Biological nitrification inhibition in sorghum: the role of sorgoleone production
- 860 Downloads
Background and aims
Nitrification and denitrification are the two most important processes that contribute to greenhouse gas emission and inefficient use of nitrogen. Suppressing soil nitrification through the release of nitrification inhibitors from roots is a plant function, and termed “Biological Nitrification Inhibition (BNI)”. We report here the role and contribution of sorgoleone release to sorghum-BNI function.
Three sorghum genotypes (Hybridsorgo, IS41245 and GDLP 34-5-5-3) were evaluated for their capacity to release sorgoleone, which has BNI-activity, in hydroponic and soil culture. Sorgoleone released was measured using HPLC; BNI-activity was determined using a luminescent recombinant Nitrosomonas europaea assay.
Sorgoleone production and BNI-activity release by roots are closely associated (1 μg of sorgoleone is equivalent to 1 ATU activity in assay). Purified sorgoleone inhibited Nitrosomonas activity and suppressed soil nitrification. Sorghum genotypes release varying quantity of sorgoleone; GDLP 34-5-5-3 and Hybridsorgo showed higher capacity for both sorgoleone release and BNI-activity than did IS41245. In soil culture, GDLP 34-5-5-3 released higher quantity of sorgoleone into the rhizosphere, which had higher BNI-activity, and suppressed soil nitrification to a greater extent than did by IS41245.
These results demonstrate genetic differences for sorgoleone release and its functional link with BNI-capacity; there is potential for genetic improvement of sorghum BNI-capacity and deployment of this in low-nitrifying sorghum production systems.
KeywordsBiological nitrification inhibition (BNI) BNI-capacity Genotypic variation Hydrophobic-BNIs Nitrification inhibition Sorghum Sorgoleone
This research work was supported by JIRCAS fellowship program 2011. This work has been undertaken as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Dryland Cereals.
- Anon (1974) Technicon autoanalyzer II. Technicon Industrial Systems, TarrytownGoogle Scholar
- Klotz MG, Arp DJ, Chain PS, El-Sheikh AF, Hauser LJ, Hommes NG, Larimer FW, Malfatti SA, Norton JM, Poret-Peterson AT et al (2006) Complete genome sequence of the marine, chemolitho-autotrophic, ammonia oxidizing bacterium Nitrosococcusoceani ATCC 19707. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6299–6315PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raun WR, Johnson GV (1999) Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J 91:357–363Google Scholar
- Shen JP, Zhang LM, Di HJ, He JZ (2012) A review of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in Chinese soils. Front Microbiol 3:1–7Google Scholar
- Smith CW, Frederiksen RA (2000) Sorghum: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Starkenburg SR, Chain PS, Sayavedra-Soto LA, Hauser L, Land ML, Larimer FW, Malfatti SA, Klotz MG, Bottomley PJ, Arp DJ et al (2006) Genome sequence of the chemo-litho autotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium Nitrobacterwinogradskyi Nb-255. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2050–2063PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Subbarao GV, Nakahara K, Hurtado MP, Ono H, Moreta DE, Salcedo AF, Yoshihashi AT, Ishikawa T, Ishitani M, Ohnishi-Kameyama M, Yoshida M, Rondon M, Rao IM, Lascano CE, Berry WL, Ito O (2009) Evidence for biological nitrification inhibition in Brachiaria pastures. PNAS (USA) 106:17302–17307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker CB, de la Torre JR, Klotz MG, Urakawa H, Pinel N, Arp DJ, Brochier-Armanet C, Chain PSG, Chan PP, Gollabgir A, Hemp J, Huegler M, Karr EA, Koenneke M, Shin M, Lawton TJ, Lowe T, Martens-Habbena W, Sayavedra-Soto LA, Lang D, Sievert SM, Rosenzweig AC, Manning G, Stahl DA (2010) Nitrosopumilus maritimus genome reveals unique mechanisms for nitrification and autotrophy in globally distributed marine crenarchaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(19):8818–8823Google Scholar
- Weston LA (1996) Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron J 88:860–866Google Scholar