A physiological and molecular study of the effects of nickel deficiency and phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD) application on urea metabolism in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)
- 512 Downloads
Background and aims
Urea is the major nitrogen (N) form supplied as fertilizer in agriculture. However, urease, a nickel-dependent enzyme, allows plants to use external or internally generated urea as a nitrogen source. Since a urease inhibitor is frequently applied in conjunction with urea fertilizer, the N-metabolism of plants may be affected. The aim of this study was to determine physiological and molecular effects of nickel deficiency and a urease inhibitor on urea uptake and assimilation in oilseed rape.
Plants were grown on hydroponic solution with urea as the sole N source under three treatments: plants treated with nickel (+Ni) as a control, without nickel (−Ni) and with nickel and phenylphosphorodiamidate (+Ni+PPD). Urea transport and assimilation were investigated.
The results show that Ni-deficiency or PPD supply led to reduced growth and reduced 15N-uptake from urea. This effect was more pronounced in PPD-treated plants, which accumulated high amounts of urea and ammonium. Thus, Ni-deficiency or addition of PPD, limit the availability of N and decreased shoot and root amino acid content. The up-regulation of BnDUR3 in roots indicated that this gene is a component of the stress response to nitrogen-deficiency. A general decline of glutamine synthetase (GS) activity and activation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and increases in its expression level were observed in control plants. At the same time, in (−N) or (+Ni+PPD) treated plants, no increases in GS or GDH activities and expression level were found.
Overall results showed that plants require Ni as a nutrient (while most widely used nutrient solutions are devoid of Ni), whether they are grown with or without a urea supply, and that urease inhibitors may have deleterious effects at least in hydroponic grown oilseed rape.
KeywordsUrea BnDUR3 15N-labeling Nickel Phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD) Enzymatic activities Gene expressions
N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide
We thank Marie-Paule Bataillé and Raphaël Ségura for IRMS analyses. We acknowledge Xavier Sarda for helping with plant culture and harvest and Laurence Cantrill for kindly improving the English of the manuscript. The authors thank the «Pôle de compétitivité Mer-Bretagne» and the «Fond Unique Inter-ministériel» which supported this work conducted through the AZOSTIMER project.
- Galili G, Amir R, Galili G (2008) Genetic engineering of amino acid metabolism in plants. Adv Plant Biochem Mol Biol 1:48–80Google Scholar
- Gerendás J, Zhu Z, Sattelmacher B (1998) Influence of N and Ni supply on nitrogen metabolism and urease activity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 49:1545–1554Google Scholar
- Kyllingsbæk A (1975) Extraction and colorimetric determination of urea in plants. Acta Agricult Scand B Soil Plant Sci 25:109–112Google Scholar
- Rhodes D, Brunk OG, Magalhaes JR (1989) Assimilation of ammonium by glutamate dehydrogenase? In: Poulten TE, Romeo JT, Conn EE (eds) Recent advances in phytochemistry. Plenum, New York, pp 191–226Google Scholar
- Skopelitis DS, Paranychiankis NV, Paschalidis KA, Plianokis ED, Delis ID, Yakoumakis DI et al (2006) Abiotic stress generates ROS that signal expression of anionic glutamate dehydrogenase to form glutamate for proline synthesis in tobacco and grapevine. Plant Cell 18:2767–2781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tercé-Laforgue T, Dubois F, Ferrario-Méry S, Pou de Crecenzo MA, Sangwan R, Hirel B (2004) Glutamate dehydrogenase of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) is mainly induced in the cytosol of phloem companion cells when ammonia is provided either externally or released during photorespiration. Plant Physiol 136:4308–4317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson CJ, Miller H, Poland P, Kilpatrick DJ, Allen MDB, Garret MK, Christianson CB (1994) Soil properties and the ability of the urease inhibitor N-(N-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide (NBTPT) to reduce ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1165–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar