Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 381, Issue 1–2, pp 95–110 | Cite as

Distribution of cutin and suberin biomarkers under forest trees with different root systems

  • Sandra SpielvogelEmail author
  • Jörg Prietzel
  • Jana Leide
  • Michael Riedel
  • Julian Zemke
  • Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Differences in chemical composition of root compounds and root systems among tree species may affect organic matter (OM) distribution, source and composition in forest soils. The objective of this study was to elucidate the contribution of species specific cutin and suberin biomarkers as proxies for shoot- and root-derived organic carbon (OC) to soil OM at different depths with increasing distance to the stems of four different tree species.

Methods

The contribution of cutin- and suberin-derived lipids to OM in a Cutanic Alisol was analyzed with increasing soil depth and distance to the stems of Fagus sylvatica L., Picea abies (L.) Karst., Quercus robur L. and Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. Cutin and suberin monomers of plants and soils were analyzed by alkaline hydrolysis and subsequent gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Results

The amount and distribution of suberin-derived lipids in soil clearly reflected the specific root system of the different tree species. The amount of cutin-derived lipids decreased strongly with soil depth, indicating that the input of leaf/needle material is restricted to the topsoil. In contrast to the suberin-derived lipids, the spatial pattern of cutin monomer contribution to soil OM did not depend on tree species.

Conclusions

Our results document the importance of tree species as a main factor controlling the composition and distribution of OM in forest soils. They reveal the impact of tree species on root-derived OM distribution and the necessity to distinguish among different zones when studying soil OM storage in forests.

Keywords

Biomarkers Cutin Suberin Depth profile Subsoil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the invaluable help of G. Albert during sample preparation, pretreatment, hydrolysis, derivatization and GC analyses. We also want to thank the two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Funding for this study was provided by the German Science Foundation (DFG; Ko 1035/34-1).

References

  1. Amelung W, Brodowski S, Sandhage-Hofmann A, Bol R (2008) Combining biomarker with stable isotope analyses for assessing the transformation and turnover of soil organic matter. Adv Agron 100:155–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreetta A, Dignac M-F, Carnicelli S (2013) Biological and physico-chemical processes influence cutin and suberin biomarker distribution in two Mediterranean forest soil profiles. Biogeochemistry 112:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolte A, Villanueva I (2006) Interspecific competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fine roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Eur J Forest Res 125:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catovsky S, Bradford MA, Hector A (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity: implications for carbon storage. Oikos 97:443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crow SE, Lajtha K, Filley TR, Swanston CW, Bowden RD, Caldwell BA (2009) Sources of plant-derived carbon and stability of organic matter in soil: implications for global change. Global Change Biol 15:2003–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Draffan GH, Stillwell RN, McCloskey JA (1968) Electron impact-induced rearrangement of trimethylsilyl groups in long chain compounds. Org Mass Spectr 1:669–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eglinton G, Hunneman DH (1968) Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric studies of long chain hydroxy acids – I : The constituent cutin acids of apple cuticle. Phytochem 7:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahey TJ, Hughes JW (1994) Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. J of Ecology 82:533–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrar J, Hawes M, Jones D, Lindow S (2003) How roots control the flux of carbon to the rhizosphere. Ecology 84:827–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gleixner G, Kramer C, Hahn V, Sachse D (2005) The effect of biodiversity on carbon storage in soils. In: Caldwell MM, Heldmaier G, Jackson RB, Lange OL, Mooney HA, Schulze E-D, Sommer U (eds) Forest Diversity and Function. Springer, Berlin, pp 165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goñi MA, Hedges JI (1990a) Potential applications of cutin-derived CuO reaction products for discriminating vascular plant sources in natural environments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 54:3073–3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goñi MA, Hedges JI (1990b) The diagenetic behaviour of cutin acids in buried conifer needles and sediments from a coastal marine environment. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 54:3083–3093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo LB, Halliday MJ, Siakimotu SJM, Gifford RM (2005) Fine root production and litter input: Its effects on soil carbon. Plant Soil 272:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holloway PJ, Deas AHB (1971) Occurrence of positional isomers of dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid in plant cutins and suberins. Phytochem 10:2781–2785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holloway PJ, Deas AHB (1973) Epoxyoctadecanoic acids in plant cutins and suberins. Phytochem 12:1721–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunneman DH, Eglinton G (1972) The constituent acids of gymnosperm cutins. Phytochem 11:1989–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources (2006) World Soil Resources Reports 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdahl L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137:253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kögel-Knabner I (2002) The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 34:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kögel-Knabner I, Ziegler F, Riedere M, Zech W (1989) Distribution and decomposition pattern of cutin and suberin in forest soils. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenk 152:409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolattukudy PE (2001) Polyesters in higher plants. In: Scheper T (ed) Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol 71. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–49Google Scholar
  22. Köstler JN, Brückner E, Bibelriether H (1968) Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume: Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Waldbäume in Mitteleuropa. Parey Verlag, pp. 284Google Scholar
  23. Leuschner C, Hertel D, Coners H, Büttner V (2001) Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis. Oecologia 126:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Majdi H, Andersson P (2005) Fine root production and turnover in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden: effects of nitrogen and water manipulation. Ecosystems 8:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matzke K, Riederer M (1991) A comparative study into the chemical constitution of cutins and suberins from Picea abies (L.) Karst, Quercus robur L., and Fagus sylvatica L. Planta 185:233–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mendez-Millan M, Dignac M-F, Rumpel C, Derenne S (2011) Can cutin and suberin biomarkers be used to trace shoot and root-derived organic matter? A molecular and isotopic approach. Biogeochemistry 106:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mueller KE, Polissar PJ, Oleksyn J, Freeman KH (2012) Differentiating temperate tree species and their organs using lipid biomarkers in leaves, roots and soil. Org Geochem 52:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mueller KE, Eissenstat DM, Müller CW, Oleksyn J, Reich PB, Freeman KH (2013) What controls the concentration of various aliphatic lipids in soil? Soil Biol Biochem 63:14–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naafs DFW, Nierop KGJ, van Bergen PF, de Leeuw JW (2005) Changes in the molecular composition of ester-bound aliphatics with depth in an acid andic forest soil. Geoderma 127:130–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nakajima N, Sugimoto M, Tsuboi S, Tsuji H, Ishihara K (2005) An isozyme of earthworm serine proteases acts on hydrolysis of triacylglycerol. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:2009–2011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nierop KGJ (2001) Temporal and vertical organic matter differentiation along a vegetation succession as revealed by pyrolysis and thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 61:111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nierop KGJ, Verstraten JM (2004) Rapid molecular assessment of the bioturbation extent in sandy soil horizons under pine using ester-bound lipids by online thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18:1081–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nierop KGJ, Naafs DFW, Verstraten JM (2003) Occurrence and distribution of ester-bound lipids in Dutch coastal dune soils along a pH gradient. Org Geochem 34:719–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nierop KGJ, Jansen B, Hageman JA, Verstraten JM (2006) The complementarity of extractable and ester-bound lipids in a soil profile under pine. Plant Soil 286:269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Otto A, Simpson MJ (2006) Sources and composition of hydrolysable aliphatic lipids and phenols in soils from western Canada. Org Geochem 37:385–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Otto A, Simpson MJ (2007) Analysis of soil organic matter biomarkers by sequential chemical degradation and gas chromatography – mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci 30:272–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac M-F (2005) Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilization. Plant Soil 269:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Riederer M, Matzke K, Ziegler F, Kögel-Knabner I (1993) Occurrence, distribution and fate of the lipid plant biopolymers cutin and suberin in temperate forest soils. Org Geochem 20:1063–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rumpel C, Kögel-Knabner I, Bruhn F (2002) Vertical distribution, age, and chemical composition of organic carbon in two forest soils of different pedogenesis. Org Geochem 33:1131–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2005) Mapping the global distribution of deep roots in relation to climate and soil characteristics. Geoderma 126:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmid I (2002) The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech. Basic Appl Ecol 3:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmid I, Kazda M (2002) Root distribution of Norway spruce in monospecific and mixed stands on different soils. Forest Ecol Man 159:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simpson MJ, Otto A, Feng XJ (2008) Comparison of solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance and organic matter biomarkers for assessing soil organic matter degradation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suárez ER, Fahey TJ, Yavitt JB, Groffman PM, Bohlen PJ (2006) Patterns of litter disappearance in a northern hardwood forest invaded by exotic earthworms. Ecol Appl 16:154–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winkler A, Haumaier L, Zech W (2005) Insoluble alkyl carbon components in soils derive mainly from cutin and suberin. Org Geochem 36:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zoth R, Block J (1992) Untersuchungen an Wurzelballen sturmgeworfener Bäume in Rheinland-Pfalz. Forst Holz 47:566–571Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Spielvogel
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jörg Prietzel
    • 1
  • Jana Leide
    • 3
  • Michael Riedel
    • 3
  • Julian Zemke
    • 2
  • Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für BodenkundeTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Integrierte NaturwissenschaftenUniversität Koblenz-LandauKoblenzGermany
  3. 3.Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften, Lehrstuhl für Botanik IIUniversität WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Advanced StudyTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations