Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 401, Issue 1–2, pp 185–196 | Cite as

Dynamics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in calcareous soils after land-use abandonment – A chronosequence study

  • Marie Spohn
  • Tibor József Novák
  • József Incze
  • Luise Giani
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

The objective of this study was to investigate changes in soil total organic C (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (P) fractions, and microbial community structure during secondary succession after abandonment of vineyards on calcareous soils.

Methods

Two chronosequences covering 200 years and differing in aspect and slope were established in Hungary, and the upper 10 cm of the mineral soils were studied.

Results

We found strong increases in TOC concentrations after land-use abandonment, especially at the south-exposed sites. The TOC/TN ratio increased by a factor of 1.3 in the south-west exposed chronosequence and by a factor of 1.6 in south exposed chronosequence. The concentration of labile P (NaHCO3-extractable P) diminished during the first 50 years after land-use abandonment, leading to low P availability at the later stages of the succession. The total organic P (TOP) concentration increased during the first 40 years after abandonment. At the later stages of succession, TOP concentrations decreased again, while the ratio of TOC/TOP increased continuously over 200 years. The ratio of arbuscular-mycorrhizal-fungi-to-bacteria (AMF/bacteria) increased strongly during the first decade after abandonment of the vineyards.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that impacts of former cultivation on secondary ecosystems persisted for more than a century, and that especially P concentrations showed long lasting legacy effects.

Keywords

Land-use abandonment Chronosequence Phosphorus fractions Organic phosphorus Stoichiometry Microbial community composition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research was allowed by the Northern-Hungary Inspectorate for Environmental Protection Nature Conservation and Water Management, Miskolc, in accordance with decree No. 16496-3/2011. We would like to thank all students that helped with the field work. We are grateful to Carolin Apostel and Michaela Dippold for their help with the PLFA analysis, and to Carlos A. Sierra for his help with the software program R.

Supplementary material

11104_2015_2513_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Appendix 1 (DOCX 15 kb)
11104_2015_2513_MOESM2_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Appendix 2 (DOCX 18.0 KB)

References

  1. Allison VJ, Miller RM, Jastrow JD, Matamala R, Zak DR (2005) Changes in soil microbial community structure in a tallgrass prairie chronosequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1412–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison VJ, Yermakov Z, Miller RM, Jastrow JD, Matamala R (2007) Using landscape and depth gradients to decouple the impact of correlated environmental variables on soil microbial community composition. Soil Biol Biochem 39:505–516Google Scholar
  3. Alt F, Oelmann Y, Herold N, Schrumpf M, Wilcke W (2011) Phosphorus partitioning in grassland and forest soils of Germany as related to land‐use type, management intensity, and land use–related pH. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer SG, Kitchen DJ, Blair JM, Rice CW (2002) Changes in ecosystem structure and function along a chronosequence of restored grasslands. Ecol Appl 12:1688–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt KS (2005) A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:634–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandtberg PO, Davis MR, Clinton PW, Condron LM, Allen RB (2010) Forms of soil phosphorus affected by stand development of mountain beech Nothofagus forests in New Zealand. Geoderma 157:228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL http://www.R-projectorg/
  8. Crews TE, Kitayama K, Fownes JH, Riley RH, Herbert DA, Mueller-Dombois D, Vitousek PM (1995) Changes in soil phosphorus fractions and ecosystem dynamics across a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Ecology 76:1407–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Schrijver A, Vesterdal L, Hansen K, De Frenne P, Augusto L, Achat DL, Verheyen K (2012) Four decades of post-agricultural forest development have caused major redistributions of soil phosphorus fractions. Oecologia 169:221–234Google Scholar
  10. Demoling F, Figueroa D, Bååth E (2007) Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2485–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickie IA, Yeates GW, St John MG, Stevenson BA, Scott JT, Rillig MC, Aislabie J (2011) Ecosystem service and biodiversity trade‐offs in two woody successions. J Appl Ecol 48:926–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunjó G, Pardini G, Gispert M (2003) Land use change effects on abandoned terraced soils in a Mediterranean catchment, NE Spain. Catena 52:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD, Moares C (2002) Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83:2978–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falkengren-Grerup U, Brink DJT, Brunet J (2006) Land use effects on soil N, P, C and pH persist over 40–80 years of forest growth on agricultural soils. For Ecol Manag 225:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fierer N, Strickland MS, Liptzin D, Bradford MA, Cleveland CC (2009) Global patterns in belowground communities. Ecol Lett 12:1238–1249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frostegård Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E (1991) Microbial biomass measured as total lipid phosphate in soils of different organic content. J Microbiol Methods 14:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gough MW, Marrs RH (1990) A comparison of soil fertility between semi-natural and agricultural plant communities: implications for the creations of species-rich grassland on abandoned agricultural land. Biol Conserv 51:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunina A, Dippold MA, Glaser B, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Fate of low molecular weight organic substances in an arable soil: from microbial uptake to utilisation and stabilisation. Soil Biol Biochem 77:304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a metaanalysis. Glob Chang Biol 8:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris J (2009) Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers? Science 329:573–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinrichs H, Brumsack HJ, Loftfield N, König N (1986) Verbessertes Druckaufschlußsystem für biologische und anorganische Materialien. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd 149:350–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heuck C, Weig A, Spohn M (2015) Soil microbial biomass C: N: P stoichiometry and microbial use of organic phosphorus. Soil Biol Biochem 85:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195Google Scholar
  25. Hooker TD, Compton JE (2003) Forest ecosystem carbon and nitrogen accumulation during the first century after agricultural abandonment. Ecol Appl 13:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joergensen RG, Scheu S (1999) Response of soil microorganisms to the addition of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in a forest Rendzina. Soil Biol Biochem 31:859–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson NC, Zak DR, Tilman D, Pfleger FL (1991) Dynamics of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae during old field succession. Oecologia 86:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalinina O, Goryachkin SV, Karavaeva NA, Lyuri DI, Najdenko L, Giani L (2009) Self-restoration of post-agrogenic sandy soils in the southern taiga of Russia: soil development, nutrient status, and carbon dynamics. Geoderma 152:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalinina O, Krause SE, Goryachkin SV, Karavaeva NA, Lyuri DI, Giani L (2011) Self-restoration of post-agrogenic Chernozems of Russia: soil development, carbon stocks and dynamics of carbon pools. Geoderma 162:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knops JM, Tilman D (2000) Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 81:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koulouri M, Giourga C (2007) Land abandonment and slope gradient as key factors of soil erosion in Mediterranean terraced lands. Catena 69:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kurganova IN, Kudeyarov VN, Lopes de Gerenyu VO (2010) Updated estimate of carbon balance on Russian territory. Tellus B 62:497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kurganova I, Lopes de Gerenyu V, Six J, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Carbon cost of collective farming collapse in Russia. Glob Chang Biol 20:938–947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. MacDonald GK, Bennett EM, Taranu ZE (2012) The influence of time, soil characteristics, and land‐use history on soil phosphorus legacies: a global meta‐analysis. Glob Chang Biol 18:1904–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matamala R, Jastrow JD, Miller RM, Garten CT (2008) Temporal changes in C and N stocks of restored prairie: implications for C sequestration strategies. Ecol Appl 18:1470–1488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Matar A, Torrent J, Ryan J (1992) Soil and fertilizer phosphorus and crop responses in the dryland Mediterranean zone. In: Advances in Soil Science (pp 81–146) Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. McLauchlan K (2006) The nature and longevity of agricultural impacts on soil carbon and nutrients: a review. Ecosystems 9:1364–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McMahon SM, Parker GG, Miller DR (2010) Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth. PNAS 107:3611–3615CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activityby N and P availability. Biogeochem 49:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils using NaHCO3. United States Department of Agriculture Circular 939Google Scholar
  41. Poeplau C, Don A, Vesterdal L, Leifeld J, Van Wesemael BAS, Schumacher J, Gensior A (2011) Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land‐use change in the temperate zone–carbon response functions as a model approach. Glob Chang Biol 17:2415–2427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poschlod P, WallisDeVries MF (2002) The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands—lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv 104:361–376Google Scholar
  43. Post WM, Kwon KC (2000) Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential. Glob Chang Biol :317–327Google Scholar
  44. Potthoff M, Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Drenovsky RE, Scow KM, Joergensen RG (2006) Soil microbial community composition as affected by restoration practices in California grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1851–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poulton PR, Pye E, Hargreaves PR, Jenkinson DS (2003) Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen by old arable land reverting to woodland. Glob Chang Biol 9:942–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramankutty N (2006) Global land-cover change: recent progress, remaining challenges. In: Lambin EF, Geist HJ (eds) Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1998) Characterizing patterns of global land use: an analysis of global croplands data. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 12:667–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson SJ, Peltzer DA, Allen RB, McGlone MS, Parfitt RL (2004) Rapid development of phosphorus limitation in temperate rainforest along the Franz Josef soil chronosequence. Oecologia 139:267–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Saunders WMH, Williams EG (1955) Observations on the determination of total organic phosphorus in soils. Eru J Soil Sci 6:254–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sendtko A (1999) Succession of xerothermic vegetation in abandoned vineyards of the Tokaj region (northeastern Hungary): studies in phytosociology and population biology. Phytocoenologia 29:345–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spohn M, Kuzyakov Y (2013a) Distribution of microbial-and root-derived phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere depending on P availability and C allocation–coupling soil zymography with 14C imaging. Soil Biol Biochem 67:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spohn M, Kuzyakov Y (2013b) Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by microbial need for carbon. Soil Biol Biochem 61:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJ (2004) Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303:1876–1879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tarolli P, Preti F, Romano N (2014) Terraced landscapes: from an old best practice to a potential hazard for soil degradation due to land abandonment. Anthropocene 6:10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van der Wal A, van Veen JA, Smant W, Boschker HT, Bloem J, Kardol P, de Boer W (2006) Fungal biomass development in a chronosequence of land abandonment. Soil Biol Biochem 38:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Veldhoven PP, Mannaerts GP (1987) Inorganic and organic phosphate measurements in the nanomolar range. Anal Biochem 161:45–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soils microbial biomass-C Soil. Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walker LR, Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Clarkson BD (2010) The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol 98:725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wassen MJ, Venterink HO, Lapshina ED, Tanneberger F (2005) Endangered plants persist under phosphorus limitation. Nature 437:547–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Young IM, Ritz K (2000) Tillage, habitat space and function of soil microbes. Soil Till Res 53:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zak DR, Grigal DF, Gleeson S, Tilman D (1990) Carbon and nitrogen cycling during old-field succession: constraints on plant and microbial biomass. Biogeochemistry 11:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zeller V, Bardgett RD, Tappeiner U (2001) Site and management effects on soil microbial properties of subalpine meadows: a study of land abandonment along a north–south gradient in the European Alps. Soil Biol Biochem 33:639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zornoza R, Guerrero C, Mataix-Solera J, Scow KM, Arcenegui V, Mataix-Beneyto J (2009) Changes in soil microbial community structure following the abandonment of agricultural terraces in mountainous areas of Eastern Spain. Appl Soil Ecol 42:315–323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Spohn
    • 1
  • Tibor József Novák
    • 2
  • József Incze
    • 2
  • Luise Giani
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Soil Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER)University BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental GeographyUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary
  3. 3.Department of Soil Science, Institute of Biology and Environmental SciencesCarl von Ossietzky University OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations