Plant and Soil

, Volume 355, Issue 1–2, pp 395–406

How red mangrove seedlings stand up

Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

The establishment of Rhizophoracean mangroves usually involves a transition from a horizontal to vertical orientation. Neither how this occurs nor the possible associated ecological benefits and costs have previously been considered.

Methods

The “righting” of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) propagules was studied using frequent observation and time lapse photography under growth chamber and greenhouse conditions. Rates of leaf appearance were analyzed as functions of substrate, propagule placement, propagule orientation and salinity.

Results

Propagule righting progressed in four phases. First, propagules alternately elevated and relaxed in a diurnal cycle. Next, propagules developed upward curvature, centered approximately two-thirds of the way between the base and tip; curvature developed and relaxed in 24 h cycles. Third, the distal portion straightened and a second center of curvature developed at the base, elevating the whole propagule. Finally, the epicotyl swelled, the stem elongated and leaves unfolded. If bases were in contact with the substrate, initial orientation had no effect on leaf opening. However, propagules without that contact experienced delays throughout the cycle. The delays were longer, initially, at higher salinity.

Conclusions

R. mangle propagules are both physiologically and phenotypically highly flexible. This improves their chances of successful establishment in a heterogeneous, unpredictable, and often, high energy environment.

Keywords

Rhizophora mangle Red mangrove Autotropic straightening Propagule Seedling establishment Geotropism Phototropism Salinity 

Supplementary material

Supplementary movie 1

“push-ups” (6.3 MB)—During the first phase of sprouting, propagules elevate and relax in a diurnal fashion, up during the day and down at night. The movements likely result from alternating hydration and partial desiccation of the propagule, made possible by soil contact at the base. The end of this phase coincides with the penetration of the soil by the adventitious roots. (M4V 6408 kb)

Supplementary movie 2

diageotropic curvature (4.7 MB)—During the second phase of sprouting, push-ups are replaced by increasing hypocotyl curvature which does not completely relax at night. The dead propagule does not enter this phase. (M4V 4792 kb)

Supplementary movie 3

basal curvature and elevation (3.5 MB)—During the third phase of sprouting, a second center of curvature develops at the base of the propagules, just above the point where roots anchor them. This elevates the whole unit distal to the base. (M4V 3588 kb)

Supplementary movie 4

autotropic straightening (and leaf emeergence) (6.3 MB)—During the last phase of sprouting, the elevated propagule straightens as it becomes vertical. This is accomplished by elongation of the inner radius of curvature. At this point, too, the epicotyl bud swells and the shoot emerges… this is NOT developmentally linked to the elevation itself (see main text). (M4V 6444 kb)

Supplementary movie 5

composite of all four phases (9.4 MB)—This movie combines all four phases into a single, summarizing movie. (M4V 9599 kb)

References

  1. Ball MC (1988) Ecophysiology of mangroves. Trees 2:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball MC (2002) Interactive effects of salinity and irradiance on growth: implications for mangrove forest structure along salinity gradients. Trees 16:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dassanayake M, Haas JS, Bohnert HJ, Cheeseman JM (2010) Comparative transcriptomics for mangrove species: an expanding resource. Funct Integ Genom 10:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis JH (1940) The ecology and geologic role of mangroves in Florida. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, p 384, with 312 platesGoogle Scholar
  5. Drexler JZ (2001) Maximum longevities of Rhizophora apiculata and R. mucronata propagules. Pac Sci 55:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellison AM, Farnsworth EJ (1993) Seedling survivorship, growth and response to disturbance in a Belizean mangal. Amer J Bot 80:1137–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellison AM, Farnsworth EJ (1996) Spatial and temporal variability in growth of Rhizophora mangle sapling on coral cays: links with variation in insolation, herbivory, and local sedimentation rate. J Ecol 84:717–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farnsworth EJ, Ellison AM (1996) Sun-shade adaptability of the red mangrove, Rhizophora mangle (Rhizophoraceae): changes through ontogeny at several leves of biological organization. Amer J Bot 83:1131–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feller IC (1995) Effects of nutrient enrichment on growth and herbivory of dwarf red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle). Ecol Monogr 65:477–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feller IC (2002) The role of herbivory by wood-boring insects in mangrove ecosystems in Belize. Oikos 97:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feller IC, Whigham D, O’Neill J, McKee K (1999) Effects of nutrient enrichment on within-stand cycling in a mangrove forest. Ecol 80:2193–2205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallego-Bartolome J, Kami C, Fankhauser C, Alabadi D, Blazquez MA (2011) A hormonal regulatory module that provides flexibility to tropic responses. Plant Physiol 156:1819–1825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart JW, Macdonald IR (1981) Phototropism and geotropism in hypocotyls of cress (Lepidium sativum L.). Plant Cell Environ 4:197–201Google Scholar
  14. Janzen D (2007) Mangroves: where’s the understory? J Trop Ecol 1:89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Juncosa AM (1982) Developmental morphology of the embryo and seedling of Rhizophora mangle L. (Rhizophoraceae). Amer J Bot 69:1599–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Juncosa A, Tomlinson P (1988) Systematic comparison and some biological characteristics of Rhizophoraceae and Anisophylleaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 75:1296–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitaya Y, Sumiyoshi M, Kawabata Y, Monji N (2002) Effect of submergence and shading of hypocotyls on leaf conductance in young seedlings of the mangrove Rhizophora stylosa. Trees 16:147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krauss KW, Allen JA (2003) Influences of salinity and shade on seedling photosynthesis and growth of two mangrove species, Rhizophora mangle and Bruguiera sexangula, introduced to Hawaii. Aquat Bot 77:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krauss K, Lovelock C, McKee K, López-Hoffman L, Ewe S, Sousa W (2008) Environmental drivers in mangrove establishment and early development: a review. Aquat Bot 89:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lovelock CE, Feller IC, Ball MC, Engelbrecht BMJ, Ewe ML (2006) Differences in plant function in phosphorus- and nitrogen-limited mangrove ecosystems. New Phytol 172:514–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lugo A (1986) Mangrove understory: an expensive luxury. J Trop Ecol 2:287–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lugo A, Snedaker SC (1974) The ecology of mangroves. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:39–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macdonald IR, Hart JW, Gordon DC (1983) Analysis of growth during geotropic curvature in seedling hypocotyls. Plant Cell Environ 6:401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parida AK, Das AB (2004) Effects of NaCl stress on nitrogen and phosphorous metabolism in a true mangrove bruguiera parviflora grown under hydroponic culture. J Plant Physiol 161:921–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parida AK, Jha B (2010) Salt tolerance mechanisms in mangroves: a review. Trees 24:199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabinowitz D (1978a) Dispersal properties of mangrove propagules. Biotropica 10:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabinowitz D (1978b) Early growth of mangrove seedlings in Panama and an hypothesis concerning the relationship of dispersal and zonation. J Biogeog 5:113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabinowitz D (1978c) Mortality and initial propagule size in mangrove seedlings in Panama. J Ecol 66:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith SM, Snedaker SC (2000) Hypocotyl function in seedling development of the red mangrove, Rhizophora mangle L. Biotropica 32:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sousa WP, Mitchell BJ (1999) The effect of seed predators on plant distributions: is there a general pattern in mangroves? Oikos 86:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sousa WP, Quek SP, Mitchell BJ (2003) Regeneration of Rhizophora mangle in a Caribbean mangrove forest: interacting effects of canopy disturbance and a stem-boring beetle. Oecologia 137:436–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sousa W, Kennedy P, Mitchell B, Ordóñez LB (2007) Supply-side ecology in mangroves: do propagule dispersal and seedling establishment explain forest structure? Ecol Monographs 77:53–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations