Plant and Soil

, Volume 362, Issue 1–2, pp 93–106 | Cite as

Drivers of increased soil respiration in a poplar coppice exposed to elevated CO2

  • Alessandra Lagomarsino
  • Martin Lukac
  • Douglas L. Godbold
  • Sara Marinari
  • Paolo De Angelis
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

The response of soil respiration (SR) to elevated CO2 is driven by a number of processes and feedbacks. This work aims to i) detect the effect of elevated CO2 on soil respiration during the second rotation of a short rotation forest, at two levels of N availability; and ii) identify the main drivers behind any changes in soil respiration.

Methods

A poplar plantation (POP-EUROFACE) was grown for two rotations of 3 years under elevated CO2 maintained by a FACE (Free Air CO2 Enrichment) technique. Root biomass, litter production and soil respiration were followed for two consecutive years after coppice.

Results

In the plantation, the stimulation of fine root and litter production under elevated CO2 observed at the beginning of the rotation declined over time. Soil respiration (SR) was continuously stimulated by elevated CO2, with a much larger enhancement during the growing (up to 111 %) than in the dormant season (40 %). The SR increase at first appeared to be due to the increase in fine root biomass, but at the end of the 2nd rotation was supported by litter decomposition and the availability of labile C. Soil respiration increase under elevated CO2 was not affected by N availability.

Conclusions

The stimulation of SR by elevated CO2 was sustained by the decomposition of above and belowground litter and by the greater availability of easily decomposable substrates into the soil. In the final year as elevated CO2 did not increase C allocation to roots, the higher SR suggests greater C losses from the soil, thus reducing the potential for C accumulation.

Keywords

SRF FACE Soil respiration Labile C Root biomass Litter 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Prof. Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza, coordinator of the EU EUROFACE (EVR1-CT-2002-40027) and MIUR Centre of Excellence “Forests and climate” projects for allowing the use of POP-EUROFACE experimental station. The authors thanks Mr. Tullio Oro for the technical assistance.

References

  1. Astrid RB, Giesemann A, Anderson TH, Weigel HJ, Buchmann N (2004) Soil respiration under elevated CO2 and its partitioning into recently assimilated and older carbon sources. Plant Soil 262:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bader M, Hiltbrunner E, Körner C (2009) Fine root responses of mature deciduous forest trees to free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE). Funct Ecol 23:913–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldocchi D, Tang J, Xu L (2006) How switches and lags in biophysical regulators affect spatial–temporal variation of soil respiration in an oak–grass savanna. J Geophys Res 111:GO2008. doi:10.1029/2005JG000063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernhardt ES, Barber JJ, Pippen JS, Taneva L, Andrews JA, Schlesinger WH (2006) Long-term effects of Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) on soil respiration. Biogeochem 77:91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown ALP, Day FP, Hungate BA, Drake BG, Hinkle CR (2007) Root biomass and nutrient dynamics in a scrub–oak ecosystem under the influence of elevated atmospheric CO2. Plant Soil 292:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calfapietra C, Gielen B, Sabatti M, De Angelis P, Miglietta F, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Ceulemans R (2003) Do above ground growth dynamics of poplar change with time under CO2 enrichment? New Phytol 160:305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calfapietra C, Tulva I, Eensalu E, Perez M, De Angelis P, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Kull O (2005) Canopy profiles of photosynthetic parameters under elevated CO2 and N fertilization in a poplar plantation. Environ Pollut 137:525–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng W, Coleman DC (1990) Effect of living roots on soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 22:781–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng W, Johnson DW (1998) Elevated CO2, rhizosphere processes, and soil organic matter decomposition. Plant Soil 202:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotrufo MF, De Angelis P, Polle A (2005) Leaf litter production and decomposition in a poplar short-rotation coppice exposed to free air CO2 enrichment (POPFACE). Global Change Biol 11:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson EA, Savage K, Bolstad P, Clark DA, Curtis PS, Ellsworth DS, Hanson PJ, Law PE, Luo Y, Pregitzer KS, Randolph JC, Zak D (2002) Belowground carbon allocation in forests estimates from litterfall and IRGA-based soil respiration measurements. Agr Forest Meteorol 113:9–51Google Scholar
  12. Epron D, Le Dantec V, Dufrene E, Granier A (2001) Seasonal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide efflux and simulated rhizosphere respiration in a beech forest. Tree Physiol 21:145–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giardina CP, Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH (2003) Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experiment forest. Global Change Biol 9:1438–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handa IT, Hagedorn F, Hättenschwiler S (2008) No stimulation in root production in response to 4 years of in situ CO2 enrichment at the Swiss treeline. Funct Ecol 22:348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hogberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N, Taylor AFS, Ekblad A, Hogberg MN, Nyberg G, Ottoson-Lofvenius M, Read DJ (2001) Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature 411:789–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoosbeek MR, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE (2009) Increased litter build up and soil organic matter stabilization in a poplar plantation after 6 years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment (FACE): final results of POP-EUROFACE compared to other forest FACE experiments. Ecosystems 12:220–239. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9219-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoosbeek MR, Lukac M, van Dam D, Godbold DL, Velthorst EJ, Biondi FA, Peressotti A, Cotrufo MF, De Angelis P, Scarascia Mugnozza G (2004) More new carbon in the mineral soil of a poplar plantation under free air carbon enrichment (POPFACE): cause of increased priming effect? Global Biogeochem Cy 18. doi:10.1029/2003GB002127
  18. Hungate BA, Chapin FS III, Zhong H, Holland EA, Field CB (1997) Stimulation of grassland nitrogen cycling under carbon dioxide enrichment. Oecologia 109:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iversen CM, Ledford J, Norby RJ (2008) CO2 enrichment increases carbon and nitrogen input from fine roots in a deciduous forest. New Phytol 179:837–847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janssens IA, Lankreijer H, Matteucci G, Kowalski AS et al (2001) Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Global Change Biol 7:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones DL, Hodge A, Kuzyakov Y (2004) Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. New Phytol 163:459–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD (2009) Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil 321:5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King JS, Hanson PJ, Bernhardt E, De Angelis P, Norby RJ, Pregitzer KS (2004) A multiyear synthesis of soil respiration responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 from four forest FACE experiments. Global Change Biol 10:1027–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuzyakov Y, Cheng W (2001) Photosynthesis controls of rhizosphere respiration and organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1915–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lagomarsino A, Moscatelli MC, De Angelis P, Grego S (2006) Labile substrate quality as the main driving force of microbial mineralization activity in a poplar plantation soil under elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. Sci Total Environ 372:256–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lagomarsino A, Moscatelli MC, Hoosbeek MR, De Angelis P, Grego S (2008) Assessment of soil nitrogen and phosphorous availability under elevated CO2 and N-fertilization in a short rotation poplar plantation. Plant Soil 308:131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lagomarsino A, De Angelis P, Moscatelli MC, Grego S (2009) The influence of temperature and labile C substrates on heterotrophic respiration in response to elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. Plant Soil 317:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lekkerkerk LJA, van De Geijn SC, van Veen J (1990) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 levels on the carbn economy of a soil planted with wheat. In: Bouwman AF (ed) Soils and the greenhouse effect. Wiley, USA, pp 423–429Google Scholar
  29. Liberloo M, Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Veys C, Pigliacelli R, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Ceulemans R (2004) Growth of a poplar short rotation coppice under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (EUROFACE) depends on fertilization and species. Ann For Sci 61:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liberloo M, Dillen SY, Calfapietra C, Marinari S, Luo ZB, De Angelis P, Ceulemans R (2005) Elevated CO2 concentration, fertilization and their interaction: growth stimulation in a short-rotation poplar coppice (EUROFACE). Tree Physiol 25:179–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liberloo M, Calfapietra C, Lukac M, Godbold D, Luo ZB, Polle A, Hoosbeek M, Kull O, Marek M, Raine CT, Rubino M, Taylor G, Scarascia Mugnozza G, Ceulemans R (2006) Woody biomass production during the second rotation of a bio-energy Populus plantaion increases in a future high CO2 world. Global Change Biol 12:1094–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liberloo M, Tulva I, Raïm O, Kull O, Ceulemans R (2007) Photosynthetic stimulation under long-term CO2 enrichment and fertilization is sustained across a closed Populus canopy profile (EUROFACE). New Phytol 173:537–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liberloo M, Lukac M, Calfapietra C, Hoosbeek MR, Gielen B, Miglietta F, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Ceulemans R (2009) Coppicing shifts CO2 stimulation of poplar productivity to above-ground pools: a synthesis of leaf to stand level results from the POP/EUROFACE experiment. New Phytol 182:331–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liljeroth E, Kuikman P, Van Veen JA (1994) Carbon translocation to the rhizosphere of maize and wheat and influence on the turnover of native soil organic matter at different soil nitrogen levels. Plant Soil 161:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lukac M, Calfapietra C, Godbold DL (2003) Root production and turnover in, pulus grown under elevated CO2 using a free air enrichment system POPFACE. Global Change Biol 9:838–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maier CA, Kress LW (2000) Soil CO2 evolution and root respiration in 11 year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations as affected by moisture and nutrient availability. Can J Fort Res 30:347–359Google Scholar
  37. Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Vaccari FP, Zaldei A, De Angelis P, Sarascia Mugnozza G (2001) Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytol 150:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moscatelli MC, Lagomarsino A, Marinari S, De Angelis P, Grego S (2005) Soil microbial indices as bioindicators of environmental changes in a poplar plantation. Ecol Ind 5:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norby RJ (2004) Forest responses to a future CO2-enriched atmosphere. In: Steffen W et al (eds) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, Berlin, pp 158–159Google Scholar
  40. Norby RJ, Hanson PJ, O’Neill EG, Tschaplinski TJ, Weltzin JF et al (2002) Net primary productivity of a CO2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storage. Ecol Appl 12:1261–1266Google Scholar
  41. Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ, King JS, Zak DR (2008) Soil respiration, root biomass, and root turnover following long-term exposure of northern forests to elevated atmospheric CO2 and tropospheric O3. New Phytol 180:153–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raich JW, Nadelhoffer KJ (1989) Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology 70:1346–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raich JW, Tufekcioglu A (2000) Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochem 48:71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryan MG, Law BE (2005) Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration. Biogeochem 73:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH, Giardina CP, Senock RS (2004) An experimental test of the causes of forest growth decline with stand age. Ecol Monogr 74:393–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scarascia Mugnozza G, De Angelis P, Sabatti M, Calfapietra C, Ceulemans R, Peressotti A, Miglietta F (2000) A FACE experiment on short rotation, intensive poplar plantation: objective and experimental set up of POPFACE. In: Sutton MA, et al. (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems research in Europe: success, challenges and policy. European Communities, Luxemburg, EUR 19375. pp 136–140Google Scholar
  47. Sennerby-Forsse L (1995) Growth processes. Biomass Bioenergy 9:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trueman RJ, Gonzalez-Meler A (2005) Accelerated belowground C cycling in a managed agriforest acosystem exposed to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Global Change Biol 11:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Hees PAW, Jones DL, Finlay R, Godbold DL, Lundstrom US (2005) The carbon we do not see—the impact of low molecular weight compounds on carbon dynamics and respiration in forest soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, King JS, Holmes WE (2000) Elevated atmospheric CO2, fine roots and the response of soil microorganism: a review and hypotesis. New Phytol 147:201–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandra Lagomarsino
    • 1
  • Martin Lukac
    • 2
  • Douglas L. Godbold
    • 3
  • Sara Marinari
    • 4
  • Paolo De Angelis
    • 4
  1. 1.Agriculture Research Council, Research Centre for Agrobiology and Pedology (CRA-ABP)FirenzeItaly
  2. 2.School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  3. 3.Institute of Forest EcologyUniversität für BodenkulturViennaAustria
  4. 4.DIBAF (Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems)University of TusciaViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations