Crop residue incorporation negates the positive effect of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration on wheat productivity and fertilizer nitrogen recovery
Background and purpose
Rapid increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) may increase crop residue production and carbon: nitrogen (C:N) ratio. Whether the incorporation of residues produced under elevated [CO2] will limit soil N availability and fertilizer N recovery in the plant is unknown. This study investigated the interaction between crop residue incorporation and elevated [CO2] on the growth, grain yield and the recovery of 15N-labeled fertilizer by wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Yitpi) under controlled environmental conditions.
Residue for ambient and elevated [CO2] treatments, obtained from wheat grown previously under ambient and elevated [CO2], respectively, was incorporated into two soils (from a cereal-legume rotation and a cereal-fallow rotation) 1 month before the sowing of wheat. At the early vegetative stage 15N-labeled granular urea (10.22 atom%) was applied at 50 kg N ha−1 and the wheat grown to maturity.
When residue was not incorporated into the soil, elevated [CO2] increased wheat shoot (16 %) and root biomass (41 %), grain yield (19 %), total N uptake (4 %) and grain N removal (8 %). However, the positive [CO2] fertilization effect on these parameters was absent in the soil amended with residue. In the absence of residue, elevated [CO2] increased fertilizer N recovery in the plant (7 %), but when residue was incorporated elevated [CO2] decreased fertilizer N recovery.
A higher fertilizer application rate will be required under future elevated [CO2] atmospheres to replenish the extra N removed in grains from cropping systems if no residue is incorporated, or to facilitate the [CO2] fertilization effect on grain yield by overcoming N immobilization resulting from residue amendment.
KeywordsElevated [CO2] Residue incorporation Wheat growth Fertilizer N recovery 15N
- Alexander M (1977) Mineralization and immobilization of nitrogen. In: Alexander M (ed) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 136–247Google Scholar
- Azam F, Ashraf M, Lodhi A, Sajjad MI (1990) Availability of soil and fertilizer nitrogen to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) following rice-straw amendment. Biol Fertil Soils 10:134–138Google Scholar
- Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Winden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Isbell RF (1996) The Australian soil classification. Australian soil and land survey handbook. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Agronomy 9. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 643–698Google Scholar
- Mandal KG, Misra AK, Hati KM, Bandyopadhyay KK, Ghosh PK, Mohanty M (2004) Rice residue-management options and effects on soil properties and crop productivity. J Food Agric Environ 2:224–231Google Scholar
- Montoya-González A, González-Navarro OE, Govaerts B, Sayre KD, Estrada I, Luna-Guido M, Ceja-Navarro JA, Patiño-Zúñiga L, Marsch R, Dendooven L (2009) Straw management, crop rotation and nitrogen source effect on carbon and nitrogen dynamics: a laboratory study. Plant Soil 325:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar