Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 364, Issue 1–2, pp 131–143 | Cite as

The contribution of entrapped gas bubbles to the soil methane pool and their role in methane emission from rice paddy soil in free-air [CO2] enrichment and soil warming experiments

  • Takeshi TokidaEmail author
  • Weiguo Cheng
  • Minaco Adachi
  • Toshinori Matsunami
  • Hirofumi Nakamura
  • Masumi Okada
  • Toshihiro Hasegawa
Regular Article

Abstract

Purpose

We attempted to determine the contribution of entrapped gas bubbles to the soil methane (CH4) pool and their role in CH4 emissions in rice paddies open to the atmosphere.

Methods

We buried pots with soil and rice in four treatments comprising two atmospheric CO2 concentrations (ambient and ambient +200 μmol mol−1) and two soil temperatures (ambient and ambient +2 °C). Pots were retrieved for destructive measurements of rice growth and the gaseous CH4 pool in the soil at three stages of crop development: panicle formation, heading, and grain filling. Methane flux was measured before pot retrieval.

Results

Bubbles that contained CH4 accounted for a substantial fraction of the total CH4 pool in the soil: 26–45 % at panicle formation and 60–68 % at the heading and grain filling stages. At panicle formation, a higher CH4 mixing ratio in the bubbles was accompanied by a greater volume of bubbles, but at heading and grain filling, the volume of bubbles plateaued and contained ~35 % CH4. The bubble-borne CH4 pool was closely related to the putative rice-mediated CH4 emissions measured at each stage across the CO2 concentration and temperature treatments. However, much unexplained variation remained between the different growth stages, presumably because the CH4 transport capacity of rice plants also affected the emission rate.

Conclusions

The gas phase needs to be considered for accurate quantification of the soil CH4 pool. Not only ebullition but also plant-mediated emission depends on the gaseous-CH4 pool and the transport capacity of the rice plants.

Keywords

Rice paddy Methane Entrapped bubbles Free-air CO2 enrichment Soil warming Climate change 

Abbreviations

FACE

Free air CO2 enrichment

[CO2]

CO2 concentration

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. H. Iino and Mr. H. Kamimura of the Field Management Division of the National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences (NIAES) for technical assistance with pot preparation. We also acknowledge Ms. M. Kajiura and Dr. N. Katayanagi of NIAES and Dr. M. Matsushima of Chiba University for help with flux measurements and Drs. S. Sudo and K. Minamikawa of NIAES for assistance with the GC analysis. This research was financially supported by the Global Environment Research Program, Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (PD 19-7010) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

  1. Armstrong J, Armstrong W (2001) Rice and Phragmites: effects of organic acids on growth, root permeability, and radial oxygen loss to the rhizosphere. Am J Bot 88:1359–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazhin N (2010) Theory of methane emission from wetlands. Energy Environ Sci 3:1057–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker M, Asch F (2005) Iron toxicity in rice—conditions and management concepts. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168:558–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosse U, Frenzel P (1998) Methane emissions from rice microcosms: the balance of production, accumulation and oxidation. Biogeochemistry 41:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossio DA, Horwath WR, Mutters RG, van Kessel C (1999) Methane pool and flux dynamics in a rice field following straw incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1313–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buendia LV, Neue HU, Wassmann R et al (1998) An efficient sampling strategy for estimating methane emission from rice field. Chemosphere 36:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes BH, Austin ER, Tays BK (1995) Methane emissions from flooded rice soils and plants under controlled conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 27:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cao M, Dent J, Heal O (1995) Modeling methane emissions from rice paddies. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng W, Yagi K, Xu H, Sakai H, Kobayashi K (2005) Influence of elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2 on CH4 and CO2 entrapped in rice-paddy soil. Chem Geol 218:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng W, Inubushi K, Hoque MM et al (2008a) Effect of elevated [CO2] on soil bubble and CH4 emission from a rice paddy: a test by 13C pulse-labeling under free-air CO2 enrichment. Geomicrobiol J 25:396–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng W, Sakai H, Hartley AE, Yagi K, Hasegawa T (2008b) Increased night temperature reduces the stimulatory effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on methane emission from rice paddy soil. Global Change Biol 14:644–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clever HL, Young CL (1987) IUPAC solubility data series, vol27/28, methane. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Denier Van Der Gon HAC, Neue HU (1995) Influence of organic-matter incorporation on the methane emission from a wetland rice field. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denier Van Der Gon HAC, Van Breemen N (1993) Diffusion-controlled transport of methane from soil to atmosphere as mediated by rice plants. Biogeochemistry 21:177–190Google Scholar
  15. Denier Van Der Gon HAC, Van Breemen N, Neue HU et al (1996) Release of entrapped methane from wetland rice fields upon soil drying. Global Biogeochem Cycles 10:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–234Google Scholar
  17. Fumoto T, Kobayashi K, Li C, Yagi K, Hasegawa T (2007) Revising a process-based biogeochemistry model (DNDC) to simulate methane emission from rice paddy fields under various residue management and fertilizer regimes. Global Change Biol 14:382–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Han GH, Yoshikoshi H, Nagai H et al (2005) Concentration and carbon isotope profiles of CH4 in paddy rice canopy: isotopic evidence for changes in CH4 emission pathways upon drainage. Chem Geol 218:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R et al (2005) Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res 110:D18104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Himmelblau DM (1964) Diffusion of dissolved gases in liquids. Chem Rev 64:527–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Seiler W (1986) Methane emission during a cultivation period from an italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res 91:11803–11814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Seiler W (1986) Effects of vegetation on the emission of methane from submerged paddy soil. Plant Soil 92:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hosono T, Nouchi I (1997) Effect of gas pressure in the root and stem base zone on methane transport through rice bodies. Plant Soil 195:65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang Y, Zhang W, Zheng X, Li J, Yu Y (2004) Modeling methane emission from rice paddies with various agricultural practices. J Geophys Res 109:D08113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutchinson GL, Livingston GP (2002) Soil-atmosphere gas exchange. In: Dane JH, Topp C (eds) Method of soil analysis part 4 physical method. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, pp 1159–1182Google Scholar
  27. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberber O (2006) Sas® for mixed models, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  28. Maeda T, Soma K (1986) Physical properties. In: Wada K (ed) Ando soils in Japan. Kyushu University Press, Fukuoka, pp 99–114Google Scholar
  29. Nouchi I, Mariko S, Aoki K (1990) Mechanism of methane transport from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Physiol 94:59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nouchi I, Hosono T, Aoki K, Minami K (1994) Seasonal variation in methane flux from rice paddies associated with methane concentration in soil water, rice biomass and temperature, and its modeling. Plant Soil 161:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Okada M, Lieffering M, Nakamura H et al (2001) Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) using pure CO2 injection: system description. New Phytol 150:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramaswamy V, Boucher O, Haigh J et al (2001) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ et al (eds) Climate change 2001: The scientific basis contribution of working group i to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 349–416Google Scholar
  33. Rothfuss F, Conrad R (1998) Effect of gas bubbles on the diffusive flux of methane in anoxic paddy soil. Limnol Oceanogr 43:1511–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sass RL, Fisher FM, Harcombe PA, Turner FT (1990) Methane production and emission in a texas rice field. Global Biogeochem Cycles 4:47–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sass RL, Fisher FM, Turner FT, Jund MF (1991) Methane emission from rice fields as influenced by solar radiation, temperature, and straw incorporation. Global Biogeochem Cycles 5:335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sass RL, Fisher FM Jr, Huang Y (2000) A process-based model for methane emissions from irrigated rice fields: experimental basis and assumptions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 58:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schimel D, Alves D, Enting I et al (1995) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA et al (eds) Climate change 1995: The science of climate change, contribution of WG I to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–132Google Scholar
  38. Schink B (1997) Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:262–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schütz H, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Rennenberg H, Seiler W (1989) A 3-year continuous record on the influence of daytime, season, and fertilizer treatment on methane emission rates from an italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res 94:16405–16416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Bell N, Schmidt GA (2005) An emissions-based view of climate forcing by methane and tropospheric ozone. Geophys Res Lett 32:L04803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Koch DM et al (2009) Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science 326:716–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shindell D, Kuylenstierna JCI, Vignati E et al (2012) Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335:183–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shine KP, Derwent RG, Wuebbles DJ, Morcrette J-J (1990) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (eds) Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 41–68Google Scholar
  44. Stams AJM (1994) Metabolic interactions between anaerobic-bacteria in methanogenic environments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 66:271–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sudo S (2006) Method and instrument for measuring atmospheric gas, patent publication number 2006-275844. National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, JapanGoogle Scholar
  46. Tokida T, Miyazaki T, Mizoguchi M, Seki K (2005) In situ accumulation of methane bubbles in a natural wetland soil. Eur J Soil Sci 56:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tokida T, Miyazaki T, Mizoguchi M et al (2007) Falling atmospheric pressure as a trigger for methane ebullition from peatland. Global Biogeochem Cycles 21:GB2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tokida T, Miyazaki T, Mizoguchi M (2009) Physical controls on ebullition losses of methane from peatlands. In: Baird A, Belyea L, Comas X, Reeve A, Slater L (eds) Northern peatlands and carbon cycling. American Geophysical Union, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  49. Tokida T, Fumoto T, Cheng W et al (2010) Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) and soil warming on CH4 emission from a rice paddy field: impact assessment and stoichiometric evaluation. Biogeosciences 7:2639–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tokida T, Adachi M, Cheng W et al (2011) Methane and soil CO2 production from current-season photosynthates in a rice paddy exposed to elevated CO2 concentration and soil temperature. Global Change Biol 17:3327–3337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Uzaki M, Mizutani H, Wada E (1991) Carbon isotope composition of CH4 from rice paddies in Japan. Biogeochemistry 13:159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Bodegom PM, Groot T, Van Den Hout B, Leffelaar PA, Goudriaan J (2001) Diffusive gas transport through flooded rice systems. J Geophys Res 106:20861–20873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang B, Neue HU, Samonte HP (1997) Role of rice in mediating methane emission. Plant Soil 189:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang B, Neue HU, Samonte HP (1999) Factors controlling diel patterns of methane emission via rice. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 53:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wassmann R, Neue HU, Alberto MCR et al (1996) Fluxes and pools of methane in wetland rice soil with varying organic inputs. Environ Monit Assess 42:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watanabe A, Kimura M (1995) Methane production and its fate in paddy fields. VIII. Seasonal variation of methane retained in soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 41:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watanabe A, Kimura M (1998) Factors affecting variation in CH4 emission from paddy soils grown with different rice cultivars: a pot experiment. J Geophys Res 103:18947–18952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watanabe A, Murase J, Katoh K, Kimura M (1994) Methane production and its fate in paddy fields. V. Fate of methane remaining in paddy soil at harvesting stage. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 40:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilhelm E, Battino R, Wilcock RJ (1977) Low-pressure solubility of gases in liquid water. Chem Rev 52:219–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xu S, Jaffé PR, Mauzerall DL (2007) A process-based model for methane emission from flooded rice paddy systems. Ecol Model 205:475–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takeshi Tokida
    • 1
    Email author
  • Weiguo Cheng
    • 2
  • Minaco Adachi
    • 3
  • Toshinori Matsunami
    • 4
  • Hirofumi Nakamura
    • 5
  • Masumi Okada
    • 6
  • Toshihiro Hasegawa
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Agro-Environmental SciencesTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata UniversityTsuruokaJapan
  3. 3.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan
  4. 4.Akita Prefectural Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research CenterAkitaJapan
  5. 5.Taiyo Keiki Co., Ltd, TokyoKita-kuJapan
  6. 6.Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate UniversityMoriokaJapan

Personalised recommendations