Plant and Soil

, Volume 384, Issue 1–2, pp 37–51 | Cite as

Wheat leaf properties affecting the absorption and subsequent translocation of foliar-applied phosphoric acid fertiliser

  • C. A. E. Peirce
  • T. M. McBeath
  • V. Fernández
  • M. J. McLaughlin
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Although foliar fertilisation using liquid forms of phosphorus (P) is not a new concept, its adoption has been hindered by a limited understanding of the variability in performance of fluid forms of foliar P applied to broadacre crops. There is a need to identify how the surface structure of leaves influences the absorption and subsequent translocation of foliar-applied P in above ground plant parts.

Methods

This study examined the surface properties of wheat leaves using scanning electron microscopy and measured the recovery of foliar-applied fertiliser that was labelled with either 32P or 33P from both the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) leaf sides into untreated plant parts.

Results

We found that the adaxial leaf surface absorbed and translocated more foliar-applied P away from the treated leaf than the abaxial surface, likely related to the higher abundance of trichomes and stomata present on that side of the leaf. The recovery of the foliar-applied fertiliser varied with rate and timing of application; ranging from <30 % to as much as 80 % of the adaxial-applied fertiliser translocated from the treated leaf into the wheat ear.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the differences in surface morphological features between leaf sides influenced the combined absorption and subsequent translocation of foliar-applied P in the above ground plant parts. This is due to a direct effect on the foliar pathway and/or due to differences in wettability affecting both the leaf coverage and drying time of fertilisers on the leaves. Although foliar fertilisation in this study contributed less than 10 % of the total P in the plant, it provided a more efficient pathway for P fertilisation than soil-applied P.

Keywords

Foliar uptake Foliar translocation Phosphorus Adaxial Abaxial Wheat Radiotracer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Craig Priest for assistance with contact angle measurements and advice on leaf wettability. The authors thank Caroline Johnston for technical assistance and Paula Guzman for comments on the manuscript. We would also like to acknowledge Adelaide Microscopy for use of the SEM and DIC Microscopes and technical assistance from Gwen Mayo. C Peirce thanks the Grains Research and Development Corporation for their Grains Industry Research Scholarship, The Commonwealth Hill Trust for their Commonwealth Hill Scholarship and the Fluid Fertilizer Foundation (USA) for financial support.

References

  1. Barel D, Black C (1979a) Effect of neutralization and addition of urea, sucrose, and various glycols on phosphorus absorption and leaf damage from foliar-applied phosphate. Plant Soil 52:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barel D, Black CA (1979b) Foliar application of P. II. Yield responses of corn and soybeans sprayed with various condensed phosphates and P-N compounds in greenhouse and field experiments. Agron J 71:21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrow NJ (1974) The slow reactions between soil and anions: 1. Effects of time, temperature, and water content of a soil on the decrease in effectiveness of phosphate for plant growth. Soil Sci 118:380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batten G, Wardlaw I, Aston M (1986) Growth and the distribution of phosphorus in wheat developed under various phosphorus and temperature regimes. Aust J Agric Res 37:459–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum BR, Tulloch AP, Bailey LG (1980) A survey of epicuticular waxes among genera of Triticeae. 1. Ultrastructure of glumes and some leaves as observed with the scanning electron-microscope. Can J Bot 58:2467–2480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianchi G, Figini ML (1986) Epicuticular waxes on glaucous and nonglaucous durum wheat lines. J Agric Food Chem 34:429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer CA, Smith WK, Vogelmann TC (1991) Functional interaction between leaf trichomes, leaf wettability and the optical properties of water droplets. Plant Cell Environ 14:955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornish PS (2009) Research directions: Improving plant uptake of soil phosphorus, and reducing dependency on input of phosphorus fertiliser. Crop Pasture Sci 60:190–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Ruiter H, Uffing AJM, Meinen E, Prins A (1990) Influence of surfactants and plant species on leaf retention of spray solutions. Weed Sci 38:567–572Google Scholar
  10. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB (1995) Basic plant pathology methods. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  11. Doroshkov AV, Pshenichnikova TA, Afonnikov DA (2011) Morphological characterization and inheritance of leaf hairiness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as analyzed by computer-aided phenotyping. Russ J Genet 47:739–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eckerson SH (1908) The number and size of the stomata. Bot Gaz 46:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eglinton G, Hamilton RJ (1967) Leaf epicuticular waxes. Sci 156:1322–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eichert T, Fernández V (2012) Chapter 4 - Uptake and release of elements by leaves and other aerial plant parts. In: Marschner P (ed) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants (Third edition). Academic Press, San Diego, pp 71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eichert T, Goldbach HE (2008) Equivalent pore radii of hydrophilic foliar uptake routes in stomatous and astomatous leaf surfaces – further evidence for a stomatal pathway. Physiol Plant 132:491–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eichert T, Goldbach HE, Burkhardt J (1998) Evidence for the uptake of large anions through stomatal pores. Bot Acta 111:461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández V, Brown PH (2013) From plant surface to plant metabolism: the uncertain fate of foliar-applied nutrients. Front Plant Sci 4:289PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernández V, Eichert T (2009) Uptake of hydrophilic solutes through plant leaves: current state of knowledge and perspectives of foliar fertilization. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:36–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernández V, Ebert G, Winkelmann G (2005) The use of microbial siderophores for foliar iron application studies. Plant Soil 72:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernández V, Khayet M, Montero-Prado P, Heredia-Guerrero JA, Liakopoulos G, Karabourniotis G, del Rio V, Dominguez E, Tacchini I, Nerin C, Val J, Heredia A (2011) New insights into the properties of pubescent surfaces: peach fruit as a model. Plant Physiol 156:2098–2108PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernández V, Guzmán P, Peirce C A E, McBeath T M, Khayet M, McLaughlin M J (2014a) Effect of wheat phosphorus status on leaf surface properties and permeability to foliar applied phosphorus. Plant Soil 1–14. Doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2052-6Google Scholar
  22. Fernández V, Sancho-Knapik D, Guzmán P, Peguero-Pina J J, Gil L, Karabourniotis G, Khayet M, Fasseas C, Heredia-Guerrero J A, Heredia A, Gil-Pelegrin E (2014b) Wettability, polarity and water absorption of Quercus ilex leaves: effect of leaf side and age. Plant Physiol (in press). DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.242040
  23. Forsberg PSH, Priest C, Brinkmann M, Sedev R, Ralston J (2010) Contact line pinning on microstructured surfaces for liquids in the Wenzel state. Langmuir 26:860–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gooding MJ, Davies WP (1992) Foliar urea fertilization of cereals: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 32:209–222Google Scholar
  25. Grant CA, Flaten DN, Tomasiewicz DJ, Sheppard SC (2001) The importance of early season phosphorus nutrition. Can J Plant Sci 81:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gutschick VP (1999) Biotic and abiotic consequences of differences in leaf structure. New Phytol 143:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holloway PJ (1969) The effects of superficial wax on leaf wettability. Ann Appl Biol 63:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holloway PJ (1993) Structure and chemistry of plant cuticles. Pestic Sci 37:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Isbell RF (1997) The Australian soil classification. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  30. Klute A (1986) Water retention: laboratory methods. American Society of Agronomy Inc./ Soil Science Society of America, Inc., MadisonGoogle Scholar
  31. Koch K, Barthlott W, Koch S, Hommes A, Wandelt K, Mamdouh W, De-Feyter S, Broekmann P (2006) Structural analysis of wheat wax (Triticum aestivum cv ‘Naturastar’ L.): from the molecular level to three dimensional crystals. Planta 223(2):258–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Konboon Y, Blair G, Lefroy R, Whitbread A (2000) Tracing the nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon released from plant residues in a soil/plant system. Aust J Soil Res 38:699–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mallarino AP, Haq MU, Murrell TS (2005) Early season foliar fertilization of soybeans. Better Crops 89:11–13Google Scholar
  34. Marschner P, Rengel Z (2012) Chapter 12 - Nutrient availability in soils. In: Marschner P (ed) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants (Third edition). Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall C, Wardlaw I (1973) A comparative study of the distribution and speed of movement of 14C assimilates and foliar-applied 32P-labelled phosphate in wheat. Aust J Biol Sci 26:1–14Google Scholar
  36. Martin AE, Reeve R (1955) A rapid manometric method for determining soil carbonate. Soil Sci 79:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mason S, McNeill A, McLaughlin MJ, Zhang H (2010) Prediction of wheat response to an application of phosphorus under field conditions using diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) and extraction methods. Plant Soil 337:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matejovic I (1997) Determination of carbon and nitrogen in samples of various soils by the dry combustion. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 28:1499–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McBeath TM, Lombi E, McLaughlin MJ, Buenemann EK (2008) Isotopic exchangeability, hydrolysis and mobilization reactions of pyrophosphate in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1337–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McBeath TM, McLaughlin MJ, Noack SR (2011) Wheat grain yield response to and translocation of foliar-applied phosphorus. Crop Pasture Sci 62:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McBeath TM, McLaughlin MJ, Kirby JK, Armstrong RD (2012) The effect of soil water status on fertiliser, topsoil and subsoil phosphorus utilisation by wheat. Plant Soil 358:337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moody PW (2007) Interpretation of a single-point P buffering index for adjusting critical levels of the Colwell soil P test. Aust J Soil Res 45:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mosali J, Desta K, Teal RK, Freeman KW, Martin KL, Lawles JW, Raun WR (2006) Effect of foliar application of phosphorus on winter wheat grain yield, phosphorus uptake, and use efficiency. J Plant Nutr 29:2147–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muenscher WLC (1915) A study of the relation of transpiration to the size and number of stomata. Am J Bot 2:487–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Netting AG, von Wettstein-Knowles P (1973) The physico-chemical basis of leaf wettability in wheat. Planta 114:289–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noack SR, McBeath TM, McLaughlin MJ (2011) Potential for foliar phosphorus fertilisation of dryland cereal crops: a review. Crop Pasture Sci 62:659–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parker MB, Boswell FC (1980) Foliage injury, nutrient intake, and yield of soybeans as influenced by foliar fertilization. Agron J 72:110–113Google Scholar
  48. Phillips SB, Mullins GL (2004) Foliar burn and wheat grain yield responses following topdress-applied nitrogen and sulfur fertilizers. J Plant Nutr 27:921–930Google Scholar
  49. Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  50. Sargent JA, Blackman GE (1962) Studies on foliar penetration: I. Factors controlling the entry of 2, 4 - dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. J Exp Bot 13:348–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schlegel TK, Schönherr J (2002a) Selective permeability of cuticles over stomata and trichomes to calcium chloride. Acta Hortic 549:91–96Google Scholar
  52. Schlegel TK, Schönherr J (2002b) Stage of development affects penetration of calcium chloride into apple fruits. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenk 165:738–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schönherr J, Bukovac MJ (1972) Penetration of stomata by liquids. Dependence on surface tension, wettability, and stomatal morphology. Plant Physiol 49:813–819PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Schönherr J, Bukovac MJ (1978) Foliar penetration of succinic acid-2,2-dimethylhydrazide: Mechanism and rate limiting step Physiol. Plant 42:243–251Google Scholar
  55. Stalder AF, Kulik G, Sage D, Barbieri L, Hoffmann P (2006) A snake-based approach to accurate determination of both contact points and contact angles. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 286:92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stein LA, Storey JB (1986) Influence of adjuvants on foliar absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by soybeans. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 111:829–832Google Scholar
  57. Sutton PJ, Peterson GA, Sander DH (1983) Dry matter production in tops and roots of winter wheat as affected by phosphorus availability during various growth stages. Agron J 75:657–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Syverud TD, Walsh LM, Oplinger ES, Kelling KA (1980) Foliar fertilization of soybeans (Glycine max L.). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 11:637–651Google Scholar
  59. Taylor P (2011) The wetting of leaf surfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 16:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Teare ID, Peterson CJ, Law AG (1971) Size and frequency of leaf stomata in cultivars of Triticum-Aestivum and other Triticum species. Crop Sci 11:496–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thorne GN (1958) Factors affecting uptake of radioactive phosphorus by leaves and its translocation to other parts of the plant. Ann Bot 22:381–398Google Scholar
  62. Tukey HB, Bukovac MJ, Wittwer SH (1961) Absorption of radionuclides by aboveground plant parts and movement within the plant. J Agric Food Chem 9:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tulloch AP (1973) Composition of leaf surface waxes of Triticum species: variation with age and tissue. Phytochemistry 12:2225–2232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tulloch AP, Hoffman LL (1973) Leaf wax of Triticum aestivum. Phytochemistry 12:2217–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Uddin MN, Marshall DR (1988) Variation in epicuticular wax content in wheat. Euphytica 38:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallihan EF, Embleton TW, Sharpless RG (1964) Response of chlorotic citrus leaves to iron sprays in relation to surfactants and stomatal apertures. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 85:210–217Google Scholar
  67. Will S, Eichert T, Fernández V, Müller T, Römheld V (2012) Boron foliar fertilization of soybean and lychee: effects of side of application and formulation adjuvants. J Plant Nutrit Soil Sci 175:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wójcik P (2004) Uptake of mineral nutrients from foliar fertilization (review). J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 12:201–218Google Scholar
  69. Woolfolk CW, Raun WR, Johnson GV, Thomason WE, Mullen RW, Wynn KJ, Freeman KW (2002) Influence of late-season foliar nitrogen applications on yield and grain nitrogen in winter wheat. Agron J 94:429–434Google Scholar
  70. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zarcinas BA, Cartwright B, Spouncer LR (1987) Nitric acid digestion and multi-element analysis of plant material by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 18:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zarcinas BA, McLaughlin MJ, Smart MK (1996) The effect of acid digestion technique on the performance of nebulization systems used in inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 27:1331–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. E. Peirce
    • 1
  • T. M. McBeath
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Fernández
    • 3
  • M. J. McLaughlin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Agriculture, Food and WineThe University of AdelaideGlen OsmondAustralia
  2. 2.Agriculture Flagship, CSIRO Glen OsmondAustralia
  3. 3.Genetics and Eco-physiology Research Group, School of Forest EngineeringTechnical University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations