Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilisation stimulates stem growth
- 839 Downloads
Few direct tests of phosphorus (P) limitation on highly-weathered soils have been conducted, especially in mature, native Eucalyptus stands. We tested whether growth in a mature >80-year old stand of Eucalyptus tereticornis in Cumberland Plain Woodland was limited by P, and whether this P-limitation affected leaf photosynthetic capacity.
P was added to trees at the native woodland site at 50 kg ha-1 year-1 in each of 3 years, and stem and leaf responses were measured.
Leaf P concentrations before fertilisation were < 1 mg g-1 and N:P ratios ranged between 16 and 23. Addition of 50 kg ha-1 year-1 of P increased leaf P concentration significantly (+50 %) compared to non-fertilised trees, for two but not for the 3 years. Despite higher leaf P in fertilised trees, photosynthetic capacity was unaffected. However, there was a 54 % increase in tree stem basal area growth during the first and second years of P fertilisation, statistically significant in the second year of the experiment.
Our evidence shows that E. tereticornis is P-limited on Cumberland Plain soils. This has implications for forest responses to rising atmospheric [CO2], because photosynthesis in elevated [CO2] may become further constrained by required phosphate pools within the photosynthetic apparatus.
KeywordsEucFACE Basal area increment Eucalyptus tereticornis Leaf N:P ratio Nutrients Photosynthesis Stem growth
The research was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC Discovery grant DP110105102). EucFACE is supported by the Australian government through the Education Investment Fund administrated by the Dept. of Industry and Science. Burhan Amiji and Marine Guerret are thanked for assistance in the field. Paul Milham and Cassie Mosdal are gratefully acknowledged for help in developing and implementing our method to obtain leaf P concentrations at the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment. We thank the reviewers of the initial manuscript for providing thoughtful comments that improved the paper.
- Battie-Laclau P, Laclau JP, Beri C, Mietton L, Muniz MRA, Arenque BC, Piccolo MDC, Jordan-Meille L, Bouillet JP, Nouvellon Y (2014) Photosynthetic and anatomical responses of Eucalyptus grandis leaves to potassium and sodium supply in a field experiment. Plant Cell Environ 37:70–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brady NC, Weil RR (2007) The nature and properties of soils. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Cleveland CC, Townsend AR, Taylor P, Alvarez-Clare S, Bustamante MMC, Chuyong G, Dobrowski SZ, Grierson P, Harms KE, Houlton BZ, Marklein A, Parton W, Porder S, Reed SC, Sierra CA, Silver WL, Tanner EVJ, Wieder WR (2011) Relationships among net primary productivity, nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a pan-tropical analysis. Ecol Lett 14:939–947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cromer RN, Wheeler AM, Barr NJ (1984) Mineral nutrition and growth of Eucalyptus seedlings. N Z J For Sci 14:229–239Google Scholar
- Epstein E, Bloom AJ (eds) (2005) Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, p 380Google Scholar
- Haase DL, Rose R (1995) Vector analysis and its use for interpreting plant nutrient shifts in response to silvicultural treatments. For Sci 41:54–66Google Scholar
- Hedin LO, Brookshire ENJ, Menge DNL, Barron AR (2009) The nitrogen paradox in tropical forest ecosystems. Annual review of ecology evolution and systematics. Annual Reviews, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- Isbell RF (2002) The Australian soil classification (Revised Edition). CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Judd TS, Attiwill PM, Adams MA (1996) Nutrient concentrations in Eucalyptus: a synthesis in relation to differences between taxa, sites and components. In: Attiwill PM, Adams MA (eds) Nutrition of eucalypts. CSIRO Press, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Lambert MJ, Turner J (1987) Suburban development and change in vegetation nutrient status. Aust J Bot 12:193–196Google Scholar
- Nielsen U, Prior S, Delroy B, Walker JKM, Ellsworth DS, Powell JR (2015) Response of belowground communities to short-term phosphorus addition in a phosphorus-limited Woodland. Plant Soil doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2432-6
- Ollinger SV, Smith ML, Martin ME, Hallett RA, Goodale CL, Aber JD (2002) Regional variation in foliar chemistry and N cycling among forests of diverse history and composition. Ecology 83:339–355Google Scholar
- Tozer M (2003) The native vegetation of the Cumberland Plain, western Sydney: systematic classification and field identification of communities. CunninghamiaGoogle Scholar
- Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750Google Scholar
- Wright SJ, Yavitt JB, Wurzburger N, Turner BL, Tanner EVJ, Sayer EJ, Santiago LS, Kaspari M, Hedin LO, Harms KE, Garcia MN, Corre MD (2011) Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest. Ecology 92:1616–1625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar