Plant and Soil

, Volume 357, Issue 1–2, pp 117–129 | Cite as

Varietal differences of quinoa’s tolerance to saline conditions

  • Verena I. Adolf
  • Sergey Shabala
  • Mathias N. Andersen
  • Fatemeh Razzaghi
  • Sven-Erik Jacobsen
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

This study aimed to assess varietal differences of quinoa’s tolerance to salinity and to investigate physiological mechanisms conferring these differences.

Methods

Production of biomass in fourteen varieties grown under saline conditions was analysed in a pot experiment. For two contrasting varieties, the Danish variety Titicaca and the Bolivian variety Utusaya gas exchange, chlorophyll content index (CCI), fluorescence and ion relations were studied.

Results

Responses to salinity differed greatly among the varieties; least affected were two varieties from the Bolivian altiplano and a variety from Peru. Titicaca and Utusaya both had substantially increased K+ concentrations in the leaf sap. But, Utusaya was much more efficient in restricting xylem Na+ loading. Xylem Na+ and K+ loading were found to be uncoupled. Utusaya maintained a relatively high stomatal conductance resulting in an only 25% NaCl-induced reduction in net CO2 assimilation compared to a 67% reduction in salt treated Titicaca plants. Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII was not affected by salinity.

Conclusion

In addition to maintaining high gas exchange, tolerant varieties better control xylem Na+ loading. To what extent this control is related to radial root Na+ uptake or to the activity of Na+/H+-exchangers at the xylem parenchyma boundary remains to be studied.

Keywords

Abiotic stress Photosynthesis Stomatal conductance Chlorophyll Ion uptake Sodium Potassium 

References

  1. Adolf VI, Jacobsen SE, Liu F, Jensen CR, Andersen MN (2010) Effects of salinity in two contrasting quinoa cultivars. In: Memorias III Congreso Mundial de la Quinua, 16–19 March 2010, Oruro, Bolivia, p. 110Google Scholar
  2. Akram M, Farooq S, Afzaal M, Naz F, Arshad R (2006) Chlorophyll fluorescence in different wheat genotypes grown under salt stress. Pakistan J Bot 38(5):1739–1743Google Scholar
  3. Blumwald E, Aharon GS, Apse MP (2000) Sodium transport in plant cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1465:140–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosque Sanchez H, Lemeur R, Van Damme P, Jacobsen SE (2003) Ecophysiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev Int 19(1&2):111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Z, Pottosin II, Cuin TA, Fuglsang AT, Tester M, Jha D, Zepeda-Jazo I, Zhou M, Palmgren MG, Newman IA, Shabala S (2007) Root plasma membrane transporters controlling K+/Na+ homeostasis in salt-stressed barley. Plant Physiol 145:1714–1725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiansen JL, Jacobsen S-E, Jørgensen ST (2010) Photoperiodic effect on flowering and seed development in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Plant Soil Science, 1–6.Google Scholar
  7. Cuin TA, Tian Y, Betts SA, Chalmandrier R, Shabala S (2009) Ionic relations and osmotic adjustment in durum and bread wheat under saline conditions. Funct Plant Biol 36:1110–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuin TA, Bose J, Stefano G, Jha DA, Tester M, Mancuso S, Shabala S (2011) Assessing the role of root plasma membrane and tonoplast Na+/H+ exchangers in salinity tolerance in wheat: in planta quantification methods. Plant Cell Environ 34(6):947–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniells LG, Holland JF, Young RR, Alston CL, Bernardi AL (2001) Relationship between yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolour) and soil salinity under field conditions. Aust J Exp Agr 41:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davenport R, James RA, Zakrisson-Plogander A, Tester M, Munns R (2005) Control of sodium transport in Durum Wheat. Plant Physiol 137:807–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engels C, Marschner H (1992) Adaptation of potassium translocation into the shoot of maize (Zea mays) to shoot demand: Evidence for xylem loading as a regulating step. Physiol Plantarum 86(2):263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (1998) Under-utilized Andean Food Crops. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Flowers TJ (2004) Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 55(396):307–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghassemi F, Jakeman AJ, Nix HA (1995) Salinization of land and water resources. University of New South Wales Press, Ltd., CanberraGoogle Scholar
  15. Gómez-Pando LR, Àlvarez-Castro R, Equiluz-de la Barra A (2010) Effect of salt stress on Peruvian Germplasm of Chenopodium quinoa Willd.: a promising crop. J Agron Crop Sci 196:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. González JA, Gallardo M, Hilal M, Rosa M, Prado FE (2009) Physiological responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought and waterlogging stresses: dry matter partitioning. Bot Stud 50:35–42Google Scholar
  17. González JA, Bruno M, Valoy M, Prado FE (2010) Genotypic variation of gas exchange parameters and leaf stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in ten quinoa cultivars grown under drought. J Agron Crop Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00446.x
  18. Hamada AM, El-Enany AE (1994) Effect of NaCl salinity on growth. Pigment and mineral element contents, and gas exchange of broad and pea plants. Biol Plant 36:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hariadi Y, Marandon K, Tian Y, Jacobsen SE, Shabala S (2011) Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels. J Exp Bot 1–9. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq257
  20. Heuer B (2006) Photosynthetic carbon metabolism of crops under salt stress. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of photosynthesis. Taylor & Francis group, Boca Raton, pp 779–792Google Scholar
  21. Hughes FM, Cidlowski JA (1999) Potassium is a critical regulator of apoptotic enzymes in vitro and in vivo. Adv Enzyme Regul 39:157–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobsen SE (1997) Adaptation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) to Northern European agriculture: studies on developmental pattern. Euphytica 96:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobsen SE (2003) The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev Int 19(1–2):167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobsen SE (2011) The situation for Quinoa and its production in Southern Bolivia: from economic success to environmental disaster. J Agron Crop Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00475.x
  25. Jacobsen SE, Mujica A (2003) Quinoa: an alternative crop for saline soils. J Exp Bot 54(suppl 1):i25Google Scholar
  26. Jacobsen SE, Quispe H, Mujica A (2001) Quinoa: an alternative crop for saline soils in the Andes. In: Scientists and Farmer-Partners in Research for the 21st Century. CIP Program Report 1999–2000, pp. 403–408.Google Scholar
  27. Jacobsen SE, Mujica A, Jensen CR (2003) The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Rev Int 19:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacobsen SE, Monteros C, Christiansen JL, Bravo LA, Corcuera LJ, Mujica A (2005) Plant responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to frost at various phenological stages. Eur J Agron 22:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacobsen SE, Monteros C, Corcuera LJ, Bravo LA, Christiansen JL, Mujica A (2007) Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Eur J Agron 26(4):471–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacobsen SE, Liu F, Jensen CR (2009) Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Sci Hortic 122(2):281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jamil M, ur Rehman S, Lee KJ, Kim JM, Kim HS, Rha ES (2007a) Salinity reduced growth PS2 photochemistry and chlorophyll content in radish. Sci Agric (Piracicaba Braz) 64(2):111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jamil M, Rehman S, Rha ES (2007b) Salinity effect on plant growth, PSII photochemistry and chlorophyll content in sugar beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) and cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Capitata L.). Pakistan J Bot 39(3):753–760Google Scholar
  33. Jensen CR, Jacobsen SE, Andersen MN, Nuñez N, Andersen SD, Rasmussen L, Mogensen VO (2000) Leaf gas exchange and water relations of field quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying. Eur J Argon 13:11–25Google Scholar
  34. Jimenez MS, Gonzalez-Rodriguez AM, Morales D, Cid MC, Socorro AR, Caballefro M (1997) Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for salt stress detection in roses. Photosynthetica 33(2):291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khan MA, Shirazi MU, Ali Khan M, Mujtaba SM, Islam E, Mumtaz S, Shereen A, Ansari RU, Yasin Ashraf M (2009) Role of proline, K/Na ratio and chlorophyll content in salt tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan J Bot 41(2):633–638Google Scholar
  36. Koyro HW, Geißler N, Hussin S, Huchzermeyer B (2008) Survival at extreme locations: Life strategies of halophytes—The long way from system ecology, whole plant physiology, cell biochemistry and molecular aspects back to sustainable utilization at field sites. In: Abdelly C, Ötztürck M, Ashraf M, Grignon C (eds) Biosaline agriculture and high salinity tolerance. Birkhäuser Verlag, Switzerland, pp 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lapina LP, Popov BA (1970) Effect of sodium chloride on photosynthetic apparatus of tomatoes. Fiziologia Rastenii 17:580–584Google Scholar
  38. Marenco RA, Antezana-Vera SA, Nascimento HCS (2009) Relationship between specific leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf water content and SPAD-502 readings in six Amazonian tree species. Photosynthetica 47(2):184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marschner H (1995) Saline soils. In: Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, New York, pp. 657–680Google Scholar
  40. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51(345):659–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peng S, Garcia FV, Laza RC, Cassman KG (1993) Adjustment for specific leaf weight improves chlorophyll meter’s estimate of rice leaf nitrogen concentration. Agron J 85:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pitman MG, Läuchli A (2002) Salinity: environment–plants–molecules. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge (eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  44. Plett DC, Moller IS (2010) Na+ transport in glycophytic plants: what we know and would like to know. Plant Cell Environ 33:612–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Razzaghi F, Ahmadi SH, Adolf VI, Jensen CR, Jacobsen SE, Andersen MN (2011) Water relations and transpiration of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under salinity and soil drying. J Agron Crop Sci 197:348–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reddy MP, Vora AB (1986) Changes in pigment composition. Hill reaction activity and saccharides metabolism in bajra (Penisetum typhoides S & H) leaves under NaCl salinity. Photosynthetica 20:50–55Google Scholar
  47. Repo-Carrasco R, Espinoza C, Jacobsen SE (2003) Nutritional value and use of the Andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Rev Int 19(1–2):179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richards RA (1983) Should selection for yield in saline regions be made on saline or non-saline soils. Euphytica 32:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rojas W, Soto JL, Carrasco E (2004) Study on the social, environmental and economic impacts of quinoa promotion in Bolivia. Proinpa Foundation, La PazGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosa M, Hilal M, Gonzalez JA, Prado FE (2009) Low-temperature effect on enzyme activities involved in sucrose-starch partitioning in salt-stressed and salt-acclimated cotyledons of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:300–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruffino AMC, Rosa M, Hilal M, Gonzalez JA, Prado FE (2010) The role of cotyledon metabolism in the establishment of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seedlings growing under salinity. Plant Soil 326:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Santos CV (2004) Regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation by salt stress in sunflower leaves. Sci Hortic 103:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shabala S (2000) Ionic and Osmotic components of salt stress specifically modulate net ion fluxes from bean leaf mesophyll. Plant Cell Environ 23:825–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shabala S (2003) Regulation of potassium transport in leaves: from molecular to tissue level. Ann Bot 92:627–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shabala S (2009) Salinity and programmed cell death: unravelling mechanisms for ion specific signalling. J Exp Bot 60:709–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shabala S, Cuin TA (2008) Potassium transport and plant salt tolerance. Physiol Plant 133:651–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shabala S, Mackay A (2011) Ion transport in halophytes. Adv Bot Res 57:151–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shabala S, Shabala SI, Martynenko AI, Babourina O, Newman IA (1998) Salinity effect on bioelectric activity, growth, Na+ accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize leaves: a comparative survey and prospects for screening. Aust J Plant Physiol 25:609–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shabala S, Shabala L, Van Volkenburgh E, Newman I (2005) Effect of divalent cations on ion fluxes and leaf photochemistry in salinized barley leaves. J Exp Bot 56:1369–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shabala S, Demidchik V, Shabala L, Cuin TA, Smith SJ, Miller AJ, Davies JM, Newman IA (2006) Extracellular Ca2+ ameliorates NaCl-induced K+ loss from Arabidopsis root and leaf cells by controlling plasma membrane K+-permeable channels. Plant Physiol 14:1653–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shabala S, Cuin TA, Pang JY, Percey W, Chen ZH, Conn S, Eing C, Wegner LH (2010) Xylem ionic relations and salinity tolerance in barley. Plant J 61:839–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singh MP, Pandey SK, Singh M, Ram PC, Singh BB (1990) Photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and leaf chlorophyll content in mustard genotypes grown under sodic conditions. Photosynthetica 24:623–627Google Scholar
  63. Smethurst CF, Shabala S (2003) Screening methods for waterlogging tolerance in lucerne: comparative analysis of waterlogging effects on chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis, biomass and chlorophyll content. Funct Plant Biol 30:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turner NC (1981) Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant Soil 58:339–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vogelmann TC (1993) Plant tissue optics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44:231–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wegner LH, de Boer AH (1997) Properties of two outwardrectifying channels in root xylem parenchyma cells suggest a role in K+ homeostasis and long-distance-signaling. Plant Physiol 115:1707–1719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wegner LH, Stefano G, Shabala L, Rossi M, Mancuso S, Shabala S (2011) Sequential depolarization of root cortical and stelar cells induced by an acute salt shock—implications for Na+ and K+ transport into xylem vessels. Plant Cell Environ 34:859–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson C, Read JJ, Abo KE (2002) Effect of mixed-salt salinity on growth and ion relations of a quinoa and a wheat variety. J Plant Nutr 25(12):2689–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zeven AC (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhu JK (2001) Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:66–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Verena I. Adolf
    • 1
  • Sergey Shabala
    • 2
  • Mathias N. Andersen
    • 3
  • Fatemeh Razzaghi
    • 3
  • Sven-Erik Jacobsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Life SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenTaastrupDenmark
  2. 2.School of Agricultural ScienceUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  3. 3.Department of AgroecologyAarhus University, Faculty of Science and TechnologyTjeleDenmark

Personalised recommendations