Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 374, Issue 1–2, pp 89–107 | Cite as

Biochar application to a fertile sandy clay loam in boreal conditions: effects on soil properties and yield formation of wheat, turnip rape and faba bean

  • Priit Tammeorg
  • Asko Simojoki
  • Pirjo Mäkelä
  • Frederick L. Stoddard
  • Laura Alakukku
  • Juha Helenius
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

We studied the effect of different biochar (BC) application rates on soil properties, crop growth dynamics and yield on a fertile sandy clay loam in boreal conditions.

Methods

In a three-year field experiment conducted in Finland, the field was divided into three sub-experiments with a split-plot experimental design, one for each crop: wheat (Triticum aestivum), turnip rape (Brassica rapa), and faba bean (Vicia faba). The main plot factor was BC rate (0, 5 and 10 t DM ha−1) and the sub-plot factor was the N-P-K fertiliser rate. Soil physico-chemical properties as well as plant development, yield components and quality were investigated.

Results

BC addition did not significantly affect the soil chemical composition other than the increased C and initially increased K contents. Increased soil moisture content was associated with BC application, especially at the end of the growing seasons. BC decreased the N content of turnip rape and wheat biomass in 2010, thus possibly indicating an initial N immobilisation. In dry years, the seed number per plant was significantly higher in faba bean and turnip rape when grown with BC, possibly due to compensation for decreased plant density and relieved water deficit. However, the grain yields and N uptake with BC addition were not significantly different from the control in any year.

Conclusions

Even though BC application to a fertile sandy clay loam in a boreal climate might have relieved transient water deficit and thereby supported yield formation of crops, it did not improve the yield or N uptake.

Keywords

Brassica rapa Nitrogen uptake Triticum aestivum Vicia faba Water retention Yield components 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Sampo Tukiainen (Preseco Oy) for providing the biochar, Mikko Hakojärvi for his help with the TDR measurements, Markku Tykkyläinen for his technical assistance with the field experiments and Johanna Muurinen for her assistance with biochar and soil analysis. The contribution of Xiaoyulong Chen and Juho Honkala with yield component analyses is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Markku Yli-Halla and anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions and comments. This research was funded by Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation and Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland.

Supplementary material

11104_2013_1851_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (783 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 783 KB)

References

  1. Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G (2013) Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksouh NM, Jacobs BC, Stoddard FL, Mailer R (2001) Response of canola to different heat stresses. Aust J Agric Res 52:817–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Karaki G, McMichael B, Zak J (2004) Field response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress. Mycorrhiza 14:263–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altenbach SB, DuPont FM, Kothari KM, Chan R, Johnson EL, Lieu D (2003) Temperature, water and fertilizer influence the timing of key events during grain development in a US spring wheat. J Cereal Sci 37:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson CR, Condron LM, Clough TJ, Fiers M, Stewart A, Hill RA, Sherlock RR (2011) Biochar induced soil microbial community change: implications for biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Pedobiologia 54:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ARA (2013) Maatalouden ympäristötuen sitoumusehdot 2013. Agency for Rural Affairs. http://www.mavi.fi/attachments/mavi/ymparistotuki/6FRzGaeg7/Maatelouden_ymparistotuen_sitoumusehdot_2013.pdf (in Finnish). Accessed 23 May 2013
  7. Arif M, Ali A, Umair M, Munsif F, Ali K, Inamullah MS, Ayub G (2012) Effect of biochar, FYM and mineral nitrogen alone and in combination on yield and yield components of maize. Sarhad J Agric 28:191–195Google Scholar
  8. Asai H, Samson BK, Haefele SM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res 111:81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ASTM D3175–02 (2002) Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis sample of coal and coke. American Society for Testing and Materials, ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  10. Augé RM (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizae and soil/plant water relations. Can J Soil Sci 84:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackwell P, Krull E, Butler G, Herbert A, Solaiman Z (2010) Effect of banded biochar on dryland wheat production and fertiliser use in south-western Australia: an agronomic and economic perspective. Aust J Soil Res 48:531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brockhoff SR, Christians NE, Killorn RJ, Horton R, Davis DD (2010) Physical and mineral-nutrition properties of sand-based turfgrass root zones amended with biochar. Agron J 102:1627–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruun EW, Ambus P, Egsgaard H, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2012) Effects of slow and fast pyrolysis biochar on soil C and N turnover dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 46:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busscher WJ, Novak JM, Evans DE, Watts DW, Niandou MAS, Ahmedna M (2010) Influence of pecan biochar on physical properties of a Norfolk loamy sand. Soil Sci 175:10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Champolivier L, Merrien A (1995) Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages to Brassica napus L. var. oleifera on yield, yield components and seed quality. Eur J Agron 5:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45:629–634. doi: 10.1071/SR07109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 46:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen Y, Shinogi Y, Taira M (2010) Influence of biochar use on sugarcane growth, soil parameters, and groundwater quality. Aust J Soil Res 48:526–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng C-H, Lehmann J, Thies JE, Burton SD (2008) Stability of black carbon in soils across a climatic gradient. J Geophys Res. doi: 10.1029/2007JG000642 Google Scholar
  20. Dane JH, Hopmans JW (2002) Water retention and storage. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part. 4. SSSA book ser. 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 671–796Google Scholar
  21. Deenik JL, McClellan T, Uehara G, Antal MJ, Campbell S (2010) Charcoal volatile matter content influences plant growth and soil nitrogen transformations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1259–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eastman CM (2011) Soil physical characteristics of an Aeric Ochraqualf amended with Biochar. MSc thesis. Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Fábián A, Jäger K, Rakszegi M, Barnabás B (2011) Embryo and endosperm development in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) kernels subjected to water deficit stress. Plant Cell Rep 30:551–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources report 103. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  25. FMI (2012) Monthly climatological statistics of Finland. Finnish Meteorological Institute. http://ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/kuukausitilastot. Accessed 16 March 2012
  26. FMI (2013) Monthly climatological statistics of Finland. Finnish Meteorological Institute. http://ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/kuukausitilastot. Accessed 17 January 2013
  27. Gaskin JW, Speir A, Morris LM, Ogden L, Harris K, Lee D, and Das KC (2007) Potential for pyrolysis char to affect soil moisture and nutrient status of loamy sand soil. Proceedings of the 2007 Georgia Water Resources Conference, March 27–29, 2007 at the University of GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Genesio L, Miglietta F, Lugato E, Baronti S, Pieri M, Vaccari FP (2012) Surface albedo following biochar application in durum wheat. Environ Res Lett. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014025 Google Scholar
  29. Graber ER, Harel YM, Kolton M, Cytryn E, Silber A, David DR, Tsechansky L, Borenshtein M, Elad Y (2010) Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant Soil 337:481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Gerstl Z, Lew B (2012) High surface area biochar negatively impacts herbicide efficacy. Plant Soil 353:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Güereña D, Lehmann J, Hanley K, Enders A, Hyland C, Riha S (2012) Nitrogen dynamics following field application of biochar in a temperate North American maize-based production system. Plant Soil. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1383-4 Google Scholar
  32. Gundale MJ, DeLuca TH (2007) Charcoal effects on soil solution chemistry and growth of Koeleria macrantha in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir ecosystem. Biol Fertil Soils 43:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hale SE, Lehmann J, Rutherford D, Zimmerman AR, Bachmann RT, Shitumbanuma V, O’Toole A, Sundqvist KL, Arp HPH, Cornelissen G (2012) Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ Sci Technol 46:2830–2838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamer U, Marschner B, Brodowski S, Amelung W (2004) Interactive priming of black carbon and glucose mineralisation. Org Geochem 35:823–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones JB, Steyn WJA (1973) Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. In: Walsh LM, Beaton JD (eds) Soil testing and plant analysis. ASA-SSSA Inc, Madison, pp 249–270Google Scholar
  36. Jones BEH, Haynes RJ, Phillips IR (2010) Effect of amendment of bauxite processing sand with organic materials on its chemical, physical and microbial properties. J Environ Manage 91:2281–2288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones DL, Murphy DV, Khalid M, Ahmad W, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH (2011) Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1723–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH, Murphy DV (2012) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol Biochem 45:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kammann CI, Linsel S, Gössling J, Koyro H-W (2011) Influence of biochar on water deficit tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa willd and on soil-plant relations. Plant Soil 345:195–210. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0771-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kammann CI, Ratering S, Eckhard C, Müller C (2012) Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) fluxes from soils. J Environ Qual 41:1052–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I, Regina K (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity-Results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimetu J, Lehmann J, Ngoze S, Mugendi D, Kinyangi J, Riha S, Verchot L, Recha J, Pell A (2008) Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient. Ecosystems 11:726–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kishimoto S, Sugiura G (1985) Charcoal as a soil conditioner. In: symposium on forest products research. Int Achieve Future 5:12–23Google Scholar
  44. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010a) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laird DA, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen DL (2010b) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lehmann J, Silva JJP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lehmann J, Skjemstad J, Sohi S, Carter J, Barson M, Falloon P, Coleman K, Woodbury P, Krull E (2008) Australian climate-carbon cycle feedback reduced by soil black carbon. Nat Geosci 1:832–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lentz RD, Ippolito JA (2012) Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. J Environ Qual 41:1033–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li P, Chen J, Wu P (2011) Agronomic characteristics and grain yield of 30 spring wheat genotypes under water deficit stress and nonstress conditions. Agron J 103:1619–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizao FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu J, Schulz H, Brandl S, Miehtke H, Huwe B, Glaser B (2012) Short-term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a Dystric Cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201100172 Google Scholar
  53. López-Bellido FJ, Lopez-Bellido LO, López-Bellido RJ (2005) Competition, growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Eur J Agron 23:359–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha S, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna Oxisol. Plant Soil 333:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J (2012) Nutrient leaching in a Colombian savanna Oxisol amended with biochar. J Environ Qual 41:1076–1086. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0128 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Manschadi AM, Sauerborn J, Stützel H, Göbel W, Saxena MC (1998) Simulation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) root system development under Mediterranean conditions. Eur J Agron 9:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGregor DI (1987) Effect of plant density on development and yield of rapeseed and its significance to recovery from hail injury. Can J Plant Sci 67:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meier U (ed) (2001) Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants. BBCH-Monograph. Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. Blackwell Wissenschafts–Verlag, Berlin, pp 6–36Google Scholar
  59. Nelson NO, Agudelo SC, Yuan WQ, Gan J (2011) Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in biochar-amended soils. Soil Sci 176:218–226Google Scholar
  60. Nielsen DC (1997) Water use and yield of canola under dryland conditions in the central Great Plains. J Prod Agric 10:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Novak JM, Lima IM, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg H (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. AES 3:195–206Google Scholar
  62. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Laird DA, Ahmedna MA, Niandou MAS (2010) Short-term CO2 mineralization after additions of biochar and switchgrass to a Typic Kandiudult. Geoderma 154:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Passioura J (2004) Water use efficiency on the farmers’ fields. In: Bacon MA (ed) Water use efficiency in plant biology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 302–318Google Scholar
  64. Peng X, Ye LL, Wang CH, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature- and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res 112:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Porter JR, Semenov MA (2005) Crop responses to climatic variation. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:2021–2035. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1752 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Quilliam RS, Marsden KA, Gertler C, Rousk J, DeLuca TH, Jones DL (2012) Nutrient dynamics, microbial growth and weed emergence in biochar amended soil are influenced by time since application and reapplication rate. Agr Ecosyst Environ 158:192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rajala A, Hakala K, Mäkelä P, Muurinen S, Peltonen-Sainio P (2009) Spring wheat response to timing of water deficit through sink and grain filling capacity. Field Crop Res 114:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J (2012) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fertil Soils 48:271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodríguez L, Salazar P and Preston TR (2011) Effect of a culture of “native” micro-organisms, biochar and biodigester effluent on the growth of maize in acid soils. LRRD 23. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/10/rodr23223.htm. Accessed 1 April 2012
  70. Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramirez J, Hurtado M (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with biochar additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Silva G (2011) Fertilizer prices on the rise. Integrated pest management resources. http://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/fertilizer_prices_on_the_rise. Accessed 14 June 2012
  72. Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil survey manual, Agric. Handbook No. 18, USDA-NRCS. U.S Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  73. Solaiman ZM, Blackwell P, Abbott LK, Storer P (2010) Direct and residual effect of biochar application on mycorrhizal root colonisation, growth and nutrition of wheat. Soil Res 48:546–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macedo JLV, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WEH, Zech W (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:893–899. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200625199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Streubel JD (2011) Biochar: its characterization and utility for recovering phosphorus from anaerobic digested dairy effluent. Dissertation, Washington State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  77. Tammeorg P, Brandstaka T, Simojoki A, Helenius J (2012) Nitrogen mineralization dynamics of meat bone meal and cattle manure as affected by the application of softwood chips biochar in soil. Earth Env Sci T R S E 103:19–30Google Scholar
  78. Ugalde TD, Jenner CF (1990) Substrate gradients and regional patterns of dry matter deposition within developing wheat endosperm. I. Carbohydrates. Aust J Plant Physiol 17:377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. USDA (2012) Average U.S. farm prices of selected fertilizers, 1960–2012. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FertilizerUse/Tables/Table7.xls. Accessed 4 June 2012
  80. USEPA (1996) Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices. USEPA. http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/3052.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2012
  81. Vaccari PF, Baronti S, Lugatoa E, Genesio L, Castaldi S, Fornasier F et al (2011) Biochar as a strategy to sequester carbon and increase yield in durum wheat. Eur J Agron. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.01.006 Google Scholar
  82. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan YK, Downie A, Rust J et al (2010a) Effect of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Downie A, Morris S, Petty S, Rust J, Chan KY (2010b) A glasshouse study on the interaction of low mineral ash biochar with nitrogen in a sandy soil. Soil Res 48:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vuorinen J, Mäkitie O (1955) The method of soil testing in use in Finland. Agrogeological Publ 63:1–44Google Scholar
  85. Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C, Zackrisson O (2008) Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science 320:629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Whaley JM, Sparkes DL, Foulkes MJ, Spink JH, Semere T, Scott RK (2000) The physiological response of winter wheat to reductions in plant density. Ann Appl Biol 137:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:1–9PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yanai Y, Toyota K, Ozakaki M (2007) Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhang A, Liu Y, Pan G, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng J, Zhang X (2012) Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil organic carbon poor calcareous loamy soil from Central China Plain. Plant Soil 351:263–275. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0957-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1295–1301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priit Tammeorg
    • 1
  • Asko Simojoki
    • 2
  • Pirjo Mäkelä
    • 1
  • Frederick L. Stoddard
    • 1
  • Laura Alakukku
    • 3
  • Juha Helenius
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Food and Environmental SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations