Modeling soil CO2 production and transport to investigate the intra-day variability of surface efflux and soil CO2 concentration measurements in a Scots Pine Forest (Pinus Sylvestris, L.)
- 407 Downloads
The main aim of this study is to improve the mechanistic understanding of soil CO2 efflux (Fs), especially its temporal variation at short-time scales, by investigating, through modeling, which underlying process among CO2 production and its transport up to the atmosphere is responsible for observed intra-day variation of Fs and soil CO2 concentration [CO2].
In this study, a measurement campaign of Fs and vertical soil [CO2] profiles was conducted in a Scots Pine Forest soil in Hartheim (Germany) and used to develop a model testing several hypotheses. A reference model taking into account a purely diffusive CO2 transport and a temperature-dependent CO2 production is compared to models with a more complex description of either CO2 production or CO2 transport. For transport, the introduction of advection and the dispersion is investigated. For the production, the emergent hypothesis of the phloem pressure concentration wave (PPCW) influence is tested.
We show that intra-day variation of Fs and [CO2] is better represented when the more complex CO2 production expression is taken into account compared to the more detailed description of CO2 transport.
We conclude that focus should be placed on the potential factors affecting the CO2 production, rather than on the transport process description
KeywordsSoil CO2 efflux Production Transport Process-based model Intra-day variability
Stéphanie Goffin acknowledges the support of the Belgium National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), within the framework of her thesis (FRIA) and the FEDER (Fonds Européen de Développement Régional). Christophe Wylock acknowledges the support of the FNRS within the framework of his postdoctoral research. The authors are grateful to B. Clerc, P. Courtoisand J.M Gioria of the UMR1137 at INRA Nancy for the installation and maintenance of the experimental set-up during summer 2010. The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their comments.
- Bahn M, Schmitt M, Siegwolf R, Richter A, Bruggemann N (2009) Does photosynthesis affect grassland soil-respired CO2 and its carbon isotope composition on a diurnal timescale? New Phytol 182(2):451–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02755.x
- Bowling DR, Massman WJ (2011) Persistent wind-induced enhancement of diffusive CO2 transport in a mountain forest snowpack. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 116(G4), G04006Google Scholar
- Denman KL et al (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system andbiogeochemistry. In: Solomon S (ed) Climate change 2007: the physicalscience basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment reportof the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- FAO (2006) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. World Soil ResourcesReport No 103, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Gamnitzer U, Moyes AB, Bowling DR, H, S (2011) Measuring and modelling the isotopic composition of soil respiration: insight from a grassland tracer experiment. Biogeosciences 8(5)Google Scholar
- Hirano T (2005) Seasonal and diurnal variations in topsoil and subsoil respiration under snowpack in a temperate deciduous forest. Global Biogeochem Cycles 19(2): n/a–n/a.Google Scholar
- Hirano T, Kim H, Tanaka Y (2003) Long-term half-hourly measurement of soil CO2 concentration and soil respiration in a temperate deciduous forest. J Geophys Res Atmos 108(D20): n/a–n/a.Google Scholar
- Jassal R, Black A, Novak M, Morgenstern K, Nesic Z, Gaumont-Guay D (2005) Relationship between soil CO2 concentrations and forest-floor CO2 effluxes. Agric For Meteorol 130(3):176–192Google Scholar
- Pumpanen J, Bernard Longdoz, Kutsch WL (2010) Field measurements of soil respiration: principles and constraints, potentials and limitations of different methods. Soil Carbon Dyn. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Risk D, Kellman L, Beltrami H (2008) A new method for in situ soil gas diffusivity measurement and applications in the monitoring of subsurface CO2 production. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 113(G2), G02018Google Scholar
- Riveros-Iregui DA, McGlynn BL, Epstein HE, Welsch DL (2008) Interpretation and evaluation of combined measurement techniques for soil CO2 efflux: discrete surface chambers and continuous soil CO2 concentration probes. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 113(G4), G04027Google Scholar