Mixture toxicity of copper and zinc to barley at low level effects can be described by the Biotic Ligand Model
- 596 Downloads
Background and aims
The biotic ligand model (BLM) is a bioavailability model for metals based on the concept that toxicity depends on the concentration of metal bound to a biological binding site; the biotic ligand. Here, we evaluated the BLM to interpret and explain mixture toxicity of metals (Cu and Zn).
The mixture toxicity of Cu and Zn to barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was tested with a 4 days root elongation test in resin buffered nutrient solutions. Toxicity of one toxicant was tested in presence or absence of a low effect level of the other toxicant or in a ray design with constant toxicant ratios. All treatments ran at three different Ca concentrations (0.3, 2.2 and 10 mM) to reveal ion interaction effects.
The 50 % effect level (EC50) of one metal, expressed as the free ion in solution, significantly (p < 0.05) increased by adding a low level effect of the other metal at low Ca. Such antagonistic interactions were smaller or became insignificant at higher Ca levels. The Cu EC10 was unaffected by Zn whereas the Zn EC10 increased by Cu at low Ca. These effects obeyed the BLM combined with the independent action model for toxicants.
The BLM model explains the observed interactions by accounting for competition between both metals free ions and Ca2+ at the Cu and Zn biotic ligands. The implications of these findings for Cu/Zn interactions in soil are discussed.
KeywordsMixture toxicity BLM Metals Plants Interactions
The authors thank the Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (FWO) for financial support (project FWOG0460.12).
- Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Paquin PR, Gorsuch JW, Apte S, Batley GE, Bowles KC, Campbell PGC, Delos CG, Di Toro DM, Dwyer RL, Galvez F, Gensemer RW, Goss GG, Hogstrand C, Janssen CR, McGeer JC, Naddy RB, Playle RC, Santore RC, Schneider U, Stubblefield WA, Wood CM, Wu KB (2002) The biotic ligand model: a historical overview. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 133(1–2):3–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Playle R, Janes N, Hollis L, Horn D (1995) Modelling metal interactions at fish gills: silver and nickel. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 0(2050):75–75Google Scholar
- Reiley MC (2007) Science, policy, and trends of metals risk assessment at EPA: How understanding metals bioavailability has changed metals risk assessment at US EPA. Aquat. Toxicol. 84 (2):292–298. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.05.014
- Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Soft 12(5):1–22Google Scholar
- Seefeldt SS, Jensen JE, Fuerst EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol 9(2):218–227Google Scholar
- Sharma SS, Schat H, Vooijs R, Van Heerwaarden LM (1999) Combination toxicology of copper, zinc, and cadmium in binary mixtures: concentration-dependent antagonistic, nonadditive, and synergistic effects on root growth in Silene vulgaris. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(2):348–355. doi: 10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<0348:ctocza>2.3.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thakali S, Allen HE, Di Toro DM, Ponizovsky AA, Rooney CP, Zhao F-J, McGrath SP (2006) A terrestrial biotic ligand model. 1. development and application to Cu and Ni toxicities to barley root elongation in soils. Environ Sci Technol 40(22):7085–7093. doi: 10.1021/es061171s PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar