Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 389, Issue 1–2, pp 131–144 | Cite as

The influence of soils with different textures on development, colonization capacity and interactions between Fusarium culmorum and Pseudomonas fluorescens in soil and on barley roots

  • Olga K. Strunnikova
  • Nadezhda A. Vishnevskaya
  • Anastasia S. Ruchiy
  • Vlada Yu. Shakhnazarova
  • Nikolai I. Vorobyov
  • Vladimir K. Chebotar
Regular Article

Abstract

Backgrounds and aims

Soils are known to influence the survival and the biocontrol activity of Pseudomonas bacteria. However, few studies have focused on the development of the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium culmorum under various soil conditions and its interactions with the antagonistic microflora. The aims of our research were to study the development of Fusarium culmorum and Pseudomonas fluorescens in two soils with different textures and on barley roots and to assess the influence of these soils in the growth, colonization capacity and interactions between the phytopathogen and the antagonist.

Methods

Development of F. culmorum and P. fluorescens was studied in dynamics on membranes in two non-sterile soils with different textures, as well as on barley roots. F. culmorum was identified by indirect immunofluorescent method, and P. fluorescens was visualised with the use of a gus-marked strain.

Results

P. fluorescens 2137gus suppressed considerably the mycelium growth and the macroconidia formation of F. culmorum in both soils. However, bacterium did not decrease considerably the density of the fungal mycelium on the surface of barley roots. On the contrary, the amount of the 2137gus was decreased considerably on roots in the light loamy soil in the presence of F. culmorum. Nevertheless, biocontrol effect of P. fluorescens 2137gus was expressed in the light loamy soil. There was no direct correlation between the mycelia density on membranes in soils and the amount of the fungus on roots at the beginning of colonization. The amount of the fungus on root surface did not correlate directly with the intensity of barley root rot.

Conclusion

The behaviour and interactions of F. culmorum and P. fluorescens depend on soil type and the habitat (soil or roots).

Keywords

Biocontrol Gus-marked strain Immunofluorescence Root rot 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 10-04-00488) and partially by Government of Russian Federation, grant 074-U01. Also, we thank the anonymous reviewers and the subject editor for their highly valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Amir H, Alabouvette C (1993) Involvement of soil abiotic factors in the mechanisms of soil suppressiveness to Fusarium wilts. Soil Biol Biochem 25:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1976) Microbial colonization of plant roots. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chebotar V, Nakayama Y, Kang UG, El Gaali E, Akao S (1999) Use of reporter gus-gene to study the colonization of rice roots by Azospirillum lipoferum. Soil Microorg 53:13–18Google Scholar
  4. Chebotar VK, Asis CA, Akao S (2001) Production of growth-promoting substances and high colonization ability of rhizobacteria enhance the nitrogen fixation of soybean when inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Biol Fertil Soils 34:427–432Google Scholar
  5. Cook JR, Baker FK (1983) The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. American Phytopathology Society Press, St. Paul, p 539Google Scholar
  6. Duffy BK, Defago G (1997) Zinc improves biocontrol of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato by Pseudomonas fluorescens and represses the production of pathogen metabolites inhibitory to bacterial antibiotic biosynthesis. Phytopathology 87:1250–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Duijff BJ, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B (1994) Suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas putida WCS 358 at different levels of disease incidence and iron availability. Biocontrol Technol 4:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerlach W, Nirenberg H (1982) The genus Fusarium—a pictorial atlas. Mitt Biol Bundesanst Land U Forstwirtsch Berlin-Dahlem 209:1–40Google Scholar
  9. Heijnen CE, Hok-A-Hin CH, Van Elsas JD (1993) Root colonization by Pseudomonas fluorescens introduced into soil amended with bentonite. Soil Biol Biochem 25:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoper H, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C (1995) Involvement of clay type and pH in the mechanisms of soil suppressiveness to fusarium wilt of flax. Soil Biol Biochem 27:955–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J Lab Clin Med 44:301–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kravchenko LV, Makarova NM, Azarova TS, Provorov NA, Tikhonovich IA (2002) Isolation and phenotypic characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria with high antiphytopathogenic activity and root-colonizing ability. Microbiology 71:444–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurek E, Jaroszuk-Scisel J (2003) Rye (Secale cereale) growth promotion by Pseudomonas fluorescens strains and their interactions with Fusarium culmorum under various soil conditions. Biological control: theory and applications in pest management. Biol Control 26:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leeman M, Van Pelt JA, Hendrick MJ, Scheffer RJ, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B (1995) Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of radish in commercial greenhouse trials by seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS374. Phytopathology 85:1301–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemanceau P, Alabouvette C (1993) Suppression of Fusarium-wilt by fluorescent pseudomonads: mechanisms and applications. Biocontrol Sci Technol 3:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ownley BH, Duffy BK, Weller DM (2003) Identification and manipulation of soil properties to improve the biological control performance of phenazine-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3333–3343CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pantou MP, Strunnikova OK, Shakhnazarova VY, Vishnevskaya NA, Papalouka VG, Typas MA (2005) Molecular and immunochemical phylogeny of Verticillium species. Mycol Res 109:889–902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Parry DW, Jenkinson P, McLeod L (1995) Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals—a review. Plant Pathol 44:207–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pomeranz Y, Bechter DB, Sauer DB, Seitz LM (1990) Fusarium head blight (scab) in cereal grains. In: Pomeranz Y (ed) Advances in cereal science and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, pp 373–433Google Scholar
  20. Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1997) Frequency of antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:881–887PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Scher FM, Baker R (1982) Effect of Pseudomonas putida and a synthetic iron chelator on induction of soil suppressiveness to fusarium wilt pathogens. Phytopathology 70:412–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shakhnazarova VY, Feoktistova AS, Chizhevskaya EP, Vishnevskaya NA, Strunnikova OK (2012) Optimization of DNA extraction for Fusarium culmorum identification and quantification in barley and wheat roots with PCR. Mycol Phytopathol 46:287–292 (rus)Google Scholar
  23. Shakhnazarova VY, Strunnikova OK, Vishnevskaya NA, Stefanova NA, Muromtsev GS (2000) Structure and dynamics of Fusarium culmorum population in soil of different textures. Eurasian Soil Sci 33:86–91Google Scholar
  24. Shakhnazarova VY, Strunnikova OK, Vishnevskaya NA (2003) Dynamics and biomorphological structure of micromycetes populations in sterile soil mixtures of different textures. Eurasian Soil Sci 36:195–201Google Scholar
  25. Shakhnazarova VY, Strunnikova OK, Vishnevskaya NA (2004) Development of introduced population of Fusarium culmorum in soil: formation and lysis of fungal structures. Mycol Phytopathol 38:61–70 (rus)Google Scholar
  26. Singleton LL, Mihail JD, Rush CM (eds) (1992) Methods for research on soilborne phytopathogenic fungi. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, p 266Google Scholar
  27. Strigul NS, Kravchenko LV (2006) Mathematical modeling of PGPR inoculation into the rhizosphere. Environ Model Softw 21:1158–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strunnikova OK, Shakhnazarova VY, Vishnevskaya NA, Chebotar VK, Tikhonovich IA (2007) Development and relations of Fusarium culmorum and Pseudomonas fluorescens in soil. Microbiology 76:596–602. doi: 10.1134/S002626170705013X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strunnikova OK, Shakhnazarova VY, Vishnevskaya NA, Chebotar VK, Tikhonovich IA (2008) Interactions between Fusarium culmorum and Pseudomonas fluorescens in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of barley. Mycol Phytopathol 42:70–77Google Scholar
  30. Strunnikova OK, Vishnevskaya NA, Tikhonovich IA (2010) Colonization of barley roots by Fusarium culmorum and influence of Pseudomonas fluorescens on the process. Microbiology 79:865–870. doi: 10.1134/S0026261710060251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strunnikova OK, Feoktistova AS, Vishnevskaya NA, Chebotar VK (2011) Role competition between Pseudomonas fluorescens 2137gus and Fusarium culmorum for colonization of barley roots. Mycol Phytopathol 45:362–369 (rus)Google Scholar
  32. Thomashow LS, Weller DM (1995) Current concepts in the use of introduced bacteria for biological disease control: mechanisms and antifungal metabolites. In: Stacey G, Keen NT (eds) Plant-microbe interactions. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 187–325Google Scholar
  33. Toyoda H, Hashimoto H, Utsumi R, Kobayashi H, Ouchi S (1988) Detoxification of fusaric acid by a fusaric acidresistant mutant of Pseudomonas solanacearum and its application to biological control of fusarium wilt of tomato. Phytopathology 78:1307–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:379–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM, McSpadden Gardener BB, Thomashow LS (2002) Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:309–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga K. Strunnikova
    • 1
  • Nadezhda A. Vishnevskaya
    • 1
  • Anastasia S. Ruchiy
    • 1
  • Vlada Yu. Shakhnazarova
    • 1
  • Nikolai I. Vorobyov
    • 1
  • Vladimir K. Chebotar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.All-Russia Research Institute for Agriculture MicrobiologySt. Petersburg-PushkinRussia
  2. 2.International Research Centre “Biotechnologies of the Third Millennium”ITMO UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations