Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 375, Issue 1–2, pp 229–240 | Cite as

The effect of compacted soil layers on vertical root distribution and water uptake by wheat

  • A. Nosalewicz
  • J. Lipiec
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Soil compaction strongly affects water uptake by roots. The aim of the work was to examine soil—plant interactions with focus on the impact of distribution of compacted soil layers on growth and water uptake by wheat roots.

Methods

The growth-chamber experiment was conducted on wheat growth in soil with compacted soil layers. The system for maintaining constant soil water potential and measurement of daily water uptake from variously compacted soil layers was used.

Results

Layered soil compaction differentiated vertical root distribution to higher extent for root length than root mass. The propagation rate of a water extraction front was the highest through layers of moderately compacted soil. The root water uptake rate was on average 67 % higher from moderately than heavily compacted soil layers. Correlations between water uptake and the length of thick roots were increasing with increasing level of soil compaction.

Conclusions

The study shows that root amount, water uptake, propagation of water extraction and shoot growth strongly depend on the existence of compacted layers within soil profile. The negative effects of heavily compacted subsoil layer on water uptake were partly compensated by increased uptake from looser top soil layers and significant contribution of thicker roots in water uptake.

Keywords

Water uptake Root length density Root diameter Soil compaction Spring wheat 

Abbreviations

L/L

Soil column with loose soil (1.30 Mg m−3)

L/M

Soil column with loose soil in 0–10 and 10–20 cm layers and moderately compacted soil in 20–30 and 30–40 cm layers (1.50 Mg m−3)

M/H

Soil column with moderately compacted soil in 0–10 and 10–20 cm layers (1.50 Mg m−3) and heavily compacted soil in 20–30 and 30–40 cm layers (1.72 Mg m−3)

DAP

Days after planting

RMD

Root mass density

RLD

Root length density

RWUR

Root water uptake rate

References

  1. Alaoui A, Lipiec J, Gerke HH (2011) A review of the changes in the soil pore system due to soil deformation: a hydrodynamic perspective. Soil Tillage Res 115–116:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato M, Ritchie JT (2002) Spatial distribution of roots and water uptake of maize (L.) as affected by soil structure. Crop Sci 42:773–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson SH (2011) Claypan and its environmental effects. In: Gliński J, Horabik J, Lipiec J (eds) Encyclopedia of agrophysics. Springer Dordrecht, Heidelberg, pp 122–125Google Scholar
  4. Araki H, Iijima M (2005) Stable isotope analysis of water extraction from subsoil in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by drought and soil compaction. Plant Soil 270(1–2):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asch F, Bahrun A, Jensen CR (2009) Root-shoot communication of field-grown maize drought-stressed at different rates as modified by atmospheric conditions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:678–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrowclough DE, Peterson CA, Steudle E (2000) Radial hydraulic conductivity along developing onion roots. J Exp Bot 51(344):547–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bécel C, Vercambre G, Pagès L (2012) Soil penetration resistance, a suitable soil property to account for variations in root elongation and branching. Plant Soil 353:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bengough AG (2012) Root elongation is restricted by axial but not by radial pressures: so what happens in field soil? Plant Soil 360:15–18. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1428-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengough AG, McKenzie BM, Hallett PD, Valentine TA (2011) Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. J Exp Bot 62:59–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bingham IJ (2001) Soil-root-canopy interactions. Ann Appl Biol 138:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Birkás M (2008) Environmentally-sound adaptable tillage. Akademia Kiado, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  12. Doussan C, Vercambre G, Pages LC (1998) Modelling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: an integrated approach to water absorption distribution of axial and radial conductances in maize. Ann Bot 81:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupuy L, Gregory PJ, Bengough AG (2010) Root growth models: towards a new generation of continuous approaches. J Exp Bot 61:2131–2143. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp389 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feddes RA, Raats PAC (2004) Parametrizing the soil-water-plant root system. In: Fedes RA, de Rooij GH, van Dam JC (eds) Unsaturated zone modeling: progress, challenges and applications. Wageningen UR Frontis series. Kluwer Academic Publ, Dordrecht, pp 95–141Google Scholar
  15. Garrigues E, Doussan C, Pierret A (2006) Water uptake by plant roots: I- Formation and propagation of a water extraction front in mature root systems as evidenced by 2D light transmission imaging. Plant Soil 283:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory P (2006) Plant roots growth, activity and interaction with soils. Blackwell Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
  17. Håkansson I (2005) Machinery-induced compaction of arable soils, incidence–cnsequences–counter-measures. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Reports from the division of soil management, no. 109Google Scholar
  18. Horn R, Peth S (2011) Mechanics of unsaturated soils for agricultural applications. Chapter 3. In: Huang PM, Li Y, Sumner ME (eds) Handbook of soil sciences, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, p 31Google Scholar
  19. Kato Y, Abe J, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J (2006) Genotypic variation in root growth angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its association with deep root development in upland fields with different water regimes. Plant Soil 287:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimura K, Yamasaki S (2003) Accurate root length and diameter measurement using NIH Image: use of Pythagorean distance for diameter estimation. Plant Soil 254:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krounbi L, Lazarovitch N (2011) Soil hydraulic properties affecting root water uptake. In: Gliński J, Horabik J, Lipiec J (eds) Encyclopedia of agrophysics. Springer Dordrecht, Heidelberg, pp 748–754Google Scholar
  22. Lancashire PD, Bleiholder H, Langelüddecke P, Stauss R, van den Boom T, Weber E, Witzen-Berger A (1991) An uniformdecimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Ann Appl Biol 119:561–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leuschner C, Coners H, Icke R (2004) In situ measurement of water absorption by fine roots of three temperate trees: species differences and differential activity of superficial and deep roots. Tree Physiol 24:1359–1367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li KY, De Jong R, Boisvert JB (2001) An exponential root-water-uptake model with water stress compensation. J Hydrol 252:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lipiec J, Håkansson I (2000) Infuences of degree of compactness and matric water tension on some important plant growth factors. Soil Tillage Res 53:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lipiec J, Hatano R (2003) Quantification of compaction effect on soil physical properties and crop growth. Geoderma 116:107–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lipiec J, Kubota T, Iwama H, Hirose J (1988) Measurement of plant water use under controlled soil moisture condition by the negative pressure circulation technique. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 34:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lipiec J, Arvidsson J, Murer E (2003) Review of modelling crop growth, movement of water and chemicals in relation to topsoil and subsoil compaction. Soil Tillage Res 73:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lipiec J, Horn R, Pietrusiewicz J, Siczek A (2012) Effects of soil compaction on root elongation and anatomy of different ce 400 real plant species. Soil Tillage Res 121:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lipiec J, Doussan C, Nosalewicz A, Kondracka K (2013) Effect of drought and heat stresses on plant growth and yield: a review. Int Agrophysics 27:463–477. doi: 10.2478/intag-2013-0017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nosalewicz A, Nosalewicz M (2011) The effect of soil compaction on dehydrogenase activity in bulk soil and rhizosphere. Int Agrophysics 25(1):47–51Google Scholar
  32. Nosalewicz A, Iijima M, Lipiec J (2011) Use of porous tubes for measuring of water extraction by roots and simultaneous maintaining of soil water potential in growth chamber experiments. Acta Agrophysica 18(2):347–354Google Scholar
  33. Pagliai M, Marsili A, Servadio P, Vignzzi N, Pellegrini S (2003) Changes in some physical properties of a clay soil in Central Italy following the passage of rubber tracked and wheeled tractors of medium power. Soil Tillage Res 73:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Passioura JB (2002) Soil conditions and plant growth. Plant Cell Environ 25:311–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierret A, Doussan C, Pages L (2006) Spatio-temporal variations in axial conductance of primary and first-order lateral roots of a maize crop as predicted by a model of the hydraulic architecture of root systems. Plant Soil 282:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roose T, Fowler AC (2004) A model for water uptake by plant roots. J Theor Biol 228:155–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanderson J (1983) Water uptake by different regions of the barley root. Pathways of radial flow in relation to development of the endodermis. J Exp Bot 34(140):240–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi J, Zuo Q (2009) Root water uptake and root nitrogen mass of winter wheat and their simulations. SSSJJ 73(6):1764–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sochan A, Bieganowski A, Ryżak M, Dobrowolski R, Bartmiński P (2012) Comparison of soil texture determined by two dispersion units of Mastersizer 2000. Int Agrophysics 26:99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steudle E, Peterson CA (1998) How does water get through roots? J Exp Bot 49:775–788Google Scholar
  41. Thornley JHM, Johnson IR (2000) Plant and crop modeling: a mathematical approach to plant and crop physiology. The Blackburn PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Tracy SR, Black TC, Roberts JA, McNeill A, Davidson R, Tester M, Samec M, Korošak D, Sturrock C, Mooney SJ (2012) Quantifying the effect of soil compaction on three varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (CT). Plant Soil 353:195–208. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1022-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van den Akker JJH, Arvidsson J, Horn R (2003) Introduction to the special issue on experiences with the impact and prevention of subsoil compaction in the European Union. Soil Tillage Res 73:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varney GT, Canny MJ (1993) Rates of water uptake into the mature root system of maize plants. New Phytol 123(4):775–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vereecken H, Weynants M, Javaux M, Pachepsky Y, Schaap MG, van Genuchten MT (2010) Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem soil hydraulic properties: a review. Vadose Zone J 9:795–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whalley WR, Lipiec J, Stepniewski W, Tardieu F (2000) Control and measurement of the physical environment in root growth experiments. In: Smit et al (eds) Root methods: a handbook. Springer, Hiedelberg, pp 75–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White RG, Kirkegaard JA (2010) The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil-implications for water uptake. Plant Cell Environ 33:133–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitmore AP, Whalley WR, Bird NRA, Watts CW, Gregory AS (2011) Estimating soil strength in the rooting zone of wheat. Plant Soil 339:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yu G-R, Zhuang J, Nakayama K, Jin Y (2007) Root water uptake and profile soil water as affected by vertical root distribution. Plant Ecol 189:15–30. doi: 10.1007/s11258-006-9163-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zobel RW, Baligar VC, Kinraide TB (2007) Fine root diameters can change in response to changes in nutrient concentrations. Plant Soil 297:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of AgrophysicsPolish Academy of SciencesLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations