Opportunity costs for maize associated with localised application of sewage sludge derived fertilisers, as indicated by early root and phosphorus uptake responses
- 422 Downloads
Phosphorus recycling from waste and localised placement of fertilisers can potentially improve sustainable P management in agriculture. However, knowledge about root and plant P uptake responses to placement of complex waste-derived fertilisers is lacking.
Sewage sludge (SS) and sewage sludge ash (ASH) were tested against triple superphosphate (TSP) in a rhizobox setup where maize shoot and root growth and architecture were followed for 30 days. The three P sources were either mixed homogenously into the soil (slightly acidic, low in available P and moderate P fixing capacity; labelled with 33P) or localised in a patch close to the seed.
Localisation of TSP and SS both induced increased root length density in and around the fertiliser patch. For TSP this was followed by enhanced dry matter yield and fertiliser P uptake compared to the mixed source. In contrast, P uptake from SS was not enhanced by the localisation, and while the uptake from the seed was similar, the uptake from soil was lower probably due to weaker root development in the remaining soil. No root response was found for localised ASH, whereas mixed ASH more than doubled dry matter yield and P uptake in comparison.
Young maize plants’ responses to fertiliser localisation imply opportunity costs and under the given soil conditions, localisation of SS and ASH (contrary to TSP) did not entail an overall benefit for the plant.
KeywordsFertiliser placement Root growth Sewage sludge Sewage sludge ash Rhizobox Maize
Triple super phosphate
Sewage sludge ash
- TSPloc and TSPmix
Treatments with localised and mixed triple super phosphate respectively.
- SSloc and SSmix
Treatments with localised and mixed sewage sludge respectively.
- ASHloc and ASHmix
Treatments with localised and mixed sewage sludge ash respectively.
Control treatment with no amendment of P.
P derived from.
P uptake efficiency of the roots
Days after sowing.
The authors would like to thank Sean Case for proofreading of the manuscript. The study was conducted as part of the research projects IRMAR (funded by the Danish Council for Strategic Research); RoCo (part of the Organic RDD 2 programme, which is coordinated by International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems (ICROFS) and has received grants from the Green Growth and Development programme (GUDP) under the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries.); and IMPROVE-P (financial support for this project was provided by transnational funding bodies, being partners of the FP7 ERA-net project, CORE Organic Plus, and the cofund from the European commission).
- Bergmann W, Neubert P (1976) Pflanzendiagnose und pflanzenanalyse. Zur ermittlung von ernährungsstörungen und des ernährungszustandes der kulturpflanzenGoogle Scholar
- Frei OM (2000) Changes in yield physiology of corn as a result of breeding in northern Europe. Maydica 45:173–183Google Scholar
- Frossard E, Achat DL, Bernasconi SM, et al. (2011) The use of tracers to investigate phophate cycling in soil-plan systems. Bünemann E, Oberson A, Frossard E Phosphorus action Biol Process soil phosphorus cycling vol 100, Soil Biol Springer, Berlin 59–91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15271-9
- Lynch JP (2007) Rhizoeconomics: the roots of shoot growth limitations. HortSci 42:1107–1109Google Scholar
- Miljøministeriet (2013) Slambekendtgørelsen - Bekendtgørelse om anvendelse af affald til jordbrugsformål - BEK nr 1650 af 13/12/2006. Retsinformation.dk 1–11Google Scholar
- Oenema O, Chardon W, Ehlert P, et al. (2012) Phosphorus fertilisers from by-products and wastes. Proc 717, Int Fertil Soc Leek, UK 1–56Google Scholar
- Ohno T, Zibilske LM (1991) Determination of low concentrations of phosphorus in soil extracts using malachite green. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:892–895 doi: 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500030046x
- Petersen J, Lemming C, Rubæk GH, Sørensen P (2013) Side-band injection of acidified cattle slurry as starter P-fertilization for maize seedlings. Vallez, G., Houot, S., Formisano, S., Cheviron, N., Revallier, A., Lepeuple, A.-S., Bacheley, H. Cambier, P. Recycl. Org. residues Agric. From waste Manag. to Ecosyst. Serv. B. Abstr. RAMIRAN 2013 - 15thGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- Schröder JJ, ten Holte L, Brouwer G (1997) Response of silage maize to placement of cattle slurry. Neth J Agric Sci 45:249–261Google Scholar