Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 378, Issue 1–2, pp 153–172 | Cite as

Influence of elevation on canopy transpiration of temperate deciduous forests in a complex mountainous terrain of South Korea

  • Eun-Young Jung
  • D. Otieno
  • H. Kwon
  • S. Berger
  • M. Hauer
  • J. Tenhunen
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Variations in microclimate and soil characteristics on mountain slopes influence forest structure and function. Precipitation, incoming solar radiation and relative humidity change along a mountain slope. Equally, soil depth and the amount of stored soil moisture vary. The objective of this study was to examine the impacts of these factors on forest water use in mountainous terrains.

Methods

Transpiration of four temperate deciduous forest stands located at different elevations in South Korea was monitored with a sap flow technique throughout the growing season in 2010. The study sites were located on the north slope at 450 m (450 N), 650 m (650 N), and 950 m (950 N). To examine the effect of aspect, an additional site with a southern aspect was studied at 650 m (650S). All the sites were dominated by Quercus species, with leaf area index (L) ranging between 5 − 6 m2 m−2.

Results

Rainfall increased, while air temperature (T A ) and daytime vapor pressure deficit (D) decreased with increasing elevation. We did not observe any gradients in solar radiation (R S ), soil moisture and sap flux density of the individual trees (J st ) with an elevational gradient. Sapwood area (A S ), i.e., hydro-active xylem area, and daily maximum tree water use (max TWU) increased non-linearly with increasing diameter at breast height (DBH). Neither A S nor max TWU varied among tree species or along the elevation. The total annual canopy transpiration (E C ) was 175, 115, 110, and 90 mm for 450 N, 650 N, 650S, and 950 N, respectively. E C declined with increasing elevation as a result of decreasing length of the growing season, D, and T A along the elevation. Significantly (P < 0.001) higher stomatal sensitivity to changes in D was found at the 950 N, leading to lower annual E C and lower water use efficiency (WUE) at this elevation.

Conclusions

We conclude that differences in E C exist along the mountain slope studied, corresponding to changing T A , D, length of the growing season, and stomatal sensitivity to D, which should be considered when establishing forest catchment water balances.

Keywords

Elevational gradient Tree water use Canopy transpiration Asian temperate deciduous forest Stomatal sensitivity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out as part of the International Research Training Group, TERRain and ECOlogical Heterogeneity (TERRECO; GRK 1565/1) funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) at University of Bayreuth, Germany and the Korean Research Foundation (KRF) at Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. The isotope abundance analyses by the BayCEER—Laboratory of Isotope Biogeochemistry are kindly acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Dr. Markus W.T. Schmidt for his review and valuable comments to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Barry RG (1981) Mountain weather and climate. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beniston M (2003) Climatic change in mountain regions: a review of possible impacts. Clim Chang 59:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bidartondo MI, Burghardt B, Gebauer G, Bruns TD, Read DJ (2004) Changing partners in the dark: isotopic and molecular evidence of ectomycorrhizal liaisons between forest orchids and trees. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1799–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Scholz FG, Franco AC, Bustamante M (2004) Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant. Tree Physiol 24:891–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrows LE (1980) Differentiating sapwood, heartwood and pathological wood in live mountain beech. New Zealand Forest Service, Forest Research Institute, Protection Forestry Report 172Google Scholar
  6. Campbell-Clause M (1998) Stomatal response of grapevines to wind. Aust J Exp Agric 38:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Clausnitzer F, Köstner B, Schwärzel K, Bernhofer C (2011) Relationships between canopy transpiration, atmospheric conditions and soil water availability—Analyses of long-term sap-flow measurements in an old Norway spruce forest at the Ore Mountains/Germany. Agric For Meteorol 151:1023–1034Google Scholar
  9. Clearwater MJ, Meinzer FC, Andrade JL, Goldstein G, Holbrook NM (1999) Potential errors in measurement of nonuniform sap flow using heat dissipation probes. Tree Physiol 19:681–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dittmar C, Elling W (2006) Phenological phases of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and their dependence on region and altitude in Southern Germany. Eur J For Res 125:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehleringer JR (1993) Carbon and water relations in desert plants: an isotopic perspective. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  12. Ewers BE, Oren R (2000) Analyses of assumptions and errors in the calculation of stomatal conductance from sap flux measurements. Tree Physiol 20:579–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gebauer T, Horna V, Leuschner C (2008) Variability in radial sap flux density patterns and sapwood area among seven co-occurring temperate broad-leaved tree species. Tree Physiol 28:1821–1830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Granier A (1987) Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3:309–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Granier A, Biron P, Bréda N, Pontailler JY, Saugier B (1996) Transpiration of trees and forest stands: short and long-term monitoring using sapflow methods. Global Change Biol 2:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris PP, Huntingford C, Coxb PM, Gasha JHC, Malhi Y (2004) Effect of soil moisture on canopy conductance of Amazonian rainforest. Agric For Meteorol 122:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herbst M, Rosier PTW, Morecroft MD, Gowing DJ (2008) Comparative measurements of transpiration and canopy conductance in two mixed deciduous woodlands differing in structure and species composition. Tree Physiol 28:959–970Google Scholar
  18. Hirobe M, Tokuchi N, Iwatsubo G (1998) Spatial variability of soil nitrogen transformation patterns along a forest slope in a Cryptomeria japonica D. Don plantation. Eur J Soil Biol 34:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoch G, Körner C (2005) Growth, demography and carbon relations of Polylepis trees at the world’s highest tree line. Funct Ecol 19:941–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubick KT, Farquhar GD, Shorter R (1986) Correlation between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in diverse peanut (Arachis) germplasm. Australian J Plant Physiol 13:803–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 273:593–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones HG (1992) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Jung EY, Otieno D, Lee B, Lim JH, Kang SK, Schmidt MWT, Tenhunen J (2011) Up-scaling to stand transpiration of an Asian temperate mixed-deciduous forest from single tree sapflow measurements. Plant Ecol 212:383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelliher FM, Hollinger DY, Schulze ED, Vygodskaya NN, Beyers JN, Hunt JE, McSeveny TM, Milukova I, Sogatchev A, Varlargin A, Ziegler W, Arneth A, Bauer G (1997) Evaporation for an eastern Siberian larch forest. Agric For Meteorol 85:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Komatsu H, Cho J, Matsumoto K, Otsuki K (2012) Simple modeling of the global variation in annual forest evapotraspiration. J Hydrol 420–421:380–390Google Scholar
  26. Korea Forest Service (2009) National report on sustainable forest management in Korea 2009, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  27. Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Körner C (2007) The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 22:569–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Körner C, Farquhar GD, Roksandik Z (1988) A global survey of carbon isotope discrimination in plants from high altitude. Oecologia 74:623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Körner C, Farquhar GD, Wong SC (1991) Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends. Oecologia 88:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Köstner B (2001) Evaporation and transpiration from forests in Central Europe–relevance of patch-level studies for spatial scaling. Meteorol Atmos Phys 76:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kubota M, Tenhunen J, Zimmermann R, Schmidt M, Adiku S, Kakubari Y (2005) Influences of environmental factors on the radial profile of sap flux density in Fagus crenata growing at different elevations in the Naeba Mountains, Japan. Tree Physiol 25:545–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumagai T, Tateishi M, Shimizu T, Otsuki K (2008) Transpiration and canopy conductance at two slope positions in a Japanese cedar forest watershed. Agric For Meteor 148:1444–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawlor DW (2002) Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. J Exp Bot 53:773–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matyssek R, Wieser G, Patzner K, Blaschke H, Häberle K-H (2009) Transpiration of forest trees and stands at different altitude: consistencies rather than contrasts? Eur J Forest Res 128:579–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDowell NG, White S, Pockman WT (2008) Transpiration and stomatal conductance across a steep climate gradient in the southern Rocky Mountains. Ecohydrol 1:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McNaughton KG, Jarvis PG (1991) Effects of spatial scale on stomatal control of transpiration. Agric For Meteorol 54:279–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mediavilla S, Escudero A (2003) Stomatal responses to drought at a Mediterian site: a comparative study of co-occurring woody species differing in leaf longevity. Tree Physiol 23:987–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Andrade JL (2001) Regulation of water flux through tropical forest canopy trees: do universal rules apply? Tree Physiol 21:19–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meinzer FC, Bond BJ, Warren JM, Woodruff DR (2005) Does water transport scale universally with tree size? Functional Ecol 19:558–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miyajima Y, Takahashi K (2007) Changes with altitude of the stand structure of temperate forests on Mount Norikura, central Japan. J For Res 12:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monteith JL, Unsworth MH (1990) Principles of Envirionmental Physics. 2nd Ed., Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Muraoka H, Koizumi H (2005) Photosynthetic and structural characteristics of canopy and shrub trees in a cool-temperate deciduous broadleaved forest: implication to the ecosystem carbon gain. Agric For Meteorol 134:39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murray FW (1967) On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. J Appl Meteorol 6:203–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nobel PS (2005) Plant Physiology. Elsevier Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Oren R, Pataki DE (2001) Transpiration in response to variation in microclimate and soil moisture in southeastern deciduous forests. Oecologia 127:549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schäfer KVR (1999) Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ 22:1515–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pfautsch S, Bleby TM, Rennenberg H, Adams MA (2010) Sap flow measurements reveal influence of temperature and stand structure on water use of Eucalytus regnans forests. For Ecol Manage 259:1190–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Phillips N, Oren R (1998) A comparison of daily representations of canopy conductance based on two conditional time-averaging methods and the dependence of daily conductance on environmental factors. Ann Sci For 55:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environ- ment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  51. Richardson AD, Bailey AS, Denny EG, Martin CW, O’Keefe J (2006) Phenology of a northern hardwood forest canopy. Global Chang Biol 12:1174–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rotzer T, Chmielewski FM (2001) Phenological maps of Europe. Clim Res 18:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Running SW, Nemani RR, Hungerford RD (1987) Extrapolation of synoptic meteorological data in mountainous terrain and its use for simulating forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis. Canadian J For Research 17:472–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sala A, Tenhunen J (1996) Simulations of canopy net photosynthesis and transpiration of Quercus ilex L. under the influence of seasonal drought. Agric For Meteorol 78:203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saugier B, Granier A, Pontailler JY (1997) Transpiration of a boreal pine forest measured by branch bag, sap flow and micrometeorological methods. Tree Physiol 17:511–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schaap MG, Feike JL, van Genuchten MT (2001) ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schulze ED, Kelliher FM, Körner C, Lloyd J, Leuning R (1994) Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: a global ecology scaling exercise. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:629–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schulze ED, Beck E, Müller-Hohenstein K (2005) Plant ecology. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  59. Stewart JB (1988) Modelling surface conductance of pine forest. Agric For Meteorol 43:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tateno R, Hishi T, Takeda H (2004) Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in relation to topographical changes in soil nitrogen. For Ecol Manage 193:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tenhunen JD, Lange OL, Gebel J, Beyschlag W, Weber JA (1984) Changes in photosynthetic capacity, carboxylation efficiency, and CO2 compensation point associated with midday stomatal closure and midday depression of et CO2 exchange of leaves of Quercus suber. Planta 162:193–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tieszman LL, Archer S (1990) Isotope assessment of vegetation changes. In: Osmond CB, Pitelka LF, Hidy GM (eds) Plant biology of the basin and range, vol. 80. Ecological studies, pp. 144–178Google Scholar
  63. Tognetti R, Giovannelli A, Lavini A, Morelli G, Fragnito F, d’Andria R (2009) Assessing environmental controls over conductances through the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum in an experimental olive tree plantation of southern Italy. Agric For Meteorol 149:1229–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tromp-van M, McDonnell JJ (2006) On the interrelations between topography, soil depth, soil moisture, transpiration rates and species distribution at the hillslope scale. Adv Water Resour 29:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vertessy RA, Benyon RG, O’Sullivan SK, Gribben PR (1995) Relationships between stem diameter, sapwood area, leaf area and transpiration in a young mountain ash forest. Tree Physiol 15:559–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vitasse Y, Porté AJ, Kremer A, Michalet R, Delzon S (2009) Responses of canopy duration to temperature changes in four temperate tree species: relative contributions of spring and autumn leaf phenology. Oecologia 161:187–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whitley R, Zeppel M, Armstrong N, Macinnis-Ng C, Yunsa IAM, Eamus D (2008) A modified JS model for predicting stand-scale transpiration of an Australian native forest. Plant Soil 305:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whitley R, Medlyn B, Zeppel M, Macinnis-Ng C, Eamus D (2009) Comparing the Penman-Monteith equation and a modified Jarvis-Stewart model with an artificial neural network to estimate stand-scale transpiration and canopy conductance. J Hydrol 373:256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Willmott CJ (1984) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2:184–194Google Scholar
  72. Wilson KB, Hanson PJ, Mulholland PK, Baldocchi DD, Wullschleger SD (2001) A comparison of methods for determining forest evaporation and its components: sap flow, soil water budget, eddycovariance and catchment water balance. Agric For Meteorol 106:153–168Google Scholar
  73. Wright IR, Manzi AO, Da Rocha HR (1995) Surface conductance of Amazonian pasture: model application and calibration for canopy climate. Agric For Meteorol 75:51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wullschleger SD, Hanson PJ, Todd DE (2001) Transpiration from a multi-species deciduous forest as estimated by xylem sap flow techniques. For Ecol Manage 143:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yoshino MM (1975) Climate in a small area. University of Tokyo Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eun-Young Jung
    • 1
  • D. Otieno
    • 1
  • H. Kwon
    • 2
  • S. Berger
    • 3
  • M. Hauer
    • 4
  • J. Tenhunen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant EcologyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Department of Forest Ecosystems and SocietyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Department of HydrologyUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Sugar Beet ResearchGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations