Biochar amendment increases maize root surface areas and branching: a shovelomics study in Zambia
- 1.6k Downloads
Background and aims
Positive crop yield effects from biochar are likely explained by chemical, physical and/or biological factors. However, studies describing plant allometric changes are scarcer, but may be crucial to understand the biochar effect. The main aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of biochar on root architecture under field conditions in a tropical setting.
The presented work describes a shovelomics (i.e., description of root traits in the field) study on the effect of biochar on maize root architecture. Four field experiments we carried out at two different locations in Zambia, exhibiting non-fertile to relatively fertile soils. Roots of maize crop (Zea mays L.) were sampled from treatments with fertilizer (control) and with a combination of fertilizer and 4 t.ha−1 maize biochar application incorporated in the soil.
For the four sites, the average grain yield increase upon biochar addition was 45 ± 14 % relative to the fertilized control (from 2.1–6.0 to 3.1–9.1 ton ha−1). The root biomass was approximately twice as large for biochar-amended plots. More extensive root systems (especially characterized by a larger root opening angle (+14 ± 11 %) and wider root systems (+20 ± 15 %)) were observed at all biochar-amended sites. Root systems exhibited significantly higher specific surface areas (+54 ± 14 %), branching and fine roots: +70 ± 56 %) in the presence of biochar.
Biochar amendment resulted in more developed root systems and larger yields. The more extensive root systems may have contributed to the observed yield increases, e.g., by improving immobile nutrients uptake in soils that are unfertile or in areas with prolonged dry spells.
KeywordsBiochar Shovelomics Root architecture Plant allometric trends Field experiment Maize
Sampling and manuscript writing was done in the realm of FriPro project 217918 of the Research Council of Norway, the University Research Priority Programme “global change and biodiversity” of the University of Zurich and the National Research Programme 68 “soil as a resource” by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The Zambia Conservation Farming Unit (CFU) funded by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) is acknowledged for facilitating experimental setup as well as field assistance during sampling. Norbert Kirchgessner (ETH) is acknowledged for his support with the REST software. Sarah Hale (NGI) is thanked for comments on the manuscript.
- Breazeale JF (1906) Effect of certain solids upon the growth of seedlings in water cultures. Botanical Gazette 41:54–63Google Scholar
- Bucksch A, Burridge J, York LM, Das A, Nord E, Weitz JS, Lynch JP (2014) Image-based high-throughput field phenotyping of crop roots. Plant Physiol. 1Google Scholar
- Colombi T, Kirchgessner N, Marié Le CA, York LM, Lynch JP, Hund A (2015) Next generation shovelomics: set up a tent and REST 1–20Google Scholar
- Ekanayake IJ, O'Toole JC, Garrity DP, Masajo TM, (1985) Inheritance of Root Characters and their Relations to Drought Resistance in Rice. Crop Science. 25(6):927–933. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500060007x
- Ho MD, Rosas JC, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2005) Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. Funct Plant Biol 32:737–748. doi: 10.1071/FP05043
- Kimetu JM, Lehmann J, Ngoze SO, Mugendi DN, Kinyangi JM, Riha S, Verchot L, Recha JW, Pell AN (2008) Reversibility of Soil Productivity Decline with Organic Matter of Differing Quality Along a Degradation Gradient. Ecosystems 11:726–739. doi: 10.1007/s10021-008-9154-z
- Nutman PS (1952) Host factors influencing infection and nodule development in leguminous plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B Bio-logical Sciences 139:176–185Google Scholar
- Rogers H, Prior S, Runion G, Mitchell R (1996) Root to shoot ratio of crops as influenced by CO2. Plant Soil 187:229–248Google Scholar
- Sharp RE, Davies WJ (1979) Solute regulation and growth by roots and shoots of water-stressed maize plants. Planta 147:43–49. doi: 10.1007/BF00384589
- Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, Luis J, Macêdo V de, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9193-9