Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 362, Issue 1–2, pp 79–92 | Cite as

A physiological and molecular study of the effects of nickel deficiency and phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD) application on urea metabolism in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

  • Mustapha Arkoun
  • Laëtitia Jannin
  • Philippe Laîné
  • Philippe Etienne
  • Céline Masclaux-Daubresse
  • Sylvie Citerne
  • Maria Garnica
  • José-Maria Garcia-Mina
  • Jean-Claude Yvin
  • Alain OurryEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Urea is the major nitrogen (N) form supplied as fertilizer in agriculture. However, urease, a nickel-dependent enzyme, allows plants to use external or internally generated urea as a nitrogen source. Since a urease inhibitor is frequently applied in conjunction with urea fertilizer, the N-metabolism of plants may be affected. The aim of this study was to determine physiological and molecular effects of nickel deficiency and a urease inhibitor on urea uptake and assimilation in oilseed rape.

Methods

Plants were grown on hydroponic solution with urea as the sole N source under three treatments: plants treated with nickel (+Ni) as a control, without nickel (−Ni) and with nickel and phenylphosphorodiamidate (+Ni+PPD). Urea transport and assimilation were investigated.

Results

The results show that Ni-deficiency or PPD supply led to reduced growth and reduced 15N-uptake from urea. This effect was more pronounced in PPD-treated plants, which accumulated high amounts of urea and ammonium. Thus, Ni-deficiency or addition of PPD, limit the availability of N and decreased shoot and root amino acid content. The up-regulation of BnDUR3 in roots indicated that this gene is a component of the stress response to nitrogen-deficiency. A general decline of glutamine synthetase (GS) activity and activation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and increases in its expression level were observed in control plants. At the same time, in (−N) or (+Ni+PPD) treated plants, no increases in GS or GDH activities and expression level were found.

Conclusions

Overall results showed that plants require Ni as a nutrient (while most widely used nutrient solutions are devoid of Ni), whether they are grown with or without a urea supply, and that urease inhibitors may have deleterious effects at least in hydroponic grown oilseed rape.

Keywords

Urea BnDUR3 15N-labeling Nickel Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD) Enzymatic activities Gene expressions 

Abbreviations

Ni

Nickel

PPD

Phenylphosphorodiamidate

NBPT

N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide

GS

Glutamine synthetase

GDH

Glutamate dehydrogenase

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Marie-Paule Bataillé and Raphaël Ségura for IRMS analyses. We acknowledge Xavier Sarda for helping with plant culture and harvest and Laurence Cantrill for kindly improving the English of the manuscript. The authors thank the «Pôle de compétitivité Mer-Bretagne» and the «Fond Unique Inter-ministériel» which supported this work conducted through the AZOSTIMER project.

Supplementary material

11104_2012_1227_MOESM1_ESM.doc (44 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 44 kb)

References

  1. Artola E, Cruchaga S, Ariz I, Moran JF, Garnica M, Houdusse F, Garcia Mina JM, Irigoyen I, Lasa B, Aparicio-Tejo PM (2011) Effect of N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on urea metabolism and the assimilation of ammonium by Triticum aestivum L. Plant Growth Regul 63:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bremner JM (1995) Recent research on problems in the use of urea as a nitrogen fertilizer. Fertilizer Res 42:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown PH, Welch RM, Madison JT (1990) Effect of nickel deficiency on soluble anion, amino acid, and nitrogen levels in barley. Plant Soil 125:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen YG, Ching TM (1988) Induction of barley leaf urease. Plant Physiol 86:941–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cruchaga S, Artola E, Lasa B, Ariz I, Irigoyen I, Moran JF, Aparicio-Tejo PM (2011) Short term physiological implications of NBPT application on the N metabolism of Pisum sativum and Spinacea oleracea. J Plant Physiol 168:329–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eskew DL, Welch RM, Norvall WA (1984) Nickel in higher plants. Further evidence for an essential role. Plant Physiol 76:691–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galili G, Amir R, Galili G (2008) Genetic engineering of amino acid metabolism in plants. Adv Plant Biochem Mol Biol 1:48–80Google Scholar
  8. Gerendás J, Sattelmacher B (1997) Significance of Ni supply for growth, urease activity and the contents of urea, amino acids and mineral nutrients of urea-grown plants. Plant Soil 190:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerendás J, Sattelmacher B (1999) Influence of Ni supply on growth and nitrogen metabolism of Brassica napus L. grown with NH4NO3 or urea as N source. Ann Bot London 83:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerendás J, Zhu Z, Sattelmacher B (1998) Influence of N and Ni supply on nitrogen metabolism and urease activity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 49:1545–1554Google Scholar
  11. Hogan ME, Swift IE, Done J (1983) Urease assay and ammonia release from leaf tissues. Phytochemistry 22:663–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kojima S, Bohner A, Gassert B, Yuan L, Von Wirén N (2007) AtDUR3 represents the major transporter for high-affinity urea transport across the plasma membrane of nitrogen-deficient Arabidopsis roots. Plant J 52:30–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krogmeier MJ, McCarty GW, Bremner JM (1989) Potential phytotoxicity associated with the use of soil urease inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:1110–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krogmeier MJ, McCarty GW, Shogren DR, Bremner JM (1991) Effect of nickel deficiency in soybeans on the phytotoxicity of foliar applied urea. Plant Soil 135:283–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kyllingsbæk A (1975) Extraction and colorimetric determination of urea in plants. Acta Agricult Scand B Soil Plant Sci 25:109–112Google Scholar
  16. Laemmli U (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu LH, Ludewig U, Frommer WB, von Wirén N (2003) AtDUR3 encodes a new type of high-affinity urea/H+ symporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15:790–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25:402–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loulakakis KA, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (1991) Plant NAD(H)-glutamate dehydrogenase consists of two subunit polypeptides and their participation in the seven isoenzymes occurs in an ordered ratio. Plant Physiol 97:104–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matsumoto H, Yasuda T, Koayashi M, Takahashi E (1966) The inducible formation of urease in rice plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 12:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsumoto H, Hasegawa Y, Kobayashi M, Takahashi E (1968) Inducible formation of urease in Canavalia ensiformis. Physiol Plant 21:872–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mérigout P, Lelandais M, Bitton F, Renou JP, Briand X, Meyer C, Daniel-Vedele F (2008) Physiological and transcriptomic aspects of urea uptake and assimilation in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol 147:1225–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mobley HL, Hausinger RP (1989) Microbial ureases: significance, regulation and molecular characterization. Microbiol Rev 53:85–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mobley HL, Island MD, Hausinger RP (1995) Molecular biology of microbial ureases. Microbiol Rev 59:451–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Neal D, Joy KW (1973) Glutamine synthetase of pea leaves. I. Purification, stabilisation and pH optima. Arch Biochem Biophys 159:113–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Purnell MP, Botella JR (2007) Tobacco isoenzyme 1 of NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase catabolizes glutamate in vivo. Plant Physiol 143:530–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Purnell MP, Skopelitis DS, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA, Botella JR (2005) Modulation of higher-plant NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tobacco via alteration of β subunit levels. Planta 222:167–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rhodes D, Brunk OG, Magalhaes JR (1989) Assimilation of ammonium by glutamate dehydrogenase? In: Poulten TE, Romeo JT, Conn EE (eds) Recent advances in phytochemistry. Plenum, New York, pp 191–226Google Scholar
  29. Skopelitis DS, Paranychiankis NV, Paschalidis KA, Plianokis ED, Delis ID, Yakoumakis DI et al (2006) Abiotic stress generates ROS that signal expression of anionic glutamate dehydrogenase to form glutamate for proline synthesis in tobacco and grapevine. Plant Cell 18:2767–2781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skopelitis DS, Paranychiankis NV, Kouvarakis A, Spyros A, Stephanou EG, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (2007) The isoenzyme 7 of tobacco NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase exhibits high deaminating and low aminating activity. Plant Physiol 145:1726–1734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tercé-Laforgue T, Dubois F, Ferrario-Méry S, Pou de Crecenzo MA, Sangwan R, Hirel B (2004) Glutamate dehydrogenase of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) is mainly induced in the cytosol of phloem companion cells when ammonia is provided either externally or released during photorespiration. Plant Physiol 136:4308–4317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Terman GL (1979) Volatilization losses of nitrogen as ammonia from surface-applied fertilizers, organic amendments, and crop residues. Adv Agron 31:189–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turano FJ, Dashner R, Upadhayaya A, Caldwell CR (1996) Purification of mitochondrial glutamate dehydrogenase from dark-grown soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol 112:1357–1364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker CD, Graham RD, Madison JT, Cary EE, Welch RM (1985) Effects of nickel deficiency on some nitrogen metabolites in cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Plant Physiol 79:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang WH, Kohler B, Cao FQ, Liu LH (2008) Molecular and physiological aspects of urea transport in higher plants. Plant Sci 175:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson CJ, Miller H (1996) Short-term effects of urea amended with the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on perennial grass. Plant Soil 184:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watson CJ, Miller H, Poland P, Kilpatrick DJ, Allen MDB, Garret MK, Christianson CB (1994) Soil properties and the ability of the urease inhibitor N-(N-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide (NBTPT) to reduce ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1165–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Witte CP, Tiller SA, Taylor MA, Davies HV (2002) Leaf urea metabolism in potato. Urease activity profile and patterns of recovery and distribution of 15N after foliar urea application in wild-type and urease-antisense transgenics. Plant Physiol 128:1129–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Witte CP, Rosso MG, Romeis T (2005) Identification of three urease accessory proteins that are required for urease activation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139:1155–1162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yamaya T, Oaks A, Rhodes D, Matsumoto H (1986) Synthesis of [15N]glutamate from [2–15N]glutamate and [15N]glycine by mitochondria isolated from pea and corn shoots. Plant Physiol 81:754–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yuan L, Loqué D, Ye F, Frommer WB, Von Wirèn N (2007) Nitrogen-dependent posttranscriptional regulation of the ammonium transporter AtAMT1;1. Plant Physiol 143:732–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zonia LE, Stebbins NE, Polacco JC (1995) Essential role of urease in germination of nitrogen limited Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Plant Physiol 107:1097–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustapha Arkoun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laëtitia Jannin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Philippe Laîné
    • 1
    • 2
  • Philippe Etienne
    • 1
    • 2
  • Céline Masclaux-Daubresse
    • 3
  • Sylvie Citerne
    • 4
  • Maria Garnica
    • 5
  • José-Maria Garcia-Mina
    • 5
  • Jean-Claude Yvin
    • 6
  • Alain Ourry
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.UMR 950 Ecophysiologie Végétale, Agronomie et nutritions N, C, SUniversité de Caen Basse-NormandieCaenFrance
  2. 2.INRA, UMR 950 Ecophysiologie Végétale, Agronomie et nutritions N, C, SCaenFrance
  3. 3.Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, IJPBVersaillesFrance
  4. 4.Plateau Technique de Chimie du VégétalInstitut Jean-Pierre BourginVersaillesFrance
  5. 5.Timac Agro SpainOrcoyenSpain
  6. 6.Timac Agro InternationalSaint-MaloFrance

Personalised recommendations