Endophytic bacterial community composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum) is determined by plant tissue type, developmental stage and soil nutrient availability
To understand effects of tissue type, growth stage and soil fertilisers on bacterial endophyte communities of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hereward).
Endophytes were isolated from wheat grown under six fertiliser conditions in the long term Broadbalk Experiment at Rothamsted Research, UK. Samples were taken in May and July from root and leaf tissues.
Root and leaf communities differed in abundance and composition of endophytes. Endophytes were most abundant in roots and the Proteobacteria were most prevalent. In contrast, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, the Gram positive phyla, were most prevalent in the leaves. Both fertiliser treatment and sample time influenced abundance and relative proportions of each phylum and genus in the endosphere. A higher density of endophytes was found in the Nil input treatment plants.
Robust isolation techniques and stringent controls are critical for accurate recovery of endophytes. The plant tissue type, plant growth stage, and soil fertiliser treatment all contribute to the composition of the endophytic bacterial community in wheat. These results should help facilitate targeted development of endophytes for beneficial applications in agriculture.
KeywordsBacterial endophyte Community structure Culture dependent Fertiliser RFLP Nitrogen
We are grateful to the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and to Novozymes for providing the funding for a PhD studentship for R. Robinson. We would particularly like to thank Dr Stephen Powers (Rothamsted Research) for his help and advice with statistical analysis and Dr Ben Raymond (Imperial College) for statistical advice and recommendations.
- Barroso JM (2011) Regulations: Commission implementing regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the the European Parliament and of the council as regards the list of approved active substances. Official Journal of the European Union 153.Google Scholar
- Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K, Ver Loren van Themaat E, Ahmadinejad N, Assenza F, Rauf P, Huettel B, Reinhardt R, Schmelzer E, Peplies J, Gloeckner FO, Amann R, Eickhorst T, Schulze-Lefert P (2012) Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488:91–95. doi: 10.1038/nature11336 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark IM, Buchkina N, Jhurreea D, Goulding KW, Hirsch PR (2012) Impacts of nitrogen application rates on the activity and diversity of denitrifying bacteria in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:1235–1244. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0314 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2009) The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D141–D145. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn879 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferrando L, Fernandez Manay J, Fernandez Scavino A (2012) Molecular and culture-dependent analyses revealed similarities in the endophytic bacterial community composition of leaves from three rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80:696–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01339.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontol Electron 4:9Google Scholar
- Lauber CL, Strickland MS, Bradford MA, Fierer N (2008) The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types. Soil Biol Biochem 40(9):2407–2415. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.021
- Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH, Yourstone S, Gehring J, Malfatti S, Tremblay J, Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, del Rio TG, Edgar RC, Eickhorst T, Ley RE, Hugenholtz P, Tringe SG, Dangl JL (2012) Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488:86–90. doi: 10.1038/nature11237 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Monteiro RA, Balsanelli E, Wassem R, Marin AM, Brusamarello-Santos LCC, Schmidt MA, Tadra-Sfeir MZ, Pankievicz VCS, Cruz LM, Chubatsu LS, Pedrosa FO, Souza EM (2012) Herbaspirillum-plant interactions: microscopical, histological and molecular aspects. Plant Soil 356:175–196. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1125-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- OECD/FAO (2011) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011–2020. OECD Publishing and FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Rothamsted (2006) Guide to the classical and other long-term experiments, datasets and sample archive. Lawes Agricultural Trust Co. Ltd, Harpenden, UKGoogle Scholar
- Thaweenut N, Hachisuka Y, Ando S, Yanagisawa S, Yoneyama T (2010) Two seasons’ study on nifH gene expression and nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic endophytes in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids): expression of nifH genes similar to those of rhizobia. Plant Soil 338:435–449. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0557-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turner TR, Ramakrishnan K, Walshaw J, Heavens D, Alston M, Swarbreck D, Osbourn A, Grant A, Poole PS (2013) Comparative metatranscriptomics reveals kingdom level changes in the rhizosphere microbiome of plants. ISME J 7(12):2248–2258. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.119
- van Grinsven HJM, Spiertz JHJ, Westhoek HJ, Bouwman AF, Erisman JW (2013) Nitrogen use and food production in European regions from a global perspective. The Journal of Agricultural Science Nitrogen Workshop Special Issue Paper: 1–11. doi: 10.1017/s0021859613000853
- Zhalnina K, de Quadros PD, Gano KA, Davis-Richardson A, Fagen JR, Brown CT, Giongo A, Drew JC, Sayavedra-Soto LA, Arp DJ, Camargo FA, Daroub SH, Clark IM, McGrath SP, Hirsch PR, Triplett EW (2013) Ca. Nitrososphaera and Bradyrhizobium are inversely correlated and related to agricultural practices in long-term field experiments. Front Microbiol 4:104. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar