Varietal differences of quinoa’s tolerance to saline conditions
- 886 Downloads
This study aimed to assess varietal differences of quinoa’s tolerance to salinity and to investigate physiological mechanisms conferring these differences.
Production of biomass in fourteen varieties grown under saline conditions was analysed in a pot experiment. For two contrasting varieties, the Danish variety Titicaca and the Bolivian variety Utusaya gas exchange, chlorophyll content index (CCI), fluorescence and ion relations were studied.
Responses to salinity differed greatly among the varieties; least affected were two varieties from the Bolivian altiplano and a variety from Peru. Titicaca and Utusaya both had substantially increased K+ concentrations in the leaf sap. But, Utusaya was much more efficient in restricting xylem Na+ loading. Xylem Na+ and K+ loading were found to be uncoupled. Utusaya maintained a relatively high stomatal conductance resulting in an only 25% NaCl-induced reduction in net CO2 assimilation compared to a 67% reduction in salt treated Titicaca plants. Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII was not affected by salinity.
In addition to maintaining high gas exchange, tolerant varieties better control xylem Na+ loading. To what extent this control is related to radial root Na+ uptake or to the activity of Na+/H+-exchangers at the xylem parenchyma boundary remains to be studied.
KeywordsAbiotic stress Photosynthesis Stomatal conductance Chlorophyll Ion uptake Sodium Potassium
- Adolf VI, Jacobsen SE, Liu F, Jensen CR, Andersen MN (2010) Effects of salinity in two contrasting quinoa cultivars. In: Memorias III Congreso Mundial de la Quinua, 16–19 March 2010, Oruro, Bolivia, p. 110Google Scholar
- Akram M, Farooq S, Afzaal M, Naz F, Arshad R (2006) Chlorophyll fluorescence in different wheat genotypes grown under salt stress. Pakistan J Bot 38(5):1739–1743Google Scholar
- Christiansen JL, Jacobsen S-E, Jørgensen ST (2010) Photoperiodic effect on flowering and seed development in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Plant Soil Science, 1–6.Google Scholar
- FAO (1998) Under-utilized Andean Food Crops. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Ghassemi F, Jakeman AJ, Nix HA (1995) Salinization of land and water resources. University of New South Wales Press, Ltd., CanberraGoogle Scholar
- González JA, Gallardo M, Hilal M, Rosa M, Prado FE (2009) Physiological responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought and waterlogging stresses: dry matter partitioning. Bot Stud 50:35–42Google Scholar
- González JA, Bruno M, Valoy M, Prado FE (2010) Genotypic variation of gas exchange parameters and leaf stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in ten quinoa cultivars grown under drought. J Agron Crop Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00446.x
- Hariadi Y, Marandon K, Tian Y, Jacobsen SE, Shabala S (2011) Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels. J Exp Bot 1–9. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq257
- Heuer B (2006) Photosynthetic carbon metabolism of crops under salt stress. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of photosynthesis. Taylor & Francis group, Boca Raton, pp 779–792Google Scholar
- Jacobsen SE (2011) The situation for Quinoa and its production in Southern Bolivia: from economic success to environmental disaster. J Agron Crop Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00475.x
- Jacobsen SE, Mujica A (2003) Quinoa: an alternative crop for saline soils. J Exp Bot 54(suppl 1):i25Google Scholar
- Jacobsen SE, Quispe H, Mujica A (2001) Quinoa: an alternative crop for saline soils in the Andes. In: Scientists and Farmer-Partners in Research for the 21st Century. CIP Program Report 1999–2000, pp. 403–408.Google Scholar
- Jamil M, Rehman S, Rha ES (2007b) Salinity effect on plant growth, PSII photochemistry and chlorophyll content in sugar beet (Beta Vulgaris L.) and cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Capitata L.). Pakistan J Bot 39(3):753–760Google Scholar
- Jensen CR, Jacobsen SE, Andersen MN, Nuñez N, Andersen SD, Rasmussen L, Mogensen VO (2000) Leaf gas exchange and water relations of field quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying. Eur J Argon 13:11–25Google Scholar
- Khan MA, Shirazi MU, Ali Khan M, Mujtaba SM, Islam E, Mumtaz S, Shereen A, Ansari RU, Yasin Ashraf M (2009) Role of proline, K/Na ratio and chlorophyll content in salt tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan J Bot 41(2):633–638Google Scholar
- Koyro HW, Geißler N, Hussin S, Huchzermeyer B (2008) Survival at extreme locations: Life strategies of halophytes—The long way from system ecology, whole plant physiology, cell biochemistry and molecular aspects back to sustainable utilization at field sites. In: Abdelly C, Ötztürck M, Ashraf M, Grignon C (eds) Biosaline agriculture and high salinity tolerance. Birkhäuser Verlag, Switzerland, pp 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lapina LP, Popov BA (1970) Effect of sodium chloride on photosynthetic apparatus of tomatoes. Fiziologia Rastenii 17:580–584Google Scholar
- Marschner H (1995) Saline soils. In: Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, New York, pp. 657–680Google Scholar
- Pitman MG, Läuchli A (2002) Salinity: environment–plants–molecules. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge (eds) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
- Reddy MP, Vora AB (1986) Changes in pigment composition. Hill reaction activity and saccharides metabolism in bajra (Penisetum typhoides S & H) leaves under NaCl salinity. Photosynthetica 20:50–55Google Scholar
- Rojas W, Soto JL, Carrasco E (2004) Study on the social, environmental and economic impacts of quinoa promotion in Bolivia. Proinpa Foundation, La PazGoogle Scholar
- Singh MP, Pandey SK, Singh M, Ram PC, Singh BB (1990) Photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and leaf chlorophyll content in mustard genotypes grown under sodic conditions. Photosynthetica 24:623–627Google Scholar