A new LandscapeDNDC biogeochemical module to predict CH4 and N2O emissions from lowland rice and upland cropping systems
- 1.1k Downloads
Background and aims
Replacing paddy rice by upland systems such as maize cultivation is an on-going trend in SE Asia caused by increasing water scarcity and higher demand for meat. How such land management changes will feedback on soil C and N cycles and soil greenhouse gas emissions is not well understood at present.
A new LandscapeDNDC biogeochemical module was developed that allows the effect of land management changes on soil C and N cycle to be simulated. The new module is applied in combination with further modules simulating microclimate and crop growth and evaluated against observations from field experiments.
The model simulations agree well with observed dynamics of CH 4 emissions in paddy rice depending on changes in climatic conditions and agricultural management. Magnitude and peak emission periods of N 2 O from maize cultivation are simulated correctly, though there are still deficits in reproducing day-to-day dynamics. These shortcomings are most likely related to simulated soil hydrology and may only be resolved if LandscapeDNDC is coupled to more complex hydrological models.
LandscapeDNDC allows for simulation of changing land management practices in SE Asia. The possibility to couple LandscapeDNDC to more complex hydrological models is a feature needed to better understand related effects on soil-atmosphere-hydrosphere interactions.
KeywordsMethane Nitrous oxide Paddy rice Maize Model
We thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for its generous funding (FOR 1701, “Introducing Non-Flooded Crops in Rice-Dominated Landscapes: Impacts on Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Cycles (ICON)”, BU1173/13-1 and KI1413).
Furthermore, funding was provided via the knowledge hub of the Joint Research Programming Initiative on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change (FACCE-JPI) within the project “Modelling European Agriculture with Climate Change for Food Security” (MACSUR) and the ÉCLAIRE project (Effects of Climate Change on Air Pollution and Response Strategies for European Ecosystems) funded by the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7).
KBB and RW received additional financial support via the Climate Change, Agricultural and Food Security Programme (CCAFS) of CGIAR Institutes.
- Alberto MCR, Quilty JR, Buresh RJ, et al. (2014) Actual evapotranspiration and dual crop coefficients for dry-seeded rice and hybrid maize grown with overhead sprinkler irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 136:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.01.005
- Blagodatsky S, Grote R, Kiese R, Werner C, Butterbach-Bahl K (2011) Modelling of microbial carbon and nitrogen turnover in soil with special emphasis on N-trace gases emission. Plant and Soil 346:297–330–330. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0821-z
- Borken W, Matzner E (2008) Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Glob Chang Biol 14:1–17Google Scholar
- Bronson KF, Cassman KG, Wassmann R, Olk DC, van Noordwijk M, Garrity DP (2006) Soil carbon dynamics in different cropping systems in principal ecoregions of Asia. In: LaI R, Kimble J, Follett RF, Stewar BA (eds) In management of carbon sequestration in soil. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 35–57Google Scholar
- Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H, Rennenberg H (2000) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the aerenchyma in two rice cultivars. Phyton 40:43–55Google Scholar
- Butterbach-Bahl K, Kock M, Willibald G, Hewett B, Buhagiar S, Papen H, Kiese R (2004b) Temporal variations of fluxes of NO, NO2, N2O, CO2 and CH4 in a tropical rain forest ecosystem. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18, doi: 10.1029/2004GB002243
- Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20130122–20130122. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0122 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciais P, Cox PM, Dickinson RE, Hauglustaine D, Heinze C, Holland E, Jacob D, Lohmann U, Ramachandran S, da Silva Dias PL, Wofsy SC, Zhang X (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Firestone MK, Davidson EA (1989) Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere, In: Andreae MO, Schimel DS (eds), John Wiley, New York, pp. 7–21, 1989Google Scholar
- Haas E, Klatt S, Fröhlich A, Kraft P, Werner C, Kiese R, Grote R, Breuer L, Butterbach-Bahl K (2013) LandscapeDNDC: a process model for simulation of biosphere–atmosphere–hydrosphere exchange processes at site and regional scale. Landsc Ecol 28:615–636. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9772-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kesik M, Ambus P, Baritz R, Brüggemann N, Butterbach-Bahl K, Damm M, Duyzer J, Horvath L, Kiese R, Kitzler B, Leip A, Li C, Pihlatie M, Pilegaard K, Seufert G, Simpson D, Skiba U, Smiatek G, Vesala T, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2005) Inventories of N2O and NO emissions from European forest soils. Biogeosciences 2:353–375. doi: 10.5194/bg-2-353-2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matthews RB, Wassmann R, Arah JRM (2000a) Using a crop-soil simulation model and GIS techniques to assess methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. I. Model development. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58:11–159Google Scholar
- Moormann FR, van Breemen N (1978) Rice: soil, water, land. IRRI, Los BanosGoogle Scholar
- Roger PA (1996) Biology and management of the floodwater ecosystem in rice fields. IRRI, Los BanosGoogle Scholar
- Schütz H, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Conrad R, Rennenberg H, Seiler W (1989a) A 3-year continuous record on the influence of daytime, season, and fertilizer treatment on methane emission rates from an Italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res 94:16405–16416. doi: 10.1029/JD094iD13p16405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1957) Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Publications in climatology, vol X, no 3. Drexel Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Climatology, CentertonGoogle Scholar
- Timsina J, Buresh RJ, Dobermann A, Dixon J (2011) Rice-maize systems in Asia: current situation and potential. International Rice Research Institute and International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Los BañosGoogle Scholar
- van Bodegom PM, Leffelaar PA, Stams AJM, Wassmann R (2000) Modeling Methane Emissions from Rice Fields: Variability, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis of Processes Involved. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 58:231–248–248. doi: 10.1023/A:1009854905333
- Weller S, Kraus D, Ayag KRP, Wassmann R, Butterbach-Bahl K, Kiese R (2014) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice and maize production in diversified rice cropping systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (under review)Google Scholar
- Werner C, Butterbach-Bahl K, Haas E, Hickler T, Kiese R (2007) A global inventory of N2O emissions from tropical rainforest soils using a detailed biogeochemical model. Global Biogeochem Cycles 21. doi: 10.1029/2006GB002909