Soil-mediated local adaptation alters seedling survival and performance
- First Online:
- 559 Downloads
Background and aims
Soils can act as agents of natural selection, causing differential fitness among genotypes and/or families of the same plant species, especially when soils have extreme physical or chemical properties. More subtle changes in soils, such as variation in microbial communities, may also act as agents of selection. We hypothesized that variation in soil properties within a single river drainage can be a selective gradient, driving local adaptation in plants.
Using seeds collected from individual genotypes of Populus angustifolia James and soils collected from underneath the same trees, we use a reciprocal transplant design to test whether seedlings would be locally adapted to their parental soil type.
We found three patterns: 1. Soils from beneath individual genotypes varied in pH, soil texture, nutrient content, microbial biomass and the physiological status of microorganisms. 2. Seedlings grown in local soils experienced 2.5-fold greater survival than seedlings planted in non-local soils. 3. Using a composite of height, number of leaves and leaf area to measure plant growth, seedlings grew ∼17.5% larger in their local soil than in non-local soil.
These data support the hypothesis that variation in soils across subtle gradients can act as an important selective agent, causing differential fitness and local adaptation in plants.
KeywordsHome-field advantage Local adaptation Phospholipid fatty acid biomarkers Populus Soil as selective agent Plant soil ineractions
- Bezemer TM, Fountain M, Barea J, Christensen S, Dekker S, Duyts H, Van Hall R, Harvey JA, Hedlund K, Mikola J, Robin C, De Ruiter P, Setälä H, Scheu S, Šmilauer P, Van der Putten WH (2011) Divergent composition but similar function of soil food webs beneath individual plants: plant species and community effects. Ecology (In Press)Google Scholar
- Gee GW, Bauder JM (1986) Particle-size analysis. Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, Physical and mineralogical methods. In: Agronomy monograph No. 9 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 383–411Google Scholar
- Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette M (1993) Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 141–146Google Scholar
- O’Leary WM, Wilkinson SG (1988) Gram-positive bacteria. In: Ratledge C, Wilkinson SG (eds) Microbial lipids. Academic, London, pp 117–201Google Scholar
- Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK, Fisher DG, LeRoy CJ, Whitham TG, Hart SC (2011) Functional and heritable consequences of genotypic variation on community assembly and ecosystem processes. In: Ohgushi T, Schmidt O, Holt R (eds) Ecology and evolution of trait-mediated indirect interactions: linking evolution, community, and ecosystem. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- White DC, Ringleberg DB (1998) Signature lipid biomarker analysis. In: Burlage RS, Atlas R, Stahl D, Gessey G, Sayler G (eds) Techniques in microbial ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 255–272Google Scholar
- Wilkinson SG (1988) Gram-negative bacteria. In: Ratledge C, Wilkinson SG (eds) Microbial lipids. Academic, London, pp 299–488Google Scholar
- Wright JW, Stanton ML, Scherson R (2006) Local adaptation to serpentine and non-serpentine soils in Collinsia sparsiflora. Evol Ecol Res 8:1–21Google Scholar