Plant and Soil

, Volume 352, Issue 1–2, pp 303–319 | Cite as

Impact of simulated changes in rainfall regime and nutrient deposition on the relative dominance and isotopic composition of ruderal plants in anthropogenic grasslands

  • Pablo García-PalaciosEmail author
  • José I. Querejeta
  • Fernando T. Maestre
  • Adrián Escudero
  • Fernando Valladares
Regular Article


Background and aims

Plant productivity in drylands is frequently co-limited by water and nutrient availability, and thus is expected to be influenced by ongoing changes in rainfall regime and atmospheric nutrient deposition. Roadside grasslands are widespread worldwide, represent ecologically meaningful examples of highly dynamic anthropogenic ecosystems, and are well suited to investigate global change effects on plant performance. We evaluated the effects of changes in water and nutrient availability on the relative dominance and physiological performance of Bromus rubens, Carduus tenuifolius and Melilotus officinalis, which belong to contrasting functional groups (grasses, non-legume forbs and legumes, respectively).


We conducted a factorial field experiment in two semiarid roadside grasslands in central Spain with the following factors: watering (no water addition vs. watering with 50% of the monthly total precipitation median) and fertilization (no fertilization vs. addition of 80 kg N ha−1 year−1). The cover of the species evaluated, was surveyed over a 2-year period. Plant isotopic composition (leaf δ13C and δ18O) and nutrient concentrations (foliar N, P and K) were used to assess plant ecophysiological performance.


Carduus was able to cope with lower water availability levels through stomatal adjustments without a significant reduction in its relative dominance. The relative dominance of Bromus was negatively affected by even moderate water stress, although elevated nutrient deposition buffered the adverse impact of drought through a nutrient-mediated enhancement of plant water use efficiency. Increased nutrient availability strongly decreased the relative dominance of Melilotus, irrespective of water availability.


Species-specific physiological mechanisms of adjustment to treatments suggest that plant communities in roadside grasslands will not respond as a unit to global environmental change. The characterization of species-specific responses to major global change drivers may improve predictions about the future dynamics of plant communities in novel ecosystems such as roadside slopes.


1318Foliar nutrients Drought Nutrient deposition Global change Ruderal species Roadside grasslands 



We wish to thank Santiago Soliveres for his useful comments and corrections on a previous version of this manuscript. Virginia Sanz, Cristina Alcala and Enrique Pigem helped during the field and laboratory work. PGP was supported by a PhD fellowship from Proyecto Expertal, funded by Fundación Biodiversidad and CINTRA. FTM is supported by the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC Grant agreement n° 242658 (BIOCOM). JIQ is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science (CGL2010-21064). This research was supported by the EXPERTAL, EFITAL (B007/2007/3-10.2) and REMEDINAL (S0505/AMB/0335) projects, funded by Fundación Biodiversidad-Cintra S.A., Ministerio de Medio Ambiente and the Comunidad de Madrid, respectively.

Supplementary material

11104_2011_998_MOESM1_ESM.doc (92 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 92 kb)


  1. Barbour M (2007) Stable oxygen isotope composition of plant tissue: a review. Funct Plant Biol 34:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbour MM, Fischer RA, Sayre KD, Farquhar GD (2000) Oxygen isotope ratio of leaf and grain material correlates with stomatal conductance and yield in irrigated, field-grown wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:625–637Google Scholar
  3. Bassin S, Werner RA, Sörgel K, Volk M, Buchmann N, Fuhrer J (2009) Effects of combined ozone and nitrogen deposition on the in situ properties of eleven key plant species of a subalpine pasture. Oecologia 158:747–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobbink R, Hornung M, Roelofs JGM (1998) The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J Ecol 86:717–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, Bustamante M, Cinderby S, Davidson E, Dentener F, Emmett B, Erisman JW, Fenn M, Gilliam F, Nordin A, Pardo L, De Vries W (2010) Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 20:30–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Sánchez C, Araus JL (2009a) Oxygen isotope enrichment (Δ18O) reflects yield potential and drought resistance in maize. Plant Cell Environ 32:1487–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Molero G, Nogués S, Araus JL (2009b) Water and nitrogen conditions affect the relationships of Δ13C and Δ18O to gas exchange and growth in durum wheat. J Exp Bot 60:1633–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrera-Bosquet L, Albrizio R, Nogués S, Araus JL (2011) Dual Δ13C/δ 18O response to water and nitrogen availability and its relationship with yield in field-grown durum wheat. Plant Cell Environ 34:418–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cape JN, Tang YS, van Dijk N, Love L, Sutton MA, Palmer SCF (2004) Concentrations of ammonia and nitrogen dioxide at roadside verges, and their contribution to nitrogen deposition. Env Pollut 132:469–478Google Scholar
  10. Carson WP, Pickett STA (1990) Role of resources and disturbance in the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology 71:226–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casper BB, Forseth IN, Wait DA (2005) Variation in carbon isotope discrimination in relation to plant performance in a natural population of Cryptantha flava. Oecologia 145:541–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cernusak LA, Winter K, Turner BL (2009) Physiological and isotopic (δ 13C and δ 18O) responses of three tropical tree species to nutrient and water availability. Plant Cell Environ 32:1441–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damesin C, Rambal S, Jofree R (1997) Between-tree variations in leaf VC of Quercus pubescens and Quecus ilex among Mediterranean habitats with different water availability. Oecologia 111:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP (2002) Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:507–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dukes JS, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Moore LA, Shaw MR, Thayer S, Tobeck T, Mooney HA, Field CB (2005) Responses of grassland production to single and multiple global environmental changes. PLoS Bio 3:1829–1837Google Scholar
  16. Echalar F, Gaudichet A, Cachier H, Artaxo P (1995) Aerosol emissions by tropical forest and savanna biomass burning: characteristic trace elements and fluxes. Geo Res Let 22:3039–3042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehleringer JR, Philips SL, Comstock JP (1992) Seasonal variation in the carbon isotopic composition of desert plants. Funct Ecol 6:396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falkowski P, Scholes RJ, Boyle E, Canadell J, Canfield D, Elser J et al (2000) The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of Earth as a system. Science 290:291–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flombaum P, Sala OE (2009) Cover is a good predictor of biomass in arid systems. J Arid Env 73:597–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forman RTT (2000) Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States. Conserv Biol 14:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. García-Palacios P, Soliveres S, Maestre FT, Escudero A, Castillo-Monroy AP, Valladares F (2010) Dominant plant species modulate responses to hydroseeding, irrigation and fertilization during the restoration of motorway slopes. Ecol Eng 36:1290–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. García-Palacios P, Maestre FT, Gallardo G (2011a) Soil nutrient heterogeneity modulates ecosystem responses to changes in the identity and richness of plant functional groups. J Ecol 99:551–562Google Scholar
  26. García-Palacios P, Maestre FT, Chapman SJ, Soliveres S, Bowker MA, Gallardo A, Valladares F, Guerrero C, Escudero A (2011b) Early-successional vegetation changes after roadside prairie restoration modify processes related with soil functioning by changing microbial functional diversity. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1245–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  28. Grams TEE, Kozovits AR, Häberle KH, Matyssek R, Dawson TE (2007) Combining δ13C and δ18O analyses to unravel competition, CO2 and O3 effects on the physiological performance of different-aged trees. Plant Cell Env 30:1023–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE et al (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. International Panel of Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaggi M, Fuhrer J (2007) Oxygen and carbon isotopic signatures reveal a long-term effect of free-air ozone enrichment on leaf conductance in semi-natural grassland. Atmos Environ 41:8811–8817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaggi M, Saurer M, Fuhrer J, Siegwolf R (2003) Seasonality of δ18O in needles and wood of Picea abies. New Phytologist 158:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kardol P, Campany CE, Souza L, Norby R, Weltzin JF, Classen AT (2010) Climate change effects on plant biomass alter dominance patterns and community evenness in an experimental old-field ecosystem. Glob Chan Biol 16:2676–2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee JA, Caporn SJM (1998) cological effects of atmospheric reactive nitrogen deposition on semi-natural terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist 139:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee TD, Tjoelker MG, Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (2001) Leaf gas exchange responses of 13 prairie grassland species to elevated CO2 and increased nitrogen supply. New Phytol 150:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maestre FT, Reynolds JF (2007) Amount or pattern? Grassland responses to the heterogeneity and availability of two key resources. Ecology 88:501–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maestre FT, Bradford M, Reynolds JF (2005) Soil nutrient heterogeneity interacts with elevated CO2 and nutrient availability to determine species and assemblage responses in a model grassland community. New Phytol 168:637–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matesanz S, Escudero A, Valladares F (2009) Impact of three global change drivers on a Mediterranean shrub. Ecology 90:2609–2621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Merlin G, Di-Gioia L, Goddon C (1999) Comparative study of the capacity of germination and of adhesion of various hydrocolloids used for revegetalization by hydroseeding. Land Degrad Dev 10:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miranda JD, Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2009) Response of a Mediterranean semiarid community to changing patterns of water supply. Persp Plant Ecol Evo Syst 11:255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morecroft MD, Sellers EK, Lee JA (1994) An experimental investigation into the effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on two semi-natural grasslands. J Ecol 82:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myster RW, Pickett SA (1992) Dynamics of associations between plants in old fields during 31 years of succession. J Ecol 80:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naveh Z, Dan J (1973) The human degradation of Mediterranean landscapes in Israel. In: di Castri F, Mooney HA (eds) Mediterranean-type ecosystems: origin and structure. Springer, Berlin, pp 373–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ochoa-Hueso R, Allen EB, Branquinho C, Cruz C, Dias T, Fenn ME, Manrique E, Pérez-Corona ME, Sheppard LJ, Stock ED (2011) Nitrogen deposition effects on Mediterranean-type ecosystems: an ecological assessment. Env Poll 159:2265–2279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peñuelas J, Filella I, Lloret F, Piñol J, Siscart D (2000) Effects of a severe drought on water and nitrogen use by Quercus ilex and Phillyrea latifolia. Biol Plantar 43:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Phoenix GK, Hicks WK, Cinderby S, Kuylenstierna JCI, Stock WD, Dentener FJ, Giller KE, Austin AT, Lefroy RDB, Gimeno BS et al (2006) Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in world biodiversity hotspots: the need for a greater global perspective in assessing N deposition impacts. Glob Chang Biol 12:470–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prentice IC, Harrison SP, Bartlein PJ (2011) Global vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle changes after the last ice age. New Phytol 189:988–998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Querejeta JI, Barea JM, Allen MF, Caravaca F, Roldán A (2003) Differential response of δ13C and water use efficiency to arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in two aridland woody plant species. Oecologia 135:510–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Querejeta JI, Allen MF, Caravaca F, Roldán A (2006) Differential modulation of host plant δ13C and δ18O by native and nonnative arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a semiarid environment. New Phytol 169:379–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Querejeta JI, Allen MF, Alguacil MM, Roldán A (2007) Plant isotopic composition provides insight into mechanisms underlying growth stimulation by AM fungi in a semiarid environment. Funct Plant Biol 34:683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Querejeta JI, Barberá GG, Granados A, Castillo VM (2008) Afforestation method affects the isotopic composition of planted Pinus halepensis in a semiarid region of Spain. Forest Ecol Manag 254:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramírez DA, Querejeta JI, Bellot J (2009) Bulk leaf δ18O and δ13C reflect the intensity of intraspecific competition for water in semi–arid tussck grassland. Plant Cell Env 32:1346–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reynolds JF, Stafford-Smith DM, Lambin EF, Turner BL II, Mortimore M, Batterbury SPJ, Downing TE, Dowlatabadi H, Fernández RJ, Herrick JE et al (2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robinson D, Handley L, Scrimgeour CM, Gordon DC, Forster BP, Ellis RP (2000) Using stable isotope natural abundances (δ15N and δ13C) to integrate the stress responses of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch.) genotypes. J Exp Bot 51:41–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sala OE, Lauenroth WK, McNaughton J, Rusch G, Zhang X (1996) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in grasslands. In: Mooney HA, Cushman JH, Medina E, Sala OE, Schulze ED (eds) Functional roles of biodiversity: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 129–149Google Scholar
  57. Sala O, Chapin FI, Armesto J, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke L, Jackson R, Kinzig A et al (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sardans J, Rodà F, Peñuelas J (2004) Phosphorus limitation and competitive capacities of Pinus halepensis and Quercus ilex subsp. rotundifolia on different soils. Plant Ecol 174:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scheidegger Y, Saurer M, Bahn M, Siegwolf R (2000) Linking stable oxygen and carbon isotopes with stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity: a conceptual model. Oecologia 125:350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skogen KA, Holsinger KE, Cardon ZG (2011) Nitrogen deposition, competition and the decline of a regionally threatened legume, Desmodium cuspidatum. Oecologia 165:261–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soliveres S, García-Palacios P, Castillo-Monroy AP, Maestre FT, Escudero A, Valladares F (2011) Co-occurrence of herbivory and water availability modulate the outcome of a grass-shrub interaction in a pulse-driven ecosystem. Oikos 120:710–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spellerberg IF (1998) Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Let 7:317–333Google Scholar
  63. Stevens MHH, Carson WP (2001) Phenological complementarity, species diversity, and ecosystem function. Oikos 92:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Pennings S (2005) Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:4387–4392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tsialtas JT, Handley LL, Kassioumi MT, Veresoglou DS, Gagianas AA (2001) Interspecific variation in potential water use efficiency and its relation to plant species abundance in a water limited grassland. Funct Ecol 15:605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. UNESCO (1962) Land use in semi-arid Mediterranean climates. International Geographical Union Symposium. UNCESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  67. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wali MK (1999) Ecological succession and the rehabilitation of disturbed terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Soil 213:195–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang XZ (2007) Effects of species richness and elevated carbon dioxide on biomass accumulation: a synthesis using meta-analysis. Oecologia 152:595–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin FS, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zavaleta ES, Shaw MR, Chiariello NR, Mooney HA, Field CB (2003) Additive effects of simulated climate changes, elevated CO2, and nitrogen deposition on grassland diversity. PNAS 100:7650–7654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo García-Palacios
    • 1
    Email author
  • José I. Querejeta
    • 2
  • Fernando T. Maestre
    • 1
  • Adrián Escudero
    • 1
  • Fernando Valladares
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Biología y Geología, Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y TecnologíaUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMóstolesSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Conservación de Suelos y Aguas, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura, CSIC, Campus Universitario de EspinardoMurciaSpain
  3. 3.Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN, CSICMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations