye P (1986) A simple model for predicting the rates of dissolution of sparingly soluble calcium phosphates in soil. I The basic model J Soil Sci 37:529–540Google Scholar
- Kontrec J, Babić-Ivančićand V, Brečević L (2005) Formation and morphology of struvite and newberyite in aqueous solutions at 25 and 37 °C. Coll Anthropol 29:289–294Google Scholar
- McKenzie NJ, Coughlan KJ, Cresswell HP (2002) Soil physical measurements and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.Google Scholar
- Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Talboys PJ, Heppell J, Roose T, Healey J R, Jones DL, Withers PJ (2016). Struvite: A slow-release fertiliser for sustainable phosphorus management? Plant Soil 401:109–123.Google Scholar