Do techniques based on 15N enrichment and 15N natural abundance give consistent estimates of the symbiotic dependence of N2-fixing plants?
- 757 Downloads
The primary aim of this review is to determine if methods based on 15N enrichment (E) and 15N natural abundance (NA) give consistent estimates of the proportional dependence of N2-fixing species on biological N2 fixation (P atm), and secondly to attempt to explain any inconsistencies that may be found.
Published estimates of the symbiotic dependence of N2-fixing plants based on E and NA techniques applied in the same experiment were compared across scales from glasshouse pots to field plots to landscapes in agricultural and forest ecosystems, which included grain legumes, pasture and forage legumes, and woody perennials. A meta-analysis of the published data was based on correlation coefficients, box-plots and confidence intervals of means.
In some studies, estimates were reference plant dependent for both E and NA techniques, indicating temporal and/or spatial variations in the natural and artificial distribution of 15N, which can sometimes result in erroneous negative estimates of symbiotic dependence. While significant correlations were obtained between E and NA estimates of P atm for each of the three groups of N2-fixing species, the probability that the methods provided estimates of P atm within −5 to +5 % of each other was 0.29 or was 0.54 within −10 to +10 % of each other.
We have identified a number of interacting factors that may contribute to the inconsistent agreement between estimates of P atm by E and NA techniques, which underlines the need for a re-examination of the fundamental assumptions on which each method is based, and whether those assumptions are valid in any given situation.
KeywordsSymbiotic dependence 15N enrichment 15N natural abundance δ15N Legumes Alder
The senior author thanks the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) for a visiting scientist fellowship (Pesquisador Visitante No. 101.466/2014) and EMBRAPA-Solos as the host Institution.
- Bouillet JP, Laclau JP, Gonçalves JLM, Moreira MZ, Trivelin PCO, Jourdan C, Silva EV, Piccolo MC, Tsai SM, Galiana A (2008) Mixed-species plantations of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis in Brazil. 2: nitrogen accumulation in the stands and biological N2 fixation. For Ecol Manag 255:3918–3930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brendel O, Wheeler C, Handley L (1997) A statistical comparison of the two-source δ15N and 15N isotope dilution methods for estimating plant N2-fixation using Trifolium pratense and Lolium perenne. Funct Plant Biol 24:631–636Google Scholar
- Burchill W, James EK, Li D, Lanigan GJ, Williams M, Iannetta PPM, Humphreys J (2014) Comparisons of biological nitrogen fixation in association with white clover (Trifolium repens L.) under four fertiliser nitrogen inputs as measured using two 15N techniques. Plant Soil 385:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shearer G, Kohl DH (1986) N2 fixation in field settings: estimates based on natural 15N abundance. Funct Plant Biol 13:699–756Google Scholar
- Somado EA, Kuehne RF (2006) Appraisal of the 15N-isotope dilution and 15N natural abundance methods for quantifying nitrogen fixation by flood-tolerant green manure legumes. Afr J Biotechnol 5:1210–1214Google Scholar
- Unkovich M, Herridge D, Peoples M, Cadisch G, Boddey R., Giller K, Alves B, Chalk, P (2008) Measuring Plant-Associated Nitrogen Fixation in Agricultural Systems. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra. 258 pp. http://aciar.gov.au/files/node/10169/mn136_measuring_plant_associated_nitrogen_fixation_19979.pdf