Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 391, Issue 1–2, pp 207–218 | Cite as

Growth, morphological traits and mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots respond differently to nitrogen addition in a slash pine plantation in subtropical China

  • Liang Kou
  • Dali Guo
  • Hao Yang
  • Wenlong Gao
  • Shenggong LiEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Growth, morphological traits, and mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots show high degree of plasticity in response to changes in nutrient availability, causing shifts in root nutrient-foraging strategy. However, little is known about how this plasticity associated with root branching orders respond to atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition in subtropical coniferous forests.

Methods

We used soil block sampling method to examine the responses of six key root functional parameters (including three morphological traits (specific root length (SRL), root tissue density (RTD), and root diameter), two growth indices (total root length (TRL) and biomass) on an areal basis across five root orders, and ectomycorrhizal (EM) tip colonization) to different doses and species of N addition in a slash pine (Pinus elliottii) plantation in subtropical China.

Results

TRL, root biomass in all root orders, and EM tip colonization increased significantly with N addition. However, SRL, RTD, and root diameter did not change in any root orders. In comparison to low doses of N input, high doses of N input exerted greater effects on lower-order roots. In regard to species of N added, stronger responses in lower-order roots were observed under ammonium-based than nitrated-based N input. Foliar P content was significantly decreased and stoichiometric N:P ratio was markedly increased in response to high dose of ammonium-based N input.

Conclusions

Fine root growth and EM tip colonization displayed higher degree of plasticity than morphological traits in response to N addition. The plastic responses were not root-order dependent, but dependent on both N dose and species, especially for ephemeral lower-order roots that are mostly like to be the main nutrient acquisition structures. Our results imply that while N limitation was alleviated by exogenous N input, P limitation may persist or even be exacerbated, thus causing an increase of absorptive root length, biomass, and dependence on ectomycorrhizae for nutrient acquisition in subtropical slash pine plantation forests.

Keywords

Ectomycorrhizal tip colonization Fine root growth Morphological traits Nitrogen deposition Root branching order Stoichiometric ratio 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is financially supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31130009) and the National Key Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Program (No. 2013BAC03B03). Special thanks are due to the Qianyanzhou Experimental Station of Red Soil and Hilly Land, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiangxi province, China, for permission to work in their permanent slash pine plantation experiment plots. Thanks to all the staff and students of the Qianyanzhou Experimental Station for their assistance in the field work. The authors acknowledge the contributions of the anonymous reviewers.

Supplementary material

11104_2015_2420_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 35 kb)
11104_2015_2420_MOESM2_ESM.docx (81 kb)
Fig. S1 (DOCX 80 kb)
11104_2015_2420_MOESM3_ESM.docx (141 kb)
Fig. S2 (DOCX 140 kb)

References

  1. Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Steudler P, Melillo JM (1989) Nitrogen Saturation in Northern Forest Ecosystems. Bioscience 39:378–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams TS, McCormack ML, Eissenstat DM (2013) Foraging strategies in trees of different root morphology: the role of root lifespan. Tree Physiol 33:940–948CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolan NS (1991) A critical-review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant Soil 134:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun S, Thomas VFD, Quiring R, Fluckiger W (2010) Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus. Environ Pollut 158:2043–2052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bünemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E (2010) Phosphorus in action: biological processes in soil phosphorus cycling. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahill JF Jr, McNickle GG (2011) The behavioral ecology of nutrient foraging by plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairney JWG (2011) Ectomycorrhizal fungi: the symbiotic route to the root for phosphorus in forest soils. Plant Soil 344:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callaway RM, Pennings SC, Richards CL (2003) Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:1115–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:545–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke A, Barley K (1968) The uptake of nitrogen from soils in relation to solute diffusion. Soil Res 6:75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Comas LH, Eissenstat DM (2004) Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Funct Ecol 18:388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Comas LH, Bouma TJ, Eissenstat DM (2002) Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species. Oecologia 132:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danielsen L, Lohaus G, Sirrenberg A, Karlovsky P, Bastien C, Pilate G, Polle A (2013) Ectomycorrhizal Colonization and Diversity in Relation to Tree Biomass and Nutrition in a Plantation of Transgenic Poplars with Modified Lignin Biosynthesis. Plos One 8Google Scholar
  15. Dudley SA, File AL (2007) Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol Lett 3:435–438CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (1997) The ecology of root lifespan. Adv Ecol Res 27:1–60Google Scholar
  17. Falkengren-Grerup U (1995) Interspecies Differences in the Preference of Ammonium and Nitrate in Vascular Plants. Oecologia 102:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai ZC, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. George E, Seith B, Schaeffer C, Marschner H (1997) Responses of Picea, Pinus and Pseudotsuga roots to heterogeneous nutrient distribution in soil. Tree Physiol 17:39–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldberg DE, Rajaniemi T, Gurevitch J, Stewart-Oaten A (1999) Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80:1118–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gradowski T, Thomas SC (2006) Phosphorus limitation of sugar maple growth in central Ontario. For Ecol Manag 226:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo DL, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ (2004) Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia 140:450–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo DL, Xia MX, Wei X, Chang WJ, Liu Y, Wang ZQ (2008) Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytol 180:673–683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo YY, Wang JJ, Kong DL, Wang W, Guo DL, Wang YB, Xie QL, Liu YS, Zeng H (2013) Fine root branch orders contribute differentially to uptake, allocation, and return of potentially toxic metals. Environ Sci Technol 47:11465–11472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Güsewell S (2004) N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol 164:243–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Güsewell S, Koerselman M (2002) Variation in nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of wetland plants. Perspect Plant Ecol 5:37–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hageman R (1980) Effect of form of nitrogen on plant growth. In: Meisinger JJ, Randall GW, Vitosh ML, Stelly M, Kroll DM, Cousin MK (eds) Nitrification Inhibitors—Potentials and Limitations, Spec publ ASA 38. Am Soc of Agron and Soil Sci Soc of Am, Madison, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  28. Helmisaari HS, Ostonen I, Lõhmus K, Derome J, Lindroos AJ, Merila P, Nojd P (2009) Ectomycorrhizal root tips in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in boreal forests. Tree Physiol 29:445–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hermans C, Hammond JP, White PJ, Verbruggen N (2006) How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends Plant Sci 11:610–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodge A (2006) Plastic plants and patchy soils. J Exp Bot 57:401–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahmen A, Wanek W, Buchmann N (2008) Foliar δ15N values characterize soil N cycling and reflect nitrate or ammonium preference of plants along a temperate grassland gradient. Oecologia 158:371CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kong DL, Ma CE, Zhang Q, Li L, Chen XY, Zeng H, Guo DL (2014) Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytol 203:863–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuzyakov Y, Xu XL (2013) Competition between roots and microorganisms for nitrogen: mechanisms and ecological relevance. New Phyto 198:656–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leuschner C, Gebel S, Rose L (2013) Root trait responses of six temperate grassland species to intensive mowing and NPK fertilisation: a field study in a temperate grassland. Plant Soil 373:687–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lima JE, Kojima S, Takahashi H, von Wiren N (2010) Ammonium triggers lateral root branching in Arabidopsis in an AMMONIUM TRANSPORTER1;3-dependent manner. Plant Cell 22:3621–3633CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Linkohr BI, Williamson LC, Fitter AH, Leyser HMO (2002) Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis. Plant J 29:751–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lõhmus K, Truu M, Truu J, Ostonen I, Kaar E, Vares A, Uri V, Alama S, Kanal A (2006) Functional diversity of culturable bacterial communities in the rhizosphere in relation to fine-root and soil parameters in alder stands on forest, abandoned agricultural, and oil-shale mining areas. Plant Soil 283:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matson PA, McDowell WH, Townsend AR, Vitousek PM (1999) The globalization of N deposition: ecosystem consequences in tropical environments. Biogeochemistry 46:67–83Google Scholar
  40. Mei L, Gu JC, Zhang ZW, Wang ZQ (2010) Responses of fine root mass, length, production and turnover to soil nitrogen fertilization in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica forests in Northeastern China. J For Res 15:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meier IC, Leuschner C (2008) Genotypic variation and phenotypic plasticity in the drought response of fine roots of European beech. Tree Physiol 28:297–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mou P, Jones RH, Tan ZQ, Bao Z, Chen HM (2013) Morphological and physiological plasticity of plant roots when nutrients are both spatially and temporally heterogeneous. Plant Soil 364:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nicodemus MA, Salifu KF, Jacobs DF (2008) Nitrate reductase activity and nitrogen compounds in xylem exudate of Juglans nigra seedlings: relation to nitrogen source and supply. Trees-Struct Funct 22:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noguchi K, Nagakura J, Kaneko S (2013) Biomass and morphology of fine roots of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) after 3 years of nitrogen fertilization. Front Plant Sci 4:347CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nordin A, Hogberg P, Nasholm T (2001) Soil nitrogen form and plant nitrogen uptake along a boreal forest productivity gradient. Oecologia 129:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ostonen I, Puttsepp U, Biel C, Alberton O, Bakker MR, Lõhmus K, Majdi H, Metcalfe D, Olsthoorn AFM, Pronk A, Vanguelova E, Weih M, Brunner I (2007) Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosyst 141:426–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ostonen I, Helmisaari HS, Borken W, Tedersoo L, Kukumagi M, Bahram M, Lindroos AJ, Nojd P, Uri V, Merila P, Asi E, Lõhmus K (2011) Fine root foraging strategies in Norway spruce forests across a European climate gradient. Glob Chang Biol 17:3620–3632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plassard C, Dell B (2010) Phosphorus nutrition of mycorrhizal trees. Tree Physiol 30:1129–1139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol Monogr 72:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rewald B, Ephrath JE, Rachmilevitch S (2011) A root is a root is a root? Water uptake rates of Citrus root orders. Plant Cell Environ 34:33–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Teste FP, Veneklaas EJ, Dixon KW, Lambers H (2014) Complementary plant nutrient-acquisition strategies promote growth of neighbour species. Funct Ecol 28:819–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tobner CM, Paquette A, Messier C (2013) Interspecific coordination and intraspecific plasticity of fine root traits in North American temperate tree species. Front Plant Sci 4:242CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Treseder KK (2004) A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. New Phytol 164:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang M, Moore TR (2014) Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium stoichiometry in an ombrotrophic peatland reflects plant functional type. Ecosystems 17:673–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang YD, Wang ZL, Wang HM, Guo CC, Bao WK (2012) Rainfall pulse primarily drives litterfall respiration and its contribution to soil respiration in a young exotic pine plantation in subtropical China. Can J For Res 42:657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang GL, Fahey TJ, Xue S, Liu F (2013) Root morphology and architecture respond to N addition in Pinus tabuliformis, west China. Oecologia 171:583–590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wen XF, Wang HM, Wang JL, Yu GR, Sun XM (2010) Ecosystem carbon exchanges of a subtropical evergreen coniferous plantation subjected to seasonal drought, 2003–2007. Biogeosciences 7:357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xia MX, Guo DL, Pregitzer KS (2010) Ephemeral root modules in Fraxinus mandshurica. New Phytol 188:1065–1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhan XY, Yu GR, He NP, Fang HJ, Jia BR, Zhou M, Wang CK, Zhang JH, Zhao GD, Wang SL, Liu YF, Yan JH (2014) Nitrogen deposition and its spatial pattern in main forest ecosystems along north–south transect of eastern China. Chin Geogra Sci 24:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang HM, Forde BG (1998) An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science 279:407–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang JB, Cai ZC, Zhu TB, Yang WY, Müller C (2013) Mechanisms for the retention of inorganic N in acidic forest soils of southern China. Sci Rep 3:2342PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liang Kou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dali Guo
    • 1
  • Hao Yang
    • 1
  • Wenlong Gao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shenggong Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and ModelingInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations